AzTrials
AzTrials

Wounds and InjuriesNCT02744144

Wound Bacterial Microbiota and Their Antibiotic Resistance

An observational study of Wounds and Injuries and War-Related Injuries, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Jordan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to explore the microbiology in war-associated wounds of hospitalized patients from the Syrian armed conflict. Cultures collected from acute wounds with clinical signs of infection will be analyzed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
How many people
457 participants
Where
1 siteJordan
Study dates
Sep 2014to Jun 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients originating from the Syrian armed conflict who receive treatment for blast- and gunshot-injuries.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients that receive surgical treatment for war-associated injuries, irrespective of injury location, injury mechanism, time from injury and prior treatment
  • Patients that receive treatment during the study period and are later re-admitted will only be counted as one patient

Who cannot join

  • Patients that are only re-admitted during the study period, i.e. patients that received primary treatment by MSF before study initiation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jordan1 site
  • Ministry of Health hospital

    Ar Ramtha, Irbid Governorate

Other trials in Jordan

About this study

Official title: Wound Bacterial Microbiota and Their Antibiotic Resistance: a Prospective Cohort Study of Hospitalized Patients Originating From the Syrian Armed Conflict

The purpose of the study is to explore the microbiology in war-associated wounds of hospitalized patients from the Syrian armed conflict. Cultures collected from acute wounds with clinical signs of infection will be analyzed.

Read the detailed description

War-associated injuries often result in soft tissue and bone being contaminated with foreign material, leading to infection (Fares et al. 2013; Covey, Lurate, and Hatton 2000). Wound infections remain the greatest risk to life and restoration of function in war-wounded that survive the first few hours (Tong 1972; Murray 2008).

The Syrian armed conflict broke out in 2011 and quickly deteriorated. Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) runs an emergency trauma project in the Ministry of Health hospital in Ar Ramtha, Jordan, less than five kilometers from the Syrian border. At this facility patients from the Syrian armed conflict receive treatment for blast- and gunshot-injuries. Wounds are treated according to the International Committee of the Red Cross war surgery protocol (Giannou and Baldan 2010). Wound management and healing has been difficult and time consuming, often complicated by infections and antibiotic resistance.

Recommendations for treatment of war-associated infections are generally not supported by cohort studies (Murray et al. 2008). High rates of war wound infections caused by antimicrobial drug resistant organisms have been shown in the Middle East but reports generally only include combatants. Due to the use of body armor and forward medical therapy this data may not be applicable to a civilian setting. Furthermore, available studies are either performed on old wounds (Teicher et al. 2014) or on all available culture samples, disregarding infection signs (Sutter et al. 2011; Dau, Tloba, and Daw 2013). Without clinical signs of infection, routine collection of peri-debridement culture samples is inappropriate in war-associated injuries (Murray et al. 2008). The differentiation between contamination and infecting organisms is crucial in order to avoid unnecessary medication, especially limit the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics as overuse may lead to development of multi-drug resistant organisms (Eardley et al. 2011). Cultures collected from acute wounds with clinical signs of infection will be analyzed.

Medical subject headings
Wounds and Injuries, War-Related Injuries, Wound Infection, Wounds, Penetrating, Wounds, Gunshot, Arm Injuries, Leg Injuries, Soft Tissue Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02744144
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Non-infectionPatients without clinical infection or positive wound culture
InfectionPatients with clinical infection and positive wound culture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients that develops infections after receiving surgical treatment

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Frequency of different bacterial microbiota in wounds with clinical signs of infection

    For wounds with clinical signs of infection the bacterial microbiota will be characterized.

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Frequency of microbiota with antibiotic resistance in wounds with clinical signs of infection

    For wounds with clinical signs of infection the the antibiotic resistance patterns of the bacterial microbiota will be characterized.

    Measured: 30 days

  3. Length of stay

    Length of hospital stay

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Surgery

    Number and type of surgeries

    Measured: 30 days

  5. Death

    Mortality

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
457 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02744144
Sponsor's protocol ID
KISOS002
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
13 Apr 2016
Last updated
1 Jun 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Fares Y, El-Zaatari M, Fares J, Bedrosian N, Yared N. Trauma-related infections due to cluster munitions. J Infect Public Health. 2013 Dec;6(6):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

    PubMed 23999350
  • Covey DC, Lurate RB, Hatton CT. Field hospital treatment of blast wounds of the musculoskeletal system during the Yugoslav civil war. J Orthop Trauma. 2000 May;14(4):278-86; discussion 277. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200005000-00010.

    PubMed 10898201
  • Tong MJ. Septic complications of war wounds. JAMA. 1972 Feb 21;219(8):1044-7. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4621762
  • Murray CK. Infectious disease complications of combat-related injuries. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7 Suppl):S358-64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817e2ffc.

    PubMed 18594263
  • Giannou C, Baldan M. War Surgery: Working With Limited Resources in Armed Conflict and Other Situations of Violence. ICRC; 2010.

  • Murray CK, Hsu JR, Solomkin JS, Keeling JJ, Andersen RC, Ficke JR, Calhoun JH. Prevention and management of infections associated with combat-related extremity injuries. J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3 Suppl):S239-51. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318163cd14.

    PubMed 18316968
  • Teicher CL, Ronat JB, Fakhri RM, Basel M, Labar AS, Herard P, Murphy RA. Antimicrobial drug-resistant bacteria isolated from Syrian war-injured patients, August 2011-March 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;20(11):1949-51. doi: 10.3201/eid2011.140835. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25340505
  • Sutter DE, Bradshaw LU, Simkins LH, Summers AM, Atha M, Elwood RL, Robertson JL, Murray CK, Wortmann GW, Hospenthal DR. High incidence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria recovered from Afghan patients at a deployed US military hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;32(9):854-60. doi: 10.1086/661284.

    PubMed 21828965
  • Dau AA, Tloba S, Daw MA. Characterization of wound infections among patients injured during the 2011 Libyan conflict. East Mediterr Health J. 2013 Apr;19(4):356-61.

    PubMed 23882961
  • Eardley WG, Brown KV, Bonner TJ, Green AD, Clasper JC. Infection in conflict wounded. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 27;366(1562):204-18. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0225.

    PubMed 21149356
  • Alga A, Wong S, Shoaib M, Lundgren K, Giske CG, von Schreeb J, Malmstedt J. Infection with high proportion of multidrug-resistant bacteria in conflict-related injuries is associated with poor outcomes and excess resource consumption: a cohort study of Syrian patients treated in Jordan. BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 22;18(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3149-y.

    PubMed 29788910

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Wounds and Injuries and War-Related Injuries, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Jordan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Jordan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients that develops infections after receiving surgical treatment (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02744144, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in