AzTrials
AzTrials

Prenatal CareCARENCT02786225

Collaboration for Antepartum Risk Evaluation

A study testing Collaborative Care in people with Prenatal Care and Maternal-child Health Services, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Perinatal outcomes in the US rank behind most other developed countries even though women in the US utilize more maternity services. Current approaches to consultation and collaboration among perinatal care providers, including nurse-midwives, obstetricians, and perinatologists, fragment care resulting in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Collaborative Care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
182 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2016to Oct 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult pregnant women receiving prenatal care at the VUSN Nurse-Midwifery Faculty Practice.
  • Gestational age of pregnancy 4-40 weeks
  • Needs a consultation with perinatologist for one of the following reasons:
  • Prior pregnancy with congenital abnormality History of fetal demise >20 weeks History of preterm labor in previous pregnancy Current maternal drug or alcohol abuse Controlled maternal condition (e.g. thyroid disorder) Mild abnormality of fetus or placenta on ultrasound Idiopathic thrombocytopenia in pregnancy
  • Can attend the collaborative care clinic

Who cannot join

  • Unable to give consent for research participation - including age < 18 or impaired mental function
  • Urgent medical condition requiring immediate assessment including: ectopic pregnancy or vaginal bleeding
  • Medical conditions outside of scope of VUSN midwifery guidelines including:
  • Chronic maternal conditions requiring specialist involvement including: HIV, epilepsy, uncontrolled asthma, and liver, renal, cardiac disease.
  • Multiple gestation > 2 previous cesarean births Rh isoimmunization Incompetent cervix Major fetal or placenta abnormalities

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Vanderbilt School of Nursing

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37240

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Interprofessional Perinatal Consults to Improve Communication Quality, Satisfaction, and Team Cohesion: A Randomized Trial of the Collaboration for Antepartum Risk Evaluation (CARE) Model

Perinatal outcomes in the US rank behind most other developed countries even though women in the US utilize more maternity services. Current approaches to consultation and collaboration among perinatal care providers, including nurse-midwives, obstetricians, and perinatologists, fragment care resulting in communication errors and maternal dissatisfaction. The CARE study will test an innovative interdisciplinary consult visit to improve communication, teamwork, maternal satisfaction, and perinatal outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Perinatal outcomes in the United States rank below many other developed countries. National organizations, such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, have called for women to utilize the level and provider of maternity services that meet their personal and medical needs. This leveled approach to care requires consultation and collaboration among providers to ensure women receive appropriate services. While national and international organizations have called for team-based maternity care, current models can fragment services, increasing the risk of communication errors. Women can feel disenfranchised by models that do not meet their needs and opt out of beneficial services altogether.

Currently, there is not evidence on effective interdisciplinary models of maternity care. The Collaboration for Antepartum Risk Evaluation (CARE) study will use a randomized design to systematically test the effect of interdisciplinary consults on women and providers. The two aims of the study are: (1) evaluate the effect of collaborative vs individual consults on participant outcomes including communication quality (using the Communication Assessment Tool, team version), maternal satisfaction (using a modified Satisfaction with Prenatal Care measure), semi-structured interviews, adherence to the developed plan of care, and perinatal outcomes; (2) evaluate the effect of the CARE clinic on providers using the Communication Assessment Tool- team version, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews.

The CARE study will provide valuable information on effective models for patient-centered maternity care. The AHRQ K08 will allow Dr. Philippi to implement the CARE study and facilitate her growth into a national leader in midwifery and health services research.

Being tested
Collaborative Care, Comparison Care- Usual Care + primary midwife

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Collaborative CareBehavioural

    Intervention Group: Women (n=118) will be seen one time, simultaneously by a VUMC perinatologist and a VUSN nurse-midwife (the CARE visit). During the CARE visit, the nurse-midwife and perinatologist will complete the CARE checklist The checklist will be signed by the woman and providers and scanned into the medical record. Following the CARE visit, women will return to midwifery care or be referred to perinatology depending on their needs, remaining in the study. Women returning to the midwifery practice will see a primary midwife for the remainder of care.

  • Comparison Care- Usual Care + primary midwifeBehavioural

    Comparison Group: Usual care enhanced with primary midwife. Women in the comparison group (n=118) will receive the standard individual consult visit with a perinatologist and then, if they return to midwifery care, have one consistent midwife (primary midwife) for the majority of remaining prenatal care.

Study groups in NCT02786225
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Collaborative CareExperimentalIntervention Group: Women (n=118) will be seen one time, simultaneously by a Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) perinatologist and a Vanderbilt University School of Nursing (VUSN) nurse-midwife (the CARE visit). During the CARE visit, the nurse-midwife and perinatologist will complete the CARE checklist The checklist will be signed by the woman and providers and scanned into the medical record. Following the CARE visit, women will return to midwifery care or be referred to perinatology depending on their needs, remaining in the study. Women returning to the midwifery practice will see a primary midwife for the remainder of care.
Receives: Behavioral: Collaborative Care
Comparison Care- Usual Care + primary midwifeActive comparatorComparison Group: Usual care enhanced with primary midwife. Women in the comparison group (n=118) will receive the standard individual consult visit with a perinatologist and then, if they return to midwifery care, have one consistent midwife (primary midwife) for the majority of remaining prenatal care.
Receives: Behavioral: Comparison Care- Usual Care + primary midwife

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)-Team survey

    The CAT, developed by Makoul et al., assesses views of provider communication via 14 Likert responses ranging from 1= 'poor' to 5= 'excellent.

    Measured: 2 weeks after intervention/comparison visit

  2. Satisfaction with Prenatal Care (SPC) scale

    The SPC scale assesses patient satisfaction with prenatal care

    Measured: 2 weeks after intervention/comparison visit

  3. Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)-Team survey - following birth

    The CAT, developed by Makoul et al., assesses views of provider communication via 14 Likert responses ranging from 1= 'poor' to 5= 'excellent.

    Measured: Within 2 weeks after patient gives birth

  4. Satisfaction with Prenatal Care (SPC) scale - following birth

    The SPC scale assesses patient satisfaction with prenatal care

    Measured: Within 2 weeks after patient gives birth

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Smoking at 1st prenatal visit

    Measured: 1 week after the patient gives birth

  2. For smokers, number of cigarettes per day

    Number of cigarettes per day

    Measured: 1 week after the patient gives birth

  3. Location of birth

    Location where the mother gave birth - Vanderbilt / Other hospital, Birth center, Home, En Route

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  4. Provider at admission to labor and delivery

    Medical care provider at the time of admission in labor

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  5. Patient & provider adherence to checklist plan

    Congruence between the anticipated plan of care at the time of the intervention/comparison visit and what occurred at the time of birth

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  6. Gestational age at birth

    the gestational age of the baby at the time of birth - in weeks+days

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  7. Infant birth weight

    Infant birth weight in grams as collected within 4 hours of birth

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  8. Mode of birth

    Number of women giving birth via 1 of 4 methods: vaginal/assisted vaginal/cesarean after labor/planned cesarean

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  9. Trial of labor after cesarean

    Whether the woman was attempting a trial of labor after a previous cesarean birth

    Measured: 1 week after the mother gives birth

  10. Vaginal birth after cesarean

    Whether the woman gave birth vaginally with this infant after she had a previous cesarean birth.

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  11. Complications at birth

    The presence of any adverse outcomes during pregnancy, birth, postpartum, including details

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  12. Breastfeeding at birth

    Breastmilk feeding of the infant at the time of birth

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  13. Breastfeeding at discharge

    Breastmilk feeding of the infant at the time of discharge.

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  14. Hospital stay postpartum

    Lengths of postpartum hospital stay in calendar days

    Measured: 1 week after patient gives birth

  15. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)

    Measure of anxiety level. Scale can range from 0-21 with higher scores representing greater anxiety.

    Measured: 2 weeks after intervention/comparison visit

  16. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)

    Measure of anxiety level. Scale can range from 0-21 with higher scores representing greater anxiety.

    Measured: Within 2 weeks after patient gives birth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionOct 2020
  4. Study completionOct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
182 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02786225
Sponsor's protocol ID
160523
Acronym
CARE
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
18 May 2016
Last updated
14 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Will share deindentified data after submission of the Data Use Agreement

Publications

  • Phillippi JC, Doersam JK, Neal JL, Roumie CL. Electronic Informed Consent to Facilitate Recruitment of Pregnant Women Into Research. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Jul;47(4):529-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.04.134.

    PubMed 29758172

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Collaborative Care in people with Prenatal Care and Maternal-child Health Services, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)-Team survey (time frame: 2 weeks after intervention/comparison visit). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02786225, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in