AzTrials
AzTrials

Neuromuscular BlockPhase 4RELAXNCT02838134

Deep Versus Moderate Muscle Relaxation During Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in Enhancing Postoperative Recovery

A Phase 4 study testing Rocuronium and No additional Rocuronium in people with Neuromuscular Block and Renal Transplant Donor of Left Kidney, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Postoperative recovery after live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is largely determined by the consequences of postoperative pain and analgesia consumptions. The investigators' goal is to establish the relationship between the use of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and the early… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Rocuronium and No additional Rocuronium
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
101 participants
Where
2 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
Nov 2016to 2 Dec 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • obtained informed consent
  • age over 18 years

Who cannot join

  • insufficient control of the Dutch language to read the patient information and to fill out the questionnaires
  • chronic use of analgesics or psychotropic drugs
  • use of NSAIDs shorter than 5 days before surgery
  • known or suspect allergy to rocuronium of sugammadex
  • neuromuscular disease
  • indication for rapid sequence induction
Show all 10Show fewer
  • deficiency of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors, coagulopathy or active use of coumarin derivates.
  • Peri-operative use of fusidic acid or flucloxacillin
  • Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30ml/min)
  • Morbid obesity (BMI>35 kg/m2)

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Netherlands2 sites
  • LUMC

    Leiden

  • Radboudumc

    Nijmegen

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: The Effectiveness of Deep Versus Moderate Muscle Relaxation During Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in Enhancing Postoperative Recovery

Postoperative recovery after live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is largely determined by the consequences of postoperative pain and analgesia consumptions. The investigators' goal is to establish the relationship between the use of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and the early quality of recovery. Therefore, the investigators designed a trial in which patients scheduled for living donor nephrectomy are randomized into a group with deep NMB or moderate NMB. The primary outcome measurement will be the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire (overall score) at 48 hours after extubation.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Postoperative recovery after live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is largely determined by the consequences of postoperative pain and analgesia consumptions. The use of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) has shown to reduce postoperative pain scores after laparoscopic surgery. With this study the investigators will investigate if deep NMB also improves the early quality of recovery after LDN.

Objective: To establish the relationship between the use of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) - with standard pressure pneumoperitoneum - and the early quality of recovery.

Study design: A multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial

Study population: 96 adult patients (18 years or older), scheduled for living donor nephrectomy, will be randomized into a group with deep or moderate neuromuscular blockade. Deep neuromuscular blockade is defined as post tetanic count 1-2.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome measurement will be the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire (overall score) at 48 hours after extubation.

Secondary outcomes measured are: intra-operative parameters (e.g. surgical conditions, operation time, length of pneumoperitoneum, first warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, conversion to open or hand-assisted donor nephrectomy, intra-operative complications, cumulative use of rocuronium and sugammadex), the total score of the quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire at 48 hours after extubation, post-operative pain (components of pain scores); postoperative nausea and vomiting (NRS), the cumulative use of analgesics and anti-emetics, time to reach discharge criteria and postoperative complications.

Being tested
Rocuronium, No additional Rocuronium
Keywords
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, Early quality of recovery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RocuroniumOther

    A bolus of 0.7 mg/kg rocuronium is administered just after tracheal intubation and then an infusion of rocuronium (0.3 to 0.4 mg/kg) is started when post-tetanic count (PTC) is more than 0 and titrated towards PTC 1-2.

  • No additional RocuroniumOther

    No additional rocuronium is administered after tracheal intubation.

Study groups in NCT02838134
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: Deep Neuromuscular blockadeExperimentalAn extra bolus of rocuronium after intubation followed by infusion
Receives: Other: Rocuronium
Group B: Moderate neuromuscular BlockadeSham comparatorModerate neuromuscular Blockade No additional rocuronium after intubation.
Receives: Other: No additional Rocuronium

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Score of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40)

    The QoR-40 is a validated assessment tool for measuring a patient's self-assessed quality of recovery after surgery. It consists of 40 questions measuring 5 dimensions: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence and pain. Each item is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, giving a minimal score of 40 and a maximum score of 200. Higher values represent a better outcome

    Measured: Day 1: 24 hours after detubation

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Surgical Conditions

    Surgical rating score, concerning the quality of the surgical field, scored with the surgical rating scale (SRS) A likert scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores represent better outcomes.

    1. = extremely poor conditions
    2. = poor conditions
    3. = acceptable conditions
    4. =good conditions
    5. = optimal conditions

    Measured: Day 0: Intraoperative, average of scores up to 240 minutes (assessed each 15 minutes)

  2. Length of Pneumoperitoneum

    Intraoperative parameter of duration of pneumoperitoneum

    Measured: Day 0: once, up to 240 minutes

  3. Warm Ischemia Time

    Intraoperative parameter measuring the time (in minutes) between dissection of the renal artery and flushing of the kidney after retrieval

    Measured: Day 0: once, up to 240 minutes

  4. Estimated Blood Loss

    Intraoperative parameter

    Measured: Day 0: once, up to 240 minutes

  5. Conversion

    Number of Participants with conversion to open or hand-assisted donor nephrectomy

    Measured: Day 0: once, up to 240 minutes

  6. Intra-operative Complications

    Number of Participants with Complications which occurred during surgery

    Measured: Day 0: once, up to 240 minutes

  7. Cumulative Use of Rocuronium

    Total amount of rocuronium administered during surgery

    Measured: Day 0: once, up to 240 minutes

  8. Total Score of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire

    The QoR-40 is a validated assessment tool for measuring a patient's self-assessed quality of recovery after surgery. It consists of 40 questions measuring 5 dimensions: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence and pain. Each item is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, giving a minimal score of 40 and a maximum score of 200. Higher values represent a better outcome.

    Measured: Day 2: 48 hours after detubation

  9. Postoperative Pain

    components of pain scores after 1 hour, 6 hours, on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and postoperative day 2 (POD2).

    Likert scale from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent more pain.

    Measured: Day 0: 1h, 6h, day 1: 24h and day 2: 48 hours (and if still admitted 72h) after detubation

  10. Postoperative Complications

    Number of participants with postoperative complications that occurred up to 8 weeks after surgery

    Measured: 24 and 48 hours (and if still admitted 72h) after detubation and 4 and 8 weeks after surgery

  11. Discharge Criteria

    Scoring the following criteria: adequate pain control with oral medication, passage of flatus or defecation, intake of solid food tolerated, patient is mobilized and independent and patient accepts discharge.

    Measured: 24 and 48 hours after detubation

  12. Pain Scores

    Total amount of pain 4 weeks after surgery Likert scale from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent more pain (worse outcome).

    Measured: once, 4 weeks after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2016
  3. Primary completion2 Nov 2017
  4. Study completion2 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
101 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02838134
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL58160.091.16
Acronym
RELAX
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
29 Jun 2016
Last updated
19 Sep 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Reijnders-Boerboom GTJA, van Helden EV, Minnee RC, Albers KI, Bruintjes MHD, Dahan A, Martini CH, d'Ancona FCH, Scheffer GJ, Keijzer C, Warle MC. Deep neuromuscular block reduces the incidence of intra-operative complications during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Perioper Med (Lond). 2021 Dec 9;10(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00224-1.

    PubMed 34879862
  • Albers KI, van Helden EV, Dahan A, Martini CH, Bruintjes MHD, Scheffer GJ, Steegers MAH, Keijzer C, Warle MC. Early postoperative pain after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy predicts 30-day postoperative infectious complications: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2020 Jul;161(7):1565-1570. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001842.

    PubMed 32107359
  • Bruintjes MHD, Krijtenburg P, Martini CH, Poyck PP, d'Ancona FCH, Huurman VAL, van der Jagt M, Langenhuijsen JF, Nijboer WN, van Laarhoven CJHM, Dahan A, Warle MC; RELAX collaborator group. Efficacy of profound versus moderate neuromuscular blockade in enhancing postoperative recovery after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jul;36(7):494-501. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000992.

    PubMed 30920983
  • Bruintjes MH, Braat AE, Dahan A, Scheffer GJ, Hilbrands LB, d'Ancona FC, Donders RA, van Laarhoven CJ, Warle MC. Effectiveness of deep versus moderate muscle relaxation during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in enhancing postoperative recovery: study protocol for a randomized controlled study. Trials. 2017 Mar 4;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1785-y.

    PubMed 28259181

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Rocuronium and No additional Rocuronium in people with Neuromuscular Block and Renal Transplant Donor of Left Kidney, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total Score of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40) (time frame: Day 1: 24 hours after detubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02838134, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in