AzTrials
AzTrials

BiofilmsPhase 4NCT02946814

Immediate Effect and Substantivity of the Essential Oils Without Alcohol on the Oral Biofilm in Situ

A Phase 4 study testing essential oils, essential oils without mouthwash and sterile water in people with Biofilms and Substantivity, run by University of Santiago de Compostela.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to evaluate the in situ antibacterial activity of a mouthwash containing essential oils with and without alcohol on undisturbed de novo plaque-like biofilm (PL-biofilm) up to 7 h after its application. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Biofilms, Substantivity, Oils, Essential
What is being tested?
essential oils, essential oils without mouthwash and sterile water
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2016to Nov 2016
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Systemically healthy adults.
  • Minimum of 24 permanent teeth.
  • No gingivitis (Community Periodontal Index score = 0).
  • No periodontitis (Community Periodontal Index score = 0).
  • Absence of untreated caries.

Who cannot join

  • Smoker or former smoker.
  • Presence of dental prostheses.
  • Presence of orthodontic devices.
  • Antibiotic treatment or routine use of oral antiseptics in the previous 3 months.
  • Presence of any systemic disease that could alter the production or composition of saliva.

About this study

Official title: Immediate Effect and Substantivity of the Essential Oils Without Alcohol on the Oral Biofilm in Situ. A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study aims to evaluate the in situ antibacterial activity of a mouthwash containing essential oils with and without alcohol on undisturbed de novo plaque-like biofilm (PL-biofilm) up to 7 h after its application.

An appliance was designed to hold six glass disks on the buccal sides of the lower teeth, allowing PL-biofilm growth. Twenty healthy volunteers will the appliance for 48 h and then performed a mouthwash with essential oils. Disks will be removed after 30 s and at 1, 3, 5, and 7 h later. After a washout period, the same procedure will be repeated with a sterile water mouthwash and a mouthwash with essential oils without alcohol. After PL-biofilm vital staining, samples will be analyzed using a confocal laser scanning microscope analysing their bacterial viability and thickness.

Being tested
essential oils, essential oils without mouthwash, sterile water
Keywords
essential oils, microscope, colfocal, dental plaque
Medical subject headings
Dental Plaque

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • essential oilsDrug

    Also called Listerine Mentol

  • essential oils without mouthwashDrug

    Also called Listerine Zero

  • sterile waterDrug

Study groups in NCT02946814
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
essential oilsActive comparatora single mouthwash with 20 ml of essential oils for 30 seconds.
Receives: Drug: essential oils
essential oils without mouthwashExperimentala single mouthwash with 20 ml of essential oils without alcohol for 30 seconds.
Receives: Drug: essential oils without mouthwash
sterile waterSham comparatora single mouthwash with 20 ml of sterile water for 30 seconds.
Receives: Drug: sterile water

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of bacterial viability

    Measured: 48 hours after the volunteer has started to wear the splints

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. thickness in microns

    Measured: 48 hours after the volunteer has started to wear the splints

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2016
  3. Primary completionNov 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02946814
Sponsor's protocol ID
substantivity 2016
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
21 Oct 2016
Last updated
27 Oct 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Quintas V, Prada-Lopez I, Prados-Frutos JC, Tomas I. In situ antimicrobial activity on oral biofilm: essential oils vs. 0.2 % chlorhexidine. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jan;19(1):97-107. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1224-3. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

    PubMed 24687247

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing essential oils, essential oils without mouthwash and sterile water in people with Biofilms and Substantivity, run by University of Santiago de Compostela.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of bacterial viability (time frame: 48 hours after the volunteer has started to wear the splints). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02946814, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in