Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 3NCT02954510
Ferumoxytol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
A Phase 3 study testing ferumoxytol in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
There are no current alternatives to diagnostic contrast-requiring imaging for patients with an eGFR <30mL/min due to the association of gadolinium-based imaging modalities to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and iodinated contrast-induced kidney injury. Ferumoxytol-enhanced imaging may offer an alternative approach. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- ferumoxytol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 185 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2017to 27 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Both female and male participants are being studied aged 18-85 years old with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 30ml/min/1.73 meters squared. Patients will have undergone cardiac screening tests that warrant further evaluation. Patients will be excluded with an eGFR >30ml/min/1.73 meters squared.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: Ferumoxytol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Interpretation of Vascular Defects
There are no current alternatives to diagnostic contrast-requiring imaging for patients with an eGFR <30mL/min due to the association of gadolinium-based imaging modalities to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and iodinated contrast-induced kidney injury. Ferumoxytol-enhanced imaging may offer an alternative approach.
Read the detailed description
This is a case control study which will assess the resolution by which the coronary arteries can be visualized using ferumoxytol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance angiography (fcMRA) in patients with prior regional cardiac ischemia localized by stress-induced echocardiography. Resolution will be compared to invasive coronary arteriography completed in all patients that will be analyzed at the end of the study.
Masked experts will interpret fcMRA images to determine if coronary stenosis is present or absent. By strict definitions, this is a single-arm study. However comparison will be made between fcMRA and invasive coronary arteriography performed in each patient. With a prevalence of disease of approximately 0.35 in the study population, it is anticipated that both sensitivity and specificity of fcMRA to identify the absence of coronary artery stenosis can be calculated.
We anticipate a population size of 70 will be needed to adequately study the primary outcome due to potential confounders, including racial and sex differences which may exist (see below), which are known to exist in a population with significant renal and possible cardiac disease to determine if fcMRA is differs in its ability to exclude greater than or equal to 50 percent stenosis in a single coronary artery compared to dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). This is based on prevalence of disease of 0.35. Non-invasive cardiac stress testing in those with eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m2 is estimated to have a sensitivity of 0.81 (CI 0.57-0.94) and specificity of 0.83 (CI 0.62-0.95) to identify coronary epicardial lesion of greater than 70 percent. The sensitivity of non-invasive non-intraluminal testing is anticipated to be 0.60 when patients with myocardial scar are enrolled. We anticipate that 50 percent of patients with a positive DSE will have evidence of myocardial scar. Predicted sensitivity of fcMRA will likely be increased compared to referenced estimates because true positives will be defined by stenosis greater than or equal to 50 percent. Based on a prevalence of 0.35, we anticipate DSE will yield 24 true positives, 25 true negatives, 7 false positives, and 14 false negatives resulting in sensitivity of 0.63 and specificity of 0.78. To achieve study power that will allow for the null hypothesis to be ignored, in as study size of 70, fcMRA must yield at least 28 true positives and 27 true negatives allowing for 5 false positives and 10 false negatives resulting in sensitivity of 0.737 and specificity of 0.843. To account for drop-out and incomplete data collection in 50 percent of patients approached, recruitment of 140 patients will be needed. The drop-out rate from recruitment to enrollment approximates the fcMRA study experience at the Brigham and Women's Hosptial in 2017.
Racial/sex subgroup analysis will involve testing in whites vs. non-whites and males vs. females. Prevalence of 0.35 will again be assumed. Previously, 45 percent of patients enrolled were of non-white racial origin. An additional 85 patients would be necessary to demonstrate a difference between fcMRA and DSE when comparing sensitivity and specificity as above, therefore this will be considered an exploratory analysis.
Using the Partners Healthcare System Research Patient Data Registry (RPDR) all patients in calendar year 2017 were identified with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease stage 4-5D and who underwent a left heart cardiac catheterization at either Brigham and Women's Hospital or Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). "chronic kidney disease stage 4", "chronic kidney disease stage 5", and "left heart catheterization", and "abnormal echocardiogram" were used as mesh terms resulting in 68 patients. 108 patients utilizing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis completed ICA. 35 patients not yet requiring renal replacement therapy completed ICA in the same time period. Separately, clinical practices at the Brigham and Women's Hospital kidney transplant center in calendar year 2017 were reviewed. 207 patients underwent non-invasive cardiac stress testing and 16 patients underwent ICA. All patients that underwent arteriography had prior non--invasive cardiac stress testing. Surveying both the inpatient and outpatient settings a total of 159 patients were identified in the Partners Healthcare System that would have qualified for the proposed study.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- ferumoxytol
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ferumoxytolDrug
Also called feraheme
ferumoxytol will assess patency of coronary arteries
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Single arm utilizing ferumoxytol Receives: Drug: ferumoxytol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Detect the absence of ≥50% stenosis in the coronary artery tree
This outcome derives from the central hypothesis which states that coronary artery disease can more effectively be excluded in patients with severe chronic kidney disease using ferumoxtyol enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance angiography (fcMRA) rather than non-invasive cardiac testing combined with ICA. The presence or absence of a single 50% stenosis in the region of interest (measured as described above) will be dichotomized (0=absent/ 1= present) from each of the two measures, fcMRA and invasive coronary arteriography
Measured: 48 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Detect stenosis in proximal and distal segments of the coronary artery tree
The purpose of this secondary outcome is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of fcMRA to detect the absence of lesions exhibiting ≥50% stenosis compared to ICA in proximal and distal arterial segments
Measured: 48 months
Compare ferumoxtyol enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with stress echocardiography
The purpose of this secondary outcome is to determine the contrast and estimate the similarity between fcMRA, dobutamine stress echocardgiography testing with the gold standard of ICA
Measured: 48 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Feb 2017
- Primary completion1 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion27 Feb 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Brigham and Women's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- case control
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrew Michael Siedlecki, Brigham and Women's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02954510
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016P000250
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: At the conclusion of the study de-identified data will be made available. according to guidelines described by the Biological Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center. The structure will abide by the National Heart Lung Blood Institute Policy for Data Sharing from Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Studies.
Publications
Chin MS, Steigner M, Yin W, Kwong RY, Siedlecki AM. Intraluminal Assessment of Coronary Arteries With Ferumoxytol-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):505-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Dec 13. No abstract available.
PubMed 29248659
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ferumoxytol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Interpretation of Vascular Defects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02954510
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016P000250
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 27 Feb 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are no current alternatives to diagnostic contrast-requiring imaging for patients with an eGFR <30mL/min due to the association of gadolinium-based imaging modalities to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and iodinated contrast-induced kidney injury. Ferumoxytol-enhanced imaging may offer an alternative approach.
Detailed description
This is a case control study which will assess the resolution by which the coronary arteries can be visualized using ferumoxytol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance angiography (fcMRA) in patients with prior regional cardiac ischemia localized by stress-induced echocardiography. Resolution will be compared to invasive coronary arteriography completed in all patients that will be analyzed at the end of the study.
Masked experts will interpret fcMRA images to determine if coronary stenosis is present or absent. By strict definitions, this is a single-arm study. However comparison will be made between fcMRA and invasive coronary arteriography performed in each patient. With a prevalence of disease of approximately 0.35 in the study population, it is anticipated that both sensitivity and specificity of fcMRA to identify the absence of coronary artery stenosis can be calculated.
We anticipate a population size of 70 will be needed to adequately study the primary outcome due to potential confounders, including racial and sex differences which may exist (see below), which are known to exist in a population with significant renal and possible cardiac disease to determine if fcMRA is differs in its ability to exclude greater than or equal to 50 percent stenosis in a single coronary artery compared to dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). This is based on prevalence of disease of 0.35. Non-invasive cardiac stress testing in those with eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m2 is estimated to have a sensitivity of 0.81 (CI 0.57-0.94) and specificity of 0.83 (CI 0.62-0.95) to identify coronary epicardial lesion of greater than 70 percent. The sensitivity of non-invasive non-intraluminal testing is anticipated to be 0.60 when patients with myocardial scar are enrolled. We anticipate that 50 percent of patients with a positive DSE will have evidence of myocardial scar. Predicted sensitivity of fcMRA will likely be increased compared to referenced estimates because true positives will be defined by stenosis greater than or equal to 50 percent. Based on a prevalence of 0.35, we anticipate DSE will yield 24 true positives, 25 true negatives, 7 false positives, and 14 false negatives resulting in sensitivity of 0.63 and specificity of 0.78. To achieve study power that will allow for the null hypothesis to be ignored, in as study size of 70, fcMRA must yield at least 28 true positives and 27 true negatives allowing for 5 false positives and 10 false negatives resulting in sensitivity of 0.737 and specificity of 0.843. To account for drop-out and incomplete data collection in 50 percent of patients approached, recruitment of 140 patients will be needed. The drop-out rate from recruitment to enrollment approximates the fcMRA study experience at the Brigham and Women's Hosptial in 2017.
Racial/sex subgroup analysis will involve testing in whites vs. non-whites and males vs. females. Prevalence of 0.35 will again be assumed. Previously, 45 percent of patients enrolled were of non-white racial origin. An additional 85 patients would be necessary to demonstrate a difference between fcMRA and DSE when comparing sensitivity and specificity as above, therefore this will be considered an exploratory analysis.
Using the Partners Healthcare System Research Patient Data Registry (RPDR) all patients in calendar year 2017 were identified with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease stage 4-5D and who underwent a left heart cardiac catheterization at either Brigham and Women's Hospital or Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). "chronic kidney disease stage 4", "chronic kidney disease stage 5", and "left heart catheterization", and "abnormal echocardiogram" were used as mesh terms resulting in 68 patients. 108 patients utilizing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis completed ICA. 35 patients not yet requiring renal replacement therapy completed ICA in the same time period. Separately, clinical practices at the Brigham and Women's Hospital kidney transplant center in calendar year 2017 were reviewed. 207 patients underwent non-invasive cardiac stress testing and 16 patients underwent ICA. All patients that underwent arteriography had prior non--invasive cardiac stress testing. Surveying both the inpatient and outpatient settings a total of 159 patients were identified in the Partners Healthcare System that would have qualified for the proposed study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- case control
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Drug: ferumoxytolSingle arm utilizing ferumoxytol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ferumoxytolAlso: ferahemeferumoxytol will assess patency of coronary arteries | Drug | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Detect the absence of ≥50% stenosis in the coronary artery tree
Time frame: 48 months
This outcome derives from the central hypothesis which states that coronary artery disease can more effectively be excluded in patients with severe chronic kidney disease using ferumoxtyol enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance angiography (fcMRA) rather than non-invasive cardiac testing combined with ICA. The presence or absence of a single 50% stenosis in the region of interest (measured as described above) will be dichotomized (0=absent/ 1= present) from each of the two measures, fcMRA and invasive coronary arteriography
2 secondary outcomes
Detect stenosis in proximal and distal segments of the coronary artery tree
Time frame: 48 months
Compare ferumoxtyol enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with stress echocardiography
Time frame: 48 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29248659Chin MS, Steigner M, Yin W, Kwong RY, Siedlecki AM. Intraluminal Assessment of Coronary Arteries With Ferumoxytol-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):505-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Dec 13. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. At the conclusion of the study de-identified data will be made available. according to guidelines described by the Biological Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center. The structure will abide by the National Heart Lung Blood Institute Policy for Data Sharing from Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Studies.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
Postural Mobilization Compared to Noradrenaline Only in Off-Pump CABG Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease With Need for Bypass Surgery, Coronary Artery Disease(CAD)
Enrolling by invitation
Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Vessel Evaluation
Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Patients With Uncommon Presentations and/or Uncommon Diseases Associated With the Cardiovascular System
Metabolic Disease, Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Coronary Myocardial Bridge and Coronary Plaques on MDCT
Myocardial Bridging, Coronary Atherosclerosis
Recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography to Assess the Effect of Camzyos on Ischaemia in HOCM: PEACH Trial
Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy \(HOCM\), Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ferumoxytol in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Detect the absence of ≥50% stenosis in the coronary artery tree (time frame: 48 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02954510, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2023.