StrokehARMoniesNCT03026712
Hemiparetic Arm Robotic Mobilization With Non Invasive Electrical Stimulation
A study testing Real dual tDCS + Robotic Arm Therapy in people with Stroke and Paresis, run by I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The two cerebral hemispheres find themselves in a state of balanced mutual inhibition. A stroke with involvement of motor function leads to a reduced excitability in affected hemisphere M1 and to an increased excitability of contralateral M1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Paresis, Upper Extremity Paralysis
- What is being tested?
- Real dual tDCS + Robotic Arm Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Feb 2016to 1 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with isolated ischemic stroke, confirmed by brain imaging (MRI, CT)
- subjects who retain sufficient cognitive functions and language to follow the instructions given by doctors and therapists
- subjects with basal Modified Ashworth Scale score under 3
- subjects with basal Fugl-Meyer score ≥ 3 so that they are not completely paralyzed
- subjects who have signed informed consent to participate in this study
- subjects that show stable conditions in the two pre-treatment evaluations, in order to avoid "Hawthorne effect"
Who cannot join
- subjects with chronic paretic limb deformities
- subjects with complete and flaccid paralysis of all motor performances of shoulder and elbow;
- subjects with severe hemineglect (Pizzamiglio battery for unilateral spatial neglect including letter cancellation test, barrage tests, reading and Wundt-Jastro area illusion test; patients diagnosed with neglect if 3 of 4 items of this battery are present)
- subjects showing an increase in the Fugl-Meyer more than 2.1 points in the second pre-treatment clinical evaluation, compared to the score of the first evaluation
- subjects with contraindications to the execution of transcranial magnetic stimulation - TMS - (pacemakers, metal implants)
- subjects with epilepsy
Show all 11Show fewer
- Previous neurosurgical interventions
- Severe upper limb osteoporosis
- Upper limb strength or joint movement limitation due to previous fractures
- Upper limb strength or joint movement limitation due to previous surgical interventions
- Mini Mental State Evaluation (MMSE) <24
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
Rome
Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
Rome
About this study
Official title: Association of Dual Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tDCS) to Upper Limb Robotic Therapy in Individuals With Chronic Stroke
The two cerebral hemispheres find themselves in a state of balanced mutual inhibition. A stroke with involvement of motor function leads to a reduced excitability in affected hemisphere M1 and to an increased excitability of contralateral M1. Stroke therefore might impair interhemispheric balance, leading to a decreased inhibition of contralesional hemisphere by ipsilesional hemisphere and, in turn, to an increased inhibition of ipsilesional hemisphere by contralesional hemisphere. Permanence of healthy hemisphere hyperactivation in chronic phase after stroke is usually index of little functional recovery and is correlated with a greater ipsilateral structural damage.
Robot-mediated physical therapy is an innovative rehabilitation technique that is effective in stroke patients. In this study, the investigators will add a non-invasive brain stimulation protocol with Transcranial stimulation with direct current (tDCS) to the robotic treatment in chronic stroke patients. tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that is able to modulate cortical excitability. The hypothesis is that dual t-DCS (ipsilesional excitation and concomitant contralesional inhibition) could restore interhemispheric balance improving the benefits of robotic therapy with Armeo Power®.
Read the detailed description
The general theory of the inhibitory interhemispheric competition speculates that, under physiological conditions, the two cerebral hemispheres find themselves in a state of balanced mutual inhibition. Accordingly, some electrophysiological and functional imaging studies have shown that a stroke with involvement of motor function leads to a reduced excitability in affected hemisphere M1 and to an increased excitability of contralateral M1. Stroke therefore might impair interhemispheric balance, leading to a decreased inhibition of contralesional hemisphere by ipsilesional hemisphere and, in turn, to an increased inhibition of ipsilesional hemisphere by contralesional hemisphere.
This imbalance in cerebral hemispheres excitability tends to decline over the functional recovery in the first months after stroke, in proportion to the functional recovery of the ipsilateral structures.
Alternatively, permanence of healthy hemisphere hyperactivation in chronic phase after stroke is usually index of little functional recovery and is correlated with a greater structural damage to the ipsilesional corticospinal tract and transcallosal fibers, although some studies have suggested a vicarious role of healthy hemisphere.
Recently, some authors have proposed a structural reserve-based bimodal model of recovery, for which the vicarious model would be valid only for patients with poor structural reserves (and therefore more extensive damage), while the interhemispheric competition model would be valid for patients with larger structural reserves.
In the light of these data, it is conceivable that procedures aiming at promoting the re-establishment of a normal balance in interhemispheric interaction can facilitate motor function recovery of the paretic limb, at least in patients with appropriate structural reserves.
Transcranial stimulation with direct current (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that uses low intensity electrical current at constant voltage and variable duration that is able to modulate cortical excitability efficiently, lastingly (with effects that begin during stimulation and that last for a few hours from the end of the stimulation) and safely in healthy subjects: moreover, it is able to produce changes of excitability in both directions (i.e. towards an increase and towards its reduction) in dependence of electrodes positioning on the scalp.
Specifically, t-DCS appears to induce metaplasticity phenomena, that is a polarity-dependent modulation of the response to subsequent synaptic potentiation protocols. Considering these results and the conclusions of a recent meta-analysis, it seems appropriate to expose a patient to t-DCS immediately before or in the early stage of intervention aiming at promoting synaptic plasticity, such as neuro-rehabilitation techniques.
Alongside the traditional physical therapy techniques, during the last twenty years many research groups around the world have started to develop robots supporting physical treatments.
A review on robot-mediated physical therapy clinical trials shows how this innovative rehabilitation technique is effective both in acute and chronic stroke patients, although it is not proven its superiority over traditional rehabilitation methods.
In this study, the investigators will use a robotic exoskeleton that allows targeted interventions on specific tasks in the three spatial dimensions; this robot, marketed under the name Armeo Power® (Hocoma AG, Switzerland), is one of the most advanced rehabilitation devices for the upper limb. The effectiveness of this tool has been demonstrated in a recent multicenter trial of chronic stroke patients with moderate-severe upper limb motor deficit.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits arising from the combination of dual t-DCS (ipsilesional excitation and contralesional inhibition) and robotic therapy with Armeo Power® in the treatment of chronic stroke patients with upper limb paralysis.
This study is a double blind randomized controlled trial in which chronic stroke patients with upper limb paresis undergone robotic treatment with Armeo Power® will be randomized to concomitant dual tDCS (excitatory on injured side and inhibitory on health side) o sham tDCS.
All patients will undergo an initial evaluation before starting treatment (between 30 and 15 days before the start) where it will be filled in a form with the medical history and the personal data and will be signed informed consent.
Once eligible, the patient will be subjected to a first clinical evaluation using validated scales, a kinematic evaluation of upper limb motor performance with ArmeoPower® and a neurophysiological evaluation.
At the end of the evaluation, every patient will be assigned through a randomized system to one of two study groups:
- Group A: robotic treatment with Armeo Power® associated with REAL dual tDCS (anodic on injured hemisphere, cathodic on healthy hemisphere) - 40 patients
- Group B: robotic treatment with Armeo Power® associated with SHAM dual tDCS - 40 patients
Immediately prior the start of treatment (time T-1), every participant will perform a second clinical assessment and kinematic evaluation and will begin treatment on the same day in the gym of the Private Department of Saint Lucia Foundation.
The ArmeoPower® device is an exoskeleton robot for upper limb rehabilitation able to allow the patients' execution of movements of proximal (shoulder-elbow movements) and distal (movements of the wrist) segments of upper limb.
Once the arms of the robot are adapted to patent's upper limb, the exoskeleton is mounted and set for defining the action areas and the volumes of exploration.
At the beginning of each session, ArmeoPower® exoskeleton will be mounted according to the patients' stored settings, which takes about 10 minutes.
Once mounted, it will proceed to real or sham tDCS stimulation, depending on the group the patient belong to.
Participants in group A will perform real dual tDCS stimulation immediately before each session of the robotic treatment, while patients in group B will perform the treatment with robotics platform with the same intensity and duration of group A but preceded by sham dual tDCS stimulation.
Real dual tDCS stimulation requires the application of the anode over the injured motor cortex (M1) and of the cathode on the healthy motor cortex (M1), so as to simultaneously perform an excitability suppression of healthy hemisphere and an activation of the ischemic cortex.
Motor cortex will be simultaneously stimulated at an intensity equal to 1-2 mA and for a maximum duration of 20 minutes. Sham dual t-DCS requires the application of the electrodes in the same positions and for the same duration, but without the delivery of electrical stimulation.
The robotic rehabilitation treatment will be started immediately after the end of stimulation, and the actual treatment will last for 30 minutes. The robot is able to relieve the weight of the arm and assisting the patient during motor execution. The patient sees on a monitor the targets upon which he should move the effector and executes the movement through the active assistance of the robot, which compensates the patient's motor deficits. Videogame-based exercises and functional training exercises of daily life activities are carried out with visual, acoustic and performance feedback. A physical therapist with a specific training certificate is always present during the sessions, with 1:1 ratio with patients.
Each patient will perform 5 sessions per week for two consecutive weeks, after which will be performed clinical, kinematic and neurophysiological evaluations expected to T0; the patient will then be re-evaluated in follow-up at one month (T1) and at 3 months after the end of treatment (T2), with clinical and kinematic assessments.
Data will be analyzed using parametric statistics if will appear to be normally distributed (based on Kolgomorov-Smirnov test with Lilliefors correction), in particular by applying a two-way mixed model analysis of variance (with an intra- and inter-factor between subjects). If the data won't appear to be normally distributed, they will be analyzed using Friedman's analysis for the intra-subject variations, and by Mann-Whitney u-test for variations between the two groups. The level of significance will be set at 0.05 for all analysis, except for post-hoc to which is applied the Bonferroni correction.
Guidelines for the safe use of non-invasive brain stimulation (Wassermann, 1998) will be respected; the participants should be able to signed an informed consent.
There are not literature report of adverse events or contraindications with regard to the use of ArmeoPower® robotics platform, except for patients with severe deformities of the paretic upper limb, that are excluded from this study. Data on patients will be anonymous and stored with password protection. There will be no samples of biological material, drug delivery, healthy volunteers or animals.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Paresis, Upper Extremity Paralysis
- Being tested
- Real dual tDCS + Robotic Arm Therapy, SHAM tDCS + Robotic Arm Therapy
- Keywords
- Robotic therapy, tDCS, non invasive electrical stimulation, ArmeoPower, interhemispheric balance
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Paresis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Real dual tDCS + Robotic Arm TherapyDevice
Dual tDCS (anodic on injured hemisphere, cathodic on healthy hemisphere). Motor cortex will be simultaneously stimulated at an intensity equal to 1-2 mA and for a maximum duration of 20 minutes just before 30 minutes of arm robotic task oriented treatment performed with an exoskeleton device (Armeo Power).
The intervention will be performed 5 times per week for 2 consecutive weeks.
SHAM tDCS + Robotic Arm TherapyDevice
SHAM bilateral tDCS for a maximum duration of 20 minutes just before 30 minutes of arm robotic task oriented treatment performed with an exoskeleton device (Armeo Power).
The intervention will be performed 5 times per week for 2 consecutive weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Real tDCS | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Real dual tDCS + Robotic Arm Therapy |
| Sham tDCS | Sham comparator | Not described Receives: Device: SHAM tDCS + Robotic Arm Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Significant Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) improvement in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Measured: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training and at 1 and 3 months follow-up
Secondary outcomes (5)
Significant Modified Ashworth scale improvement in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Measured: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training and at 1 and 3 months follow-up
Significant Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) improvement in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Measured: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training and at 1 and 3 months follow-up
Significant Barthel index improvement in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Measured: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training and at 1 and 3 months follow-up
Significant kinematic performance improvement, measured by ArmeoPower®, in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Measured: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training
Significant rebalancing of motor evoked potential (MEP) laterality index in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Measured: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2016
- Primary completion1 Dec 2021
- Study completion1 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (37)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Campus Bio-Medico University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Giovanni Morone, MD, PhD, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
- Investigators
- Stefano Paolucci, Study director, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia, RomaVincenzo Di Lazzaro, Study director, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03026712
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FSLCBM01
- Acronym
- hARMonies
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJ, Brooks DJ, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RS. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1991 Jan;29(1):63-71. doi: 10.1002/ana.410290112.
PubMed 1996881Cicinelli P, Traversa R, Rossini PM. Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2-4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Dec;105(6):438-50. doi: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00052-0.
PubMed 9448645Kinsbourne, M. (1974). Mechanisms of hemispheric interaction in man. In Hemispheric Disconnection and Cerebral Function, M. Kinsbourne, and W. Smith, eds. (Springfield: Charles C Thomas).
Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, Kennedy DN, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997 Dec;28(12):2518-27. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2518.
PubMed 9412643Cunningham DA, Machado A, Janini D, Varnerin N, Bonnett C, Yue G, Jones S, Lowe M, Beall E, Sakaie K, Plow EB. Assessment of inter-hemispheric imbalance using imaging and noninvasive brain stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.419. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
PubMed 25194451Delvaux V, Alagona G, Gerard P, De Pasqua V, Pennisi G, de Noordhout AM. Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jul;114(7):1217-25. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00070-1.
PubMed 12842718Di Lazzaro V, Pilato F, Dileone M, Profice P, Capone F, Ranieri F, Musumeci G, Cianfoni A, Pasqualetti P, Tonali PA. Modulating cortical excitability in acute stroke: a repetitive TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;119(3):715-723. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.049. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
PubMed 18165149Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, Capone F, Ferreri F, Formica D, Ranieri F, Tombini M, Ziemann U, Rothwell JC, Di Lazzaro V. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Oct;10(10):597-608. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.162. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
PubMed 25201238Duque J, Hummel F, Celnik P, Murase N, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke. Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):940-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.033. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
PubMed 16084737Gerloff C, Bushara K, Sailer A, Wassermann EM, Chen R, Matsuoka T, Waldvogel D, Wittenberg GF, Ishii K, Cohen LG, Hallett M. Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain. 2006 Mar;129(Pt 3):791-808. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh713. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
PubMed 16364955Grefkes C, Fink GR. Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Feb;13(2):206-16. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70264-3.
PubMed 24457190Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol. 2006 Aug;5(8):708-12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70525-7.
PubMed 16857577Jang SH, Kwon HG. Change of the anterior corticospinal tract on the normal side of the brain in chronic stroke patients: Diffusion tensor imaging study. Somatosens Mot Res. 2015;32(1):25-30. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2014.949006. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
PubMed 25166214Jang SH, Kim K, Kim SH, Son SM, Jang WH, Kwon HG. The relation between motor function of stroke patients and diffusion tensor imaging findings for the corticospinal tract. Neurosci Lett. 2014 Jun 20;572:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.04.044. Epub 2014 May 4.
PubMed 24796808Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;87(4):345-55. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311242. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
PubMed 26319437
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Association of Dual Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tDCS) to Upper Limb Robotic Therapy in Individuals With Chronic Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03026712
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- hARMonies / FSLCBM01
- Conditions
- Stroke, Paresis, Upper Extremity Paralysis
- Keywords
- Robotic therapy, tDCS, non invasive electrical stimulation, ArmeoPower, interhemispheric balance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Campus Bio-Medico University
- Study start
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The two cerebral hemispheres find themselves in a state of balanced mutual inhibition. A stroke with involvement of motor function leads to a reduced excitability in affected hemisphere M1 and to an increased excitability of contralateral M1. Stroke therefore might impair interhemispheric balance, leading to a decreased inhibition of contralesional hemisphere by ipsilesional hemisphere and, in turn, to an increased inhibition of ipsilesional hemisphere by contralesional hemisphere. Permanence of healthy hemisphere hyperactivation in chronic phase after stroke is usually index of little functional recovery and is correlated with a greater ipsilateral structural damage.
Robot-mediated physical therapy is an innovative rehabilitation technique that is effective in stroke patients. In this study, the investigators will add a non-invasive brain stimulation protocol with Transcranial stimulation with direct current (tDCS) to the robotic treatment in chronic stroke patients. tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that is able to modulate cortical excitability. The hypothesis is that dual t-DCS (ipsilesional excitation and concomitant contralesional inhibition) could restore interhemispheric balance improving the benefits of robotic therapy with Armeo Power®.
Detailed description
The general theory of the inhibitory interhemispheric competition speculates that, under physiological conditions, the two cerebral hemispheres find themselves in a state of balanced mutual inhibition. Accordingly, some electrophysiological and functional imaging studies have shown that a stroke with involvement of motor function leads to a reduced excitability in affected hemisphere M1 and to an increased excitability of contralateral M1. Stroke therefore might impair interhemispheric balance, leading to a decreased inhibition of contralesional hemisphere by ipsilesional hemisphere and, in turn, to an increased inhibition of ipsilesional hemisphere by contralesional hemisphere.
This imbalance in cerebral hemispheres excitability tends to decline over the functional recovery in the first months after stroke, in proportion to the functional recovery of the ipsilateral structures.
Alternatively, permanence of healthy hemisphere hyperactivation in chronic phase after stroke is usually index of little functional recovery and is correlated with a greater structural damage to the ipsilesional corticospinal tract and transcallosal fibers, although some studies have suggested a vicarious role of healthy hemisphere.
Recently, some authors have proposed a structural reserve-based bimodal model of recovery, for which the vicarious model would be valid only for patients with poor structural reserves (and therefore more extensive damage), while the interhemispheric competition model would be valid for patients with larger structural reserves.
In the light of these data, it is conceivable that procedures aiming at promoting the re-establishment of a normal balance in interhemispheric interaction can facilitate motor function recovery of the paretic limb, at least in patients with appropriate structural reserves.
Transcranial stimulation with direct current (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that uses low intensity electrical current at constant voltage and variable duration that is able to modulate cortical excitability efficiently, lastingly (with effects that begin during stimulation and that last for a few hours from the end of the stimulation) and safely in healthy subjects: moreover, it is able to produce changes of excitability in both directions (i.e. towards an increase and towards its reduction) in dependence of electrodes positioning on the scalp.
Specifically, t-DCS appears to induce metaplasticity phenomena, that is a polarity-dependent modulation of the response to subsequent synaptic potentiation protocols. Considering these results and the conclusions of a recent meta-analysis, it seems appropriate to expose a patient to t-DCS immediately before or in the early stage of intervention aiming at promoting synaptic plasticity, such as neuro-rehabilitation techniques.
Alongside the traditional physical therapy techniques, during the last twenty years many research groups around the world have started to develop robots supporting physical treatments.
A review on robot-mediated physical therapy clinical trials shows how this innovative rehabilitation technique is effective both in acute and chronic stroke patients, although it is not proven its superiority over traditional rehabilitation methods.
In this study, the investigators will use a robotic exoskeleton that allows targeted interventions on specific tasks in the three spatial dimensions; this robot, marketed under the name Armeo Power® (Hocoma AG, Switzerland), is one of the most advanced rehabilitation devices for the upper limb. The effectiveness of this tool has been demonstrated in a recent multicenter trial of chronic stroke patients with moderate-severe upper limb motor deficit.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits arising from the combination of dual t-DCS (ipsilesional excitation and contralesional inhibition) and robotic therapy with Armeo Power® in the treatment of chronic stroke patients with upper limb paralysis.
This study is a double blind randomized controlled trial in which chronic stroke patients with upper limb paresis undergone robotic treatment with Armeo Power® will be randomized to concomitant dual tDCS (excitatory on injured side and inhibitory on health side) o sham tDCS.
All patients will undergo an initial evaluation before starting treatment (between 30 and 15 days before the start) where it will be filled in a form with the medical history and the personal data and will be signed informed consent.
Once eligible, the patient will be subjected to a first clinical evaluation using validated scales, a kinematic evaluation of upper limb motor performance with ArmeoPower® and a neurophysiological evaluation.
At the end of the evaluation, every patient will be assigned through a randomized system to one of two study groups:
- Group A: robotic treatment with Armeo Power® associated with REAL dual tDCS (anodic on injured hemisphere, cathodic on healthy hemisphere) - 40 patients
- Group B: robotic treatment with Armeo Power® associated with SHAM dual tDCS - 40 patients
Immediately prior the start of treatment (time T-1), every participant will perform a second clinical assessment and kinematic evaluation and will begin treatment on the same day in the gym of the Private Department of Saint Lucia Foundation.
The ArmeoPower® device is an exoskeleton robot for upper limb rehabilitation able to allow the patients' execution of movements of proximal (shoulder-elbow movements) and distal (movements of the wrist) segments of upper limb.
Once the arms of the robot are adapted to patent's upper limb, the exoskeleton is mounted and set for defining the action areas and the volumes of exploration.
At the beginning of each session, ArmeoPower® exoskeleton will be mounted according to the patients' stored settings, which takes about 10 minutes.
Once mounted, it will proceed to real or sham tDCS stimulation, depending on the group the patient belong to.
Participants in group A will perform real dual tDCS stimulation immediately before each session of the robotic treatment, while patients in group B will perform the treatment with robotics platform with the same intensity and duration of group A but preceded by sham dual tDCS stimulation.
Real dual tDCS stimulation requires the application of the anode over the injured motor cortex (M1) and of the cathode on the healthy motor cortex (M1), so as to simultaneously perform an excitability suppression of healthy hemisphere and an activation of the ischemic cortex.
Motor cortex will be simultaneously stimulated at an intensity equal to 1-2 mA and for a maximum duration of 20 minutes. Sham dual t-DCS requires the application of the electrodes in the same positions and for the same duration, but without the delivery of electrical stimulation.
The robotic rehabilitation treatment will be started immediately after the end of stimulation, and the actual treatment will last for 30 minutes. The robot is able to relieve the weight of the arm and assisting the patient during motor execution. The patient sees on a monitor the targets upon which he should move the effector and executes the movement through the active assistance of the robot, which compensates the patient's motor deficits. Videogame-based exercises and functional training exercises of daily life activities are carried out with visual, acoustic and performance feedback. A physical therapist with a specific training certificate is always present during the sessions, with 1:1 ratio with patients.
Each patient will perform 5 sessions per week for two consecutive weeks, after which will be performed clinical, kinematic and neurophysiological evaluations expected to T0; the patient will then be re-evaluated in follow-up at one month (T1) and at 3 months after the end of treatment (T2), with clinical and kinematic assessments.
Data will be analyzed using parametric statistics if will appear to be normally distributed (based on Kolgomorov-Smirnov test with Lilliefors correction), in particular by applying a two-way mixed model analysis of variance (with an intra- and inter-factor between subjects). If the data won't appear to be normally distributed, they will be analyzed using Friedman's analysis for the intra-subject variations, and by Mann-Whitney u-test for variations between the two groups. The level of significance will be set at 0.05 for all analysis, except for post-hoc to which is applied the Bonferroni correction.
Guidelines for the safe use of non-invasive brain stimulation (Wassermann, 1998) will be respected; the participants should be able to signed an informed consent.
There are not literature report of adverse events or contraindications with regard to the use of ArmeoPower® robotics platform, except for patients with severe deformities of the paretic upper limb, that are excluded from this study. Data on patients will be anonymous and stored with password protection. There will be no samples of biological material, drug delivery, healthy volunteers or animals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Real tDCS | Experimental | Device: Real dual tDCS + Robotic Arm Therapy |
| Sham tDCS | Sham comparator | Device: SHAM tDCS + Robotic Arm Therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects with isolated ischemic stroke, confirmed by brain imaging (MRI, CT)
- subjects who retain sufficient cognitive functions and language to follow the instructions given by doctors and therapists
- subjects with basal Modified Ashworth Scale score under 3
- subjects with basal Fugl-Meyer score ≥ 3 so that they are not completely paralyzed
- subjects who have signed informed consent to participate in this study
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- subjects with chronic paretic limb deformities
- subjects with complete and flaccid paralysis of all motor performances of shoulder and elbow;
- subjects with severe hemineglect (Pizzamiglio battery for unilateral spatial neglect including letter cancellation test, barrage tests, reading and Wundt-Jastro area illusion test; patients diagnosed with neglect if 3 of 4 items of this battery are present)
- subjects showing an increase in the Fugl-Meyer more than 2.1 points in the second pre-treatment clinical evaluation, compared to the score of the first evaluation
- subjects with contraindications to the execution of transcranial magnetic stimulation - TMS - (pacemakers, metal implants)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Real dual tDCS + Robotic Arm TherapyDual tDCS (anodic on injured hemisphere, cathodic on healthy hemisphere). Motor cortex will be simultaneously stimulated at an intensity equal to 1-2 mA and for a maximum duration of 20 minutes just before 30 minutes of arm robotic task oriented treatment performed with an exoskeleton device (Armeo Power). The intervention will be performed 5 times per week for 2 consecutive weeks. | Device | Real tDCS |
| SHAM tDCS + Robotic Arm TherapySHAM bilateral tDCS for a maximum duration of 20 minutes just before 30 minutes of arm robotic task oriented treatment performed with an exoskeleton device (Armeo Power). The intervention will be performed 5 times per week for 2 consecutive weeks. | Device | Sham tDCS |
Primary outcome
Significant Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) improvement in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Time frame: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training and at 1 and 3 months follow-up
5 secondary outcomes
Significant Modified Ashworth scale improvement in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Time frame: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training and at 1 and 3 months follow-up
Significant Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) improvement in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Time frame: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training and at 1 and 3 months follow-up
Significant Barthel index improvement in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Time frame: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training and at 1 and 3 months follow-up
Significant kinematic performance improvement, measured by ArmeoPower®, in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Time frame: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training
Significant rebalancing of motor evoked potential (MEP) laterality index in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group
Time frame: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2022.
- Background: PubMed 1996881Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJ, Brooks DJ, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RS. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1991 Jan;29(1):63-71. doi: 10.1002/ana.410290112.
- Background: PubMed 9448645Cicinelli P, Traversa R, Rossini PM. Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2-4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Dec;105(6):438-50. doi: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00052-0.
- BackgroundKinsbourne, M. (1974). Mechanisms of hemispheric interaction in man. In Hemispheric Disconnection and Cerebral Function, M. Kinsbourne, and W. Smith, eds. (Springfield: Charles C Thomas).
- Background: PubMed 9412643Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, Kennedy DN, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997 Dec;28(12):2518-27. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2518.
- Background: PubMed 25194451Cunningham DA, Machado A, Janini D, Varnerin N, Bonnett C, Yue G, Jones S, Lowe M, Beall E, Sakaie K, Plow EB. Assessment of inter-hemispheric imbalance using imaging and noninvasive brain stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.419. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
- Background: PubMed 12842718Delvaux V, Alagona G, Gerard P, De Pasqua V, Pennisi G, de Noordhout AM. Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jul;114(7):1217-25. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00070-1.
- Background: PubMed 18165149Di Lazzaro V, Pilato F, Dileone M, Profice P, Capone F, Ranieri F, Musumeci G, Cianfoni A, Pasqualetti P, Tonali PA. Modulating cortical excitability in acute stroke: a repetitive TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;119(3):715-723. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.049. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
- Background: PubMed 25201238Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, Capone F, Ferreri F, Formica D, Ranieri F, Tombini M, Ziemann U, Rothwell JC, Di Lazzaro V. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Oct;10(10):597-608. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.162. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
- Background: PubMed 16084737Duque J, Hummel F, Celnik P, Murase N, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke. Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):940-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.033. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
- Background: PubMed 16364955Gerloff C, Bushara K, Sailer A, Wassermann EM, Chen R, Matsuoka T, Waldvogel D, Wittenberg GF, Ishii K, Cohen LG, Hallett M. Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain. 2006 Mar;129(Pt 3):791-808. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh713. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
- Background: PubMed 24457190Grefkes C, Fink GR. Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Feb;13(2):206-16. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70264-3.
- Background: PubMed 16857577Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol. 2006 Aug;5(8):708-12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70525-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Symptomatic Carotid Outcomes Registry
Carotid Stenosis, Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingPhase 3
Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of an Augmented Reality-Based Mirror Therapy System in Patients With Stroke
Stroke
Recruiting
A Pivotal Study Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Adaptative Tip Catheter in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Role of EEG in Differentiation Between Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Acute Haemorrhagic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stefano Paolucci study director
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia, Roma
Vincenzo Di Lazzaro study director
Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Real dual tDCS + Robotic Arm Therapy in people with Stroke and Paresis, run by I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Significant Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) improvement in real dual tDCS group vs sham tDCS group (time frame: first assessment will occur within 2 days from enrollment, and will be repeated within 2 days from the end of 2 week-training and at 1 and 3 months follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03026712, which also lists 37 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2022.