Young Older AdultsPreventITNCT03065088
The PreventIT Trial in Young Older Adults, Comparing Two Lifestyle-integrated Exercise Interventions
A study testing aLIFE and eLIFE in people with Young Older Adults, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 3 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The feasibility randomised controlled trial is part of the EU funded project "PreventIT" (2016-2018) responding to the Horizon 2020, Personalised health and care (PHC), call PHC-21: Advancing active and healthy ageing with ICT: Early risk detection and intervention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 61 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Young Older Adults
- What is being tested?
- aLIFE and eLIFE
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Feb 2017to 31 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 61 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- born in the years 1947-1956
- Retired (more than 6 months, <50% paid/unpaid work)
- Home-dwelling
- Able to read newspaper or text on smartphone
- Speak Norwegian/Dutch/German
- Able to walk 500 m without walking aids
- Available for home visits the following 6 weeks
- Defined "at risk" for functional decline by the risk screening instrument developed in the PreventIT project
Who cannot join
- Current participation in an organised exercise class >1 per week or moderate-intensity physical activity ≥150 min/week in the previous 3 months
- Travels planned >2mths during follow-up
- Cognitive impairment (MOCA <24 points)
- Medical conditions:
- Heart failure New York Heart Function Assessment (NYHA) class III and IV
- Acute myocardial infarction last 6 months or unstable angina
Show all 22Show fewer
- Pericarditis, myocarditis, endocarditis in the last 6 months
- Symptomatic aortic stenosis
- Cardiomyopathy
- Resting blood pressures of a systolic >180 or diastolic >100 or higher
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Gold class III and IV
- Uncontrolled Asthma (at least 2 exacerbation in the last 6 months)
- Amputated lower extremities
- On active cancer treatment during last 6 months
- Ankylosing spondylitis
- History of schizophrenia
- Parkinsons disease
- Recently diagnosed Cerebrovascular Accident (<6 months)
- Epilepsy (treated with medication)
- Severe rheumatic arthritis interfering with mobility
- Fracture of lumbar spine / thoracic spine or lower extremity in the last 6 months
- 3 fractures in the last 2 years due to severe osteoporosis
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 3 countries.
3 sites in 3 countries
Netherlands1 site
MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam Center on Aging
Amsterdam
About this study
Official title: The PreventIT Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial in Young Older Adults, Comparing Two Lifestyle-integrated Exercise Interventions Delivered by Use of ICT or an Instructor, With a Control Group
The feasibility randomised controlled trial is part of the EU funded project "PreventIT" (2016-2018) responding to the Horizon 2020, Personalised health and care (PHC), call PHC-21: Advancing active and healthy ageing with ICT: Early risk detection and intervention. The PreventIT project focuses on a new behaviour change activity approach for young older adults (61-70 years of age) with an overall aim of early prevention of functional decline and to empower people to take care of their own health.
Read the detailed description
In this feasibility randomised controlled trial two interventions are compared with a control group. The aLiFE programme includes instructor and paper manual delivery of life-style integrated activities, while the eLiFE programme delivers the same activities by use of smartphone and smartwatch applications. The control group is asked to follow the World Health Organisation's physical activity recommendations.
The main aim is to assess feasibility of the aLiFE and eLiFE programmes and a second aim to suggest sample size and design for a future Phase III clinical trial.
OBJECTIVES: How is the feasibility of having young older adults (between 61-70 years) to perform the aLiFE and eLiFE interventions.
Specifically:
- Participation: How is the adherence of specific activities and to the entire aLiFE and eLiFE interventions of young older adults?
- Technology: How is the feasibility and usability of the eLiFE intervention delivered using smartphones and smartwatches as platform, regarding user interface, goal setting, feedback, motivational messages, and social interaction?
- Outcome measures: How is the risk reduction of functional decline, measured by the Later Life Function and Disability Instrument and behavioural complexity, for the aLiFE and the eLiFE interventions compared to a control group, and what are the estimates of effect sizes for the primary and secondary study outcome measure?
- Health economics evaluation: Is it feasible to collect data on, and estimate, health care resource utilization, costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and model incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of aLiFE, eLiFE compared with the control group over a 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month time horizon?
The study is approved by the three ethical sites prior to study start.
(October 3rd, 2017) The final Data Analysis Plan has been closed before the start of the first post-test assessment in the PreventIT feasibility RCT, starting on the 4th of October 2017.
- Conditions
- Young Older Adults
- Being tested
- aLIFE, eLIFE, control
- Keywords
- Exercise, Feasibility Studies, Healthy Lifestyle, Health Promotion, Health Behavior, Aging, Activities of Daily Living, Mobile Applications
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity, Health Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
aLIFEBehavioural
The aLiFE programme is taught by an instructor during six home visits and 3 phone calls during the 6-month intervention period. The programme will be personalised by use of an initial balance and strength assessment (aLiFE assessment tool). The participants assigns activities to his or her daily activities, and during subsequent home visits, the number of activities and task demands are upgraded. Participants will be taught how to select opportunities themselves to embed activities into their individual daily routine, and how to progress over time.
eLIFEBehavioural
The eLIFE includes a personalised ICT-administered training schedule using the activities developed in aLiFE, delivered in the form of video clips, pictures and text/verbal instructions on a smartphone and smartwatch application. Personalisation of activity content will be decided based on a phenotype tool and initial difficulty level is decided through the aLiFE assessment tool. In addition, a virtual instructor teaches the participants how to carry out the eLiFE programme. The user receives motivational messages and feedback, and there will be a possibility for social interaction between the participants. The instructors teach the eLiFE participants the programme during 4 home visits and 3 phone calls during the 6 month intervention period.
controlBehavioural
The control group follows the World Health Organization's recommendations of physical activity. The control participants will receive one home visit and be given a written letter with the activity recommendations.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| aLiFE | Experimental | The aLiFE programme is developed for young older adults, where balance activities, strengthening activities, and specific recommendations for increasing physical activity, are embedded within everyday activities, so that the activities can be performed multiple times throughout the day. The programme is presented by an instructor by use of a paper based manual during a 6 month intervention period in participants homes. Receives: Behavioral: aLIFE |
| eLiFE | Experimental | The aLiFE programme is transferred to a mobile health system, called the eLiFE. The intervention is delivered on smartphones and smartwatches including inertial sensors well suited to monitor physical activity and movement quality in daily life. An instructor teaches the participants how to use the mobile health system during home visits and phone calls during the 6 month intervention period. A virtual instructor teaches the participants the eLiFE programme. Pictures and videos of the aLiFE activities are delivered by use of the system. Behavioural change strategies are also included in the system. Receives: Behavioral: eLIFE |
| control | Active comparator | The control group follows the World Health Organization's recommendations of physical activity. Receives: Behavioral: control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self-reported function and disability
Measured using the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI)
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Behavioural complexity metric
A composite measure of physical activity, sleep, and social participation, measured by a unitless scale. Physical activity and sleep is objectively measured by activity monitors worn at the lower back and the wrist, while social interaction is assessed as phone calls.
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (34)
Balance and mobility
Assessed by the Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB\&M)
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Static balance
Assessed by the Eight Level Balance Scale
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Gait speed
will be measured during a 4 m walk at usual pace and 7m walk at usual and fast pace
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Grip Strength
will be measured by the JAMAR dynamometer (kg)
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Functional Leg Strength
assessed by the 5-chair stand
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Cognitive function
assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tool (MoCA)
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Mood
Self-reported by use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Fear of falling
short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (short FESI)
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Health related quality of life
as assessed by the EuroQol - EQ-5D-5L
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Health related quality of life
as assessed by the Short Form Quality of Life (SF-12)
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Instrumented functional strength
Instrumented 30sec chair stand
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Instrumented standing balance
Instrumented Static balance
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Instrumented mobility
Instrumented Time up and go test (iTUG)
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Number of participants completing the different parts of the study
Flow of participants during the study (number of completers and drop outs at different phases of the study)
Measured: Screening, baseline, 6 months, and 12 months follow up
Adverse Events
Numbers, description, and severity reported by the assessors and instructors
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 12 months
Experience with the interventions, including motivation and behaviour change
7-point Likert Scale
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Experience with the interventions, including motivation and behaviour change
Focus group interview
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Process evaluation
Focus group interview
Measured: 12 months
Technology evaluation
the System Usability Scale
Measured: 6 months and 12 month follow up
Technology evaluation
the Telehealthcare Satisfaction Questionnaire
Measured: 6 months and 12 month follow up
Attendance and adherence intervention
Single question every four week (email or mail)
Measured: From date of first home visit until the date of the 12 month follow-up, assessed up to 12 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
Short Form Quality of Life (SF-12)
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
EuroQol - EQ-5D-5L
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Cost-effectiveness
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs)
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Acceptance of self-administered tests
Self-assessment test battery for physical function
Measured: Baseline and 12 month follow up
Accelerometer Collected percentages of sedentary time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected duration of sedentary time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected intensity (metabolic equivalent) of sedentary time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected percentages of walking time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected duration of walking time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected intensity (metabolic equivalent) of walking time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected percentages of active time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected duration of active time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected intensity (metabolic equivalent) of active time during 7 days
Objectively measured by activity monitors
Measured: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2017
- Study start28 Feb 2017
- Primary completion31 Aug 2018
- Study completion31 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Young Older AdultsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a feasibility study run as a randomised controlled trial (RCT). This is a multi-centre trial with three centres, Trondheim, Amsterdam, and Stuttgart, with two behaviour change exercise programmes (aLiFE and eLiFE) and a control group, with a 6 months intervention period and 6 month follow up.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- VU University of Amsterdam, Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung mbH (RBMF), University of Bologna, University of Manchester, Local Centre Health Unit Tuscany, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Doxee S.p.A., Health Leads BV
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jorunn Helbostad, phd prof, Study director, Norwegian Universitiy of Science and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03065088
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016/1891
- Acronym
- PreventIT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Taraldsen K, Mikolaizak AS, Maier AB, Boulton E, Aminian K, van Ancum J, Bandinelli S, Becker C, Bergquist R, Chiari L, Clemson L, French DP, Gannon B, Hawley-Hague H, Jonkman NH, Mellone S, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Pijnappels M, Schwenk M, Todd C, Yang FB, Zacchi A, Helbostad JL, Vereijken B. Protocol for the PreventIT feasibility randomised controlled trial of a lifestyle-integrated exercise intervention in young older adults. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e023526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023526.
PubMed 30898801Mikolaizak AS, Taraldsen K, Boulton E, Gordt K, Maier AB, Mellone S, Hawley-Hague H, Aminian K, Chiari L, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Pijnappels M, Todd C, Vereijken B, Helbostad JL, Becker C. Impact of adherence to a lifestyle-integrated programme on physical function and behavioural complexity in young older adults at risk of functional decline: a multicentre RCT secondary analysis. BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 5;12(10):e054229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054229.
PubMed 36198449Taraldsen K, Mikolaizak AS, Maier AB, Mellone S, Boulton E, Aminian K, Becker C, Chiari L, Follestad T, Gannon B, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Pijnappels M, Saltvedt I, Schwenk M, Todd C, Yang FB, Zacchi A, van Ancum J, Vereijken B, Helbostad JL. Digital Technology to Deliver a Lifestyle-Integrated Exercise Intervention in Young Seniors-The PreventIT Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Digit Health. 2020 Jul 31;2:10. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.00010. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 34713023Gordt K, Nerz C, Mikolaizak AS, Taraldsen K, Pijnappels M, Helbostad JL, Vereijken B, Becker C, Schwenk M. Sensitivity to Change and Responsiveness of the Original and the Shortened Version of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale for Young Seniors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov;102(11):2102-2108. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.036. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
PubMed 33932360
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The PreventIT Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial in Young Older Adults, Comparing Two Lifestyle-integrated Exercise Interventions Delivered by Use of ICT or an Instructor, With a Control Group
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03065088
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PreventIT / 2016/1891
- Conditions
- Young Older Adults
- Keywords
- Exercise, Feasibility Studies, Healthy Lifestyle, Health Promotion, Health Behavior, Aging, Activities of Daily Living, Mobile Applications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- VU University of Amsterdam, Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung mbH (RBMF), University of Bologna, University of Manchester, Local Centre Health Unit Tuscany, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Doxee S.p.A., Health Leads BV
- Study start
- 28 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The feasibility randomised controlled trial is part of the EU funded project "PreventIT" (2016-2018) responding to the Horizon 2020, Personalised health and care (PHC), call PHC-21: Advancing active and healthy ageing with ICT: Early risk detection and intervention. The PreventIT project focuses on a new behaviour change activity approach for young older adults (61-70 years of age) with an overall aim of early prevention of functional decline and to empower people to take care of their own health.
Detailed description
In this feasibility randomised controlled trial two interventions are compared with a control group. The aLiFE programme includes instructor and paper manual delivery of life-style integrated activities, while the eLiFE programme delivers the same activities by use of smartphone and smartwatch applications. The control group is asked to follow the World Health Organisation's physical activity recommendations.
The main aim is to assess feasibility of the aLiFE and eLiFE programmes and a second aim to suggest sample size and design for a future Phase III clinical trial.
OBJECTIVES: How is the feasibility of having young older adults (between 61-70 years) to perform the aLiFE and eLiFE interventions.
Specifically:
- Participation: How is the adherence of specific activities and to the entire aLiFE and eLiFE interventions of young older adults?
- Technology: How is the feasibility and usability of the eLiFE intervention delivered using smartphones and smartwatches as platform, regarding user interface, goal setting, feedback, motivational messages, and social interaction?
- Outcome measures: How is the risk reduction of functional decline, measured by the Later Life Function and Disability Instrument and behavioural complexity, for the aLiFE and the eLiFE interventions compared to a control group, and what are the estimates of effect sizes for the primary and secondary study outcome measure?
- Health economics evaluation: Is it feasible to collect data on, and estimate, health care resource utilization, costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and model incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of aLiFE, eLiFE compared with the control group over a 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month time horizon?
The study is approved by the three ethical sites prior to study start.
(October 3rd, 2017) The final Data Analysis Plan has been closed before the start of the first post-test assessment in the PreventIT feasibility RCT, starting on the 4th of October 2017.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a feasibility study run as a randomised controlled trial (RCT). This is a multi-centre trial with three centres, Trondheim, Amsterdam, and Stuttgart, with two behaviour change exercise programmes (aLiFE and eLiFE) and a control group, with a 6 months intervention period and 6 month follow up.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| aLiFE | Experimental | Behavioral: aLIFEThe aLiFE programme is developed for young older adults, where balance activities, strengthening activities, and specific recommendations for increasing physical activity, are embedded within everyday activities, so that the activities can be performed multiple times throughout the day. The programme is presented by an instructor by use of a paper based manual during a 6 month intervention period in participants homes. |
| eLiFE | Experimental | Behavioral: eLIFEThe aLiFE programme is transferred to a mobile health system, called the eLiFE. The intervention is delivered on smartphones and smartwatches including inertial sensors well suited to monitor physical activity and movement quality in daily life. An instructor teaches the participants how to use the mobile health system during home visits and phone calls during the 6 month intervention period. A virtual instructor teaches the participants the eLiFE programme. Pictures and videos of the aLiFE activities are delivered by use of the system. Behavioural change strategies are also included in the system. |
| control | Active comparator | Behavioral: controlThe control group follows the World Health Organization's recommendations of physical activity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 61 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- born in the years 1947-1956
- Retired (more than 6 months, <50% paid/unpaid work)
- Home-dwelling
- Able to read newspaper or text on smartphone
- Speak Norwegian/Dutch/German
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Current participation in an organised exercise class >1 per week or moderate-intensity physical activity ≥150 min/week in the previous 3 months
- Travels planned >2mths during follow-up
- Cognitive impairment (MOCA <24 points)
- Medical conditions:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| aLIFEThe aLiFE programme is taught by an instructor during six home visits and 3 phone calls during the 6-month intervention period. The programme will be personalised by use of an initial balance and strength assessment (aLiFE assessment tool). The participants assigns activities to his or her daily activities, and during subsequent home visits, the number of activities and task demands are upgraded. Participants will be taught how to select opportunities themselves to embed activities into their individual daily routine, and how to progress over time. | Behavioural | aLiFE |
| eLIFEThe eLIFE includes a personalised ICT-administered training schedule using the activities developed in aLiFE, delivered in the form of video clips, pictures and text/verbal instructions on a smartphone and smartwatch application. Personalisation of activity content will be decided based on a phenotype tool and initial difficulty level is decided through the aLiFE assessment tool. In addition, a virtual instructor teaches the participants how to carry out the eLiFE programme. The user receives motivational messages and feedback, and there will be a possibility for social interaction between the participants. The instructors teach the eLiFE participants the programme during 4 home visits and 3 phone calls during the 6 month intervention period. | Behavioural | eLiFE |
| controlThe control group follows the World Health Organization's recommendations of physical activity. The control participants will receive one home visit and be given a written letter with the activity recommendations. | Behavioural | control |
Primary outcome
Self-reported function and disability
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Measured using the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI)
Behavioural complexity metric
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
A composite measure of physical activity, sleep, and social participation, measured by a unitless scale. Physical activity and sleep is objectively measured by activity monitors worn at the lower back and the wrist, while social interaction is assessed as phone calls.
34 secondary outcomes
Balance and mobility
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Static balance
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Gait speed
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Grip Strength
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Functional Leg Strength
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Cognitive function
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Mood
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Fear of falling
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Health related quality of life
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Health related quality of life
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Instrumented functional strength
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Instrumented standing balance
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Instrumented mobility
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Number of participants completing the different parts of the study
Time frame: Screening, baseline, 6 months, and 12 months follow up
Adverse Events
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 months
Experience with the interventions, including motivation and behaviour change
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Experience with the interventions, including motivation and behaviour change
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Process evaluation
Time frame: 12 months
Technology evaluation
Time frame: 6 months and 12 month follow up
Technology evaluation
Time frame: 6 months and 12 month follow up
Attendance and adherence intervention
Time frame: From date of first home visit until the date of the 12 month follow-up, assessed up to 12 months
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 month follow up
Acceptance of self-administered tests
Time frame: Baseline and 12 month follow up
Accelerometer Collected percentages of sedentary time during 7 days
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected duration of sedentary time during 7 days
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected intensity (metabolic equivalent) of sedentary time during 7 days
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected percentages of walking time during 7 days
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected duration of walking time during 7 days
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected intensity (metabolic equivalent) of walking time during 7 days
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected percentages of active time during 7 days
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected duration of active time during 7 days
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Accelerometer Collected intensity (metabolic equivalent) of active time during 7 days
Time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 30898801Taraldsen K, Mikolaizak AS, Maier AB, Boulton E, Aminian K, van Ancum J, Bandinelli S, Becker C, Bergquist R, Chiari L, Clemson L, French DP, Gannon B, Hawley-Hague H, Jonkman NH, Mellone S, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Pijnappels M, Schwenk M, Todd C, Yang FB, Zacchi A, Helbostad JL, Vereijken B. Protocol for the PreventIT feasibility randomised controlled trial of a lifestyle-integrated exercise intervention in young older adults. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e023526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023526.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36198449Mikolaizak AS, Taraldsen K, Boulton E, Gordt K, Maier AB, Mellone S, Hawley-Hague H, Aminian K, Chiari L, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Pijnappels M, Todd C, Vereijken B, Helbostad JL, Becker C. Impact of adherence to a lifestyle-integrated programme on physical function and behavioural complexity in young older adults at risk of functional decline: a multicentre RCT secondary analysis. BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 5;12(10):e054229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054229.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34713023Taraldsen K, Mikolaizak AS, Maier AB, Mellone S, Boulton E, Aminian K, Becker C, Chiari L, Follestad T, Gannon B, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Pijnappels M, Saltvedt I, Schwenk M, Todd C, Yang FB, Zacchi A, van Ancum J, Vereijken B, Helbostad JL. Digital Technology to Deliver a Lifestyle-Integrated Exercise Intervention in Young Seniors-The PreventIT Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Digit Health. 2020 Jul 31;2:10. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.00010. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33932360Gordt K, Nerz C, Mikolaizak AS, Taraldsen K, Pijnappels M, Helbostad JL, Vereijken B, Becker C, Schwenk M. Sensitivity to Change and Responsiveness of the Original and the Shortened Version of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale for Young Seniors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov;102(11):2102-2108. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.036. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Young Older Adults
Recruiting
Effects of Baduanjin Exercise on Improving Health in Sedentary Young and Middle-Aged Adults
Sedentary Lifestyle, Behavioral Intervention
Not yet recruiting
OPTIMAL Motor Learning in Table Tennis: A fNIRS Study
Motor Learning, Aging
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study in Young People and Adults to Learn About the Medicine Ritlecitinib for Treatment of Patchy Hair Loss, Known by the Medical Term as Moderate Alopecia Areata
Alopecia Areata
RecruitingObservational study
Validation of the D-TAP Parental Questionnaire for Early Screening of Pediatric Feeding Disorder in Hospitalized Children Aged 8 to 18 Months
Pediatric Feeding Disorder, Feeding Difficulties in Infants and Young Children
Not yet recruiting
Co-Designed Digital Education and Peer Support for Young and Middle-Aged Stroke Survivors
Stroke, Stroke (6 Months or More After Onset)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jorunn Helbostad, phd prof study director
Norwegian Universitiy of Science and Technology
3 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing aLIFE and eLIFE in people with Young Older Adults, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 3 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Germany, Netherlands, Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self-reported function and disability (time frame: Change; baseline, 6 months and 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03065088, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2019.