Heart FailureNCT03127852
Effects of Remote Patient Monitoring on Chronic Disease Management
A study testing Medly in people with Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Remote patient monitoring is a potential component for the management of chronic conditions that may provide reliable and real-time physiological measurements for clinical decision support, alerting, and patient self-management. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease
- What is being tested?
- Medly
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 23 Aug 2016to 15 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All participants:
- Adults (age 18 years or older)
- Diagnosed with HF, COPD, CKD, and/or uncontrolled hypertension (individuals with diabetes who require blood glucose monitoring will be included as a co-morbidity only if patient's have at least one of the above four chronic illnesses, and will be in the form of self-care support only)
- Patient or their caregiver speaks and reads English adequately to provide informed consent and understand the text prompts in the application.
- Ability to comply with using the telemonitoring system (e.g, able to stand on the weight scale, able to answer symptom questions, etc.).
- Primary chronic disease-specific criteria:
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients with HF as the primary chronic disease: with reduced ejection fraction (EF<0.40)
- Patients with COPD as the primary chronic disease: Spirometrically confirmed diagnosis of COPD of GOLD Stage II or higher (defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1 < 80% predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio < 70%); smoking history of ≥ 20 pack-years or homozygous alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency; and prescribed an action plan for the early self-treatment of acute exacerbations
- Patients with CKD as the primary chronic disease: Grade 3-5 (eGFR < 60mL/1.73 m2)
- Patients with uncontrolled hypertension as the primary chronic disease: For non-diabetics: blood pressure >=140/90 mmHg auscultatory (manual measurement) or >=135/85 mmHg oscillometric (automated measurement). For diabetics: blood pressure >=130/80 mmHg
Who cannot join
- Patients on mechanical circulatory support
- Patients on the heart transplant list
- Terminal diagnosis with life expectancy < 1 year
- Dementia or uncontrolled psychiatric illness
- Resident of a long term care facility
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mobile Phone-based Telemonitoring Application for Self-management and Clinical Decision Support for Patients With Complex Chronic Conditions
Remote patient monitoring is a potential component for the management of chronic conditions that may provide reliable and real-time physiological measurements for clinical decision support, alerting, and patient self-management. The purpose of this study is to evaluate an UHN-built remote monitoring system for patients with complex chronic conditions called Medly.
Read the detailed description
Remote patient monitoring is a potential component for the management of chronic conditions that may provide reliable and real-time physiological measurements for clinical decision support, alerting, and patient self-management. The purpose of this study is to evaluate an UHN-built remote monitoring system for patients with complex chronic conditions called Medly. Patients with complex chronic conditions will be provided with a mobile phone and commercial home medical devices, such as a blood pressure monitor and weight scale. The measurements from the medical devices will be automatically sent to the mobile phone, and from there to a data server at the hospital for analysis and storage. Both clinicians and patients will be able to access these data and will be sent alerts by the system if the measurements are outside of the normal range. The system will be evaluated through interviews and comparing outcomes between the intervention and control groups.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Uncontrolled Hypertension, Diabetes
- Being tested
- Medly
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MedlyDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Telemonitoring (Medly) | Experimental | The telemonitoring technology will enable patients with complex chronic illnesses, to take clinically relevant physiological measurements with wireless home medical devices and to answer symptom questions on the mobile phone. The measurements will be automatically and wirelessly transmitted to the mobile phone and then to a data server. Automated self-care instructions/messages will be sent to the patient based on the readings and reported symptoms. If there are signs of their status deteriorating, an alert will be sent to a clinician that is responsible for the particular chronic condition of concern. The clinicians will have all the relevant patient data sent to them and will be able to access (through a secure web portal) to view historical and trending data for their patients. Receives: Device: Medly |
| Control | No intervention | Standard of care: Patients are followed in a specialty care clinic treating their primary conditions. Patients typically have scheduled appointments every six months. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Life as Measured by SF-36
Change in Quality of life as measured by the Short Form (36) Health Survey. The SF-36 assesses participants' overall quality of life in eight domains 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 contribute to the physical component summary (PCS) score, and items 5-8 contribute to the mental component summary (MCS) score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Self-reported Health Service Use
Number of hospitalizations, number of ED and clinic visits, and family physician visits.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months
Self-Care of Health Failure as Measured by the SCHFI
Self-care of health failure as measured by the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI). The SCFHI has three scales: maintenance, management, confidence with each scale score is standardized to a 0 to 100 range with 0 indicating the worst and 100 indicating the best performance for each scale score.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months
Heart-failure Specific Quality of Life (MLHFQ)
Heart-failure specific quality of life as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). The MLHFQ provides a total score (score range 0-105), as well as scores for two dimensions, physical (score range 0-40) and emotional (score range 0-25). A lower total score is indicative of better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months
Anxiety and Depression as Measured by HADS
Anxiety and depression as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS has two sub-scales for anxiety and depression. Each sub-scale has scores ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety/depression.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months
Self-efficacy as Measured by the SEMCD6.
Self-efficacy as measured by the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item scale (SEMCD6). Each item on the scale is rated from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). The final score for the scale is the mean of the six items with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2017
- Study start23 Aug 2016
- Primary completion20 Jun 2020
- Study completion15 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Health Network, TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03127852
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15-9995
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ware P, Shah A, Ross HJ, Logan AG, Segal P, Cafazzo JA, Szacun-Shimizu K, Resnick M, Vattaparambil T, Seto E. Challenges of Telemonitoring Programs for Complex Chronic Conditions: Randomized Controlled Trial With an Embedded Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 26;24(1):e31754. doi: 10.2196/31754.
PubMed 35080502Seto E, Ware P, Logan AG, Cafazzo JA, Chapman KR, Segal P, Ross HJ. Self-Management and Clinical Decision Support for Patients With Complex Chronic Conditions Through the Use of Smartphone-Based Telemonitoring: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Nov 21;6(11):e229. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8367.
PubMed 29162557
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mobile Phone-based Telemonitoring Application for Self-management and Clinical Decision Support for Patients With Complex Chronic Conditions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03127852
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15-9995
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Uncontrolled Hypertension, Diabetes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Aug 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Remote patient monitoring is a potential component for the management of chronic conditions that may provide reliable and real-time physiological measurements for clinical decision support, alerting, and patient self-management. The purpose of this study is to evaluate an UHN-built remote monitoring system for patients with complex chronic conditions called Medly.
Detailed description
Remote patient monitoring is a potential component for the management of chronic conditions that may provide reliable and real-time physiological measurements for clinical decision support, alerting, and patient self-management. The purpose of this study is to evaluate an UHN-built remote monitoring system for patients with complex chronic conditions called Medly. Patients with complex chronic conditions will be provided with a mobile phone and commercial home medical devices, such as a blood pressure monitor and weight scale. The measurements from the medical devices will be automatically sent to the mobile phone, and from there to a data server at the hospital for analysis and storage. Both clinicians and patients will be able to access these data and will be sent alerts by the system if the measurements are outside of the normal range. The system will be evaluated through interviews and comparing outcomes between the intervention and control groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Telemonitoring (Medly) | Experimental | Device: MedlyThe telemonitoring technology will enable patients with complex chronic illnesses, to take clinically relevant physiological measurements with wireless home medical devices and to answer symptom questions on the mobile phone. The measurements will be automatically and wirelessly transmitted to the mobile phone and then to a data server. Automated self-care instructions/messages will be sent to the patient based on the readings and reported symptoms. If there are signs of their status deteriorating, an alert will be sent to a clinician that is responsible for the particular chronic condition of concern. The clinicians will have all the relevant patient data sent to them and will be able to access (through a secure web portal) to view historical and trending data for their patients. |
| Control | No intervention | –Standard of care: Patients are followed in a specialty care clinic treating their primary conditions. Patients typically have scheduled appointments every six months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Adults (age 18 years or older)
- Diagnosed with HF, COPD, CKD, and/or uncontrolled hypertension (individuals with diabetes who require blood glucose monitoring will be included as a co-morbidity only if patient's have at least one of the above four chronic illnesses, and will be in the form of self-care support only)
- Patient or their caregiver speaks and reads English adequately to provide informed consent and understand the text prompts in the application.
- Ability to comply with using the telemonitoring system (e.g, able to stand on the weight scale, able to answer symptom questions, etc.).
- Patients with HF as the primary chronic disease: with reduced ejection fraction (EF<0.40)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients on mechanical circulatory support
- Patients on the heart transplant list
- Terminal diagnosis with life expectancy < 1 year
- Dementia or uncontrolled psychiatric illness
- Resident of a long term care facility
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medly | Device | Telemonitoring (Medly) |
Primary outcome
Quality of Life as Measured by SF-36
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change in Quality of life as measured by the Short Form (36) Health Survey. The SF-36 assesses participants' overall quality of life in eight domains 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 contribute to the physical component summary (PCS) score, and items 5-8 contribute to the mental component summary (MCS) score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
5 secondary outcomes
Self-reported Health Service Use
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Self-Care of Health Failure as Measured by the SCHFI
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Heart-failure Specific Quality of Life (MLHFQ)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Anxiety and Depression as Measured by HADS
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Self-efficacy as Measured by the SEMCD6.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35080502Ware P, Shah A, Ross HJ, Logan AG, Segal P, Cafazzo JA, Szacun-Shimizu K, Resnick M, Vattaparambil T, Seto E. Challenges of Telemonitoring Programs for Complex Chronic Conditions: Randomized Controlled Trial With an Embedded Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 26;24(1):e31754. doi: 10.2196/31754.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29162557Seto E, Ware P, Logan AG, Cafazzo JA, Chapman KR, Segal P, Ross HJ. Self-Management and Clinical Decision Support for Patients With Complex Chronic Conditions Through the Use of Smartphone-Based Telemonitoring: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Nov 21;6(11):e229. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8367.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medly in people with Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Aug 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Life as Measured by SF-36 (time frame: Baseline, 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03127852, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2023.