AzTrials
AzTrials

PolypsNCT03146052

Comparison Between Asymmetric And Standard Split-Dose Regimen For Bowel Preparation

A study testing PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl in people with Polyps and Colon Preparation, run by ASST Rhodense at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We aimed to compare the efficacy for bowel cleansing of a split-dose regimen with a low morning dose of PEG solution (Asymmetric; 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure and 75% of the dose is given on the day before) with the standard split-dose regimen in patients undergoing screening and surveillance… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Polyps, Colon Preparation
What is being tested?
PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
81 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
27 Mar 2017to 5 May 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients scheduled as outpatient for screening or surveillance colonoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Inpatients
  • refusal of split dose regimen for bowel preparation
  • previous history of colorectal resection
  • severe cardiac disease
  • advanced (stage IV and V) chronic kidney disease
  • pregnancy; ileus
Show all 9Show fewer
  • suspected bowel obstruction or toxic megacolon
  • known inflammatory bowel disease
  • known or suspected allergy to PEG.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • ASST Rhodense

    Garbagnate Milanese, Lombardy, 20020

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Comparison Between Asymmetric (Low Dose In The Morning) And Standard Split-Dose Regimen Of Polyethylene Glycol Plus Bisacodyl For Bowel Preparation For Screening And Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.

We aimed to compare the efficacy for bowel cleansing of a split-dose regimen with a low morning dose of PEG solution (Asymmetric; 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure and 75% of the dose is given on the day before) with the standard split-dose regimen in patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy using a low volume bowel preparation (2L PEG-citrate-simethicone plus Bisacodyl). We enrolled consecutive outpatients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy in a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to: group A, asymmetric split dose regimen (1,5 L of PEG + bisacodyl the day before and 0,5 L 4 hours before colonoscopy); group B, symmetric split dose regimen (1 L of PEG + bisacodyl the day before and 1 L 5 hours before colonoscopy). Primary endpoint was the proportion of adequate bowel cleansing. Moreover, all patients filled in a nurse-administered questionnaire assessing compliance, tolerability and safety of bowel preparation.

Read the detailed description

Prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial in adult patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Eligible participants were randomly assigned, according to a computer-generated list with an allocation ratio of 1:1, to receive either asymmetric or symmetric split-dose regimen of a low-volume preparation by investigators who were not involved in the enrolment process. Detailed written instructions were administered to all patients who accepted to participate. A low-fiber diet was prescribed three day before colonoscopy; participants in both groups were instructed to have a light lunch on the day before the colonoscopy and only clear liquid were allowed on the day of the exam. All endoscopic procedures were scheduled between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM.

The preparation used in the study is a combination of a 2 L sulphate-free iso-osmotic formulation of of PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) (Lovol-esse; AlfaWassermann, Bologna, Italy. Kit contains 4 pouches, each containing 64.5gr of PEG, to be dissolved in 2 L of water.), and bisacodyl 5 mg tablets (Lovodyl; Alfa-Wassermann, Bologna, Italy).

All subjects were instructed to take 4 bisacodyl tablets at 4:00 PM on the day before the procedure. Subjects allocated to the asymmetric split-dose regimen group were invited to consume at 6:00 PM on the evening before the colonoscopy 3 sachets of PEG-CS in 1,5 L of water in a range from 90 to 120 minutes (about 250 mL every 15 min) and 4 hours before the scheduled procedure 1 sachets in 0,5 L of water in a range from 15 to 30 minutes. Subjects allocated to the symmetric split-dose regimen group were invited to consume at 6:00 PM on the evening before the colonoscopy 2 sachets of PEG-CS in 1 L of water in a range from 60 to 90 minutes and 5 hours before the scheduled procedure 2 sachets in 1 L of water in a range from 60 to 90 minutes.

Unblinded investigators collected demographic and clinical data with medical history. All patients filled in a nurse-administered questionnaire to assess compliance, tolerability and safety of bowel preparation.

Blinded experencied endoscopists performed endoscopic procedure in accordance with colonoscopy quality practice. Data on bowel cleansing (evaluated by using Boston Bowel Preparation Scale), endoscopic procedures and findings (i.e. cancer, polyps, diverticula) were collected.

Being tested
PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl
Keywords
Colon cleansing
Medical subject headings
Polyps

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus BisacodylDrug

    PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) (Kit contains 4 pouches, each containing 64.5gr of PEG) and bisacodyl 5 mg tablets

Study groups in NCT03146052
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Asymmetric split dose preparationExperimental75% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure
Receives: Drug: PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl
Symmetric split dose preparationActive comparator50% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 50% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure
Receives: Drug: PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of bowel prepreparation

    Quality of bowel prepreparation/cleanliness scored using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Each segment of the colon received a score from 0 to 3, and these segment scores were summed for a total BBPS score ranging from 0 to 9. The preparation was considered adequate when BBPS score was ≥ 6 with a score with at least 2 points in any segment

    Measured: 2 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Adenoma detection rate

    rate of patients with at least one adenoma

    Measured: 2 days

  2. Rate of the occurrence of adverse events

    Rate of the occurrence of adverse events (bad taste in mouth, gastric fullness, nausea or vomiting, bloating, abdominal pain, headache)

    Measured: 2 days

  3. Compliance

    Compliance was assessed by the amount of intake of study agents using a 3-point scale: 1 (100% intake), 2 (≥ 75% intake), and 3 (< 75% intake).

    Measured: 2 days

  4. Tolerability

    Tolerability was evaluated assessing how patient finds tolerable the bowel preparation by using a 4-point scale: 1 (Easy), 2 (Acceptable), 3 (Somewhat difficult), 4 (Very difficult).

    Measured: 2 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2017
  2. Study start27 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion5 May 2017
  4. Study completion5 May 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
81 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03146052
Sponsor's protocol ID
165-032017
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
5 May 2017
Last updated
9 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Andreozzi P, De Nucci G, Bezzio C, Arena I, Devani M, Mandelli E, Morganti D, Omazzi B, Reati R, Redaelli D, Saibeni S, Manes G. Comparison of asymmetric (low morning-dose) and standard split-dose regimen of PEG plus bisacodyl for bowel preparation: A randomized controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Jun;51(6):837-842. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

    PubMed 30658942

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl in people with Polyps and Colon Preparation, run by ASST Rhodense at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of bowel prepreparation (time frame: 2 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03146052, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT03146052 | AzTrials