AzTrials
AzTrials

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)NCT03227380

Morphologic Study of the Intersegmental Plane After Fully Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy

A study testing thoracic densitometry with contrast in people with Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and Segmentectomy, run by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris at 2 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to determine whether stapling adversely affects the pulmonary parenchyma and the vascularisation of the adjacent segments. The aim of our work is to explore by thoracic densitometry with contrast the spared segments after stapling of the intersegmental plan following a thoracoscopic… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
thoracic densitometry with contrast
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
31 Mar 2017to 30 Aug 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Enrolment in the study will be offered to all patients having undergone a programmed scheduled video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy, whatever the aetiology.
  • Men or women aged 18 years or greater
  • Absence of severe hepatic insufficiency
  • signed and dated informed consent
  • candidate for segmentectomy
  • Registration in a national healthcare system.
  • Women of child-bearing age using effective oral or barrier contraception

Who cannot join

  • Proven intolerance to iodinated contrast agents
  • Know allergy or non-controlled asthma - pregnancy
  • Severe hepatic insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 30ml/min, by Cockroft's method)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients under trusteeship or curators
  • Diabetic patients or patients receiving oral antidiabetic medication

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Agathe SEGUIN-GIVELET, MD contact

0156616240

agathe.seguin-givelet@imm.fr

France2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Institut Mutualiste montsouris

    Paris, 75014

    Recruiting
  • Institut mutualiste montsouris

    Paris, 75014

    Isabelle SAURET

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

The objective of this study is to determine whether stapling adversely affects the pulmonary parenchyma and the vascularisation of the adjacent segments. The aim of our work is to explore by thoracic densitometry with contrast the spared segments after stapling of the intersegmental plan following a thoracoscopic segmentectomy, 3 or 6 months post-surgery. the investigator will assess venous drainage and the arterial vascularisation of the remaining segments, possible modifications of the adjacent parenchyma and whether there is a defect of pleuro-pulmonary adhesion (residual pneumothorax).

Read the detailed description

Scheduled anatomical segmentectomies are increasingly popular, due to the development of minimally invasive techniques, the increased incidence of early-stage tumours, and the possibility of caring for patients with compromised health and/or limited respiratory function without compromising the oncological outcome, compared to current alternatives such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (1).

One of the challenges in the development of the thoracoscopic segmentectomy technique we have published (2-5) is the orientation (6-7) and the division of the intersegmental plane, by contrast to segmentectomy by thoracotomy where this is helped by palpation and the manual traction which can be used on the segment, along the intersegmental vein. The most commonly used technique to separate two adjacent segments remains stapling, despite its high cost and sometimes giving a less anatomical section, with a risk to encroach on the intersegmental vein. Moreover, there can be a partial plicator of the spared segment(s) which could in theory make them less functional.

We have however shown that the postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were much lower than that of patients who had a thoracotomy, dropping from 42% for thoracotomies to 16% for thoracoscopies, the surgical approach being an independent predictive factor for postoperative complications (8).

Being tested
thoracic densitometry with contrast

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • thoracic densitometry with contrastOther

    injected CT scan at 3 or 6 months after segmentectomy VATS

Study groups in NCT03227380
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
radiological evaluationOtherto explore by thoracic densitometry with contrast the spared segments after stapling of the intersegmental plan following a thoracoscopic segmentectomy
Receives: Other: thoracic densitometry with contrast

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The measure of the remaining segments after stapling the intersegmental plane by injected CT scan

    The aim of investigators work is to explore by thoracic densitometry with contrast the spared segments after stapling of the intersegmental plan following a thoracoscopic segmentectomy, from 3 to 6 months post-surgery. The investigators will assess venous drainage and the arterial vascularisation of the remaining segments, possible modifications of the adjacent parenchyma and whether there is a defect of pleuro-pulmonary adhesion (residual pneumothorax).

    The radiological evaluation criteria will be:

    • Presence and quantification of a defect in pulmonary expansion (residual pneumothorax)
    • Abnormal venous and arterial vascularisation of the remaining segments
    • Defect of the pulmonary parenchyma in contact with the staples line (atelectasis, vascularisation defect)

    Measured: 3 or 6 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jul 2017
  2. Study start31 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion20 Feb 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
patients undergo anatomic segmentectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03227380
Sponsor's protocol ID
THO-2016-01
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
19 Jun 2017
Last updated
24 Jul 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing thoracic densitometry with contrast in people with Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and Segmentectomy, run by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Agathe SEGUIN-GIVELET, MD (0156616240, agathe.seguin-givelet@imm.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The measure of the remaining segments after stapling the intersegmental plane by injected CT scan (time frame: 3 or 6 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in