Cardiac CatheterizationPhase 2NCT03243942
Noninvasive, Subharmonic Intra-Cardiac Pressure Measurement
A Phase 2 study testing Definity in people with Cardiac Catheterization and Blood Pressure, run by Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The fundamental hypothesis of this project is that real-time intracardiac pressures can be monitored and quantified noninvasively in humans using a novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound technique called subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE).This study will use contrast echocardiography to assess the accuracy of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Catheterization, Blood Pressure, Heart Ventricles
- What is being tested?
- Definity
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2017to 26 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be scheduled for a cardiac catheterization procedure
- Adult patients over the age of 21
- Acceptable baseline echocardiographic images in the supine position
- If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
- Provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Clinically unstable patients, e.g., those who are clinically in decompensated heart failure or having active chest pain or presenting for admission with an unstable anginal syndrome
- Patients in whom introduction of a catheter into the left ventricle is contraindicated or would potentially be dangerous, e.g., patients with active ventricular arrhythmias or with significant aortic valve stenosis where crossing the aortic valve may be difficult and not clinically necessary
- Patients with anatomic right-to-left, bi-directional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts where Definity could traverse as a bolus
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to Definity
- Females who are pregnant or nursing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Thomas Jefferson University and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
About this study
The fundamental hypothesis of this project is that real-time intracardiac pressures can be monitored and quantified noninvasively in humans using a novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound technique called subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE).This study will use contrast echocardiography to assess the accuracy of SHAPE compared to simultaneously acquired intracardiac pressures measured invasively during cardiac catheterization. This study is designed to verify that contrast echocardiography using the SHAPE method, already proven in a canine model and tested in a human pilot study can be used as a surrogate for cardiac catheterization with sufficient accuracy to allow clinical applicability in humans.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Catheterization, Blood Pressure, Heart Ventricles, Echocardiography, Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Definity
- Keywords
- pressure measurements, blood pressure, contrast echocardiography, ventricular pressures, catheterization
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DefinityDrug
Whenever a patient undergoes cardiac catheterization, which routinely includes intracardiac pressure monitoring using a pressure catheter, as part of their standard clinical care and agrees to participate in the study, we will acquire research data. With Definity infusion, SHAPE algorithm will be initiated to determine optimum acoustic pressure. Then, at the optimum acoustic pressure SHAPE specific data will be acquired from the cardiac chambers and aorta synchronously with the pressures recorded by the catheter (as a part of the patient's standard of care). After acquiring the ultrasound imaging data, the remainder of the heart catheterization will be completed by the attending cardiologist according to the patients' standard of care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Definity for pressure measurements | Experimental | 2 vials of activated Definity mixed with 50 ml saline. As per manufacturer's recommendation the infusion rate may vary between 4-10 ml/min (to provide diagnostic intracardiac contrast visibility). Receives: Drug: Definity |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Agreement between SHAPE and pressure catheter measurements
Correlation
Measured: up to 1 day
Error between SHAPE and pressure catheter measurements
ANOVA/Post-hoc comparisons
Measured: up to 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2017
- Study start1 Jun 2017
- Primary completion26 Jun 2019
- Study completion26 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiac CatheterizationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Thomas Jefferson UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Thomas Jefferson University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Heart Association, Lantheus Medical Imaging
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jaydev Dave, Thomas Jefferson University
- Investigators
- Jaydev Dave, Principal investigator, Thomas Jefferson University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03243942
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15SDG25740015
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 3 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: This project will generate pressure values in the aorta, and left and right ventricles using the proposed research method (i.e., SHAPE) and using the standard of care (i.e., catheter based pressure values). Additionally peripheral and central pressures will be generated. All of the pressure values will be made available. Further, all ultrasound data obtained for SHAPE measurements will be made available after anonymizing the data-set to remove any patient information.
Publications
Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Leung C, Forsberg F. Noninvasive estimation of dynamic pressures in vitro and in vivo using the subharmonic response from microbubbles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011 Oct;58(10):2056-66. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.2056.
PubMed 21989870Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Forsberg F. Processing of subharmonic signals from ultrasound contrast agents to determine ambient pressures. Ultrason Imaging. 2012 Apr;34(2):81-92. doi: 10.1177/016173461203400202.
PubMed 22724314Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Merton DA, Liu JB, Machado P, Zhao H, Park S, Dianis S, Chalek CL, Thomenius KE, Brown DB, Forsberg F. On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation. Ultrasonics. 2013 Apr;53(4):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
PubMed 23347593Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Raichlen JS, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Wang S, Leung C, Forsberg F. Subharmonic microbubble emissions for noninvasively tracking right ventricular pressures. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012 Jul;303(1):H126-32. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00560.2011. Epub 2012 May 4.
PubMed 22561300Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Raichlen JS, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Wang S, Leung C, Forsberg F. Noninvasive LV pressure estimation using subharmonic emissions from microbubbles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.08.017.
PubMed 22239898Eisenbrey JR, Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Merton DA, Miller C, Gonzalez JM, Machado P, Park S, Dianis S, Chalek CL, Kim CE, Baliff JP, Thomenius KE, Brown DB, Navarro V, Forsberg F. Chronic liver disease: noninvasive subharmonic aided pressure estimation of hepatic venous pressure gradient. Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):581-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121769. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
PubMed 23525208Forsberg F, Liu JB, Shi WT, Furuse J, Shimizu M, Goldberg BB. In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Apr;52(4):581-3. doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2005.1428040.
PubMed 16060506Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Leodore LM, Eisenbrey JR, Park S, Hall AL, Thomenius K, Forsberg F. Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions. Ultrason Imaging. 2011 Jul;33(3):153-64. doi: 10.1177/016173461103300301.
PubMed 21842580Shi WT, Forsberg F, Raichlen JS, Needleman L, Goldberg BB. Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Feb;25(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00163-x.
PubMed 10320317Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Eisenbrey JR, Machado P, Zhao H, Liu JB, Merton DA, Forsberg F. Subharmonic aided pressure estimation for monitoring interstitial fluid pressure in tumours--in vitro and in vivo proof of concept. Ultrasonics. 2014 Sep;54(7):1938-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 May 6.
PubMed 24856899Esposito C, Machado P, McDonald ME, Savage MP, Fischman D, Mehrotra P, Cohen IS, Ruggiero N 2nd, Walinsky P, Vishnevsky A, Dickie K, Davis M, Forsberg F, Dave JK. Noninvasive Evaluation of Cardiac Chamber Pressures Using Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation With Definity Microbubbles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Feb;16(2):224-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.09.013. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
PubMed 36648035Esposito C, Machado P, Cohen IS, Mehrotra P, Savage M, Fischman D, Davis M, Ruggiero N, Walinsky P, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Forsberg F, Dave JK. Comparing Central Aortic Pressures Obtained Using a SphygmoCor Device to Pressures Obtained Using a Pressure Catheter. Am J Hypertens. 2022 May 10;35(5):397-406. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac010.
PubMed 35079778
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Noninvasive, Subharmonic Intra-Cardiac Pressure Measurement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03243942
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15SDG25740015
- Conditions
- Cardiac Catheterization, Blood Pressure, Heart Ventricles, Echocardiography, Heart Failure
- Keywords
- pressure measurements, blood pressure, contrast echocardiography, ventricular pressures, catheterization
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Thomas Jefferson UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Heart Association, Lantheus Medical Imaging
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The fundamental hypothesis of this project is that real-time intracardiac pressures can be monitored and quantified noninvasively in humans using a novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound technique called subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE).This study will use contrast echocardiography to assess the accuracy of SHAPE compared to simultaneously acquired intracardiac pressures measured invasively during cardiac catheterization. This study is designed to verify that contrast echocardiography using the SHAPE method, already proven in a canine model and tested in a human pilot study can be used as a surrogate for cardiac catheterization with sufficient accuracy to allow clinical applicability in humans.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Definity for pressure measurements | Experimental | Drug: Definity2 vials of activated Definity mixed with 50 ml saline. As per manufacturer's recommendation the infusion rate may vary between 4-10 ml/min (to provide diagnostic intracardiac contrast visibility). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Be scheduled for a cardiac catheterization procedure
- Adult patients over the age of 21
- Acceptable baseline echocardiographic images in the supine position
- If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
- Provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Clinically unstable patients, e.g., those who are clinically in decompensated heart failure or having active chest pain or presenting for admission with an unstable anginal syndrome
- Patients in whom introduction of a catheter into the left ventricle is contraindicated or would potentially be dangerous, e.g., patients with active ventricular arrhythmias or with significant aortic valve stenosis where crossing the aortic valve may be difficult and not clinically necessary
- Patients with anatomic right-to-left, bi-directional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts where Definity could traverse as a bolus
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to Definity
- Females who are pregnant or nursing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DefinityWhenever a patient undergoes cardiac catheterization, which routinely includes intracardiac pressure monitoring using a pressure catheter, as part of their standard clinical care and agrees to participate in the study, we will acquire research data. With Definity infusion, SHAPE algorithm will be initiated to determine optimum acoustic pressure. Then, at the optimum acoustic pressure SHAPE specific data will be acquired from the cardiac chambers and aorta synchronously with the pressures recorded by the catheter (as a part of the patient's standard of care). After acquiring the ultrasound imaging data, the remainder of the heart catheterization will be completed by the attending cardiologist according to the patients' standard of care. | Drug | Definity for pressure measurements |
Primary outcome
Agreement between SHAPE and pressure catheter measurements
Time frame: up to 1 day
Correlation
Error between SHAPE and pressure catheter measurements
Time frame: up to 1 day
ANOVA/Post-hoc comparisons
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2019.
- Background: PubMed 21989870Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Leung C, Forsberg F. Noninvasive estimation of dynamic pressures in vitro and in vivo using the subharmonic response from microbubbles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011 Oct;58(10):2056-66. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.2056.
- Background: PubMed 22724314Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Forsberg F. Processing of subharmonic signals from ultrasound contrast agents to determine ambient pressures. Ultrason Imaging. 2012 Apr;34(2):81-92. doi: 10.1177/016173461203400202.
- Background: PubMed 23347593Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Merton DA, Liu JB, Machado P, Zhao H, Park S, Dianis S, Chalek CL, Thomenius KE, Brown DB, Forsberg F. On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation. Ultrasonics. 2013 Apr;53(4):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
- Background: PubMed 22561300Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Raichlen JS, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Wang S, Leung C, Forsberg F. Subharmonic microbubble emissions for noninvasively tracking right ventricular pressures. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012 Jul;303(1):H126-32. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00560.2011. Epub 2012 May 4.
- Background: PubMed 22239898Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Eisenbrey JR, Raichlen JS, Liu JB, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Wang S, Leung C, Forsberg F. Noninvasive LV pressure estimation using subharmonic emissions from microbubbles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.08.017.
- Background: PubMed 23525208Eisenbrey JR, Dave JK, Halldorsdottir VG, Merton DA, Miller C, Gonzalez JM, Machado P, Park S, Dianis S, Chalek CL, Kim CE, Baliff JP, Thomenius KE, Brown DB, Navarro V, Forsberg F. Chronic liver disease: noninvasive subharmonic aided pressure estimation of hepatic venous pressure gradient. Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):581-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121769. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
- Background: PubMed 16060506Forsberg F, Liu JB, Shi WT, Furuse J, Shimizu M, Goldberg BB. In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Apr;52(4):581-3. doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2005.1428040.
- Background: PubMed 21842580Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Leodore LM, Eisenbrey JR, Park S, Hall AL, Thomenius K, Forsberg F. Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions. Ultrason Imaging. 2011 Jul;33(3):153-64. doi: 10.1177/016173461103300301.
- Background: PubMed 10320317Shi WT, Forsberg F, Raichlen JS, Needleman L, Goldberg BB. Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Feb;25(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00163-x.
- Background: PubMed 24856899Halldorsdottir VG, Dave JK, Eisenbrey JR, Machado P, Zhao H, Liu JB, Merton DA, Forsberg F. Subharmonic aided pressure estimation for monitoring interstitial fluid pressure in tumours--in vitro and in vivo proof of concept. Ultrasonics. 2014 Sep;54(7):1938-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 May 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36648035Esposito C, Machado P, McDonald ME, Savage MP, Fischman D, Mehrotra P, Cohen IS, Ruggiero N 2nd, Walinsky P, Vishnevsky A, Dickie K, Davis M, Forsberg F, Dave JK. Noninvasive Evaluation of Cardiac Chamber Pressures Using Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation With Definity Microbubbles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Feb;16(2):224-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.09.013. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35079778Esposito C, Machado P, Cohen IS, Mehrotra P, Savage M, Fischman D, Davis M, Ruggiero N, Walinsky P, McDonald ME, Dickie K, Forsberg F, Dave JK. Comparing Central Aortic Pressures Obtained Using a SphygmoCor Device to Pressures Obtained Using a Pressure Catheter. Am J Hypertens. 2022 May 10;35(5):397-406. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac010.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. This project will generate pressure values in the aorta, and left and right ventricles using the proposed research method (i.e., SHAPE) and using the standard of care (i.e., catheter based pressure values). Additionally peripheral and central pressures will be generated. All of the pressure values will be made available. Further, all ultrasound data obtained for SHAPE measurements will be made available after anonymizing the data-set to remove any patient information.
Related trials for Cardiac Catheterization
Not yet recruiting
NHLBI SESAME (SEptal Scoring Along Midline Endocardium) Multi-Center Prospective Study Using Improvised Off-Label Devices
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
Not yet recruiting
Novel Wearable Device for Heart Failure Management
Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
Propofol-Ketamine Versus Sevoflurane for Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization
Propofol, Ketamine
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Cardiac Index Measurement Using Right Ventricular Pressure Curve Analysis and Thermodilution Via a Swan-Ganz IQ™ Catheter.
Septic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Artificial Intelligence-assisted Evaluation of Pulmonary HYpertension
Pulmonary Hypertension, Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jaydev Dave principal investigator
Thomas Jefferson University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Definity in people with Cardiac Catheterization and Blood Pressure, run by Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Agreement between SHAPE and pressure catheter measurements (time frame: up to 1 day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03243942, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2019.