Neoplasms PancreaticPhase 2NCT03245658
The Effect of Cannabis in Pancreatic Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing THC and CBD Mixture in people with Neoplasms Pancreatic and Cachexia; Cancer, run by Jens Rikardt Andersen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Cannabinoids are known to increase appetite, but THC components have psychogenic properties too. CBD is the main component in the plant, and have only minimal psychogenic effects. The aim was to test the appetite stimulating effects of CBD in patients with pancreatic cancer in palliative treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasms Pancreatic, Cachexia; Cancer, Cannabis
- What is being tested?
- THC and CBD Mixture
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 6 Oct 2017to 6 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult, palliative pancreatic cancer diagnosis, weight loss > 5%, understand and read Danish.
Who cannot join
- Regular use of cannabis, psychiatric disorders, alcohol abuse, life expectancy < 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Department of clinical oncology, Næstved-Roskilde Hospital
Næstved, 4700
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Medical Cannabis Inpatients With Palliative Pancreatic Cancer
Cannabinoids are known to increase appetite, but THC components have psychogenic properties too. CBD is the main component in the plant, and have only minimal psychogenic effects. The aim was to test the appetite stimulating effects of CBD in patients with pancreatic cancer in palliative treatment.
Read the detailed description
Randomization of consecutive patients who wanted to participate to a daily dose of CBD or not as a supplement to the standard treatment.
- Conditions
- Neoplasms Pancreatic, Cachexia; Cancer, Cannabis, Appetite Loss, Palliative Medicine, Morbidity
- Being tested
- THC and CBD Mixture
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms, Cachexia, Neoplasms, Marijuana Abuse, Anorexia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
THC and CBD MixtureDrug
Also called Medical cannabis oral drops
Individually titrated doses on daily basis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| THC and CBD Mixture | Experimental | 32 patients with palliative pancreatic cancer, intervention with oral drops of THC, 25mg/ml and CBD 50mg/ml, daily administered for 4 weeks Receives: Drug: THC and CBD Mixture |
| Control | No intervention | 32 patients with palliative pancreatic cancer, no experimental treatment, |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Energy and protein intake
Dietary history (% of estimated needs - NRS 2002)
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Secondary outcomes (12)
Lean body mass
Bioimpedance (% of body weight, kg)
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Appetite 1
VAS (cm on 10 cm scale)
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Appetite 2
Dietary history (VAS (cm on 10 cm scale))
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Appetite 3
EORTC QLQ-C30 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Appetite 4
EORTC QLQ-PAN26 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Quality of life 1
EORTC QLQ-C30 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Quality of life 2
EORTC QLQ-PAN26 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Quality of life 3
VAS (VAS (cm on 10 cm scale))
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Pain 1
EORTC QLQ-C30 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Pain 2
EORTC QLQ-PAN26 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Pain 3
VAS (VAS (cm on 10 cm scale))
Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Mortality (8 weeks)
Patient records, national register
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2017
- Study start6 Oct 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion6 May 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion6 Oct 2018 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Organization was changed. The staff was relocated.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neoplasms PancreaticStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jens Rikardt Andersen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jens Rikardt Andersen, University of Copenhagen
- Investigators
- Jens Rikardt Andersen, MD, MPA, Principal investigator, University of Copenhagen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03245658
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-17000277
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 21 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Perras C. Sativex for the management of multiple sclerosis symptoms. Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2005 Sep;(72):1-4.
PubMed 16317825Gartner S, Kruger J, Aghdassi AA, Steveling A, Simon P, Lerch MM, Mayerle J. Nutrition in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review. Gastrointest Tumors. 2016 May;2(4):195-202. doi: 10.1159/000442873. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
PubMed 27403414Ware MA, Daeninck P, Maida V. A review of nabilone in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Feb;4(1):99-107. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1132.
PubMed 18728826Grotenhermen F. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(4):327-60. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342040-00003.
PubMed 12648025Slatkin NE. Cannabinoids in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: beyond prevention of acute emesis. J Support Oncol. 2007 May;5(5 Suppl 3):1-9.
PubMed 17566383Johnson JR, Lossignol D, Burnell-Nugent M, Fallon MT. An open-label extension study to investigate the long-term safety and tolerability of THC/CBD oromucosal spray and oromucosal THC spray in patients with terminal cancer-related pain refractory to strong opioid analgesics. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):207-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
PubMed 23141881Johnson JR, Burnell-Nugent M, Lossignol D, Ganae-Motan ED, Potts R, Fallon MT. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of THC:CBD extract and THC extract in patients with intractable cancer-related pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Feb;39(2):167-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
PubMed 19896326Reuter SE, Martin JH. Pharmacokinetics of Cannabis in Cancer Cachexia-Anorexia Syndrome. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016 Jul;55(7):807-812. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0363-2.
PubMed 26883879Gamage TF, Lichtman AH. The endocannabinoid system: role in energy regulation. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Jan;58(1):144-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23367.
PubMed 22076835Fox KM, Brooks JM, Gandra SR, Markus R, Chiou CF. Estimation of Cachexia among Cancer Patients Based on Four Definitions. J Oncol. 2009;2009:693458. doi: 10.1155/2009/693458. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
PubMed 19587829Gullett N, Rossi P, Kucuk O, Johnstone PA. Cancer-induced cachexia: a guide for the oncologist. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2009 Fall;7(4):155-69.
PubMed 19883531Blum D, Omlin A, Fearon K, Baracos V, Radbruch L, Kaasa S, Strasser F; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative. Evolving classification systems for cancer cachexia: ready for clinical practice? Support Care Cancer. 2010 Mar;18(3):273-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0800-6.
PubMed 20076976
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Medical Cannabis Inpatients With Palliative Pancreatic Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03245658
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-17000277
- Conditions
- Neoplasms Pancreatic, Cachexia; Cancer, Cannabis, Appetite Loss, Palliative Medicine, Morbidity
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Organization was changed. The staff was relocated.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jens Rikardt AndersenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Oct 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 6 May 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 6 Oct 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cannabinoids are known to increase appetite, but THC components have psychogenic properties too. CBD is the main component in the plant, and have only minimal psychogenic effects. The aim was to test the appetite stimulating effects of CBD in patients with pancreatic cancer in palliative treatment.
Detailed description
Randomization of consecutive patients who wanted to participate to a daily dose of CBD or not as a supplement to the standard treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| THC and CBD Mixture | Experimental | Drug: THC and CBD Mixture32 patients with palliative pancreatic cancer, intervention with oral drops of THC, 25mg/ml and CBD 50mg/ml, daily administered for 4 weeks |
| Control | No intervention | –32 patients with palliative pancreatic cancer, no experimental treatment, |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult, palliative pancreatic cancer diagnosis, weight loss > 5%, understand and read Danish.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Regular use of cannabis, psychiatric disorders, alcohol abuse, life expectancy < 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| THC and CBD MixtureAlso: Medical cannabis oral dropsIndividually titrated doses on daily basis | Drug | THC and CBD Mixture |
Primary outcome
Energy and protein intake
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Dietary history (% of estimated needs - NRS 2002)
12 secondary outcomes
Lean body mass
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Appetite 1
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Appetite 2
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Appetite 3
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Appetite 4
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Quality of life 1
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Quality of life 2
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Quality of life 3
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Pain 1
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Pain 2
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Pain 3
Time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Mortality (8 weeks)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 16317825Perras C. Sativex for the management of multiple sclerosis symptoms. Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2005 Sep;(72):1-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 27403414Gartner S, Kruger J, Aghdassi AA, Steveling A, Simon P, Lerch MM, Mayerle J. Nutrition in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review. Gastrointest Tumors. 2016 May;2(4):195-202. doi: 10.1159/000442873. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 18728826Ware MA, Daeninck P, Maida V. A review of nabilone in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Feb;4(1):99-107. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1132.
- Results publication: PubMed 12648025Grotenhermen F. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(4):327-60. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342040-00003.
- Results publication: PubMed 17566383Slatkin NE. Cannabinoids in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: beyond prevention of acute emesis. J Support Oncol. 2007 May;5(5 Suppl 3):1-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 23141881Johnson JR, Lossignol D, Burnell-Nugent M, Fallon MT. An open-label extension study to investigate the long-term safety and tolerability of THC/CBD oromucosal spray and oromucosal THC spray in patients with terminal cancer-related pain refractory to strong opioid analgesics. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):207-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 19896326Johnson JR, Burnell-Nugent M, Lossignol D, Ganae-Motan ED, Potts R, Fallon MT. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of THC:CBD extract and THC extract in patients with intractable cancer-related pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Feb;39(2):167-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 26883879Reuter SE, Martin JH. Pharmacokinetics of Cannabis in Cancer Cachexia-Anorexia Syndrome. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016 Jul;55(7):807-812. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0363-2.
- Results publication: PubMed 22076835Gamage TF, Lichtman AH. The endocannabinoid system: role in energy regulation. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Jan;58(1):144-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23367.
- Results publication: PubMed 19587829Fox KM, Brooks JM, Gandra SR, Markus R, Chiou CF. Estimation of Cachexia among Cancer Patients Based on Four Definitions. J Oncol. 2009;2009:693458. doi: 10.1155/2009/693458. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 19883531Gullett N, Rossi P, Kucuk O, Johnstone PA. Cancer-induced cachexia: a guide for the oncologist. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2009 Fall;7(4):155-69.
- Results publication: PubMed 20076976Blum D, Omlin A, Fearon K, Baracos V, Radbruch L, Kaasa S, Strasser F; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative. Evolving classification systems for cancer cachexia: ready for clinical practice? Support Care Cancer. 2010 Mar;18(3):273-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0800-6.
- reviewLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neoplasms Pancreatic
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jens Rikardt Andersen, MD, MPA principal investigator
University of Copenhagen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing THC and CBD Mixture in people with Neoplasms Pancreatic and Cachexia; Cancer, run by Jens Rikardt Andersen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Energy and protein intake (time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03245658, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2023.