Critical IllnessNCT03250481
Responsiveness Index Versus the RASS Based Method for Adjusting Sedation in Critically Ill Patients
A study testing Propofol in people with Critical Illness, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 1 site in Finland.
Trial summary
Systematic evaluation of pain, agitation and delirium in ICU-patients is recommended and deep sedation should be avoided. Sedation is still monitored with clinical assessments, like RASS. The Responsiveness Index (RI) is a recently described method for ICU sedation monitoring. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Illness
- What is being tested?
- Propofol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFinland
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to 28 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Intensive care patients
- Need of mechanical ventilation and sedation
Who cannot join
- contraindication to propofol or oxycodone
- hypoxic or traumatic brain injury
- intracranial hemorrhage
- status epilepticus
- drug overdose as admission diagnosis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Systematic evaluation of pain, agitation and delirium in ICU-patients is recommended and deep sedation should be avoided. Sedation is still monitored with clinical assessments, like RASS. The Responsiveness Index (RI) is a recently described method for ICU sedation monitoring. It is based on processed frontal EMG and reflects the interaction between a patient's conscious state and the intensity and frequency of stimulations during treatment. RI has not been randomly compared to RASS to titrate sedation to target at a clinically adequate sedation state. In this open randomized controlled pilot study of 32 critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients, investigators will evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of RI based sedation compared to standard RASS based titration of sedation. Investigators hypothesize first that RI controlled sedation will be safe and, second that RI controlled sedation will associate with increased number of ventilator free days alive in 30 days without excess adverse events.
Read the detailed description
Sedation of intensive care patients is needed for patient's safety but deep sedation is associated with adverse outcomes. Frontal electromyogram based Responsiveness Index (RI) aims to quantify patient's arousal. RI monitoring together with staff education may have potential to improve sedation quality. Investigators will evaluate the safety of RI based sedation versus standard care using Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) for sedation.
Methods: randomized study, critically ill adult patients with mechanical ventilation and administration of sedation to either RI- or RASS-guided sedation. Propofol (and midazolam combined with if needed) as a hypnotic drug and oxycodone as an analgesic drug. Investigators will follow standardized sedation protocol in both groups to achieve the predetermined target sedation level: either RI 40-80 (RI-group) or RASS -3-0 (RASS group). RI measurement is continuous in both groups, but blinded in the RASS group. Accordingly, RI group is blinded to RASS assessments. State Entropy (SE) will register in both groups.
- Conditions
- Critical Illness
- Being tested
- Propofol
- Keywords
- Sedation, Responsiveness Index, Electromyogram
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PropofolDrug
Also called Oxycodone, Midazolame
Sedation targeted to RASS -3-0 or RI 20-40
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 'Sedation guidance with RASS-group | Active comparator | Sedation is guided with RASS. Targeted sedation level is RASS -3 - 0. Propofol: an initial rate of 2.4 mg/kg/h for one hour. Thereafter, the infusion rate of propofol is 0.8-4 mg/kg/h to reach or maintain the target RASS score. Propofol bolus of 20-40 mg is allowed. Oxycodone as 3-6 mg boluses for pain management. Other opiates are not allowed. Midazolam may given if the maximum dose of propofol is reached and pain management by oxycodone restricted achievement of the target sedation level. Midazolam will supply intravenously in boluses of 1-2 mg (based on the weight of the patient), starting at 3 boluses/h for the first hour. Dexmedetomidine and other sedatives are not allowed. Receives: Drug: Propofol |
| 'Sedation guidance with RI | Experimental | Sedation is guided with RI. Targeted sedation level is RI 40-80. Propofol: an initial rate of 2.4 mg/kg/h for one hour. Thereafter, the infusion rate of propofol is 0.8-4 mg/kg/h to reach or maintain the target RI score. Propofol bolus of 20-40 mg is allowed. Oxycodone as 3-6 mg boluses for pain management. Other opiates are not allowed. Midazolam may given if the maximum dose of propofol is reached and pain management by oxycodone restricted achievement of the target sedation level. Midazolam will supply intravenously in boluses of 1-2 mg (based on the weight of the patient), starting at 3 boluses/h for the first hour. Dexmedetomidine and other sedatives are not allowed. Receives: Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with sedation or sedation monitoring related predetermined adverse events
Predetermined adverse events hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, tachypnea, anxiety, unintended catheter removal, gas exchange deficiency, skin irritation caused by electrodes, hemodynamic instability
Measured: Up to 96 hours (starting when RI-monitoring begins)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Increased ventilator free days
Time alive without mechanical ventilation
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Aug 2017
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completion28 Aug 2017
- Study completion28 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Critical IllnessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Helsinki University Central HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ville Pettilä, Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Investigators
- Johanna Wennervirta, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 340, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03250481
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HelsinkiUCHFin
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Responsiveness Index Versus the RASS Based Method for Adjusting Sedation in Critically Ill Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03250481
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HelsinkiUCHFin
- Conditions
- Critical Illness
- Keywords
- Sedation, Responsiveness Index, Electromyogram
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Helsinki University Central HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Systematic evaluation of pain, agitation and delirium in ICU-patients is recommended and deep sedation should be avoided. Sedation is still monitored with clinical assessments, like RASS. The Responsiveness Index (RI) is a recently described method for ICU sedation monitoring. It is based on processed frontal EMG and reflects the interaction between a patient's conscious state and the intensity and frequency of stimulations during treatment. RI has not been randomly compared to RASS to titrate sedation to target at a clinically adequate sedation state. In this open randomized controlled pilot study of 32 critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients, investigators will evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of RI based sedation compared to standard RASS based titration of sedation. Investigators hypothesize first that RI controlled sedation will be safe and, second that RI controlled sedation will associate with increased number of ventilator free days alive in 30 days without excess adverse events.
Detailed description
Sedation of intensive care patients is needed for patient's safety but deep sedation is associated with adverse outcomes. Frontal electromyogram based Responsiveness Index (RI) aims to quantify patient's arousal. RI monitoring together with staff education may have potential to improve sedation quality. Investigators will evaluate the safety of RI based sedation versus standard care using Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) for sedation.
Methods: randomized study, critically ill adult patients with mechanical ventilation and administration of sedation to either RI- or RASS-guided sedation. Propofol (and midazolam combined with if needed) as a hypnotic drug and oxycodone as an analgesic drug. Investigators will follow standardized sedation protocol in both groups to achieve the predetermined target sedation level: either RI 40-80 (RI-group) or RASS -3-0 (RASS group). RI measurement is continuous in both groups, but blinded in the RASS group. Accordingly, RI group is blinded to RASS assessments. State Entropy (SE) will register in both groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 'Sedation guidance with RASS-group | Active comparator | Drug: PropofolSedation is guided with RASS. Targeted sedation level is RASS -3 - 0. Propofol: an initial rate of 2.4 mg/kg/h for one hour. Thereafter, the infusion rate of propofol is 0.8-4 mg/kg/h to reach or maintain the target RASS score. Propofol bolus of 20-40 mg is allowed. Oxycodone as 3-6 mg boluses for pain management. Other opiates are not allowed. Midazolam may given if the maximum dose of propofol is reached and pain management by oxycodone restricted achievement of the target sedation level. Midazolam will supply intravenously in boluses of 1-2 mg (based on the weight of the patient), starting at 3 boluses/h for the first hour. Dexmedetomidine and other sedatives are not allowed. |
| 'Sedation guidance with RI | Experimental | Drug: PropofolSedation is guided with RI. Targeted sedation level is RI 40-80. Propofol: an initial rate of 2.4 mg/kg/h for one hour. Thereafter, the infusion rate of propofol is 0.8-4 mg/kg/h to reach or maintain the target RI score. Propofol bolus of 20-40 mg is allowed. Oxycodone as 3-6 mg boluses for pain management. Other opiates are not allowed. Midazolam may given if the maximum dose of propofol is reached and pain management by oxycodone restricted achievement of the target sedation level. Midazolam will supply intravenously in boluses of 1-2 mg (based on the weight of the patient), starting at 3 boluses/h for the first hour. Dexmedetomidine and other sedatives are not allowed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Intensive care patients
- Need of mechanical ventilation and sedation
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- contraindication to propofol or oxycodone
- hypoxic or traumatic brain injury
- intracranial hemorrhage
- status epilepticus
- drug overdose as admission diagnosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PropofolAlso: Oxycodone, MidazolameSedation targeted to RASS -3-0 or RI 20-40 | Drug | 'Sedation guidance with RASS-group, 'Sedation guidance with RI |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with sedation or sedation monitoring related predetermined adverse events
Time frame: Up to 96 hours (starting when RI-monitoring begins)
Predetermined adverse events hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, tachypnea, anxiety, unintended catheter removal, gas exchange deficiency, skin irritation caused by electrodes, hemodynamic instability
1 secondary outcome
Increased ventilator free days
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Aug 2019.
Related trials for Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Lactate/Albumin Ratio and Mortality in Respiratory Failure
Acute Respiratory Failure, Critical Illness
RecruitingObservational study
Respiratory Physiotherapy and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Critically Ill Patients With Pneumonia
Pneumonia, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Capillary Refill Time Variation to Predict Oxygen Comsumption Variation After FLuid Challenge (CARTOFL)
Critically Ill Patients, Circulatory Shock
RecruitingPhase 4
CONTinuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Dosing of ceftaZidime/AVIbactam in Critically Ill Patients
Severe Infection
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility Study on the Use of a Walking Exoskeleton in the Intensive Care Unit
Neuromuscular Disease in Post-Intensive Care Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Johanna Wennervirta, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 340, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Propofol in people with Critical Illness, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 1 site in Finland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with sedation or sedation monitoring related predetermined adverse events (time frame: Up to 96 hours (starting when RI-monitoring begins)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2019.