AzTrials
AzTrials

Facial Injuries and DisordersPRPNCT03255681

PRP Administration in the Nasojugal Folds

A study testing PRP injections into nasojugal folds in people with Facial Injuries and Disorders, run by David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a cosmetic facial injectable filler to treat tear troughs deformities secondary to volume loss and skin laxity in the infra-orbital region. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Facial Injuries and Disorders
What is being tested?
PRP injections into nasojugal folds
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
31 Jan 2019to 1 Feb 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18
  • Patients with deepened tear troughs who are scheduled to receive PRP injections in DGMC Oral \& Maxillofacial Surgery clinic.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or nursing
  • History of any type of neuralgia or paresthesia, or paresis
  • Allergy or contraindication to lidocaine
  • Use of hyaluronic acid in last 12 months
  • Use of facial filler in last 12 months
  • Have an active inflammatory or infectious process at the injection site
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Documented bleeding dyscrasias to include thrombocytopenia or anemia, platelet or clotting factor disorders
  • Severe coronary artery disease
  • No history of facial trauma
  • No midface deformity or herniation of fat pads
  • Active use of aspirin or anticoagulants
  • History of keloids or hypertrophic scarring

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Filler for Treatment of Tear Trough Deformities

The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a cosmetic facial injectable filler to treat tear troughs deformities secondary to volume loss and skin laxity in the infra-orbital region. Patients will receive injections of PRP on the left side, and PRP with A VectraH1 3D camera will be used to quantify the volume of the infra-orbital region before treatment, at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post treatment. The objective is to quantify the amount of volume gained in the region as well as to assess duration of volumization after PRP treatment and also if volumization results are permanent.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine if PRP facial filler injections will provide effective long-term restoration of facial volume, specifically at the tear troughs. The study is a controlled trial. The attending surgeon and residents will perform the procedure. Pre-treatment photographs will be obtained of the patient using a VectraH1 3D head \& neck camera. The provider will complete PRP injections first on the left side followed by PRP with calcium chloride on the right side. At no point during the study will we deviate from the standard of care for treatment with PRP or PRP with CaCl2. 0.1cc of 10% calcium chloride per 1mL of platelet rich plasma will be mixed. The volume of PRP and will be used upon the discretion of provider for treatment of the cosmetic facial deformity.

One of the most common filler materials used today are hyaluronic acid derivatives [13]. While these types of fillers offer certain advantages over bovine and collagen derived materials that may require skin testing prior to treatment; they can be expensive and will require ongoing injections as they absorb [14]. Autogenous fillers such as autogenous fat can offer a permanent solution, which may therefore decrease the net cost compared to hyaluronic acid derived fillers, but has higher morbidity associated with the fat harvesting and transfer [15-17]. PRP as a filler material may be the least expensive option with the lowest morbidity even if the effects are not yet proven to be permanent.

To evaluate whether the PRP facial filler treatment provides long term restoration of facial volume, patients will return for additional photographs and data collection using the VectraH1 3D head \& neck camera at one, three, six and twelve months after treatment. The primary outcome will be the amount of facial volume achieved in the tear troughs, as assessed with the VectraH1 3D head \& neck camera and VECTRA Capture Analysis module software to measure volume differences (cm3) pre- and post-treatment.

The Canfield VectraH1 3D head \& neck camera is a high resolution device that captures the highest details and measures volume differences and contour changes of the face and neck. The camera allows for quantification of subsurface skin conditions using proprietary RBX® technology, allows for visualization of the degree of contour change with color distance mapping, allows for automated measurements to allow patients to understand their current conditions and visualize their post-treatment appearance. In contrast to previous 3D imaging systems, the VectraH1 is a low cost, highly portable system designed for facial imaging that has become very popular in cosmetic practice. It is a validated metric and is used within the cosmetic surgery community. The validation of tools used to measure surgical outcomes is fundamental for high-quality practice and outcomes research and studies performed with the VectraH1 show the system is accurate and comparable to other 3D imaging systems on the market such as 3dMDFace system. The advantage of the VectraH1 is the portability of the camera as opposed to a stationary system.

VectraH1 3D head \& neck camera would be an asset for any training programs participating in cosmetic surgery and would be an asset to our study for several reasons. The 3D camera would allow us to most accurately assess the volume changes in the nasojugal folds using the color distance mapping technology to visualize the results rather than relying on sequential 2D imaging and clinical measurement, further reinforcing our study data and obtaining the most accurate results possible. Currently the VectraH1 3D head \& neck camera is widely utilized in the cosmetic surgery community with testimonials from facial plastic surgeons warranting the ease of use of the product, the increase in patient satisfaction when using the camera as well as an exponential increase in use of facial fillers and fat transfer due to the realistic simulations the camera provides [18]. When patients can see the difference a filler procedure or fat transfer can provide prior to treatment, patient have a realistic expectation for what to expect and allow patients to see themselves as we do as cosmetic surgeons. This camera is a practice changer in that the clinician benefits with the most accurate imaging technology available for pre-treatment simulations and assessments as well as for the patient by offering the most realistic expectations for their individual treatment and opens the door for procedures they may not have previously considered. The use of this product would benefit our residency immensely in the cosmetic domain and keep us up-to-date with the technology that is available and utilized in private practice. This would also benefit the Air Force by opening the door for more potential candidates for cosmetic surgical procedures that may have foregone treatment once they can visualize the benefits of the procedures.

This study is projected to last approximately one year per patient. The tear trough facial volumes will be measured pre-procedure and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the procedure. The data will be reviewed after an N of 50 is reached to assess the results. An interval evaluation of the data at N of 20 and 40 will be analyzed to evaluate for concerns regarding efficacy. The facial volumes reported will enable us to draw conclusions as to the overall success of the PRP facial filler injections with and without calcium chloride, and allow us to validate it's long term use as a viable facial filler.

At the conclusion of the study, the patient will have the option to treat the remaining tear trough with the PRP with calcium chloride facial filler treatment if results between the two sides are noticeable, unless if determined to be contraindicated by the attending physician.

Being tested
PRP injections into nasojugal folds
Keywords
Cosmetics, Filler
Medical subject headings
Facial Injuries, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PRP injections into nasojugal foldsProcedure or surgery

    A topical anesthetic consisting of 4% Lidocaine (Topicaine) will be placed in the treatment zone prior to injections for no less than 20 minutes per manufactures recommendations.

    11ml of whole blood will be drawn from the patient via venous aspiration into the Eclipse collection tube. The blood then is centrifuged into three basic components: red blood cells, PRP and platelet-poor plasma. The PRP component is collected via manufactures recommendation, drawn into sterile syringes, and prepared for injection into the patient. 0.1cc of 10% CaCl2 per 1ml of PRP will be added and mixed into the PRP solution for injections on one side of the face.

    Injections will be completed using Softfil micro-cannulas inserted via a small puncture through the patients' skin to dissect into the subcutaneous plane

Study groups in NCT03255681
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Split face studyExperimentalSplit face study with the left side of the face receiving PRP injections and the right side of the face receiving PRP with 0.1cc of 10% calcium chloride per 1mL of PRP. The volume of PRP will be used upon the discretion of the provider for treatment of the cosmetic facial deformity but will be in equal amounts for each side on every patient participating in the study.
Receives: Procedure: PRP injections into nasojugal folds

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Facial volume changes

    The study control will be the facial volumes recorded for each patient on both sides of the face prior to injections of PRP and PRP with CaCl2. These values will be obtained through analysis using the VectraH1 3D head \& neck camera and recorded pre-operatively.

    Measured: 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2017
  2. Study start31 Jan 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2019 (estimated)

Why it stopped: USAF Regulatory Concerns

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The study treatment group will have one half of their face treated with PRP filler and the other half of the face treated with PRP with CaCl2. Using a VectraH1 3D camera, the degree of volume achieved, measured in cm3 using VECTRA Capture Analysis module software, will be assessed at one, three and six and twelve month intervals and compared to the pre-procedure imaging. This is therefore a pilot study and results will need to be reviewed after performing this protocol on 50 subjects.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03255681
Sponsor's protocol ID
FDG20170008H
Acronym
PRP
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
17 Aug 2017
Last updated
4 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD will be available to other researches to include the efficacy of PRP and PRP with CaCl for use as a permanent facial filler if successful. Data shared will be sustainable volume measurements with PRP and PRP with CaCl.

Publications

  • Loesch MM, Somani AK, Kingsley MM, Travers JB, Spandau DF. Skin resurfacing procedures: new and emerging options. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014 Aug 28;7:231-41. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S50367. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 25210469
  • Boxrud, C., et al., Infraorbital discoloration: Dark Circles-An Anatomic Analysis and Treatment. Plastic Surgery Key.

  • Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Apr;62(4):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.003. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15085519
  • Rodriguez-Flores J, Palomar-Gallego MA, Enguita-Valls AB, Rodriguez-Peralto JL, Torres J. Influence of platelet-rich plasma on the histologic characteristics of the autologous fat graft to the upper lip of rabbits. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Aug;35(4):480-6. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9640-5. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

    PubMed 21184066
  • Li K, Li F, Li J, Wang H, Zheng X, Long J, Guo W, Tian W. Increased survival of human free fat grafts with varying densities of human adipose-derived stem cells and platelet-rich plasma. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017 Jan;11(1):209-219. doi: 10.1002/term.1903. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

    PubMed 24978937
  • Hamilton B, Tol JL, Knez W, Chalabi H. Exercise and the platelet activator calcium chloride both influence the growth factor content of platelet-rich plasma (PRP): overlooked biochemical factors that could influence PRP treatment. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;49(14):957-60. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091916. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

    PubMed 23770705
  • Smith, A., Procedure For Autologous Thrombin Activation of Platelets in Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP). Oral Health, 2006.

  • Cervelli V, Nicoli F, Spallone D, Verardi S, Sorge R, Nicoli M, Balzani A. Treatment of traumatic scars using fat grafts mixed with platelet-rich plasma, and resurfacing of skin with the 1540 nm nonablative laser. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2012 Jan;37(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2011.04199.x.

    PubMed 22182435
  • Keller MW, Han PP, Galarneau MR, Gaball CW. Characteristics of maxillofacial injuries and safety of in-theater facial fracture repair in severe combat trauma. Mil Med. 2015 Mar;180(3):315-20. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00345.

    PubMed 25735023
  • Cheng, X., et al., Preclinical Evaluation of Biomask Materials towards Facial Skin Regeneration. US Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR).

  • Ayala, C., et al, Orbital Trauma and Nasoethmoid fractures. p. 289-314.

  • Grahovac, T., et al., Interim Analysis of a Prospective Clinical Trial: Correlation of Biological Parameters with Clinical Outcome in Craniofacial Fat Grafting. Plastic Surgery Research Laboratory, McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA.

  • Kusin S, Lippitz J. Skin fillers. Dis Mon. 2009 Apr;55(4):236-56. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2009.01.002. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19286057
  • Tran C, Carraux P, Micheels P, Kaya G, Salomon D. In vivo bio-integration of three hyaluronic acid fillers in human skin: a histological study. Dermatology. 2014;228(1):47-54. doi: 10.1159/000354384. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

    PubMed 24503674
  • Alijotas-Reig J, Fernandez-Figueras MT, Puig L. Inflammatory, immune-mediated adverse reactions related to soft tissue dermal fillers. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Oct;43(2):241-58. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 May 2.

    PubMed 23642806

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PRP injections into nasojugal folds in people with Facial Injuries and Disorders, run by David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Facial volume changes (time frame: 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03255681, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in