AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Kidney DiseaseNCT03342183

Reducing Hemodialysis Induced Recurrent Brain Injury to Improve Patients' Lives

A study testing Intervention Arm in people with Chronic Kidney Disease, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients who receive dialysis for kidney failure suffer severe cognitive impairment. Hemodialysis causes circulatory stress and ischemia, which causes severe brain injury. It has been demonstrated that a procedure known as Remote Ischemic Preconditioning(RIPC), which involves wrapping a blood pressure cuff around a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Kidney Disease
What is being tested?
Intervention Arm
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
8 Jan 2018to 12 Oct 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or Female
  • Having hemodialysis treatment at least three times per week
  • Must be 18 years old or older.
  • Ability to speak and understand English

Who cannot join

  • Exposure to hemodialysis for less than 90 days prior to recruitment
  • Established severe cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA) of less than 18 or with a formal diagnosis of dementia)
  • Previous clinical stroke
  • Taking drugs to blunt response to RIPC (e.g. ciclosporin, ATP-sensitive potassium channel directed drugs)
  • Dialysing using lower limb vascular access
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or intending pregnancy
  • Unable to give consent or understand written information

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • London Health Sciences Centre

    London, Ontario, N6A 5W9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Patients who receive dialysis for kidney failure suffer severe cognitive impairment. Hemodialysis causes circulatory stress and ischemia, which causes severe brain injury. It has been demonstrated that a procedure known as Remote Ischemic Preconditioning(RIPC), which involves wrapping a blood pressure cuff around a patient's leg and inflating has the potential of protecting many organs, such as the heart from the effects of dialysis. Our study aims to investigate this phenomenon to determine the extent to which it provides protection to a dialysis patient's brain.

Read the detailed description

Hemodialysis patients suffer severe cognitive impairment: Abnormalities of cognitive impairment (predominately sub-cortical defects in executive decision making) are almost universal in hemodialysis (HD) patients and appear early after starting dialysis. Around 75% of patients exhibit mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a high proportion (˜15%) have dementia. Mechanisms of injury: It has been demonstrated that HD associated circulatory stress and recurrent regional ischemia drives brain injury. The extent of injury is determined by the degree of BP instability during HD. Peritoneal dialysis patients are not subject to the same stress and retain cognitive abilities. The injury is multifactorial, and amenable to HD based intervention. Optimizing dialysis to minimize harm requires understanding the wide range of potential of pathophysiological processes contributing to this injury. Putative components of pathophysiology that might be amenable to intervention include: a) Direct reduction in tissue perfusion is the characteristic consequence of HD driven multi-organ injury. The investigators have directly visualized this in multiple organ beds during dialysis (heart, gut and kidney), and have inferred it in the brain from the development of ischemic based white matter (WM) injury. b) Inflammation drives WM injury.Endotoxin (derived from gut bacteria) is profoundly pro- inflammatory and translocates from intestinal lumen into the circulation during HD treatment directly causing WM inflammation. Daily HD (gentler fluid removal) normalizes endotoxemia and markers of inflammation. c) Release of the excitotoxic neurotransmitter, glutamate, produces injury in ischemia. Plasma levels are lower in HD patients with less ongoing brain injury. Removal of glutamate by dialysis significantly reduces ischemic injury severity and functional consequences. Previous success in protecting the brain during dialysis: The Investigator recently completed a successful multi- centre RCT of cooled dialysis fluid to abrogate WM progressive injury- strongly supporting the integral role that the HD process plays in brain injury. Hemodialysis patients have specific patterns of progressive brain injury: Currently the problem of dialysis induced functionally significant brain injury is typically not well recognized or a focus of care. Leukoaraiosis describes rarefaction of brain WM, typically associated with vascular cognitive impairment. It is universally present in HD patients (even when correcting for BP). Severity of reduction in cognitive function is proportional to the amount of WM injury, with a predominant loss of subcortical functions (executive functioning). The Investigators have previously demonstrated that the signature of the change in fractional anisotropy in dialysis patients was entirely explained by changes in radial diffusivity, rather than axial diffusivity- pathognomonic of a vascular etiology. Urgent need to develop additional interventions: Although dialysis fluid cooling appears to be effective in helping to protect against WM injury, there are limitations. The degree of cooling that can be applied is limited in some patients by cold symptom tolerability and effectiveness has only been tested in patients new to HD. Patients with more established injury may require additional therapies. These need to be suitable for combination with other emerging dialysis based therapies. Ideally they will be universally applicable, independent of dialysis machine type, low-cost, safe, well tolerated, and simple-requiring few healthcare resources to apply. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC): Ischemic conditioning occurs when a transient non-lethal episode of ischemia reduces the effect of a subsequent larger insult. Similar levels of protection can be achieved by applying brief episodes of ischemia (with a BP cuff on a limb) remote from a target organ. Successful clinical studies using RIPC have been performed to provide protection against ischemia in many organs, including acute stroke, and can prevent leukoaraiosis in animal models. RIPC provides protection against HD-induced acute myocardial injury: The investigators have recently completed a pilot RCT demonstrating a RIPC intervention reduced HD-induced acute cardiac injury by 50%, after only a single application. This effect was maintained over a period of 28 days. RIPC was effective, safe and well tolerated. The investigators are currently engaged in a larger Canadian based study to refine the optimum RIPC regime to provide protection against HD-induced cardiac injury. Interim analysis of this study has confirmed similar levels of efficacy in a Canadian population and allowed us to select the maximally effective RIPC regime, for use in the current proposed study. Clear translational pathway: This project is conceived in an integrated framework of new therapeutic target discovery, intervention development and sequential testing of safety and efficacy. The investigators will use clinically relevant surrogate imaging endpoints for rapid evaluation and refinement of candidate intervention, prior to large-scale testing with survival-based endpoints. The Investigators have already developed a prototype phase III equivalent study. MY-TEMP is an Ontario based cluster randomized study of individualized dialysate cooling (trials registration NCT 02628366), funded in partnership by the Heart and Stroke Foundation, Ontario Ministry of Health and US based large dialysis provider organizations. All 7000 patients will be randomized in Q3 2016. Impact: HD patients characteristically suffer from cognitive impairment. Understanding the mechanisms behind this will allow the development of therapies integrated into dialysis treatment delivery (anti-ischemic, but potentially also directed at issues such as inflammation and dialyzable injury factors), helping patients maintain cognitive vitality, independence and maximize quality of life.

Being tested
Intervention Arm, Control Arm
Keywords
Dialysis, Hemodialysis, Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
Medical subject headings
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intervention ArmOther

    RIPC stimulus will be applied prior to the first intervention visit, using a previously validated (for cardiac protection in HD patients) standard dose (four cycles of cuff inflation to the lower limb of the patient and inflating at 200mmHg for five minutes, with five minutes' deflation).

  • Control ArmOther

    Sham procedure in which the blood pressure cuff will be applied to the lower limb and inflated to 40mmHg for five minutes and deflated for five minutes with the cycle repeated a total of four times prior to dialysis. To be administered on a monthly basis from the baseline visit to the year 1 visit.

Study groups in NCT03342183
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention ArmExperimentalRIPC stimulus will be applied prior to the first intervention visit, using a previously validated (for cardiac protection in HD patients) standard dose (four cycles of cuff inflation to the lower limb of the patient and inflating at 200mmHg for five minutes, with five minutes' deflation). To be administered on a monthly basis from the baseline visit to the year 1 visit.
Receives: Other: Intervention Arm
Control ArmSham comparatorSham procedure in which the blood pressure cuff will be applied to the lower limb and inflated to 40mmHg for five minutes and deflated for five minutes with the cycle repeated a total of four times prior to dialysis. To be administered on a monthly basis from the baseline visit to the year 1 visit.
Receives: Other: Control Arm

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neuro-protection against functionally significant new brain injury

    Change from baseline in brain damage as observed by progressive ultrastructural white matter changes on MRI imaging.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Brain Perfusion

    Change of brain perfusion from baseline MRI.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Excitotoxic neurotransmitter release

    Change in Exitotoxic neurotransmitter release from baseline as seen on the combined MRI.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Microglial Inflammation

    Change in microglial Inflammation from baseline as seen on the combined MRI.

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Neurological impact

    Compare observed brain injury, as determined by MRI, to results on neurocognitive test.

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Depression scoring

    Compare observed brain injury, as determined by MRI, to results on depression scoring test.We will be utilizing the PHQ-9(Patient Health Questionnaire) which is used for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression. This test consists of 9 questions regarding symptoms which factor into the scoring severity index. Each question is given a score from 0-3, which represents responses such as: not at all(0), several days(1), more than half the days (2), and nearly everyday(3). The scores can be interpreted as follows: 5-9 (minimal symptoms), 10-14 (Minor depression, mild), 15-19 (major depression, moderately severe), and >20 (major depression, severe).

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Daily activities

    Compare observed brain injury, as determined by MRI, to results on evaluation of activities of daily living survey.

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Blood work- blood count

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Blood work-urea

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Blood work-microparticles

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 year

  10. Blood work-Cardiac biomarkers (Troponin T, nTproBNP)

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 year

  11. Blood work-CRP (C-Reactive Protein)

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 year

  12. Blood work-glucose

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 year

  13. Blood work- lactate

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 year

  14. Blood work- electrolytes

    1 year results will be compared to baseline.

    Measured: 1 year

  15. Echocardiogram

    Correlated to brain perfusion as well as circulatory stress outputs obtained by the CVInsight devices.

    Measured: 1 year

  16. CVInsight

    Help us to understand if the CVInsight® Patient Monitoring \& Informatics System can be a predictor of organ perfusion

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2017
  2. Study start8 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion3 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion12 Oct 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03342183
Sponsor's protocol ID
109413
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
16 Oct 2017
Last updated
18 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Anazodo UC, Wong DY, Theberge J, Dacey M, Gomes J, Penny JD, van Ginkel M, Poirier SE, McIntyre CW. Hemodialysis-Related Acute Brain Injury Demonstrated by Application of Intradialytic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Jun 1;34(6):1090-1104. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000105. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

    PubMed 36890644

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intervention Arm in people with Chronic Kidney Disease, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neuro-protection against functionally significant new brain injury (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03342183, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in