AzTrials
AzTrials

High Risk Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 3NCT03384225

CBA Versus FBA Conditioning Followed by Haploidentical Allogeneic HSCT in Treatment of High Risk and Refractory AML

A Phase 3 study testing Cladribine, Fludarabine and Busulfan in people with High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Allogeneic Hematopoeitic Stem Cell Transplantation, run by Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim: To evaluated if cladribine based conditioning (CBA) could decrease relapse after haploidentical allogeneic HSCT in high risk and refractory AML patients as compared with fludarabine based conditioning regimen(FBA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
What is being tested?
Cladribine, Fludarabine and Busulfan
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Aug 2016to 31 Jul 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of AML confirmed by bone marrow cell morphology, immunology, cytogenetics and molecular biology (MICM). Blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and AML transferred from myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS) or other diseases are also included.
  • AML with high risk cytogenetic abnormals, such as FLT3- ITD, et al.
  • Patients fulfilled at least one of the following criteria defining refractory AML:(1) primary induction failure (PIF) after 2 or more cycles of chemotherapy; (2) first early relapse after a remission duration of fewer than 12 months and refractory to salvage combination chemotherapy; (3) second or subsequent relapse .
  • Have no HLA matched siblings or unrelated donors, but have haploidentical donor. The donor must match the health conditions of hematopoietic stem cell donation (criteria of China Marrow Donor Program) and be willing to donate.
  • Performance status score no more than 2 (ECOG criteria).
  • Adequate organ function as defined by the following criteria:ALT, AST and total serum bilirubin <2×ULN (upper limit of normal), Serum creatinine and BUN <1.25×ULN.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Adequate cardiac function without acute myocardial infarction, arrhythmia or atrioventricular block, heart failure, active rheumatic heart disease and cardiac dilatation.
  • Signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrollment.
  • Willingness and ability to comly with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of any condition inappropriate for HSCT.
  • Presence of any fatal disease, including respiratory failure, heart failure, liver or kidney function failure et al.
  • Have no suitable donor.
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding.
  • Current treatment on another clinical trail.
  • Any other condition the investigator judged the patient inappropriate for entry into this study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jieling Jiang, M.D. contact

86-21-37798987

jiangjieling66@hotmail.com

Liping Wan, M.D., Ph.D. contact

86-21-37798987

wanliping924@hotmail.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Shanghai general hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong university school of medicine

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200080

    Xingpeng Wang, M.D.,Ph. D., 86-21-63069298, sfph_edu2@163.com

    Yanhong Zhu, 86-21-63240090 ext. 6213, sfph_edu2@shumu.edu.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Aim: To evaluated if cladribine based conditioning (CBA) could decrease relapse after haploidentical allogeneic HSCT in high risk and refractory AML patients as compared with fludarabine based conditioning regimen(FBA).

Study design: open-labed, prospective, multicenter, randomized control study Number of subjects: 60 each group

Treatment:

CBA group: CBA as HSCT conditioning which including cladribine 5mg/m2 day

-6 to day -2 , busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day -3 and cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2. FBA group: FBA as HSCT conditioning which including fludarabine 30mg/m2 day -6 to day -2, busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day -3 and cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2.

Read the detailed description

Relapse is still the main reason of death for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially for those with high risk and refractory disease. Cladribine and fludarabine are both purine analogs used in treatment of AML. Two studies by the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG) demonstrated that the addition of cladribine to DA (DAC) was associated with an increased complete remission (CR) rate and prolonged overall survival (OS) in the general AML population, with the most prominent effect in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics. Therefore we presume cladribine may more effective in eliminating leukemic cells so that reduce relapse after HSCT. Haploidentical HSCT was the main option for those without HLA matched donors and the number of haploidentical transplants has covered over fifty percent of all allogeneic transplants in China. We designed this study to evaluated if cladribine based conditioning (CBA) could decrease relapse after haploidentical HSCT in high risk and refractory AML patients as compared with fludarabine based conditioning regimen(FBA).

Eligible patients in this study should between 18 to 60 years old with confirmed AML and fulfilled at least one criteria defining high risk or refractory disease.Patients have no HLA matched sibling or unrelated donors but have haploidentical donor. Patients will be excluded if they present any contraindication for HSCT, including respiratory failure, heart failure, liver or kidney function failure et al.

To evaluate if CBA could decrease relapse after haploidentical HSCT in high risk and refractory AML patients as compared with FBA, 120 eligible patients will be randomized to two groups, the CBA group and the FBA group. Patients in the CBA group receive conditioning including cladribine 5mg/m2 day -6 to day -2 , busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day -3 and cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2. While patients in the FBA group receive conditioning including fludarabine 30mg/m2 day -6 to day -2 , busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day-3 and cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2. Graft versus host disease(GVHD) prophylactic regimen include ATG 2.5mg/kg d-4 to d-1, cyclosporine A and short term MTX.

Patients will be followed up for 2 years and the primary end point is the cumulative relapse rate at 2 years. The second end points of the study include the overall survival, disease free survival and non-relapse mortality at 2 years.

Being tested
Cladribine, Fludarabine, Busulfan, Cytarabine
Keywords
cladribine, fludarabine, relapse
Medical subject headings
Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03384225
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CBA groupExperimentalCBA as HSCT conditioning: cladribine 5mg/m2 day -6 to day -2 busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day -3 cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2
Receives: Drug: Cladribine; Drug: Busulfan; Drug: Cytarabine
FBA groupActive comparatorFBA as HSCT conditioning: fludarabine 30mg/m2 day -6 to day -2 busulfan(iv) 3.2mg/kg day-6 to day -3 cytarabine 2g/m2 day-6 to day -2
Receives: Drug: Fludarabine; Drug: Busulfan; Drug: Cytarabine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. cumulative relapse rate at 2 year

    The percentage of all patients who are relapsed within 2 years after allogeneic HSCT.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. overall survival at 2 year

    The percentage of all patients who are still alive 2 years after allogeneic HSCT.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. disease free survival at 2year

    The percentage of all patients who are leukemia free 2 years after allogeneic HSCT.

    Measured: 2 years

  3. non-relapse mortality at 2year

    The percentage of patients who are dead within 2 years of all reasons except relapse.

    Measured: 2 years

  4. non-relapse mortality at 100days

    The percentage of patients who are dead within 100days of all reasons except relapse.

    Measured: 100 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Dec 2017
  2. Study start1 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel Assignment open labled randomized controlled study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03384225
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016-221
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
5 Nov 2017
Last updated
12 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Holowiecki J, Grosicki S, Robak T, Kyrcz-Krzemien S, Giebel S, Hellmann A, Skotnicki A, Jedrzejczak WW, Konopka L, Kuliczkowski K, Zdziarska B, Dmoszynska A, Marianska B, Pluta A, Zawilska K, Komarnicki M, Kloczko J, Sulek K, Haus O, Stella-Holowiecka B, Baran W, Jakubas B, Paluszewska M, Wierzbowska A, Kielbinski M, Jagoda K; Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG). Addition of cladribine to daunorubicin and cytarabine increases complete remission rate after a single course of induction treatment in acute myeloid leukemia. Multicenter, phase III study. Leukemia. 2004 May;18(5):989-97. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403336.

    PubMed 14999298
  • Holowiecki J, Grosicki S, Giebel S, Robak T, Kyrcz-Krzemien S, Kuliczkowski K, Skotnicki AB, Hellmann A, Sulek K, Dmoszynska A, Kloczko J, Jedrzejczak WW, Zdziarska B, Warzocha K, Zawilska K, Komarnicki M, Kielbinski M, Piatkowska-Jakubas B, Wierzbowska A, Wach M, Haus O. Cladribine, but not fludarabine, added to daunorubicin and cytarabine during induction prolongs survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter, randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2441-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.1286. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

    PubMed 22508825

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Cladribine, Fludarabine and Busulfan in people with High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Allogeneic Hematopoeitic Stem Cell Transplantation, run by Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jieling Jiang, M.D. (86-21-37798987, jiangjieling66@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

cumulative relapse rate at 2 year (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03384225, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in