AzTrials
AzTrials

Skeletal DisorderBONUSKidsNCT03537443

Bone and Muscle Health in Kids

A study testing Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in people with Skeletal Disorder, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Bangladesh.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Vitamin D deficiency in childhood leads to poor bone growth and muscle weakness, yet it is unknown if the amount of vitamin D a woman consumes during her pregnancy affects her child's bone and muscle development. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 51 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Skeletal Disorder
What is being tested?
Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
642 participants
Where
1 siteBangladesh
Study dates
21 Oct 2018to 5 Feb 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 51 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • The sample population will be drawn from a cohort registry of mother-infant pairs who participated in the recently-completed Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth (MDIG) randomized controlled trial (NCT01924013):
  • Child is available for participation at 45 to 51 months postnatal age
  • Mother received ≥80% of assigned prenatal vitamin D or placebo doses during the MDIG trial
  • Child and primary caregiver(s) reside in Dhaka, Bangladesh or nearby regions
  • A parent/guardian provides written or thumb-print informed consent for study procedures

Who cannot join

  • Mother participated in the MDIG trial but chose not to be included in the cohort registry for contact regarding follow-up studies
  • Children outside the eligible age range (aged below 45 months or above 51 months)
  • Child is diagnosed with any developmental disorder that would render difficulty in completion of the DXA scan (e.g. Autism)
  • Child is unable to bear weight on his/her legs (e.g. wheelchair bound)
  • Child has a current fracture or break in which his/her limb is supported by an orthopedic cast

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Bangladesh1 site
  • International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research

    Dhaka

Other trials in Bangladesh

About this study

Official title: Effect of Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Offspring Bone Mass, Body Composition and Muscle Strength in Early Childhood: Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial Cohort.

Vitamin D deficiency in childhood leads to poor bone growth and muscle weakness, yet it is unknown if the amount of vitamin D a woman consumes during her pregnancy affects her child's bone and muscle development. In collaboration with researchers in Bangladesh, the investigators recently completed a study of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy in which women were assigned to 1 of 5 groups containing vitamin D or placebo (no vitamin D). The investigators now aim to conduct a follow-up study of a sample of 600 4 year old children born to these mothers to test the possible effects of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy on children's bones, their body composition and the strength of their muscles.

Read the detailed description

Vitamin D is a modifiable regulator of bone mineral metabolism and muscle function; yet little is known about the role of in utero vitamin D exposure on bone mineral accrual and muscle development in early childhood. Observational findings suggest associations between prenatal vitamin D status and infant bone, lean and fat mass and muscle function, but data from intervention trials is either unavailable or limited to early infancy. The investigators of the proposed study have previously shown that prenatal vitamin D supplementation safely improves maternal-fetal vitamin D status and perinatal calcium metabolism. Given the current interest in the potential role of vitamin D in perinatal health, adequately powered and well-designed randomized trials are required to investigate the effect of maternal vitamin D supplementation on offspring musculoskeletal health and body composition.

The investigators recently conducted the Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth (MDIG) trial (NCT01924013), a randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and lactation in Bangladesh, where severe vitamin D deficiency is common. Women at 17-24 weeks' gestation were randomized to 1 of 5 dose groups comprising a prenatal:postpartum regimen of placebo:placebo, 4200:0, 16800:0, 28000:0 or 28000:28000 IU vitamin D3/week until 26 weeks postpartum. Enrolment (n=1300) was completed in September 2015, and all infants were delivered by February 2016. The MDIG trial was primarily designed to determine the effect of maternal vitamin D on infant length at 12 months of age, with follow-up continuing until infants reached 24 months of age (completed in March 2018).

In the proposed observational follow-up study, the investigators will leverage the design and infrastructure of the MDIG trial to investigate effects of vitamin D on early childhood bone and muscle outcomes in a sample of MDIG participants at 4 years of age (target n=600 with 120 participants per maternal vitamin D treatment group; to allow for an expected attrition rate of 15%, the required sample size will be inflated to 140 children per group, giving an overall target sample size of 700 children).

The primary objective is to quantify the effects of prenatal vitamin D supplementation versus placebo on offspring total-body-less head (TBLH) bone mineral content and density. Secondary objectives are to examine the effect of vitamin D on TBLH lean and fat mass, and muscle function. Bone, lean and fat mass will be measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Muscle strength (handgrip test), anthropometry, dietary intake and vitamin D status will also be assessed, in addition to biomarkers of bone turnover that may affect musculoskeletal health in young children.

The proposed follow-up study of a large randomized trial will contribute new evidence regarding the effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on musculoskeletal health in childhood.

Data analysis

Owing to the large contribution of head BMC values to whole-body BMC, in addition to difficulties in obtaining accurate head positioning without motion artifact in young children, TBLH BMC will be considered as the primary outcome in the present study. While TBLH BMC and TBLH areal BMD are closely related and complementary measures of bone mass, and both will be examined in the main analyses, TBLH BMC will be considered as the primary outcome measure. Whole-body measurements will be examined as secondary outcomes, in addition to BMC and areal BMD measurements of the head alone. DXA-derived estimates of lean and fat mass will also first be explored as TBLH measures, and later explored as whole-body measurements. Primary analyses will be conducted without adjustment for covariates; however, adjustment for concurrent body size, age or child sex will be explored in additional analyses.

Placebo versus high-dose prenatal vitamin D supplementation: To address the objectives with maximum statistical efficiency, the 2 high-dose prenatal vitamin D groups will be combined for a comparison of children of mothers who received 28000 IU/week of vitamin D prenatally (with or without 28000 IU/week of vitamin D postpartum) versus those children whose mothers received placebo prenatally. Differences will be expressed as mean differences with 95% CIs, and tested for statistical significance using t-tests. In sub-group analyses, we will stratify by baseline maternal vitamin D status (25(OH)D ≥ 30 nmol/L vs < 30 nmol/L) or infant sex (boys vs girls). A restricted analysis will also be completed, limited to term-born infants only (≥37 weeks' gestation).

Dose-response effect of prenatal and postpartum vitamin D supplementation: For the dose-response analysis including data from all treatment groups, we will regress each outcome (as a continuous variable) on the assigned dose of vitamin D (as a categorical variable) during the prenatal period (with the 2 high-dose prenatal vitamin D treatment groups combined). In this way, mean differences of each prenatal supplementation group will be compared to the placebo group, to test the effect of prental supplementation only. We will also regress each outcome on the average weekly dose of vitamin D assigned as a continuous variable during the prenatal period. Similar regression models will be conducted using more precise estimates of the vitamin D dose received, based on manufacturer analysis of the vitamin D composition of each batch of tablets provided and individual compliance with study tablets. We will use linear regression splines to accommodate non-linear outcome-dose relationships if warranted based on non-parametric visualization (e.g. LOWESS). To ensure precision of the 95% CIs, and therefore ensure robust inferences, 95% CIs from the linear regression models will be obtained using bootstrapping (with 1000 replications).

To explore potential effects of prenatal only versus prenatal plus postpartum vitamin D supplementation, a similar dose-response analysis will be conducted across all 5 treatment groups (i.e., disaggregation of the 2 high-dose prenatal vitamin D groups), for which we will regress each outcome (as a continuous variable) on the vitamin D treatment group assigned during the prenatal and postpartum periods (as a categorical variable). Mean differences of each supplementation group will therefore be compared to the placebo group. Estimates of the 95% CIs from all regression models will be obtained using bootstrapping (with 1000 replications).

Further exploratory analyses of primary and secondary outcomes: Multivariable regression models will enable adjustment for other potential determinants of bone mass, muscle function and body composition including: baseline covariates that differed by treatment group (if present) and thus may confound treatment effects; child characteristics at the time of assessment (e.g. vitamin D status); maternal characteristics (e.g. education level) and socioeconomic status of the household. We will include measures of height or weight (e.g., height-for-age Z-scores) as covariates to test their roles in mediating the effect of the vitamin D intervention on bone mass or other outcomes (muscle strength, body composition). Linear regression models will also be used to assess between-group differences in calcium metabolism and bone turnover markers.

Being tested
Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
Keywords
Childhood, Vitamin D, Bone mineral density, Bone mineral content

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)Dietary supplement

    Prenatal and postpartum supplementation with vitamin D3 and/or placebo.

Study groups in NCT03537443
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A (Placebo)Placebo comparatorChildren whose mothers were randomized to receive a weekly dose of placebo from 17-24 weeks of gestation to 26 weeks postpartum.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
Group B (4200:0 IU/week)ExperimentalChildren whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 4200 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by placebo from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
Group C (16800:0 IU/week)ExperimentalChildren whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 16800 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by placebo from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
Group D (28000:0 IU/week)ExperimentalChildren whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 28000 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by placebo from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
Group E (28000:28000 IU/week)ExperimentalChildren whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 28000 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by the same dose (28000 IU/week vitamin D3) from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total-body-less head bone mineral content and total-body-less head bone mineral density

    Measured by DXA

    Measured: 4 years of age

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Muscle function (handgrip strength)

    Measured by hand-held dynamometer

    Measured: 4 years of age

  2. Total-body-less head lean and total-body-less head fat mass

    Measured by DXA

    Measured: 4 years of age

  3. Whole-body (including head) bone mineral content and whole-body bone mineral density

    Measured by DXA

    Measured: 4 years of age

  4. Head bone mineral content and head bone mineral density

    Measured by DXA

    Measured: 4 years of age

  5. Whole-body lean and whole-body fat mass

    Measured by DXA

    Measured: 4 years of age

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2018
  2. Study start21 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion5 Feb 2020
  4. Study completion5 Feb 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
642 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03537443
Sponsor's protocol ID
1000060961
Acronym
BONUSKids
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
15 May 2018
Last updated
24 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • O'Callaghan KM, Funk C, Fariha F, Nagaria MH, Dasiewicz A, Harrington J, Mahmud AA, Abrams SA, Ahmed T, Moore DR, Roth DE. Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Intact Parathyroid Hormone as Functional Biomarkers of Bone Mass in Early Childhood. J Nutr. 2025 Jun;155(6):1782-1794. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.03.022. Epub 2025 Mar 24.

    PubMed 40139482
  • O'Callaghan KM, Shanta SS, Fariha F, Harrington J, Mahmud AA, Emdin AL, Gernand AD, Ahmed T, Abrams SA, Moore DR, Roth DE. Effect of maternal prenatal and postpartum vitamin D supplementation on offspring bone mass and muscle strength in early childhood: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar 4;115(3):770-780. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab396.

    PubMed 34849536

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in people with Skeletal Disorder, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Bangladesh.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Bangladesh. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total-body-less head bone mineral content and total-body-less head bone mineral density (time frame: 4 years of age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03537443, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in