Skeletal DisorderBONUSKidsNCT03537443
Bone and Muscle Health in Kids
A study testing Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in people with Skeletal Disorder, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Bangladesh.
Trial summary
Vitamin D deficiency in childhood leads to poor bone growth and muscle weakness, yet it is unknown if the amount of vitamin D a woman consumes during her pregnancy affects her child's bone and muscle development. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 51 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Skeletal Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 642 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBangladesh
- Study dates
- 21 Oct 2018to 5 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 51 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- The sample population will be drawn from a cohort registry of mother-infant pairs who participated in the recently-completed Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth (MDIG) randomized controlled trial (NCT01924013):
- Child is available for participation at 45 to 51 months postnatal age
- Mother received ≥80% of assigned prenatal vitamin D or placebo doses during the MDIG trial
- Child and primary caregiver(s) reside in Dhaka, Bangladesh or nearby regions
- A parent/guardian provides written or thumb-print informed consent for study procedures
Who cannot join
- Mother participated in the MDIG trial but chose not to be included in the cohort registry for contact regarding follow-up studies
- Children outside the eligible age range (aged below 45 months or above 51 months)
- Child is diagnosed with any developmental disorder that would render difficulty in completion of the DXA scan (e.g. Autism)
- Child is unable to bear weight on his/her legs (e.g. wheelchair bound)
- Child has a current fracture or break in which his/her limb is supported by an orthopedic cast
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Offspring Bone Mass, Body Composition and Muscle Strength in Early Childhood: Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial Cohort.
Vitamin D deficiency in childhood leads to poor bone growth and muscle weakness, yet it is unknown if the amount of vitamin D a woman consumes during her pregnancy affects her child's bone and muscle development. In collaboration with researchers in Bangladesh, the investigators recently completed a study of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy in which women were assigned to 1 of 5 groups containing vitamin D or placebo (no vitamin D). The investigators now aim to conduct a follow-up study of a sample of 600 4 year old children born to these mothers to test the possible effects of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy on children's bones, their body composition and the strength of their muscles.
Read the detailed description
Vitamin D is a modifiable regulator of bone mineral metabolism and muscle function; yet little is known about the role of in utero vitamin D exposure on bone mineral accrual and muscle development in early childhood. Observational findings suggest associations between prenatal vitamin D status and infant bone, lean and fat mass and muscle function, but data from intervention trials is either unavailable or limited to early infancy. The investigators of the proposed study have previously shown that prenatal vitamin D supplementation safely improves maternal-fetal vitamin D status and perinatal calcium metabolism. Given the current interest in the potential role of vitamin D in perinatal health, adequately powered and well-designed randomized trials are required to investigate the effect of maternal vitamin D supplementation on offspring musculoskeletal health and body composition.
The investigators recently conducted the Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth (MDIG) trial (NCT01924013), a randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and lactation in Bangladesh, where severe vitamin D deficiency is common. Women at 17-24 weeks' gestation were randomized to 1 of 5 dose groups comprising a prenatal:postpartum regimen of placebo:placebo, 4200:0, 16800:0, 28000:0 or 28000:28000 IU vitamin D3/week until 26 weeks postpartum. Enrolment (n=1300) was completed in September 2015, and all infants were delivered by February 2016. The MDIG trial was primarily designed to determine the effect of maternal vitamin D on infant length at 12 months of age, with follow-up continuing until infants reached 24 months of age (completed in March 2018).
In the proposed observational follow-up study, the investigators will leverage the design and infrastructure of the MDIG trial to investigate effects of vitamin D on early childhood bone and muscle outcomes in a sample of MDIG participants at 4 years of age (target n=600 with 120 participants per maternal vitamin D treatment group; to allow for an expected attrition rate of 15%, the required sample size will be inflated to 140 children per group, giving an overall target sample size of 700 children).
The primary objective is to quantify the effects of prenatal vitamin D supplementation versus placebo on offspring total-body-less head (TBLH) bone mineral content and density. Secondary objectives are to examine the effect of vitamin D on TBLH lean and fat mass, and muscle function. Bone, lean and fat mass will be measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Muscle strength (handgrip test), anthropometry, dietary intake and vitamin D status will also be assessed, in addition to biomarkers of bone turnover that may affect musculoskeletal health in young children.
The proposed follow-up study of a large randomized trial will contribute new evidence regarding the effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on musculoskeletal health in childhood.
Data analysis
Owing to the large contribution of head BMC values to whole-body BMC, in addition to difficulties in obtaining accurate head positioning without motion artifact in young children, TBLH BMC will be considered as the primary outcome in the present study. While TBLH BMC and TBLH areal BMD are closely related and complementary measures of bone mass, and both will be examined in the main analyses, TBLH BMC will be considered as the primary outcome measure. Whole-body measurements will be examined as secondary outcomes, in addition to BMC and areal BMD measurements of the head alone. DXA-derived estimates of lean and fat mass will also first be explored as TBLH measures, and later explored as whole-body measurements. Primary analyses will be conducted without adjustment for covariates; however, adjustment for concurrent body size, age or child sex will be explored in additional analyses.
Placebo versus high-dose prenatal vitamin D supplementation: To address the objectives with maximum statistical efficiency, the 2 high-dose prenatal vitamin D groups will be combined for a comparison of children of mothers who received 28000 IU/week of vitamin D prenatally (with or without 28000 IU/week of vitamin D postpartum) versus those children whose mothers received placebo prenatally. Differences will be expressed as mean differences with 95% CIs, and tested for statistical significance using t-tests. In sub-group analyses, we will stratify by baseline maternal vitamin D status (25(OH)D ≥ 30 nmol/L vs < 30 nmol/L) or infant sex (boys vs girls). A restricted analysis will also be completed, limited to term-born infants only (≥37 weeks' gestation).
Dose-response effect of prenatal and postpartum vitamin D supplementation: For the dose-response analysis including data from all treatment groups, we will regress each outcome (as a continuous variable) on the assigned dose of vitamin D (as a categorical variable) during the prenatal period (with the 2 high-dose prenatal vitamin D treatment groups combined). In this way, mean differences of each prenatal supplementation group will be compared to the placebo group, to test the effect of prental supplementation only. We will also regress each outcome on the average weekly dose of vitamin D assigned as a continuous variable during the prenatal period. Similar regression models will be conducted using more precise estimates of the vitamin D dose received, based on manufacturer analysis of the vitamin D composition of each batch of tablets provided and individual compliance with study tablets. We will use linear regression splines to accommodate non-linear outcome-dose relationships if warranted based on non-parametric visualization (e.g. LOWESS). To ensure precision of the 95% CIs, and therefore ensure robust inferences, 95% CIs from the linear regression models will be obtained using bootstrapping (with 1000 replications).
To explore potential effects of prenatal only versus prenatal plus postpartum vitamin D supplementation, a similar dose-response analysis will be conducted across all 5 treatment groups (i.e., disaggregation of the 2 high-dose prenatal vitamin D groups), for which we will regress each outcome (as a continuous variable) on the vitamin D treatment group assigned during the prenatal and postpartum periods (as a categorical variable). Mean differences of each supplementation group will therefore be compared to the placebo group. Estimates of the 95% CIs from all regression models will be obtained using bootstrapping (with 1000 replications).
Further exploratory analyses of primary and secondary outcomes: Multivariable regression models will enable adjustment for other potential determinants of bone mass, muscle function and body composition including: baseline covariates that differed by treatment group (if present) and thus may confound treatment effects; child characteristics at the time of assessment (e.g. vitamin D status); maternal characteristics (e.g. education level) and socioeconomic status of the household. We will include measures of height or weight (e.g., height-for-age Z-scores) as covariates to test their roles in mediating the effect of the vitamin D intervention on bone mass or other outcomes (muscle strength, body composition). Linear regression models will also be used to assess between-group differences in calcium metabolism and bone turnover markers.
- Conditions
- Skeletal Disorder
- Being tested
- Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
- Keywords
- Childhood, Vitamin D, Bone mineral density, Bone mineral content
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)Dietary supplement
Prenatal and postpartum supplementation with vitamin D3 and/or placebo.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Placebo) | Placebo comparator | Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a weekly dose of placebo from 17-24 weeks of gestation to 26 weeks postpartum. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) |
| Group B (4200:0 IU/week) | Experimental | Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 4200 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by placebo from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) |
| Group C (16800:0 IU/week) | Experimental | Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 16800 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by placebo from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) |
| Group D (28000:0 IU/week) | Experimental | Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 28000 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by placebo from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) |
| Group E (28000:28000 IU/week) | Experimental | Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 28000 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by the same dose (28000 IU/week vitamin D3) from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total-body-less head bone mineral content and total-body-less head bone mineral density
Measured by DXA
Measured: 4 years of age
Secondary outcomes (5)
Muscle function (handgrip strength)
Measured by hand-held dynamometer
Measured: 4 years of age
Total-body-less head lean and total-body-less head fat mass
Measured by DXA
Measured: 4 years of age
Whole-body (including head) bone mineral content and whole-body bone mineral density
Measured by DXA
Measured: 4 years of age
Head bone mineral content and head bone mineral density
Measured by DXA
Measured: 4 years of age
Whole-body lean and whole-body fat mass
Measured by DXA
Measured: 4 years of age
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 May 2018
- Study start21 Oct 2018
- Primary completion5 Feb 2020
- Study completion5 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Skeletal DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hospital for Sick ChildrenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 642 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hospital for Sick Children
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniel Roth, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Investigators
- Daniel Roth, MD, Principal investigator, The Hospital for Sick Children
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03537443
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1000060961
- Acronym
- BONUSKids
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 15 May 2018
- Last updated
- 24 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
O'Callaghan KM, Funk C, Fariha F, Nagaria MH, Dasiewicz A, Harrington J, Mahmud AA, Abrams SA, Ahmed T, Moore DR, Roth DE. Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Intact Parathyroid Hormone as Functional Biomarkers of Bone Mass in Early Childhood. J Nutr. 2025 Jun;155(6):1782-1794. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.03.022. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
PubMed 40139482O'Callaghan KM, Shanta SS, Fariha F, Harrington J, Mahmud AA, Emdin AL, Gernand AD, Ahmed T, Abrams SA, Moore DR, Roth DE. Effect of maternal prenatal and postpartum vitamin D supplementation on offspring bone mass and muscle strength in early childhood: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar 4;115(3):770-780. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab396.
PubMed 34849536
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Offspring Bone Mass, Body Composition and Muscle Strength in Early Childhood: Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial Cohort.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03537443
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BONUSKids / 1000060961
- Conditions
- Skeletal Disorder
- Keywords
- Childhood, Vitamin D, Bone mineral density, Bone mineral content
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 642 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
- Study start
- 21 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Vitamin D deficiency in childhood leads to poor bone growth and muscle weakness, yet it is unknown if the amount of vitamin D a woman consumes during her pregnancy affects her child's bone and muscle development. In collaboration with researchers in Bangladesh, the investigators recently completed a study of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy in which women were assigned to 1 of 5 groups containing vitamin D or placebo (no vitamin D). The investigators now aim to conduct a follow-up study of a sample of 600 4 year old children born to these mothers to test the possible effects of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy on children's bones, their body composition and the strength of their muscles.
Detailed description
Vitamin D is a modifiable regulator of bone mineral metabolism and muscle function; yet little is known about the role of in utero vitamin D exposure on bone mineral accrual and muscle development in early childhood. Observational findings suggest associations between prenatal vitamin D status and infant bone, lean and fat mass and muscle function, but data from intervention trials is either unavailable or limited to early infancy. The investigators of the proposed study have previously shown that prenatal vitamin D supplementation safely improves maternal-fetal vitamin D status and perinatal calcium metabolism. Given the current interest in the potential role of vitamin D in perinatal health, adequately powered and well-designed randomized trials are required to investigate the effect of maternal vitamin D supplementation on offspring musculoskeletal health and body composition.
The investigators recently conducted the Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth (MDIG) trial (NCT01924013), a randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and lactation in Bangladesh, where severe vitamin D deficiency is common. Women at 17-24 weeks' gestation were randomized to 1 of 5 dose groups comprising a prenatal:postpartum regimen of placebo:placebo, 4200:0, 16800:0, 28000:0 or 28000:28000 IU vitamin D3/week until 26 weeks postpartum. Enrolment (n=1300) was completed in September 2015, and all infants were delivered by February 2016. The MDIG trial was primarily designed to determine the effect of maternal vitamin D on infant length at 12 months of age, with follow-up continuing until infants reached 24 months of age (completed in March 2018).
In the proposed observational follow-up study, the investigators will leverage the design and infrastructure of the MDIG trial to investigate effects of vitamin D on early childhood bone and muscle outcomes in a sample of MDIG participants at 4 years of age (target n=600 with 120 participants per maternal vitamin D treatment group; to allow for an expected attrition rate of 15%, the required sample size will be inflated to 140 children per group, giving an overall target sample size of 700 children).
The primary objective is to quantify the effects of prenatal vitamin D supplementation versus placebo on offspring total-body-less head (TBLH) bone mineral content and density. Secondary objectives are to examine the effect of vitamin D on TBLH lean and fat mass, and muscle function. Bone, lean and fat mass will be measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Muscle strength (handgrip test), anthropometry, dietary intake and vitamin D status will also be assessed, in addition to biomarkers of bone turnover that may affect musculoskeletal health in young children.
The proposed follow-up study of a large randomized trial will contribute new evidence regarding the effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on musculoskeletal health in childhood.
Data analysis
Owing to the large contribution of head BMC values to whole-body BMC, in addition to difficulties in obtaining accurate head positioning without motion artifact in young children, TBLH BMC will be considered as the primary outcome in the present study. While TBLH BMC and TBLH areal BMD are closely related and complementary measures of bone mass, and both will be examined in the main analyses, TBLH BMC will be considered as the primary outcome measure. Whole-body measurements will be examined as secondary outcomes, in addition to BMC and areal BMD measurements of the head alone. DXA-derived estimates of lean and fat mass will also first be explored as TBLH measures, and later explored as whole-body measurements. Primary analyses will be conducted without adjustment for covariates; however, adjustment for concurrent body size, age or child sex will be explored in additional analyses.
Placebo versus high-dose prenatal vitamin D supplementation: To address the objectives with maximum statistical efficiency, the 2 high-dose prenatal vitamin D groups will be combined for a comparison of children of mothers who received 28000 IU/week of vitamin D prenatally (with or without 28000 IU/week of vitamin D postpartum) versus those children whose mothers received placebo prenatally. Differences will be expressed as mean differences with 95% CIs, and tested for statistical significance using t-tests. In sub-group analyses, we will stratify by baseline maternal vitamin D status (25(OH)D ≥ 30 nmol/L vs < 30 nmol/L) or infant sex (boys vs girls). A restricted analysis will also be completed, limited to term-born infants only (≥37 weeks' gestation).
Dose-response effect of prenatal and postpartum vitamin D supplementation: For the dose-response analysis including data from all treatment groups, we will regress each outcome (as a continuous variable) on the assigned dose of vitamin D (as a categorical variable) during the prenatal period (with the 2 high-dose prenatal vitamin D treatment groups combined). In this way, mean differences of each prenatal supplementation group will be compared to the placebo group, to test the effect of prental supplementation only. We will also regress each outcome on the average weekly dose of vitamin D assigned as a continuous variable during the prenatal period. Similar regression models will be conducted using more precise estimates of the vitamin D dose received, based on manufacturer analysis of the vitamin D composition of each batch of tablets provided and individual compliance with study tablets. We will use linear regression splines to accommodate non-linear outcome-dose relationships if warranted based on non-parametric visualization (e.g. LOWESS). To ensure precision of the 95% CIs, and therefore ensure robust inferences, 95% CIs from the linear regression models will be obtained using bootstrapping (with 1000 replications).
To explore potential effects of prenatal only versus prenatal plus postpartum vitamin D supplementation, a similar dose-response analysis will be conducted across all 5 treatment groups (i.e., disaggregation of the 2 high-dose prenatal vitamin D groups), for which we will regress each outcome (as a continuous variable) on the vitamin D treatment group assigned during the prenatal and postpartum periods (as a categorical variable). Mean differences of each supplementation group will therefore be compared to the placebo group. Estimates of the 95% CIs from all regression models will be obtained using bootstrapping (with 1000 replications).
Further exploratory analyses of primary and secondary outcomes: Multivariable regression models will enable adjustment for other potential determinants of bone mass, muscle function and body composition including: baseline covariates that differed by treatment group (if present) and thus may confound treatment effects; child characteristics at the time of assessment (e.g. vitamin D status); maternal characteristics (e.g. education level) and socioeconomic status of the household. We will include measures of height or weight (e.g., height-for-age Z-scores) as covariates to test their roles in mediating the effect of the vitamin D intervention on bone mass or other outcomes (muscle strength, body composition). Linear regression models will also be used to assess between-group differences in calcium metabolism and bone turnover markers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Placebo) | Placebo comparator | Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a weekly dose of placebo from 17-24 weeks of gestation to 26 weeks postpartum. |
| Group B (4200:0 IU/week) | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 4200 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by placebo from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum. |
| Group C (16800:0 IU/week) | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 16800 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by placebo from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum. |
| Group D (28000:0 IU/week) | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 28000 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by placebo from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum. |
| Group E (28000:28000 IU/week) | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)Children whose mothers were randomized to receive a prenatal:postpartum regimen of 28000 IU/week vitamin D3 from 17-24 weeks of gestation to delivery, followed by the same dose (28000 IU/week vitamin D3) from delivery to 26 weeks postpartum. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 51 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The sample population will be drawn from a cohort registry of mother-infant pairs who participated in the recently-completed Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth (MDIG) randomized controlled trial (NCT01924013):
- Child is available for participation at 45 to 51 months postnatal age
- Mother received ≥80% of assigned prenatal vitamin D or placebo doses during the MDIG trial
- Child and primary caregiver(s) reside in Dhaka, Bangladesh or nearby regions
- A parent/guardian provides written or thumb-print informed consent for study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Mother participated in the MDIG trial but chose not to be included in the cohort registry for contact regarding follow-up studies
- Children outside the eligible age range (aged below 45 months or above 51 months)
- Child is diagnosed with any developmental disorder that would render difficulty in completion of the DXA scan (e.g. Autism)
- Child is unable to bear weight on his/her legs (e.g. wheelchair bound)
- Child has a current fracture or break in which his/her limb is supported by an orthopedic cast
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)Prenatal and postpartum supplementation with vitamin D3 and/or placebo. | Dietary supplement | Group A (Placebo), Group B (4200:0 IU/week), Group C (16800:0 IU/week), Group D (28000:0 IU/week), Group E (28000:28000 IU/week) |
Primary outcome
Total-body-less head bone mineral content and total-body-less head bone mineral density
Time frame: 4 years of age
Measured by DXA
5 secondary outcomes
Muscle function (handgrip strength)
Time frame: 4 years of age
Total-body-less head lean and total-body-less head fat mass
Time frame: 4 years of age
Whole-body (including head) bone mineral content and whole-body bone mineral density
Time frame: 4 years of age
Head bone mineral content and head bone mineral density
Time frame: 4 years of age
Whole-body lean and whole-body fat mass
Time frame: 4 years of age
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Aug 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40139482O'Callaghan KM, Funk C, Fariha F, Nagaria MH, Dasiewicz A, Harrington J, Mahmud AA, Abrams SA, Ahmed T, Moore DR, Roth DE. Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Intact Parathyroid Hormone as Functional Biomarkers of Bone Mass in Early Childhood. J Nutr. 2025 Jun;155(6):1782-1794. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.03.022. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34849536O'Callaghan KM, Shanta SS, Fariha F, Harrington J, Mahmud AA, Emdin AL, Gernand AD, Ahmed T, Abrams SA, Moore DR, Roth DE. Effect of maternal prenatal and postpartum vitamin D supplementation on offspring bone mass and muscle strength in early childhood: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar 4;115(3):770-780. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab396.
Related trials for Skeletal Disorder
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Safety and Dystrophin Expression of SPOT-03 in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) Patients
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of Andecaliximab in Participants With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP)
Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
Recruiting
Preserving Muscle Mass During Incretin-Induced Weight Loss
Obesity (BMI > 35)
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Inflammatory Muscle Diseases
Inflammation In Skeletal Muscle
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Roth, MD principal investigator
The Hospital for Sick Children
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in people with Skeletal Disorder, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Bangladesh.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Bangladesh. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total-body-less head bone mineral content and total-body-less head bone mineral density (time frame: 4 years of age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03537443, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2020.