Alveolar Bone GraftingNCT03549039
Effect of Alveolar Bone Grafting
An observational study of Alveolar Bone Grafting and Quality of Life, run by Ankara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study included patients who underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting by harvesting graft from the anterior iliac crest, in Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Turkey, during the period from January 2012 to March 2016. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Alveolar Bone Grafting, Quality of Life
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2018to 15 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: patients who underwent surgery due to alveolar cleft
Who may be able to join
- patients who were undergone alveolar cleft surgery before at our hospital at least 6 months after surgery
Who cannot join
- patients who don't accept to join questionnaire
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ankara University dentisry of faculty
Ankara, 06500
About this study
Official title: Effect of Alveolar Bone Grafting on Health Quality in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
This study included patients who underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting by harvesting graft from the anterior iliac crest, in Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Turkey, during the period from January 2012 to March 2016. All patients were operated using the same technique and by the same surgical team. Patients will be interviewed to fill Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Postsurgical Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSPSQ) 6 months postoperatively. The questionnaires will be used to assess the relationship between health quality and patient satisfaction. Also, grafted sites will be evaluated with respect to fistula, the presence of cleft palate, and infection.The descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analyses will be made using PSPSQ scores and SF-12 PCS and MCS scores.
Read the detailed description
The postsurgical patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSPSQ) was designed to assess each patient's overall satisfaction with the procedure(s), functional improvements, and recognized or perceived negative effects of the procedures. One of the most commonly used measures of HRQoL is SF-36, which has been reduced to 12 items with the minimal loss of information to form SF-12 . HRQoL was assessed using SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores.
- Conditions
- Alveolar Bone Grafting, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- quality of life, cleft lip, cleft palate
- Medical subject headings
- Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary
all participants will be called to faculty. SF-12 will be done. SF-12 is calculated using the scoring table. Health-related quality of life, which was measured using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores of SF-12 was assessed. Physical component is scored from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst and 100 representing the best health status.
Measured: 20 minutes
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary
all participants will be called to faculty. SF-12 will be done. SF-12 is calculated using the scoring table. Health-related quality of life, which was measured using the Mental Component Summary (MCS)scores of SF-12 was assessed. Mental component is scored from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst and 100 representing the best health status.
Measured: 20 minutes
Postsurgical Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSPSQ)
all participants will be called to faculty. PSPSQ will be done. Patient satisfaction will be assessed by analyzing data gathered from PSPSQ. PSPSQ included seven questions. It is designed to assess each patient's overall satisfaction with the procedure(s), functional improvements, and recognized or perceived negative effects of the procedures. The 7-point Likert (poor to excellent), scale is used so that the person who answers the questions can rate the level of related satisfaction with each question. The final outcome is between 7 and 49. Higher scores are associated with satisfaction.
Measured: 20 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jun 2018
- Study start30 Jun 2018
- Primary completion1 Jul 2018
- Study completion15 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alveolar Bone GraftingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ankara UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kevser Sancak, Ankara University
- Investigators
- Kevser Sancak, Study chair, Ankara University Faculty of Dentısry
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03549039
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 36290600/22
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: de-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available
Publications
Rustemeyer J, Gregersen J. Quality of Life in orthognathic surgery patients: post-surgical improvements in aesthetics and self-confidence. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;40(5):400-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
PubMed 21865051Gandhi SK, Salmon JW, Zhao SZ, Lambert BL, Gore PR, Conrad K. Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clin Ther. 2001 Jul;23(7):1080-98. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80093-x.
PubMed 11519772Motegi E, Hatch JP, Rugh JD, Yamaguchi H. Health-related quality of life and psychosocial function 5 years after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Aug;124(2):138-43. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00391-3.
PubMed 12923507
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Alveolar Bone Grafting on Health Quality in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03549039
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 36290600/22
- Conditions
- Alveolar Bone Grafting, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- quality of life, cleft lip, cleft palate
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study included patients who underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting by harvesting graft from the anterior iliac crest, in Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Turkey, during the period from January 2012 to March 2016. All patients were operated using the same technique and by the same surgical team. Patients will be interviewed to fill Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Postsurgical Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSPSQ) 6 months postoperatively. The questionnaires will be used to assess the relationship between health quality and patient satisfaction. Also, grafted sites will be evaluated with respect to fistula, the presence of cleft palate, and infection.The descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analyses will be made using PSPSQ scores and SF-12 PCS and MCS scores.
Detailed description
The postsurgical patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSPSQ) was designed to assess each patient's overall satisfaction with the procedure(s), functional improvements, and recognized or perceived negative effects of the procedures. One of the most commonly used measures of HRQoL is SF-36, which has been reduced to 12 items with the minimal loss of information to form SF-12 . HRQoL was assessed using SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- patients who underwent surgery due to alveolar cleft
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients who were undergone alveolar cleft surgery before at our hospital at least 6 months after surgery
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients who don't accept to join questionnaire
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary
Time frame: 20 minutes
all participants will be called to faculty. SF-12 will be done. SF-12 is calculated using the scoring table. Health-related quality of life, which was measured using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores of SF-12 was assessed. Physical component is scored from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst and 100 representing the best health status.
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary
Time frame: 20 minutes
all participants will be called to faculty. SF-12 will be done. SF-12 is calculated using the scoring table. Health-related quality of life, which was measured using the Mental Component Summary (MCS)scores of SF-12 was assessed. Mental component is scored from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst and 100 representing the best health status.
Postsurgical Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSPSQ)
Time frame: 20 minutes
all participants will be called to faculty. PSPSQ will be done. Patient satisfaction will be assessed by analyzing data gathered from PSPSQ. PSPSQ included seven questions. It is designed to assess each patient's overall satisfaction with the procedure(s), functional improvements, and recognized or perceived negative effects of the procedures. The 7-point Likert (poor to excellent), scale is used so that the person who answers the questions can rate the level of related satisfaction with each question. The final outcome is between 7 and 49. Higher scores are associated with satisfaction.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2019.
- Background: PubMed 21865051Rustemeyer J, Gregersen J. Quality of Life in orthognathic surgery patients: post-surgical improvements in aesthetics and self-confidence. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;40(5):400-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
- Background: PubMed 11519772Gandhi SK, Salmon JW, Zhao SZ, Lambert BL, Gore PR, Conrad K. Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clin Ther. 2001 Jul;23(7):1080-98. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80093-x.
- Background: PubMed 12923507Motegi E, Hatch JP, Rugh JD, Yamaguchi H. Health-related quality of life and psychosocial function 5 years after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Aug;124(2):138-43. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00391-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. de-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available
Related trials for Alveolar Bone Grafting
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Ascorbic Acid-Loaded I-PRF With Partially Demineralized Dentin Graft on Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Post-Extraction Bone Healing Dental Implant Site Development Tooth Loss, Alveolar Bone Regeneration Following Odontectomy
Recruiting
The Application of a Biphasic Calcium Sulfate Graft Material in Sinus Floor Elevation
Alveolar Bone Loss, Edentulism Nos
Recruiting
Effect of Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation
Dehiscence, Tooth Extraction
Not yet recruiting
Autogenous and Xenograft Bone Mix in Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction
Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevser Sancak study chair
Ankara University Faculty of Dentısry
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Alveolar Bone Grafting and Quality of Life, run by Ankara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (time frame: 20 minutes). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03549039, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2019.