PainPhase 4PECINCT03568721
Postoperative Effects of Chewing Gum, Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen on Pain After Initial Archwire Placement
A Phase 4 study testing Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen and Chewing gum in people with Pain, run by Rio de Janeiro State University at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of ibuprofen, acetaminophen, chewing gum in reducing orthodontic pain. This study include 81 patients to be classified into 4 groups of 19 each: ibuprofen (400 mg), acetaminophen (500 mg), chewing gum and control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen and Chewing gum
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 81 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 25 Jan 2015to 20 May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- moderate teeth crowding
- no need for tooth extraction to orthodontic reasons
Who cannot join
- presence of autoimmune diseases
- history of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Postoperative Effects of Chewing Gum, Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen on Pain After Initial Archwire Placement: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of ibuprofen, acetaminophen, chewing gum in reducing orthodontic pain. This study include 81 patients to be classified into 4 groups of 19 each: ibuprofen (400 mg), acetaminophen (500 mg), chewing gum and control. The patients in each group will receive 1 method immediately after placement of the initial archwire and every 6 hours for a week if they experiences pain. Pain perception will be recorded by the patients while jaw rest position and fitting back teeth at 2 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days, 7 days and 21 days after archwire placement, using a visual analog scale.
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen, Chewing gum
- Keywords
- pain, orthodontics
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IbuprofenDrug
Also called non steroidal drug
prescription of ibuprofen 400 mg
AcetaminophenDrug
Also called paracetamol
prescription of acetaminophen 500 mg
Chewing gumOther
prescription of one tablet of chewing gum
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ibuprofen | Experimental | ibuprofen (400 mg) immediately after insertion of the initial archwire and 6/6 hs for a week if there is any orthodontic pain. Receives: Drug: Ibuprofen |
| acetaminophen | Experimental | acetaminophen (500 mg) immediately after insertion of the initial archwire and 6/6 hs for a week if there is any orthodontic pain. Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen |
| chewing gum | Experimental | chewing gum (01 tablet) immediately after insertion of the initial archwire and 6/6 hs of chewing gum for a week if there is any orthodontic pain. Receives: Other: Chewing gum |
| control | No intervention | control (no reliever for orthodontic pain) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Orthodontic pain measurement by marking 100 millimeters visual analogue scales.
to compare the efficacy of ibuprofen, acetaminophen and chewing gum in changing orthodontic pain by marking in between two points in a 100 millimeters visual analogue scale that starts from the left (no pain) and end to the right (exacerbated pain) at different time points.
Measured: 2 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days, 7 days and 21 days after archwire placement.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Chewing gum as a non pharmacologic alternative for orthodontic pain control by marking 100 millimeters visual analogue scales.
to verify if chewing gum can be a non-pharmacologic method for orthodontic pain control by marking in between two points in a 100 millimeters visual analogue scale that starts from the left (no pain) and ends to the right (exacerbated pain) at different time points.
Measured: 2 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days, 7 days and 21 days after archwire placement.
Pain at rest X fitting back teeth by marking 100 millimeters visual analogue scales.
to verify wich group has less pain and if in rest or in fitting back teeth by marking in between two points in a 100 millimeters visual analogue scale that starts from the left (no pain) and end to the right (exacerbated pain) at different time points.
Measured: 2 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days, 7 days and 21 days after archwire placement.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2018
- Study start25 Jan 2015
- Primary completion18 Mar 2018
- Study completion20 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rio de Janeiro State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Diego Junior da Silva Santos, DDS,MsD, Rio de Janeiro State University
- Investigators
- DIEGO J SANTOS, MSc, Principal investigator, Rio de Janeiro State UniversityJONAS CAPELLI, PhD, Study director, Rio de Janeiro State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03568721
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 173112
- Acronym
- PECI
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Farzanegan F, Zebarjad SM, Alizadeh S, Ahrari F. Pain reduction after initial archwire placement in orthodontic patients: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Feb;141(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.042.
PubMed 22284284Sandhu SS, Sandhu J. Orthodontic pain: an interaction between age and sex in early and middle adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2013 Nov;83(6):966-72. doi: 10.2319/030113-174.1. Epub 2013 May 24.
PubMed 23705940Angelopoulou MV, Vlachou V, Halazonetis DJ. Pharmacological management of pain during orthodontic treatment: a meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2012 May;15(2):71-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2012.01542.x.
PubMed 22515183Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S. Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Apr;110(2):92-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.11193.x.
PubMed 12013568Erdinc AM, Dincer B. Perception of pain during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod. 2004 Feb;26(1):79-85. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.1.79.
PubMed 14994886Canavarro C, Teles RP, Capelli Junior J. Matrix metalloproteinases -1, -2, -3, -7, -8, -12, and -13 in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement: a longitudinal randomized split-mouth study. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Oct;35(5):652-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs053. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
PubMed 22989715Davies GM, Worthington HV, Ellwood RP, Blinkhorn AS, Taylor GO, Davies RM, Considine J. An assessment of the cost effectiveness of a postal toothpaste programme to prevent caries among five-year-old children in the North West of England. Community Dent Health. 2003 Dec;20(4):207-10.
PubMed 14696738Ngan P, Kess B, Wilson S. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Jul;96(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90228-x.
PubMed 2750720Hwang JY, Tee CH, Huang AT, Taft L. Effectiveness of thera-bite wafers in reducing pain. J Clin Orthod. 1994 May;28(5):291-2. No abstract available.
PubMed 8613507White LW. Pain and cooperation in orthodontic treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1984 Aug;18(8):572-5. No abstract available.
PubMed 6595271Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. The effect of drugs on orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2006 Nov;9(4):163-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00372.x.
PubMed 17101023Simmons KE, Brandt M. Control of orthodontic pain. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 1992 Jul-Aug;71(4):8-10.
PubMed 1432346Keith DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Kennedy M, Zullo T. Effect of text message follow-up on patient's self-reported level of pain and anxiety. Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):605-10. doi: 10.2319/091812-742.1. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
PubMed 23210546Brown DF, Moerenhout RG. The pain experience and psychological adjustment to orthodontic treatment of preadolescents, adolescents, and adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Oct;100(4):349-56. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70073-6.
PubMed 1927986Bergius M, Broberg AG, Hakeberg M, Berggren U. Prediction of prolonged pain experiences during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Mar;133(3):339.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.013.
PubMed 18331926
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Postoperative Effects of Chewing Gum, Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen on Pain After Initial Archwire Placement: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03568721
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PECI / 173112
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- pain, orthodontics
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rio de Janeiro State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Study start
- 25 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of ibuprofen, acetaminophen, chewing gum in reducing orthodontic pain. This study include 81 patients to be classified into 4 groups of 19 each: ibuprofen (400 mg), acetaminophen (500 mg), chewing gum and control. The patients in each group will receive 1 method immediately after placement of the initial archwire and every 6 hours for a week if they experiences pain. Pain perception will be recorded by the patients while jaw rest position and fitting back teeth at 2 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days, 7 days and 21 days after archwire placement, using a visual analog scale.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ibuprofen | Experimental | Drug: Ibuprofenibuprofen (400 mg) immediately after insertion of the initial archwire and 6/6 hs for a week if there is any orthodontic pain. |
| acetaminophen | Experimental | Drug: Acetaminophenacetaminophen (500 mg) immediately after insertion of the initial archwire and 6/6 hs for a week if there is any orthodontic pain. |
| chewing gum | Experimental | Other: Chewing gumchewing gum (01 tablet) immediately after insertion of the initial archwire and 6/6 hs of chewing gum for a week if there is any orthodontic pain. |
| control | No intervention | –control (no reliever for orthodontic pain) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- moderate teeth crowding
- no need for tooth extraction to orthodontic reasons
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- presence of autoimmune diseases
- history of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IbuprofenAlso: non steroidal drugprescription of ibuprofen 400 mg | Drug | ibuprofen |
| AcetaminophenAlso: paracetamolprescription of acetaminophen 500 mg | Drug | acetaminophen |
| Chewing gumprescription of one tablet of chewing gum | Other | chewing gum |
Primary outcome
Orthodontic pain measurement by marking 100 millimeters visual analogue scales.
Time frame: 2 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days, 7 days and 21 days after archwire placement.
to compare the efficacy of ibuprofen, acetaminophen and chewing gum in changing orthodontic pain by marking in between two points in a 100 millimeters visual analogue scale that starts from the left (no pain) and end to the right (exacerbated pain) at different time points.
2 secondary outcomes
Chewing gum as a non pharmacologic alternative for orthodontic pain control by marking 100 millimeters visual analogue scales.
Time frame: 2 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days, 7 days and 21 days after archwire placement.
Pain at rest X fitting back teeth by marking 100 millimeters visual analogue scales.
Time frame: 2 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days, 7 days and 21 days after archwire placement.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2018.
- Background: PubMed 22284284Farzanegan F, Zebarjad SM, Alizadeh S, Ahrari F. Pain reduction after initial archwire placement in orthodontic patients: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Feb;141(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.042.
- Background: PubMed 23705940Sandhu SS, Sandhu J. Orthodontic pain: an interaction between age and sex in early and middle adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2013 Nov;83(6):966-72. doi: 10.2319/030113-174.1. Epub 2013 May 24.
- Background: PubMed 22515183Angelopoulou MV, Vlachou V, Halazonetis DJ. Pharmacological management of pain during orthodontic treatment: a meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2012 May;15(2):71-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2012.01542.x.
- Background: PubMed 12013568Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S. Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Apr;110(2):92-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.11193.x.
- Background: PubMed 14994886Erdinc AM, Dincer B. Perception of pain during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod. 2004 Feb;26(1):79-85. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.1.79.
- Background: PubMed 22989715Canavarro C, Teles RP, Capelli Junior J. Matrix metalloproteinases -1, -2, -3, -7, -8, -12, and -13 in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement: a longitudinal randomized split-mouth study. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Oct;35(5):652-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs053. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
- Background: PubMed 14696738Davies GM, Worthington HV, Ellwood RP, Blinkhorn AS, Taylor GO, Davies RM, Considine J. An assessment of the cost effectiveness of a postal toothpaste programme to prevent caries among five-year-old children in the North West of England. Community Dent Health. 2003 Dec;20(4):207-10.
- Background: PubMed 2750720Ngan P, Kess B, Wilson S. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Jul;96(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90228-x.
- Background: PubMed 8613507Hwang JY, Tee CH, Huang AT, Taft L. Effectiveness of thera-bite wafers in reducing pain. J Clin Orthod. 1994 May;28(5):291-2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 6595271White LW. Pain and cooperation in orthodontic treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1984 Aug;18(8):572-5. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17101023Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. The effect of drugs on orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2006 Nov;9(4):163-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00372.x.
- Background: PubMed 1432346Simmons KE, Brandt M. Control of orthodontic pain. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 1992 Jul-Aug;71(4):8-10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
DIEGO J SANTOS, MSc principal investigator
Rio de Janeiro State University
JONAS CAPELLI, PhD study director
Rio de Janeiro State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen and Chewing gum in people with Pain, run by Rio de Janeiro State University at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Orthodontic pain measurement by marking 100 millimeters visual analogue scales. (time frame: 2 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days, 7 days and 21 days after archwire placement.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03568721, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2018.