AzTrials
AzTrials

Critical IllnessAKIpredValidNCT03574896

Acute Kidney Injury Predictor Validation Study

An observational study of Critical Illness and Acute Kidney Injury, run by Geert Meyfroidt, MD, PhD at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of AKIpredictor, a computer-based algorithm that predicts the development of AKI in the 7 days following ICU admission, by comparing it with similar predictions made by attending physicians. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Critical Illness, Acute Kidney Injury
What is being tested?
Computer model predictions of acute kidney injury
How many people
252 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
2 May 2018to 1 Sep 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All adult patients admitted to UZ Leuven's surgical ICU in the period of the study, with the exclusion of those with end-stage renal disease or AKI already present at the time of admission

Who may be able to join

  • All adult patients admitted to UZ Leuven's surgical ICU in the period of the study

Who cannot join

  • Patients with end-stage renal disease or AKI already present at the time of admission

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Geert Meyfroidt

    Kessel-Lo, 3010

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Prospective Validation of the AKIpredictor Through Comparison With Predictions of Acute Kidney Injury by ICU Physicians

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of AKIpredictor, a computer-based algorithm that predicts the development of AKI in the 7 days following ICU admission, by comparing it with similar predictions made by attending physicians.

Primary objective: To compare the performances of AKIpredictor and physicians in predicting AKI stage 2 or 3 in the 7 days following ICU admission Secondary objective(s): To investigate the influence of the level of seniority of the physician on the accuracy of the predictions; feasibility of making predictions within a 3 hour window for physicians Trial Design: Monocentric, prospective, longitudinal, non-interventional Endpoints: Primary: comparing the area under the ROC curves of the AKIpredictor and physicians.

Read more

Secondary: estimation of PPV, NPV, sensitivity and specificity of both predictors at different thresholds; evaluation of alternative negative endpoints (ICU readmission after discharge, death); subgroup analyses.

Sample Size: This is a pilot study. Sample size calculations to obtain sufficient power are not feasible due to lack of previous studies. The investigation will be conducted with a preset end time on June 30th. The investigators expect to include approximately 150 patients.

Summary of eligibility criteria: All adult patients admitted to UZ Leuven's surgical ICU in the period of the study, with the exclusion of those with end-stage renal disease or AKI already present at the time of admission

Read the detailed description

Inclusion and exclusion criteria:

All adult patients admitted to the UZ Leuven's ICU after the approval of the study by the local Ethical Committee and before June 30th 2018 will be included in the study. The only exclusion criteria will be the presence of end-stage renal disease before or of AKI on ICU admission.

Computer predictions:

Elements from laboratory reports, clinical history and physiological monitoring will be used both by clinicians and by the computer algorithm to estimate the risk of AKI. Such measurements are part of the routine standard care in the ICU: no additional exam will be required for this study. These values are regularly stored in the electronic health care system (KWS, Klinisch Werkstation and iMDsoft's MetaVision). They will be retrieved in read-only mode when needed for formulating the predictions. The retrieval will take place regularly on a weekly basis in order to limit the amount of time that patients' identification data will be stored for the study.

In detail, the following parameters will be used by the computer model:

  • upon admission: age, baseline serum creatinine (lowest value of the previous 3 months; if not available, calculated using the Schwartz formula), surgical or medical category (transplant surgery / cardiovascular surgery / abdominal or pelvic surgery / thoracic surgery / other: medical, trauma, other surgery), planned admission (yes / no), history of diabetes (yes / no), blood glucose, suspected sepsis (yes / no), and hemodynamic support (none / mechanical / pharmacological / both);
  • on the first morning after admission: serum creatinine (measured in the morning), APACHE II score, blood lactate (worst value since admission), total bilirubin, and hours of ICU stay;
  • at 24h after admission: hourly urine output, doses of inotropes and vasopressors, and continuous arterial blood pressure values.

Physicians predictions:

Physicians' predictions will be collected alternatively through interviews conducted personally by one of the investigators or by means of a questionnaire compiled by the physicians themselves. To parallel the timing of AKIpredictor, clinicians' predictions will be gathered at three time-points:

  • admission predictions: at the earliest after admission (up to 3h);
  • morning predictions: on the first morning after admission, right before or after the handoffs that take place between 8.30 and 9.00 AM;
  • 24h predictions: at 24h after admission (up to 24h+3h).

Interviews to multiple physicians about the same patient in the same time frame will be encouraged, as long as they are not influenced by one another (junior resident, senior resident, staff member).

In every prediction, both a continuous (on a 0-100 % scale) and a binary (yes / no) estimate of AKI risk will be inquired. A self-assessed degree of confidence about the prediction will also be tracked (very confident / medium confident / not confident at all). The exact time at which the human prediction is collected will be saved. Finally, data about the clinician expressing the prediction will be tracked: age, gender, seniority (see above), years of ICU experience.

Endpoint assessment The effective development of AKI will be diagnosed in agreement with the 2012 KDIGO guidelines [1]. To take into account AKI occurring outside the ICU where hourly measurements of urine output are not recorded, only the creatinine criterion will be used. Serum creatinine values will be collected from the electronic health record system KWS (Klinisch WerkStation) each day for 7 days following ICU admission. This biochemical exam is routinely performed on a daily basis in any hospitalized patient unless considered at low risk for complications, and it is always required if there's suspicion of an acute renal insult. For these reasons, potential missing creatinine values will be considered evidence of an improving patient and absence of AKI for that day.

ICU discharge and eventual readmission will also be tracked for secondary analyses. The death of the patient will also be recorded and included among the negative outcomes.

Assessment of efficacy The efficacy of both predictors will be evaluated with the construction of ROC curves. Due to the lack of previous studies on the subject, a current estimate of the accuracy of clinicians' prediction of AKI is not currently available. Appropriate sample size calculations to obtain sufficient power are therefore not feasible at the moment. Statistical analysis will be performed at the end of the data collection as follows. A ROC curve will be plotted both for the computer-based AKIpredictor and the continuous (%) estimate of AKI risk assessed by the clinicians at each of the three time-points (upon admission, on day 1 and at 24 hours). The area under the curve (AUC) of each plot will be calculated. The AUCs will then be compared in pairs by bootstrapping, and a significance value of the comparison will be derived. Subgroup analysis will be performed with the same approach.

Ethics and regulatory approvals:

The trial will be conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (current version) and the principles of good clinical practice. This protocol will be submitted to the ethical committee of the UZ Leuven. Any eventual subsequent protocol amendment will also be submitted to the ethical committee and Regulatory Authorities for approval.

By virtue of its non-interventional nature and that all the data will be stored in anonymized fashion, informed consent will not be required from the subjects if this is deemed appropriate by the local Ethical Committee. The investigators shall treat all information and data relating to the study as confidential and shall not disclose such information to any third parties or use such information for any purpose other than the performance of the study. The collection, processing and disclosure of personal data, such as patient health and medical information is subject to compliance with applicable personal data protection and the processing of personal data (Directive 95/46/EC and Belgian law of December 8, 1992 on the Protection of the Privacy in relation to the Processing of Personal Data).

Being tested
Computer model predictions of acute kidney injury
Medical subject headings
Critical Illness, Acute Kidney Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Computer model predictions of acute kidney injuryOther

    Comparison of the performances of AKIpredictor and physicians in predicting AKI stage 2 or 3 in the 7 days following ICU admission

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. AUROC comparison

    Comparison of the area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves between the predictions made by the AKIpredictor and the ones made by ICU physicians, to predict AKI 2-3.

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jul 2018
  2. Study start2 May 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2018
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
252 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03574896
Sponsor's protocol ID
S61388
Acronym
AKIpredValid
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
21 Jun 2018
Last updated
23 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Flechet M, Falini S, Bonetti C, Guiza F, Schetz M, Van den Berghe G, Meyfroidt G. Machine learning versus physicians' prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill adults: a prospective evaluation of the AKIpredictor. Crit Care. 2019 Aug 16;23(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2563-x.

    PubMed 31420056

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Critical Illness and Acute Kidney Injury, run by Geert Meyfroidt, MD, PhD at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

AUROC comparison (time frame: 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03574896, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in