AzTrials
AzTrials

KeratoconusTE-CXLNCT03584243

Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Eyes With Progressive Keratoconus

A study testing A crosslinking with oxygen treatment in people with Keratoconus, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Keratoconus is a corneal ectatic disease responsible for a loss of visual acuity when the steepening increases. Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) is a procedure that appears to halt or slow down the progression and avoid the visual impairment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Keratoconus
What is being tested?
A crosslinking with oxygen treatment
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
21 Dec 2017to Jun 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Be at least 18 years of age
  • Provide written informed consent
  • Diagnosis of progressive keratoconus
  • Best corrected visual acuity between 0,05 and 1 decimal scale
  • Willingness to follow all instructions and comply with schedule for follow-up visits.
  • Social security insurance or equivalent.

Who cannot join

  • Hypersensitivity to local treatment
  • Corneal pachymetry < 400 μm
  • Non progressive keratoconus
  • Aphakic eye or eye with cataract implant without UV filter
  • Concomitant corneal disease
  • History of corneal surgery
Show all 9Show fewer
  • History of crosslinking treatment
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Juridical protection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • University Hospital Toulouse

    Toulouse, 31052

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Efficiency and Security of Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Crosslinking With Oxygen to Treat Progressive Keratoconus.

Keratoconus is a corneal ectatic disease responsible for a loss of visual acuity when the steepening increases. Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) is a procedure that appears to halt or slow down the progression and avoid the visual impairment. However, such a technique requires the epithelium debridement, wich can be responsible for severs complications.

This study evaluate the safety and efficacy of transepithelial corneal crosslinking with oxygen to halt or slow down the progression of keratoconus. Such a procedure avoids the epithelium debridement and the related complications.

Read the detailed description

Keratoconus is a common bilateral progressive corneal ectatic disease causing visual impairment by inducing irregular astigmatism and corneal opacities. This disorder typically begins during teenage years. Patients with severe forms may need a corneal transplantation. The CXL procedure, described in 1998, allows to halt or to slow down the disease progression and may avoid other surgeries, e.g. transplantation. This technique creates links between collagen fibrils in order to rigidify the corneal stroma. The corneal stroma is soaked with a riboflavin solution (vitamin B2) before being exposed to ultraviolet-A (UVA) radiations. In the current standard CXL, the central corneal epithelium must be debrided to allow the penetration of riboflavin into the cornea, with a risk of side effects, such as pain for the first two post-operative days, temporary loss of visual acuity during the first three months, and serious complications such as infections and stromal opacity due to corneal scarring Transepithelial crosslinking is a non-invasive technique in which benzalkonium chloride is used to enhance the penetration of riboflavin into the cornea. To improve the reaction, a device provides oxygen to the corneal surface. The transepithelial technique could allow intrastromal riboflavin diffusion, while keeping the corneal epithelium on, conserving the efficiency of the standard procedure without the complications induced by epithelial debridement.

Patient with progressive keratoconus will be included and treated with the transepithelial procedure. The follow-up will last for one year. Every follow-up visit will evaluate the security of the procedure and its efficacy to stop or slow down the progression of the disease. Interrogatory and slit lamp examination will be performed to investigate the potential adverse effects of the procedure.

Conditions
Keratoconus
Being tested
A crosslinking with oxygen treatment
Keywords
collagen crosslinking, transepithelial crosslinking
Medical subject headings
Keratoconus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • A crosslinking with oxygen treatmentProcedure or surgery

    A supplemental oxygen system during the cross linking will be used to apply filtered, humidified oxygen across the surface of the eye through a mask. The oxygen flow will be turned on immediately prior to initiation of irradiation, and will continue through the irradiation period. The supplemental oxygen flow will be shut off following completion of the programmed irradiation time.

    All subjects will be evaluated at screening, day 3, and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment. At the same time all the potential adverse effects will be relieved.

Study groups in NCT03584243
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patient with progressive keratoconusExperimentalPatient with progressive keratoconus will be included after providing their consent. The intervention administrated is a cross-linking with oxygen treatment
Receives: Procedure: A crosslinking with oxygen treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy of the transepithelial crosslinking method

    The non-comparative evaluation of the efficacy of crosslinking of transepithelial corneal collagen with oxygen in the stabilization of progressive keratoconus during 12 months of follow-up.

    • Change from pretreatment baseline : keratometry at one year.

    Measured: One year

  2. Efficacy of the transepithelial crosslinking method

    The non-comparative evaluation of the efficacy of crosslinking of transepithelial corneal collagen with oxygen in the stabilization of progressive keratoconus during 12 months of follow-up.

    • Change from pretreatment in manifest refraction spherical equivalent at one year.

    Measured: One year

  3. Efficacy of the transepithelial crosslinking method

    • Change from pretreatment baseline : best corrected/uncorrected visual acuity at one year

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Security of the transepithelial crosslinking

    The non-comparative evaluation of the safety of crosslinking of transepithelial corneal collagen with oxygen in the stabilization of progressive keratoconus during 12 months of follow-up.

    • Change from pretreatment baseline : intraocular pressure at one year.

    Measured: One year

  2. Security of the transepithelial crosslinking

    The non-comparative evaluation of the safety of crosslinking of transepithelial corneal collagen with oxygen in the stabilization of progressive keratoconus during 12 months of follow-up.

    • Change from baseline in endothelial cell count at one year.

    Measured: One year

  3. Incidence and security of the transepithelial crosslinking

    • Incidence of treatment emergent ocular adverse events reported during the study.

    Measured: One year

  4. Incidence and security of the transepithelial crosslinking

    • Percentage of eyes with loss in best corrected of three lines from pretreatment baseline.

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2018
  2. Study start21 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completionSep 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
This experimental study is a prospective, one-center city and non-comparative study. Patient with progressive keratoconus will be included after providing their consent. The intervention of the study is to perform transepithelial crosslinking with oxygen Outcomes will be evaluated from pretreatment baseline of the patient.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
34 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03584243
Sponsor's protocol ID
RC31/17/0338
Other IDs
2017-A02661-52
Acronym
TE-CXL
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
26 Feb 2018
Last updated
12 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing A crosslinking with oxygen treatment in people with Keratoconus, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy of the transepithelial crosslinking method (time frame: One year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in