Atrial FibrillationNCT03593486
Low-Level EMF Stimulation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
A study testing Low-level Pulsed EMF in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Catheter Ablation, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This research has two main specific aims. First, a commercially-available stimulator will be utilized to assess the effect of low-level electromagnetic field (EMF) stimulation on atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility in patients with paroxysmal AF presenting for catheter ablation as compared to sham stimulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation, Autonomic Imbalance
- What is being tested?
- Low-level Pulsed EMF
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Sep 2018to 26 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients aged 21-85 presenting for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (episodes of atrial fibrillation lasting < 7 days with or without prior cardioversion)
Who cannot join
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%
- Stroke or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
- Greater than moderate valvular stenosis or regurgitation as assessed by pre-procedure transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)
- Presence of a prosthetic heart valve.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
OU Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120
About this study
Official title: Effect of Low-Level Electromagnetic Field Stimulation on Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
This research has two main specific aims. First, a commercially-available stimulator will be utilized to assess the effect of low-level electromagnetic field (EMF) stimulation on atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility in patients with paroxysmal AF presenting for catheter ablation as compared to sham stimulation. We hypothesize a reduction in AF inducibility in patients treated with EMF stimulation. Second, we aim to assess for the effect of low-level EMF on level of systemic inflammatory mediators. We hypothesize a reduction in the level of the inflammatory mediator tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-α in patients treated with EMF stimulation as compared to sham stimulation. The long-term objective of this research is to develop low-level EMF as a therapeutic alternative for patients with AF, and this research will help to determine the efficacy of low-level pulsed EMF in this regard.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Patients will be enrolled upon presentation to our electrophysiology (EP) lab for ablation of paroxysmal AF. After informed consent is obtained, the patient will be randomized to one of two protocols that have been pre-programmed into the magnetic field stimulator. As described below, one of the protocols will be an active stimulation protocol, and one will be sham (i.e. no stimulation delivered). These will be named "Stim 1" and "Stim 2" in the computer. Because the specifics of the protocol are programmed into the stimulator by the device manufacturer, investigators will not know which of these two protocols is active vs. sham. The patient will then be brought to the EP lab for the procedure and will be placed on the lab table with their head positioned in the magnetic coil. Vascular access will then be obtained and diagnostic catheters placed as is standard practice for AF ablation.
Because the study is limited to patients with paroxysmal AF, patients will begin the study in normal sinus rhythm (NSR). Before the experimental protocol is begun, baseline electrophysiologic intervals will be recorded as is standard practice for all patients presenting for EP study. This will include measurement of the atrio-ventricular nodal effective refractory period (AVNERP) using programmed stimulation from the right atrial (RA) appendage, atrio-his (AH) interval, and his-ventricular (HV) interval per standard practice. Burst atrial pacing will then be utilized to induce AF. Measurements of the number of burst pacing attempts required to induce AF, as well as the AF cycle length, and duration of pacing-induced AF will be recorded. Attempts at AF induction will occur for 15 minutes. Prior to induction of AF, 5ml of venous blood will be drawn from the central venous sheaths to measure baseline levels of the inflammatory mediator (TNF)-α. These samples will be stored for analysis.
After baseline measurements are obtained, the coil will be turned on and whichever protocol the patient has been assigned to will be run. The system to be used contains a signal-generator coupled to a Helmholtz coil capable of producing a magnetic field in response to an electric current. The Helmholtz coil itself is has 9 inches of separation in between the two coils that allows for placement of the coil around the participant's head and upper neck. The choice of the head and neck as the site of stimulation is intended to target the vagus nerve as it exits the jugular foramen to course caudally in the carotid sheath. The system is designed to create a homogenous, isotropic magnetic field with a field strength from 1 to 99 pico-Tesla (pT) with a frequency range of 0.01 Hz to 50 Hz.
Active Stimulation will involve application of a pulsed-EMF with the parameters 0.032 micro-gauss (µG) at 0.89 Hz for 60 minutes. In participants randomized to sham stimulation, the coil will be positioned around the neck as previously described, but no current will be applied to the stimulator.
During the 60 minute stimulation time, trans-septal puncture and mapping of the left atrium will be performed as is standard practice for this procedure, but no ablation will be performed. After the 60 minute protocol is complete, venous blood samples will again be drawn (within 5 minutes of protocol completion), stored, and analyzed as previously described. If the patient remains in AF after the end of the 60 minute session, they will be electrically cardioverted to sinus rhythm. The same stimulation protocol as described previously will again be employed, again noting number of attempts required to induce AF, duration of pacing-induced AF, AF cycle length, and measurements of AVNERP, AH, HV intervals and levels of TNF-α.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation, Autonomic Imbalance
- Being tested
- Low-level Pulsed EMF, Sham Stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low-level Pulsed EMFDevice
Low-level pulsed electromagnetic field stimulator delivered through a Helmholtz coil positioned around the participant's head and neck. Stimulation parameters are 0.032 µG at 0.89 Hz for 60 minutes.
Sham StimulationDevice
The stimulator will be placed around the participant's head and neck, but no EMF will be delivered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active Stimulation | Experimental | Participants will receive active EMF stimulation through the study device for 60 minutes during the procedure. Receives: Device: Low-level Pulsed EMF |
| Sham Stimulation | Sham comparator | The participant will be positioned in the stimulator, but no EMF stimulation will be delivered. Receives: Device: Sham Stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in duration of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation
Change in the duration of atrial fibrillation that is induced by burst-pacing compared between the two groups before and after the stimulation period.
Measured: 60 minutes
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number of pacing attempts required to induce AF
Number of burst-pacing attempts that are required to successfully induced atrial fibrillation, compared between the two groups before and after the stimulation period.
Measured: 60 minutes
AF Cycle length
Cycle length of induced atrial fibrillation, compared between the two groups before and after the stimulation period.
Measured: 60 minutes
TNF-alpha levels
Levels of the inflammatory mediator TNF-alpha measured in central venous blood, compared between the two groups before and after the stimulation period.
Measured: 60 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2018
- Study start27 Sep 2018
- Primary completion26 Nov 2019
- Study completion26 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of OklahomaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oklahoma
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sunny Po, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Oklahoma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03593486
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EMF for Atrial Fibrillation
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wang S, Zhou X, Wang Z, Huang B, Zhou L, Chen M, Yu L, Jiang H. Magnetic fields in noninvasive heart stimulation: A novel approach for anti-atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2015;190:54-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.155. Epub 2015 Apr 21. No abstract available.
PubMed 25912123Chen PS, Chen LS, Fishbein MC, Lin SF, Nattel S. Role of the autonomic nervous system in atrial fibrillation: pathophysiology and therapy. Circ Res. 2014 Apr 25;114(9):1500-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303772.
PubMed 24763467Scherlag BJ, Yamanashi WS, Hou Y, Jacobson JI, Jackman WM, Lazzara R. Magnetism and cardiac arrhythmias. Cardiol Rev. 2004 Mar-Apr;12(2):85-96. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000094029.10223.2f.
PubMed 14766023Yu L, Dyer JW, Scherlag BJ, Stavrakis S, Sha Y, Sheng X, Garabelli P, Jacobson J, Po SS. The use of low-level electromagnetic fields to suppress atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.022. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
PubMed 25533588Stavrakis S, Humphrey MB, Scherlag BJ, Hu Y, Jackman WM, Nakagawa H, Lockwood D, Lazzara R, Po SS. Low-level transcutaneous electrical vagus nerve stimulation suppresses atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 10;65(9):867-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.026.
PubMed 25744003
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Low-Level Electromagnetic Field Stimulation on Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03593486
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMF for Atrial Fibrillation
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation, Autonomic Imbalance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OklahomaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research has two main specific aims. First, a commercially-available stimulator will be utilized to assess the effect of low-level electromagnetic field (EMF) stimulation on atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility in patients with paroxysmal AF presenting for catheter ablation as compared to sham stimulation. We hypothesize a reduction in AF inducibility in patients treated with EMF stimulation. Second, we aim to assess for the effect of low-level EMF on level of systemic inflammatory mediators. We hypothesize a reduction in the level of the inflammatory mediator tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-α in patients treated with EMF stimulation as compared to sham stimulation. The long-term objective of this research is to develop low-level EMF as a therapeutic alternative for patients with AF, and this research will help to determine the efficacy of low-level pulsed EMF in this regard.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Patients will be enrolled upon presentation to our electrophysiology (EP) lab for ablation of paroxysmal AF. After informed consent is obtained, the patient will be randomized to one of two protocols that have been pre-programmed into the magnetic field stimulator. As described below, one of the protocols will be an active stimulation protocol, and one will be sham (i.e. no stimulation delivered). These will be named "Stim 1" and "Stim 2" in the computer. Because the specifics of the protocol are programmed into the stimulator by the device manufacturer, investigators will not know which of these two protocols is active vs. sham. The patient will then be brought to the EP lab for the procedure and will be placed on the lab table with their head positioned in the magnetic coil. Vascular access will then be obtained and diagnostic catheters placed as is standard practice for AF ablation.
Because the study is limited to patients with paroxysmal AF, patients will begin the study in normal sinus rhythm (NSR). Before the experimental protocol is begun, baseline electrophysiologic intervals will be recorded as is standard practice for all patients presenting for EP study. This will include measurement of the atrio-ventricular nodal effective refractory period (AVNERP) using programmed stimulation from the right atrial (RA) appendage, atrio-his (AH) interval, and his-ventricular (HV) interval per standard practice. Burst atrial pacing will then be utilized to induce AF. Measurements of the number of burst pacing attempts required to induce AF, as well as the AF cycle length, and duration of pacing-induced AF will be recorded. Attempts at AF induction will occur for 15 minutes. Prior to induction of AF, 5ml of venous blood will be drawn from the central venous sheaths to measure baseline levels of the inflammatory mediator (TNF)-α. These samples will be stored for analysis.
After baseline measurements are obtained, the coil will be turned on and whichever protocol the patient has been assigned to will be run. The system to be used contains a signal-generator coupled to a Helmholtz coil capable of producing a magnetic field in response to an electric current. The Helmholtz coil itself is has 9 inches of separation in between the two coils that allows for placement of the coil around the participant's head and upper neck. The choice of the head and neck as the site of stimulation is intended to target the vagus nerve as it exits the jugular foramen to course caudally in the carotid sheath. The system is designed to create a homogenous, isotropic magnetic field with a field strength from 1 to 99 pico-Tesla (pT) with a frequency range of 0.01 Hz to 50 Hz.
Active Stimulation will involve application of a pulsed-EMF with the parameters 0.032 micro-gauss (µG) at 0.89 Hz for 60 minutes. In participants randomized to sham stimulation, the coil will be positioned around the neck as previously described, but no current will be applied to the stimulator.
During the 60 minute stimulation time, trans-septal puncture and mapping of the left atrium will be performed as is standard practice for this procedure, but no ablation will be performed. After the 60 minute protocol is complete, venous blood samples will again be drawn (within 5 minutes of protocol completion), stored, and analyzed as previously described. If the patient remains in AF after the end of the 60 minute session, they will be electrically cardioverted to sinus rhythm. The same stimulation protocol as described previously will again be employed, again noting number of attempts required to induce AF, duration of pacing-induced AF, AF cycle length, and measurements of AVNERP, AH, HV intervals and levels of TNF-α.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active Stimulation | Experimental | Device: Low-level Pulsed EMFParticipants will receive active EMF stimulation through the study device for 60 minutes during the procedure. |
| Sham Stimulation | Sham comparator | Device: Sham StimulationThe participant will be positioned in the stimulator, but no EMF stimulation will be delivered. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients aged 21-85 presenting for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (episodes of atrial fibrillation lasting < 7 days with or without prior cardioversion)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%
- Stroke or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
- Greater than moderate valvular stenosis or regurgitation as assessed by pre-procedure transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)
- Presence of a prosthetic heart valve.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low-level Pulsed EMFLow-level pulsed electromagnetic field stimulator delivered through a Helmholtz coil positioned around the participant's head and neck. Stimulation parameters are 0.032 µG at 0.89 Hz for 60 minutes. | Device | Active Stimulation |
| Sham StimulationThe stimulator will be placed around the participant's head and neck, but no EMF will be delivered. | Device | Sham Stimulation |
Primary outcome
Change in duration of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation
Time frame: 60 minutes
Change in the duration of atrial fibrillation that is induced by burst-pacing compared between the two groups before and after the stimulation period.
3 secondary outcomes
Number of pacing attempts required to induce AF
Time frame: 60 minutes
AF Cycle length
Time frame: 60 minutes
TNF-alpha levels
Time frame: 60 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2019.
- Background: PubMed 25912123Wang S, Zhou X, Wang Z, Huang B, Zhou L, Chen M, Yu L, Jiang H. Magnetic fields in noninvasive heart stimulation: A novel approach for anti-atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2015;190:54-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.155. Epub 2015 Apr 21. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24763467Chen PS, Chen LS, Fishbein MC, Lin SF, Nattel S. Role of the autonomic nervous system in atrial fibrillation: pathophysiology and therapy. Circ Res. 2014 Apr 25;114(9):1500-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303772.
- Background: PubMed 14766023Scherlag BJ, Yamanashi WS, Hou Y, Jacobson JI, Jackman WM, Lazzara R. Magnetism and cardiac arrhythmias. Cardiol Rev. 2004 Mar-Apr;12(2):85-96. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000094029.10223.2f.
- Background: PubMed 25533588Yu L, Dyer JW, Scherlag BJ, Stavrakis S, Sha Y, Sheng X, Garabelli P, Jacobson J, Po SS. The use of low-level electromagnetic fields to suppress atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.022. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
- Background: PubMed 25744003Stavrakis S, Humphrey MB, Scherlag BJ, Hu Y, Jackman WM, Nakagawa H, Lockwood D, Lazzara R, Po SS. Low-level transcutaneous electrical vagus nerve stimulation suppresses atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 10;65(9):867-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
An Investigator-initiated, Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, Comparing the Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Standard Treatment on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients Without Hypertensive
Atrial Fibrillation (Persistent), Catheter Ablation
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Resumption of Anticoagulation After Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding (MGIB)
Not yet recruiting
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Repeat Ablation Strategies With Durably Isolated Pulmonary Veins
Ablation Techniques, Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)
Recruiting
Structured Treatment and Resource Efficiency Assessment With Lean Six Sigma Integration for Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Active, not recruiting
VOLT CE Mark Study
Atrial Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sunny Po, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Oklahoma
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Low-level Pulsed EMF in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Catheter Ablation, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in duration of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation (time frame: 60 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03593486, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2019.