KeratoconusNCT03619434
Femtolaser Assisted Keratoplasty Versus Conventional Keratoplasty
A study testing Femtosecond Laser and Trephine blade in people with Keratoconus and Fuchs Dystrophy, run by University of Southampton at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This pilot study will compare upto 15 patients undergoing femtolaser assisted keratoplasty (using CE[Conformité Européene] approved femtolaser apparatus) with upto 15 patients undergoing conventional keratoplasty with a manual trephine. Patients will be randomly assigned to either group. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Keratoconus, Fuchs Dystrophy, Corneal Disease
- What is being tested?
- Femtosecond Laser and Trephine blade
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2019to 26 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eyes with corneal opacities owing to previous corneal pathology.
Who cannot join
- Eyes with concomitant ocular pathology which may affect visual acuity.
- Eyes who received previous corneal grafts.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Southampton Eye Unit
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD
Parwez Hossain, MhCHb, PhD, 02381204270, P.N.Hossain@soton.ac.uk
Parwez Hossain, MhCHb, PhD
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study of Femtolaser Assisted Keratoplasty Versus Conventional Keratoplasty
This pilot study will compare upto 15 patients undergoing femtolaser assisted keratoplasty (using CE[Conformité Européene] approved femtolaser apparatus) with upto 15 patients undergoing conventional keratoplasty with a manual trephine. Patients will be randomly assigned to either group. All keratoplasties will be penetrating keratoplasties. The following aims of this research is detailed below:
- Does femtosecond laser assisted keratoplasty ( FLAK ) yield faster visual recovery and better long term BCVA (Best Corrected Visual Acuity)?
- Does FLAK offer a biomechanically stronger cornea and thereby more safety and less risk of wound dehiscence?
- Is there any difference between FLAK and conventional keratoplasty in terms of graft failure or rejection?
Read more
Follow up in best corrected visual acuity, various refraction/astigmatism measurements, intraocular pressure, graft rejection/failure rates, pachymetry and corneal hysteresis and resistance factor will be recorded at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months and 1 year and 18 months postoperatively.
This study, to the investigators' knowledge will be the first randomised controlled trial in this area, the first to provide an empirical measurement to biomechanical stability of the cornea with the femtolaser, and the first done in an NHS (National Health Service) setting.
Read the detailed description
Introduction The femtosecond laser has had a profound effect on refractive surgery and, more recently, on cataract surgery and cornea transplantation. The superior precision and control offered by femtosecond laser and its potential use in cornea transplantation show promise in terms of wound stability and strength.
By doing this research project the investigators aim to answer the following questions:
- Does femtosecond laser assisted keratoplasty ( FLAK ) yield faster visual recovery and better long term BCVA?
- Does FLAK offer a biomechanically stronger cornea and thereby more safety and less risk of wound dehiscence?
- Is there any difference between FLAK and conventional keratoplasty in terms of graft failure or rejection?
There have been other studies that have compared femtolaser to the manual trephine in corneal transplant keratoplasty surgery. The investigators' study, to their knowledge, will be the first randomised controlled trial in this area. The majority of interventional studies comparing the two procedures are retrospective case controls. This study, will also be the first to provide an empirical measurement to the biomechanical stability of corneas that have undergone femtolaser corneal transplant. Although theorised to be better with the femtolaser, there has yet to have been a comparative study that has utilised quantitative evidence supporting this. By measuring postoperative corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor using an ocular response analyser, the investigators hope to be able to do that.
Recruitment, inclusion/exclusion and method Patients attending the cornea firm at the eye unit in University Hospitals Southampton who are indicated for penetrating keratoplasty as a result of corneal disease or pathology will be recruited. The participants have no connection to the university or the researcher that is known before the research starts. The aim for this study is to have a minimum of 10 patients recruited altogether and a maximum of 30.
Inclusion criteria: • Eyes with corneal opacities owing to previous corneal pathology.
Exclusion criteria: • Eyes with concomitant ocular pathology which may affect visual acuity.
- Eyes who received previous corneal grafts. Only after the patient has given their informed consent and confirmation that they meet the criteria will they be formally included in the study.
After inclusion in the study participants will be randomised into two groups of equal numbers to either undergo femtolaser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty or to undergo conventional keratoplasty. Other than the use of instrument to make incisions for the graft on the host cornea, all other aspects of the surgery will be kept as homogenous as possible.
Patients will stay overnight or have this operation done as a day case depending on time of day the operation is done. They will then be followed up at 1 day, 1 week, 1 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months in various different visual outcome measurements as well as biomechanical measures of corneal healing. The two groups will be statistically compared at each timepoint.
This study also has a further role as a pilot study to assess the feasibility of doing a study like this on a larger scale, as a randomised, controlled trial.
Consent Patients who are deemed to not have capacity will not be eligible for this study as they cannot proceed with the consent form. All staff involved in the study have appropriate training in how to judge capacity.
For those with capacity, they will read the patient information sheet first. The patient information sheet contains in layman's terms full details for potential research participants, covering issues from why the researchers are doing the study, what the researchers expect from them, the possibility of adverse effects and anonymity and confidentiality. If patients are still interested after that they will receive a consent form to be signed by them. They will be given a copy of the signed consent form to keep.
Risks, burdens and benefits Risks are explained in the patient information sheet so patients have a fully informed decision about whether to take part in the study. From the investigators point of view it is important to note these patients for this study are indicated for corneal transplant surgery - that is it is felt the benefits of a conventional surgery outweighs the normal risks of corneal transplant surgery. Femtolaser keratoplasty is not known to add any risks that is not present in conventional keratoplasty. It is CE approved for the use in creating cuts in the cornea, as the surgeons are doing for corneal transplants.
Confidentiality The nature of this study means that their details will be known to the surgeons and staff performing the surgery in data collection but these will be coded/anonymised for members of the team involved in other parts of the study, leaving the number of people who know linking details to a minimum. Any documents linking the patient's details to the code will only be the responsibility of the surgeons and their staff. The consent forms themselves will be kept inside a locked storage unit in the Southampton Eye Unit. The patients will be reassured their personal details will not be known to any of the researchers other than the surgeons and their staff that will carry out the surgery.
- Conditions
- Keratoconus, Fuchs Dystrophy, Corneal Disease
- Being tested
- Femtosecond Laser, Trephine blade
- Keywords
- Femtolaser, Corneal Transplant, Keratoplasty, Corneal Graft, Laser, Trephine
- Medical subject headings
- Keratoconus, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy, Corneal Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Femtosecond LaserProcedure or surgery
The laser will be used to make incisions in the cornea for the graft.
Trephine bladeProcedure or surgery
A trephine blade will be used to make incisions in the cornea for the graft
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional keratoplasty group (Control) | Active comparator | This group will undergo conventional penetrating keratoplasty with a trephine blade. Receives: Procedure: Trephine blade |
| Femtolaser group | Experimental | This group will undergo femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty. Receives: Procedure: Femtosecond Laser |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Measure of clarity of vision
Measured: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Subjective refraction
A measure of refractive error
Measured: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Intraocular pressure
Fluid pressure inside the eye
Measured: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Corneal hysteresis
Measure of biomechanical stability of the cornea. Will be done by one machine (Ocular Response Analyser)
Measured: Followed up once at 3 months
Corneal topography
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal curvature. Will be done using a pentacam.
Measured: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Endothelial cell density
A measure of healing in the new graft
Measured: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Corneal Resistance Factor
Measure of biomechanical stability of the cornea. Will be done by one machine (Ocular Response Analyser)
Measured: Followed up once at 3 months
Keratometry
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal curvature. Will be done using a pentacam.
Measured: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Pachymetry
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal thickness. Will be done using a pentacam,
Measured: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Corneal irregularity index
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal curvature. Will be done using a pentacam.
Measured: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Astigmatism
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal curvature. Will be done using a pentacam.
Measured: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2018
- Study start1 Feb 2019
- Primary completion26 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion26 Dec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for KeratoconusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a prospective cohort study where a maximum of 30 patients attending the cornea firm at the eye unit in University Hospitals Southampton who are indicated for penetrating keratoplasty as a result of corneal disease or pathology will be recruited. All patients will receive a complete ophthalmological examination preoperatively. Subjects will then be divided randomly into 2 groups of 15, should we get 30 patients;
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southampton
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Parwez Hossain, B ChB, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Southampton
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03619434
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 32158
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 22 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study of Femtolaser Assisted Keratoplasty Versus Conventional Keratoplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03619434
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 32158
- Conditions
- Keratoconus, Fuchs Dystrophy, Corneal Disease
- Keywords
- Femtolaser, Corneal Transplant, Keratoplasty, Corneal Graft, Laser, Trephine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SouthamptonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 26 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This pilot study will compare upto 15 patients undergoing femtolaser assisted keratoplasty (using CE[Conformité Européene] approved femtolaser apparatus) with upto 15 patients undergoing conventional keratoplasty with a manual trephine. Patients will be randomly assigned to either group. All keratoplasties will be penetrating keratoplasties. The following aims of this research is detailed below:
- Does femtosecond laser assisted keratoplasty ( FLAK ) yield faster visual recovery and better long term BCVA (Best Corrected Visual Acuity)?
- Does FLAK offer a biomechanically stronger cornea and thereby more safety and less risk of wound dehiscence?
- Is there any difference between FLAK and conventional keratoplasty in terms of graft failure or rejection?
Follow up in best corrected visual acuity, various refraction/astigmatism measurements, intraocular pressure, graft rejection/failure rates, pachymetry and corneal hysteresis and resistance factor will be recorded at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months and 1 year and 18 months postoperatively.
This study, to the investigators' knowledge will be the first randomised controlled trial in this area, the first to provide an empirical measurement to biomechanical stability of the cornea with the femtolaser, and the first done in an NHS (National Health Service) setting.
Detailed description
Introduction The femtosecond laser has had a profound effect on refractive surgery and, more recently, on cataract surgery and cornea transplantation. The superior precision and control offered by femtosecond laser and its potential use in cornea transplantation show promise in terms of wound stability and strength.
By doing this research project the investigators aim to answer the following questions:
- Does femtosecond laser assisted keratoplasty ( FLAK ) yield faster visual recovery and better long term BCVA?
- Does FLAK offer a biomechanically stronger cornea and thereby more safety and less risk of wound dehiscence?
- Is there any difference between FLAK and conventional keratoplasty in terms of graft failure or rejection?
There have been other studies that have compared femtolaser to the manual trephine in corneal transplant keratoplasty surgery. The investigators' study, to their knowledge, will be the first randomised controlled trial in this area. The majority of interventional studies comparing the two procedures are retrospective case controls. This study, will also be the first to provide an empirical measurement to the biomechanical stability of corneas that have undergone femtolaser corneal transplant. Although theorised to be better with the femtolaser, there has yet to have been a comparative study that has utilised quantitative evidence supporting this. By measuring postoperative corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor using an ocular response analyser, the investigators hope to be able to do that.
Recruitment, inclusion/exclusion and method Patients attending the cornea firm at the eye unit in University Hospitals Southampton who are indicated for penetrating keratoplasty as a result of corneal disease or pathology will be recruited. The participants have no connection to the university or the researcher that is known before the research starts. The aim for this study is to have a minimum of 10 patients recruited altogether and a maximum of 30.
Inclusion criteria: • Eyes with corneal opacities owing to previous corneal pathology.
Exclusion criteria: • Eyes with concomitant ocular pathology which may affect visual acuity.
- Eyes who received previous corneal grafts. Only after the patient has given their informed consent and confirmation that they meet the criteria will they be formally included in the study.
After inclusion in the study participants will be randomised into two groups of equal numbers to either undergo femtolaser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty or to undergo conventional keratoplasty. Other than the use of instrument to make incisions for the graft on the host cornea, all other aspects of the surgery will be kept as homogenous as possible.
Patients will stay overnight or have this operation done as a day case depending on time of day the operation is done. They will then be followed up at 1 day, 1 week, 1 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months in various different visual outcome measurements as well as biomechanical measures of corneal healing. The two groups will be statistically compared at each timepoint.
This study also has a further role as a pilot study to assess the feasibility of doing a study like this on a larger scale, as a randomised, controlled trial.
Consent Patients who are deemed to not have capacity will not be eligible for this study as they cannot proceed with the consent form. All staff involved in the study have appropriate training in how to judge capacity.
For those with capacity, they will read the patient information sheet first. The patient information sheet contains in layman's terms full details for potential research participants, covering issues from why the researchers are doing the study, what the researchers expect from them, the possibility of adverse effects and anonymity and confidentiality. If patients are still interested after that they will receive a consent form to be signed by them. They will be given a copy of the signed consent form to keep.
Risks, burdens and benefits Risks are explained in the patient information sheet so patients have a fully informed decision about whether to take part in the study. From the investigators point of view it is important to note these patients for this study are indicated for corneal transplant surgery - that is it is felt the benefits of a conventional surgery outweighs the normal risks of corneal transplant surgery. Femtolaser keratoplasty is not known to add any risks that is not present in conventional keratoplasty. It is CE approved for the use in creating cuts in the cornea, as the surgeons are doing for corneal transplants.
Confidentiality The nature of this study means that their details will be known to the surgeons and staff performing the surgery in data collection but these will be coded/anonymised for members of the team involved in other parts of the study, leaving the number of people who know linking details to a minimum. Any documents linking the patient's details to the code will only be the responsibility of the surgeons and their staff. The consent forms themselves will be kept inside a locked storage unit in the Southampton Eye Unit. The patients will be reassured their personal details will not be known to any of the researchers other than the surgeons and their staff that will carry out the surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a prospective cohort study where a maximum of 30 patients attending the cornea firm at the eye unit in University Hospitals Southampton who are indicated for penetrating keratoplasty as a result of corneal disease or pathology will be recruited. All patients will receive a complete ophthalmological examination preoperatively. Subjects will then be divided randomly into 2 groups of 15, should we get 30 patients;
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional keratoplasty group (Control) | Active comparator | Procedure: Trephine bladeThis group will undergo conventional penetrating keratoplasty with a trephine blade. |
| Femtolaser group | Experimental | Procedure: Femtosecond LaserThis group will undergo femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Eyes with corneal opacities owing to previous corneal pathology.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Eyes with concomitant ocular pathology which may affect visual acuity.
- Eyes who received previous corneal grafts.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Femtosecond LaserThe laser will be used to make incisions in the cornea for the graft. | Procedure or surgery | Femtolaser group |
| Trephine bladeA trephine blade will be used to make incisions in the cornea for the graft | Procedure or surgery | Conventional keratoplasty group (Control) |
Primary outcome
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Measure of clarity of vision
Subjective refraction
Time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
A measure of refractive error
Intraocular pressure
Time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
Fluid pressure inside the eye
Corneal hysteresis
Time frame: Followed up once at 3 months
Measure of biomechanical stability of the cornea. Will be done by one machine (Ocular Response Analyser)
Corneal topography
Time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal curvature. Will be done using a pentacam.
Endothelial cell density
Time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
A measure of healing in the new graft
Corneal Resistance Factor
Time frame: Followed up once at 3 months
Measure of biomechanical stability of the cornea. Will be done by one machine (Ocular Response Analyser)
Keratometry
Time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal curvature. Will be done using a pentacam.
Pachymetry
Time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal thickness. Will be done using a pentacam,
Corneal irregularity index
Time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal curvature. Will be done using a pentacam.
Astigmatism
Time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months
A visual outcome measure assessing corneal curvature. Will be done using a pentacam.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Dec 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Keratoconus
RecruitingObservational study
UNITY DX Cornea Study
Tomography
Not yet recruiting
Performance Evaluation of the OCUTOP Hand-held Corneal Topographer
Corneal Topography, Dry Eye Syndromes
Recruiting
Proof-of-Concept for a Novel Optical Aperture Contact Lens in Presbyopia and Keratoconus
Keratoconus, Presbyopia
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Test the Diagnostic Potential of Brillouin Microscopy for Corneal Ectasia
Keratoconus, Ectasia
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Corneal Biomechanical Analysis Using Brillouin Microscopy
Keratoconus, Keratoconus, Unstable
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Parwez Hossain, B ChB, PhD principal investigator
University of Southampton
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Femtosecond Laser and Trephine blade in people with Keratoconus and Fuchs Dystrophy, run by University of Southampton at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Parwez N Hossain, MB ChB, PhD (02381204270, P.N.Hossain@soton.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (time frame: Followed up periodically for upto 18 months). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2020.