Musculoskeletal Diseases or ConditionsFYSIOPRIMNCT03626389
Clinical Course of Patients Receiving Physiotherapy Services in Primary Health Care
An observational study of Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions and Neurologic Disorder, run by University of Oslo at 2 sites in Norway.
Trial summary
Background: Physiotherapists (PTs) in primary health care manage patients with a large variation in medical diagnosis, age, functional status, disability and prognosis. Lack of knowledge and systematically collected data about patients treated by PTs in primary health care has prompted this longitudinal observational… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 to 125 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions, Neurologic Disorder, Widespread Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Physiotherapy
- How many people
- 4,985 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesNorway
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2016to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 to 125 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The patients are recruited through physiotherapists in primary health care.
Who may be able to join
- any patient seeking or receiving physiotherapy services in primary health care
Who cannot join
- Not understanding Norwegian or English language
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Norway2 sites
Approx 100 physiotherapists in Norway
Oslo
Physiotherapists in Trondheim
Trondheim
About this study
Official title: Clinical Course and Prognostic Factors of Patients Receiving Physiotherapy Services in Primary Health Care in Norway (FYSIOPRIM)
Background: Physiotherapists (PTs) in primary health care manage patients with a large variation in medical diagnosis, age, functional status, disability and prognosis. Lack of knowledge and systematically collected data about patients treated by PTs in primary health care has prompted this longitudinal observational physiotherapy project in Norway. This paper aims to describe a method for developing a database of patients managed by PTs in primary health care to study patients' characteristics, treatment courses and prognostic factors.
The study is a longitudinal observational project, following patients through physiotherapy treatment periods in primary health care in Norway and until one year after inclusion. The project involves both private practice and municipally employed PTs working in primary health care in eight municipalities in Norway. The participants are recruited to three different parts of the project depending on age and whether they are referred to a private practice or a municipally employed PT. All data are recorded electronically, transferred and stored securely. All patients complete extensive questionnaires providing information about demographics, disability and function, pain related variables, treatment and evaluation of treatment as well as clinical tests. The PTs have access to their own patients' data. The investigators have also prepared for linkage to national patient registers and population-based studies to be able to gather further important data.
This project will have important implications for physiotherapy services in primary health care. The database already contains almost 3000 patients, and data collection is ongoing. Preliminary analyses suggest that the patients included so far are representative of the larger population of patients treated by private practice or municipally employed PTs in Norway. This large scale prospective physiotherapy project will provide knowledge about the patient groups treated, treatment given as well as short and long term outcome of the patients.
Read the detailed description
The primary aim of the FYSIOPRIM project is to build a database by systematically collecting data from baseline throughout the intervention period and beyond, including both patient-reported outcome measures, the patients' and PTs' goals and plans for intervention, and their evaluation thereof. This will enable description of patients receiving physiotherapy services, of goal-setting and type of interventions and how general health, physical function and relevant clinical factors change throughout and after a treatment period. Secondly, the investigators want to study associations and interaction effects between and among clinical characteristics, interventions and change as well as perform health-economic evaluations. The investigators will also examine how physiotherapy practice is affected by using the system for systematic registration of clinical data and effects of such registration. Moreover, the investigators will be able to compare patients receiving physiotherapy services with information from national patient registries. In addition, elderly participants' physical fitness, balance and walking ability will be examined to study associations between these aspects of physical functioning and health-related quality of life, self-reported physical and psychological functioning as well as response to physical fitness tests. The investigators will compare data from this group of elderly with data from other patients with musculoskeletal complaints who receive physiotherapy treatment, and with similar data from large population-based studies in Norway. Finally, this project enables methodological studies to validate clinical tests and questionnaires.
Design and setting This is a longitudinal observational project following patients through physiotherapy treatment periods in primary health care in Norway and until one year after baseline. The project involves both private practice and municipally employed PTs working in primary health care in eight municipalities of Norway; Lørenskog, Ski, Nedre Eiker, Lillehammer, Stavanger, Bergen, Trondheim and Alta. All five health regions of Norway are represented. The Norwegian Health care system is publicly funded. PTs working as private practitioners have an agreement with the municipality. Hence, they are partly paid by the municipality (as a financial support for practice) and partly paid per visit by the Norwegian Health Economics Administration (HELFO) and the patient's charge (maximum around 200 Euro per patient per calendar year). Patients seeking physiotherapy services in private practice will normally meet at the PT's clinic.
Municipally employed PTs are on fixed salary. They work in an out-patient setting, and their patients receive physiotherapy services in their usual daily environment, i.e. for children at home, in kindergarten or in school, and for elderly patients often in their own home. There are no clear guidelines for which patients that should receive physiotherapy from a private practice or a municipally employed PT. The choice can be based on previous personal experiences with physiotherapy, the possibility to visit a clinic, evaluation of need and/or benefit of treating the patients in their own setting.
Characteristics of participants
The participants are recruited to three different parts of the project depending on age and whether they are referred to a private practice PT or to a municipally employed PT (in this project, these PTs are from Trondheim). The three parts of the project are:
- Adults seeking physiotherapy services in private practice This part of the project started data collection in June 2015, and data collection is planned to continue through June 2020. From January 2016 through December 2017, data were collected from a total of 2754 patients above the age of 18 years seeking physiotherapy treatment from 111 PTs in eight municipalities in different parts of Norway, including 536 patients already in treatment. Among the 111 PTs, 78 (70.3%) are general PTs, 20 (18.0%) are manual therapists and13 (11.7%) are PTs with special education in psychomotor physiotherapy. Seventy-seven (69.4%) of the PTs are working in Trondheim.
- Adults and elderly receiving physiotherapy services in Trondheim Municipality This part of the project collected data from the beginning of May 2016 to the end of May 2018. From January 2016 until the end of September 2017, data were collected from 684 adults and elderly patients receiving physiotherapy services from approximately 55 PTs working with adults and elderly in the municipality of Trondheim in Norway. Adults and elderly may be referred from general practitioners, occupational therapists, health professionals at health care centers, rehabilitation centers or hospitals, or by proxy. The physiotherapy services to adults and elderly include early intervention, activities of daily living (ADL) rehabilitation and ordinary physiotherapy, all of which are typically delivered in a home setting. Early intervention is a collaboration between health and welfare centers and units for physiotherapy and occupational services and is offered to patients in need of limited services who are referred to municipality health care services for the first time. ADL rehabilitation are offered to patients in risk of functional deterioration who are receiving home based services, while ordinary physiotherapy is offered to patients in need of more specific physiotherapy services.
- Children receiving physiotherapy services in Trondheim Municipality This part of the project collected data from May 2016 through April 2017. During this period, data were collected from 165 children aged 0-18 years receiving physiotherapy services from approximately 25 PTs working with children in the municipality of Trondheim in Norway. For children, physiotherapy may be initiated on referral from parents, personnel at kindergarten or in school, general practitioners, occupational therapists, and health professionals at primary health care centers or hospitals. The children typically receive physiotherapy services at the primary health care centers, in their own home or in kindergarten or at school, depending on the child's usual primary location and condition.
Data collection Patients are asked to participate at their first time encounter with a physiotherapist in primary health care. Project information and consent forms are available in Norwegian and English. The investigators collect baseline data in two steps. First, the therapist and the participant together fill in information about the main problem, and jointly agree on goals for treatment and a treatment plan. The therapist also asks the participant for their own specific functional problem using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). The therapist provides information about the referral, diagnosis and whether any disease-specific questionnaires should be used for this participant. Secondly, the participant completes questionnaires themselves, either using an e-tablet or through a web-link sent by e-mail. A set of outcome data are common to all, and in addition disease-specific outcome measures are included for some common patient groups.
Approximately 1 month after baseline (for participants seeking PTs in private practice), or 2-3 months after baseline (for participants receiving physiotherapy from municipally employed PTs), the therapist and the participant together evaluate goal achievement and fulfilment of the treatment plan so far. They also adjust these when needed and the participant recompletes the PSFS. Three months (for private practice) or six months after baseline (for participants receiving physiotherapy from municipally employed PTs), the PT and the participant again evaluate goal achievement and fulfilments of the treatment plan. The participant then completes the same standardized questionnaires as at baseline. The same questionnaires are also completed 6 and 12 months after baseline by participants treated by PTs in private practice using a web-link sent by smartphone or e-mail. All participants treated by PTs in private practice receive reminders once a week, up to three times, by sms and e-mail if they have not answered the questionnaires.
All data are collected electronically using an application run on a tablet or through a web-link. The software is provided by Infopad AS (www.infopad.no). Immediately after the completion of the questionnaires all data are transferred to a backend secure server with in-memory encryption. The PTs have access to their own participants' data either through a web-site and/or by importing data into their electronic medical journal. The journal number of the participant is used as the study identifier to enable data flow between the electronic medical journal and the secure backend server. The data from all participants are copied to a secure server at the University of Oslo set up for research purposes (Services for Sensitive Data). Data management is done according to the quality assurance system of the University of Oslo. The investigators have prepared for linkage between data from FYSIOPRIM and data from national patient registers. This will be done by use of the participant's journal number to access their unique 11-digit Norwegian personal number.
All the data are collected electronically, thereby avoiding the possibility of mistakes when transferring data from paper forms to electronic data. Data management is performed using STATA 15 (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas, USA). The raw data are stored in a secure database where only researchers associated with the project have access. Before data can be used for analyses a range of automated procedures for data preparation and quality checking are performed using standardized, written scripts in STATA. Examples are to check, i) patterns of missing data, ii) values outside the possible range of a variable (e.g., age>120 years), iii) conflicting answers (e.g., pregnancy and male) and iv) unexpected frequency distributions for categorical variables. The investigators will explore each variable graphically using histograms and plots to evaluate the data distribution. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the patient populations using parametric or non-parametric statistics according to the data distribution. Detailed descriptions of all the statistical analyses planned are beyond the length of this paper. Thus, specific analyses related to investigation of associations between variables, prognosis and clinical course will be described in future publications.
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions, Neurologic Disorder, Widespread Chronic Pain, Psychosomatic Disorder, Arthritis, Injuries
- Being tested
- Physiotherapy
- Keywords
- physiotherapy, primary health care setting
- Medical subject headings
- Musculoskeletal Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Chronic Pain, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Arthritis, Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PhysiotherapyOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients receiving physiotherapy in primary care | Physiotherapy, without predetermined selection of specific modalities Receives: Other: Physiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Health-Related Quality of LIfe - assessed by EuroQual 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Utility measure of Health related quality of life. Range -0.59 (worst) to 1 (best)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Participants identify activities that are difficult to perform and scores them from 0 (cannot perform) to 10 (perform without problems)
Measured: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
General Perceived Effect
A global assessment of change- 7 level scale. Score range 1 (very much better) to 5 (very much worse)
Measured: 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Pain intensity
Pain intensity assessed by a numeric rating scale. Range 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable)
Measured: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (27)
Change in Work participation
Sick leave (% of full time)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in work ability
One questeion. Range 0 (cannot work at all) -10 (can work at my very best)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in pain distribution
Participants marks pain distribution in a drawing- max no of sites:112
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in use of analgesics containing paracetamol
Participants indicate if used last week and how often (less than daily, 1-4 per day, >5 per day)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in use of analgesics containing ibuprofen
Participants indicate if used last week and how often (less than daily, 1-4 per day, >5 per day)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in use of analgesics containing acetylsalicylacid
Participants indicate if used last week and how often (less than daily, 1-4 per day, >5 per day)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in emotional distress assessed by Hopkins Symptoms Check List (HSCL)
10 questions. Score range: 1 (best) to 4 (worst)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Pain Self-efficacy
Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (2 items). Score range 0 worst) to12 (best)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in health related quality of life assessed by 15D
Utility merasure of Health related quality of life - range 0 (worst) to 1 (best)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in catastrophising thoughts assessed by Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Neck disability Index (NDI)
Questionnaire - Score range 0 (best) to 100 (worst)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Questionnaire - Score range 0 (best) to 100 (worst)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Questionnaire for patients with shoulder pain - Range 0 (no disability) to 100 (completely disabled)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (Quick-DASH)
Questionnaire for patients with shoulder or arm pain - Range 0 (no disability) to 100 (completely disabled)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in temporal aspects of pain
Participants responds with yes/no to questions on continual pain and variability in pain intensity
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in hip disability - assessed by the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Hip disability questionnaire for patient with hip pain - 5 domains (pain, symptoms, ADL, sports/recreation, quality of life). Score range 0 (best) -100 (worst)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in pelvic girdle pain and disability assessed by the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire
Quesionnaire questionnaire for patient with pelvic girdle pain - range 0 (no disability or pain) to 100 (high disability and pain)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in knee disability - assessed by the Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Knee disability questionnaire for patient with knee pain - 5 domains (pain, symptoms, ADL, sports/recreation, quality of life). Score range 0 (best) -100 (worst)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in physical functioning assessed by the Physcal function domain of Short Form 36 - (SF-36)
Sumscore with range 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in insomnia problems assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index
Questionnaire - score range 0 (no insomnia problems) to 28 (severe insomnia problems)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in 6 min walk
6 min walk - timed measure (s)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in stair climb capacity
Stair climb 3 flights - up and down; timed measure (s)
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in physical capacity assessed by 30 s sit to stand
Assessed as the number of times to complete a sit to stand and sit cycle witin 30 s
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Short Physical Performance Battery
4 tests of Physical performance
Measured: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Fulfilment of expectations
One question
Measured: 3, 6 and 12 months
Benefit of treatment
One question
Measured: 3, 6 and 12 months
Fulfillment of treatment goals
patients evaluate if the individually defined treatment goals are met, partially met or not met at all
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2016
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021
- Study completion30 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Musculoskeletal Diseases or ConditionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 4,985 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oslo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Norwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in Physiotherapy, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim Kommune
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nina K. Vollestad, University of Oslo
- Investigators
- Nina K Vøllestad, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Oslo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03626389
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FYSIOPRIM
- Acronym
- FYSIOPRIM
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We plan to make the data available for other researchers. Anonymous data will be shared to all that asks and that provide a research plan approved by our steering committee. We will in principle be open for sharing all data, but we also need to verify that we comply with the approvals given. Deidentified data may be shared with other researchers given that they have secure storage and analytical platforms.
Publications
Unsgaard-Tondel M, Evensen KAI, Vollestad NK, Robinson HS, Granviken F, Woodhouse A, Meisingset I. Can pain self-efficacy mediate the influence of pain intensity on outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal pain? A prospective mediation analysis with 12 months follow-up. Qual Life Res. 2026 Jan 3;35(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04118-3.
PubMed 41483256Handeland H, Evensen KAI, Robinson HS. Focus on physiotherapy and manual therapy for infants in Norway, a cross-sectional study on referral practice, and planned interventions. BMC Pediatr. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05627-3.
PubMed 40205420Unsgaard-Tondel M, Vasseljen O, Nilsen TIL, Myhre G, Robinson HS, Meisingset I. Prognostic ability of STarT Back Screening Tool combined with work-related factors in patients with low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 3;11(6):e046446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046446.
PubMed 34083340Amundsen O, Vollestad NK, Meisingset I, Robinson HS. Associations between treatment goals, patient characteristics, and outcome measures for patients with musculoskeletal disorders in physiotherapy practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 13;22(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04048-4.
PubMed 33583404Evensen KAI, Sellaeg S, Straete AC, Hansen AE, Meisingset I. Profile of children referred to primary health care physiotherapy: a longitudinal observational study in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05988-8.
PubMed 33407440Evensen KAI, Robinson HS, Meisingset I, Woodhouse A, Thielemann M, Bjorbaekmo WS, Myhre G, Hansen AE, Vasseljen O, Vollestad NK. Characteristics, course and outcome of patients receiving physiotherapy in primary health care in Norway: design of a longitudinal observational project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3729-y.
PubMed 30514287
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Course and Prognostic Factors of Patients Receiving Physiotherapy Services in Primary Health Care in Norway (FYSIOPRIM)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03626389
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FYSIOPRIM / FYSIOPRIM
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions, Neurologic Disorder, Widespread Chronic Pain, Psychosomatic Disorder, Arthritis, Injuries
- Keywords
- physiotherapy, primary health care setting
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 4,985 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OsloUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Norwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in Physiotherapy, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim Kommune
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Physiotherapists (PTs) in primary health care manage patients with a large variation in medical diagnosis, age, functional status, disability and prognosis. Lack of knowledge and systematically collected data about patients treated by PTs in primary health care has prompted this longitudinal observational physiotherapy project in Norway. This paper aims to describe a method for developing a database of patients managed by PTs in primary health care to study patients' characteristics, treatment courses and prognostic factors.
The study is a longitudinal observational project, following patients through physiotherapy treatment periods in primary health care in Norway and until one year after inclusion. The project involves both private practice and municipally employed PTs working in primary health care in eight municipalities in Norway. The participants are recruited to three different parts of the project depending on age and whether they are referred to a private practice or a municipally employed PT. All data are recorded electronically, transferred and stored securely. All patients complete extensive questionnaires providing information about demographics, disability and function, pain related variables, treatment and evaluation of treatment as well as clinical tests. The PTs have access to their own patients' data. The investigators have also prepared for linkage to national patient registers and population-based studies to be able to gather further important data.
This project will have important implications for physiotherapy services in primary health care. The database already contains almost 3000 patients, and data collection is ongoing. Preliminary analyses suggest that the patients included so far are representative of the larger population of patients treated by private practice or municipally employed PTs in Norway. This large scale prospective physiotherapy project will provide knowledge about the patient groups treated, treatment given as well as short and long term outcome of the patients.
Detailed description
The primary aim of the FYSIOPRIM project is to build a database by systematically collecting data from baseline throughout the intervention period and beyond, including both patient-reported outcome measures, the patients' and PTs' goals and plans for intervention, and their evaluation thereof. This will enable description of patients receiving physiotherapy services, of goal-setting and type of interventions and how general health, physical function and relevant clinical factors change throughout and after a treatment period. Secondly, the investigators want to study associations and interaction effects between and among clinical characteristics, interventions and change as well as perform health-economic evaluations. The investigators will also examine how physiotherapy practice is affected by using the system for systematic registration of clinical data and effects of such registration. Moreover, the investigators will be able to compare patients receiving physiotherapy services with information from national patient registries. In addition, elderly participants' physical fitness, balance and walking ability will be examined to study associations between these aspects of physical functioning and health-related quality of life, self-reported physical and psychological functioning as well as response to physical fitness tests. The investigators will compare data from this group of elderly with data from other patients with musculoskeletal complaints who receive physiotherapy treatment, and with similar data from large population-based studies in Norway. Finally, this project enables methodological studies to validate clinical tests and questionnaires.
Design and setting This is a longitudinal observational project following patients through physiotherapy treatment periods in primary health care in Norway and until one year after baseline. The project involves both private practice and municipally employed PTs working in primary health care in eight municipalities of Norway; Lørenskog, Ski, Nedre Eiker, Lillehammer, Stavanger, Bergen, Trondheim and Alta. All five health regions of Norway are represented. The Norwegian Health care system is publicly funded. PTs working as private practitioners have an agreement with the municipality. Hence, they are partly paid by the municipality (as a financial support for practice) and partly paid per visit by the Norwegian Health Economics Administration (HELFO) and the patient's charge (maximum around 200 Euro per patient per calendar year). Patients seeking physiotherapy services in private practice will normally meet at the PT's clinic.
Municipally employed PTs are on fixed salary. They work in an out-patient setting, and their patients receive physiotherapy services in their usual daily environment, i.e. for children at home, in kindergarten or in school, and for elderly patients often in their own home. There are no clear guidelines for which patients that should receive physiotherapy from a private practice or a municipally employed PT. The choice can be based on previous personal experiences with physiotherapy, the possibility to visit a clinic, evaluation of need and/or benefit of treating the patients in their own setting.
Characteristics of participants
The participants are recruited to three different parts of the project depending on age and whether they are referred to a private practice PT or to a municipally employed PT (in this project, these PTs are from Trondheim). The three parts of the project are:
- Adults seeking physiotherapy services in private practice This part of the project started data collection in June 2015, and data collection is planned to continue through June 2020. From January 2016 through December 2017, data were collected from a total of 2754 patients above the age of 18 years seeking physiotherapy treatment from 111 PTs in eight municipalities in different parts of Norway, including 536 patients already in treatment. Among the 111 PTs, 78 (70.3%) are general PTs, 20 (18.0%) are manual therapists and13 (11.7%) are PTs with special education in psychomotor physiotherapy. Seventy-seven (69.4%) of the PTs are working in Trondheim.
- Adults and elderly receiving physiotherapy services in Trondheim Municipality This part of the project collected data from the beginning of May 2016 to the end of May 2018. From January 2016 until the end of September 2017, data were collected from 684 adults and elderly patients receiving physiotherapy services from approximately 55 PTs working with adults and elderly in the municipality of Trondheim in Norway. Adults and elderly may be referred from general practitioners, occupational therapists, health professionals at health care centers, rehabilitation centers or hospitals, or by proxy. The physiotherapy services to adults and elderly include early intervention, activities of daily living (ADL) rehabilitation and ordinary physiotherapy, all of which are typically delivered in a home setting. Early intervention is a collaboration between health and welfare centers and units for physiotherapy and occupational services and is offered to patients in need of limited services who are referred to municipality health care services for the first time. ADL rehabilitation are offered to patients in risk of functional deterioration who are receiving home based services, while ordinary physiotherapy is offered to patients in need of more specific physiotherapy services.
- Children receiving physiotherapy services in Trondheim Municipality This part of the project collected data from May 2016 through April 2017. During this period, data were collected from 165 children aged 0-18 years receiving physiotherapy services from approximately 25 PTs working with children in the municipality of Trondheim in Norway. For children, physiotherapy may be initiated on referral from parents, personnel at kindergarten or in school, general practitioners, occupational therapists, and health professionals at primary health care centers or hospitals. The children typically receive physiotherapy services at the primary health care centers, in their own home or in kindergarten or at school, depending on the child's usual primary location and condition.
Data collection Patients are asked to participate at their first time encounter with a physiotherapist in primary health care. Project information and consent forms are available in Norwegian and English. The investigators collect baseline data in two steps. First, the therapist and the participant together fill in information about the main problem, and jointly agree on goals for treatment and a treatment plan. The therapist also asks the participant for their own specific functional problem using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). The therapist provides information about the referral, diagnosis and whether any disease-specific questionnaires should be used for this participant. Secondly, the participant completes questionnaires themselves, either using an e-tablet or through a web-link sent by e-mail. A set of outcome data are common to all, and in addition disease-specific outcome measures are included for some common patient groups.
Approximately 1 month after baseline (for participants seeking PTs in private practice), or 2-3 months after baseline (for participants receiving physiotherapy from municipally employed PTs), the therapist and the participant together evaluate goal achievement and fulfilment of the treatment plan so far. They also adjust these when needed and the participant recompletes the PSFS. Three months (for private practice) or six months after baseline (for participants receiving physiotherapy from municipally employed PTs), the PT and the participant again evaluate goal achievement and fulfilments of the treatment plan. The participant then completes the same standardized questionnaires as at baseline. The same questionnaires are also completed 6 and 12 months after baseline by participants treated by PTs in private practice using a web-link sent by smartphone or e-mail. All participants treated by PTs in private practice receive reminders once a week, up to three times, by sms and e-mail if they have not answered the questionnaires.
All data are collected electronically using an application run on a tablet or through a web-link. The software is provided by Infopad AS (www.infopad.no). Immediately after the completion of the questionnaires all data are transferred to a backend secure server with in-memory encryption. The PTs have access to their own participants' data either through a web-site and/or by importing data into their electronic medical journal. The journal number of the participant is used as the study identifier to enable data flow between the electronic medical journal and the secure backend server. The data from all participants are copied to a secure server at the University of Oslo set up for research purposes (Services for Sensitive Data). Data management is done according to the quality assurance system of the University of Oslo. The investigators have prepared for linkage between data from FYSIOPRIM and data from national patient registers. This will be done by use of the participant's journal number to access their unique 11-digit Norwegian personal number.
All the data are collected electronically, thereby avoiding the possibility of mistakes when transferring data from paper forms to electronic data. Data management is performed using STATA 15 (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas, USA). The raw data are stored in a secure database where only researchers associated with the project have access. Before data can be used for analyses a range of automated procedures for data preparation and quality checking are performed using standardized, written scripts in STATA. Examples are to check, i) patterns of missing data, ii) values outside the possible range of a variable (e.g., age>120 years), iii) conflicting answers (e.g., pregnancy and male) and iv) unexpected frequency distributions for categorical variables. The investigators will explore each variable graphically using histograms and plots to evaluate the data distribution. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the patient populations using parametric or non-parametric statistics according to the data distribution. Detailed descriptions of all the statistical analyses planned are beyond the length of this paper. Thus, specific analyses related to investigation of associations between variables, prognosis and clinical course will be described in future publications.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients receiving physiotherapy in primary care | – | Other: PhysiotherapyPhysiotherapy, without predetermined selection of specific modalities |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 to 125 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The patients are recruited through physiotherapists in primary health care.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- any patient seeking or receiving physiotherapy services in primary health care
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Not understanding Norwegian or English language
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Physiotherapy | Other | Patients receiving physiotherapy in primary care |
Primary outcome
Change in Health-Related Quality of LIfe - assessed by EuroQual 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Utility measure of Health related quality of life. Range -0.59 (worst) to 1 (best)
Change in Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Participants identify activities that are difficult to perform and scores them from 0 (cannot perform) to 10 (perform without problems)
General Perceived Effect
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
A global assessment of change- 7 level scale. Score range 1 (very much better) to 5 (very much worse)
Change in Pain intensity
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Pain intensity assessed by a numeric rating scale. Range 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable)
27 secondary outcomes
Change in Work participation
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in work ability
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in pain distribution
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in use of analgesics containing paracetamol
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in use of analgesics containing ibuprofen
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in use of analgesics containing acetylsalicylacid
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in emotional distress assessed by Hopkins Symptoms Check List (HSCL)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Pain Self-efficacy
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in health related quality of life assessed by 15D
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in catastrophising thoughts assessed by Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Neck disability Index (NDI)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (Quick-DASH)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in temporal aspects of pain
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in hip disability - assessed by the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in pelvic girdle pain and disability assessed by the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in knee disability - assessed by the Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in physical functioning assessed by the Physcal function domain of Short Form 36 - (SF-36)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in insomnia problems assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in 6 min walk
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in stair climb capacity
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in physical capacity assessed by 30 s sit to stand
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Short Physical Performance Battery
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Fulfilment of expectations
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Benefit of treatment
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Fulfillment of treatment goals
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41483256Unsgaard-Tondel M, Evensen KAI, Vollestad NK, Robinson HS, Granviken F, Woodhouse A, Meisingset I. Can pain self-efficacy mediate the influence of pain intensity on outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal pain? A prospective mediation analysis with 12 months follow-up. Qual Life Res. 2026 Jan 3;35(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04118-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40205420Handeland H, Evensen KAI, Robinson HS. Focus on physiotherapy and manual therapy for infants in Norway, a cross-sectional study on referral practice, and planned interventions. BMC Pediatr. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05627-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34083340Unsgaard-Tondel M, Vasseljen O, Nilsen TIL, Myhre G, Robinson HS, Meisingset I. Prognostic ability of STarT Back Screening Tool combined with work-related factors in patients with low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 3;11(6):e046446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046446.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33583404Amundsen O, Vollestad NK, Meisingset I, Robinson HS. Associations between treatment goals, patient characteristics, and outcome measures for patients with musculoskeletal disorders in physiotherapy practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 13;22(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04048-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33407440Evensen KAI, Sellaeg S, Straete AC, Hansen AE, Meisingset I. Profile of children referred to primary health care physiotherapy: a longitudinal observational study in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05988-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30514287Evensen KAI, Robinson HS, Meisingset I, Woodhouse A, Thielemann M, Bjorbaekmo WS, Myhre G, Hansen AE, Vasseljen O, Vollestad NK. Characteristics, course and outcome of patients receiving physiotherapy in primary health care in Norway: design of a longitudinal observational project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3729-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We plan to make the data available for other researchers. Anonymous data will be shared to all that asks and that provide a research plan approved by our steering committee. We will in principle be open for sharing all data, but we also need to verify that we comply with the approvals given. Deidentified data may be shared with other researchers given that they have secure storage and analytical platforms.
Related trials for Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
Recruiting
ITPB 1 vs 3 in VATS
Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
Recruiting
Minimum Effective Local Anesthetic Volume for Ultrasound Guided Superior Trunk Block
Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
RecruitingPhase 4
Prospective RCT Lidocaine & Levobupivacaine on Block Dynamics After Subparaneural Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
Recruiting
Sensorimotor Block Dynamics and Hemidiaphragmatic Palsy: Selective Trunk Block vs Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Knee Pain and Overweight or Obesity (VESPER-OA 1)
Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nina K Vøllestad, PhD principal investigator
University of Oslo
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions and Neurologic Disorder, run by University of Oslo at 2 sites in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Health-Related Quality of LIfe - assessed by EuroQual 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) (time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03626389, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2021.