Cognitive ChangeNCT03706118
Physiologic Volume and Atrophy of Brain and Spinal Cord Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
A study testing Magnetic resonance imaging in people with Cognitive Change and Atrophy Brain, run by Dana Horakova at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
Spinal cord (SC) involvement is prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS) and contributes importantly to disease progression. To be able reliably evaluate spinal cord volume and its changes in MS patients we need to understand variability of these parameters in sex and age matched healthy controls (HC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cognitive Change, Atrophy Brain, Atrophy; Spinal Cord
- What is being tested?
- Magnetic resonance imaging
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- 15 Mar 2018to 1 Nov 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Each participant must provide informed consent in accordance with local regulations
- Age 18-60 years.
Who cannot join
- Not able to undergo MRI examination
- Not able to be examined 4 times, i.e. M 0, 12, 24, 36 during the next 3 years
- Pregnancy at the time of enrollment into the study
- Other disease or medical condition that can influence the volume of brain or spinal cord
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Czechia1 site
Dpt of Neurology, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague
Prague, 12000
About this study
Official title: Physiologic Interindividual Variability of Volume and Atrophy in Central Nervous System Structures With Focus on Spinal Cord as Measured by Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Spinal cord (SC) involvement is prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS) and contributes importantly to disease progression. To be able reliably evaluate spinal cord volume and its changes in MS patients we need to understand variability of these parameters in sex and age matched healthy controls (HC). To date, no generally available data about these parameters in HC are available.
The objective of this study is to investigate age and sex matched HC by MRI to get the basic set of the data representing both cross sectional values and its longitudinal changes.
The present study will also investigate different strategies how to normalize the absolute spinal cord and brain volume data, what is a relationship between spinal cord volume and brain volume and what is the best protocol to be used in a routine clinical practice.
Read the detailed description
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease that affects central nervous system. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the main paraclinical examination used to monitor disease activity and response to treatment. However, there is only limited correlation between the clinical symptoms and findings seen on the conventional MRI - a phenomena called clinical-radiological paradox. Measuring whole and regional brain atrophy provides additional information to MRI and seems to correlate better with clinical course and prognosis. In the last two decades, brain atrophy in MS has been exten sively studied, cut-offs for brain volume loss over time has been established and it is likely that it will become an important outcome measure in both clinical studies and routine practice.
Compared to brain atrophy, spinal cord (SC) atrophy and its relation to MS-related disability has been given less attention. This is partly due to technical challenges such as inhomogeneous magnetic field in this region, small physical dimensions of SC and artefacts caused by motion of the SC within the spinal canal together with the flow of cerebrospinal fluid and periodic motion due to respiratory and cardiac cycles. Moreover, focal spinal cord MS lesions may cause both swelling and shrinking of SC that influence its absolute volume, resulting in problems with interpretation of absolute SC volume in MS. Despite all these challenges, it is possible to identify SC lesions and reliably measure SC volume, but there is no "gold standard" (standardized) software for SC volume measurement and no agreement on the SC level (segments) that is most suitable for SC volume loss measurement.
During 2016 we have developed an in-house semiautomatic pipeline for measurement of cervical spinal cord volume that is a part of Scanview program. The segmentation is performed on T2-weighted images. In the first step, a marker is manually placed in a center of an intervertebral disc C3-4 (sagittal plane). Subsequently a cord straightening (manual rotation of the cord to achieve a perpendicular orientation of spinal cord to dorsal part of C3 vertebral body), that enable to reduce partial volume due to the cord orientation. After this centering and straightening,transformation matrix is saved and all subsequent steps are fully automatized. These steps include: 1. Sub-pixel division, 2. Reversing the contrast of T2-weighted images and smoothing by applying a set of median, Gaussian and edge-enhancing filters and 4. Cubic spline interpolation to find a curve that represents a border of a spinal cord with highest probability. Finally, a sum of mean areas of 21 1-mm slices is calculated (1 center slice fixed at center of a intervertebral disc C3-4 and 2 x 10 slices in cranial and caudal direction. Using this new software we have assessed 1,036 MS patients during 2016 and 2017. The intra- and inter-rater variability of SC volume assessment was done by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a two-way mixed absolute agreement and single-measures design. The analysis confirmed very good consistency (> 98%) of the method. The preliminary results showed a significant correlation between spinal cord volume and different clinical phenotypes.
- Being tested
- Magnetic resonance imaging
- Keywords
- Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Cord Atrophy
- Medical subject headings
- Atrophy, Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Magnetic resonance imagingOther
At month 0, 12, 24 and 36 participants will be examined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain, cervical and part of thoracic spine.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MRI and Neuropsychologic testing | Experimental | 102 healthy controls will be examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain, spinal and thoracic cord at month 0, 12, 24 and 36.
102 healthy controls will be examined by neuropsychological and walking testing designed for patients with multiple sclerosis at month 0, 12, 24 and 36. Receives: Other: Magnetic resonance imaging |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Measure Spinal Cord Volume Change at 12 months during 3 years follow-up in Healthy Controls
Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging from each visit
Measured: Baseline, 12, 24, 36 months
Measure Spinal Cord Atrophy Change at 12 months during 3 years follow-up in Healthy Controls
Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging from each visit
Measured: Baseline, 12, 24, 36 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Measure Whole Brain Volume and Atrophy at 12 months during 3 years follow-up in Healthy Controls
Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging from each visit
Measured: Baseline, 12, 24, 36 months
Measure Regional Brain Volumes and Atrophies at 12 months during 3 years follow-up in Healthy Controls
Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging from each visit
Measured: Baseline, 12, 24, 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2018
- Study start15 Mar 2018
- Primary completion14 Sep 2018
- Study completion1 Nov 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cognitive ChangeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Prospective, longitudinal, monocentric, interventional study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dana Horakova
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Dana Horakova, General University Hospital, Prague
- Investigators
- Dana Horakova, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Dpt of Neurology, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03706118
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KHL 182/2017
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Vaneckova M, Piredda GF, Andelova M, Krasensky J, Uher T, Srpova B, Havrdova EK, Vodehnalova K, Horakova D, Hilbert T, Marechal B, Fartaria MJ, Ravano V, Kober T. Periventricular gradient of T1 tissue alterations in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin. 2022;34:103009. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103009. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
PubMed 35561554
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physiologic Interindividual Variability of Volume and Atrophy in Central Nervous System Structures With Focus on Spinal Cord as Measured by Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03706118
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KHL 182/2017
- Keywords
- Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Cord Atrophy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dana HorakovaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal cord (SC) involvement is prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS) and contributes importantly to disease progression. To be able reliably evaluate spinal cord volume and its changes in MS patients we need to understand variability of these parameters in sex and age matched healthy controls (HC). To date, no generally available data about these parameters in HC are available.
The objective of this study is to investigate age and sex matched HC by MRI to get the basic set of the data representing both cross sectional values and its longitudinal changes.
The present study will also investigate different strategies how to normalize the absolute spinal cord and brain volume data, what is a relationship between spinal cord volume and brain volume and what is the best protocol to be used in a routine clinical practice.
Detailed description
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease that affects central nervous system. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the main paraclinical examination used to monitor disease activity and response to treatment. However, there is only limited correlation between the clinical symptoms and findings seen on the conventional MRI - a phenomena called clinical-radiological paradox. Measuring whole and regional brain atrophy provides additional information to MRI and seems to correlate better with clinical course and prognosis. In the last two decades, brain atrophy in MS has been exten sively studied, cut-offs for brain volume loss over time has been established and it is likely that it will become an important outcome measure in both clinical studies and routine practice.
Compared to brain atrophy, spinal cord (SC) atrophy and its relation to MS-related disability has been given less attention. This is partly due to technical challenges such as inhomogeneous magnetic field in this region, small physical dimensions of SC and artefacts caused by motion of the SC within the spinal canal together with the flow of cerebrospinal fluid and periodic motion due to respiratory and cardiac cycles. Moreover, focal spinal cord MS lesions may cause both swelling and shrinking of SC that influence its absolute volume, resulting in problems with interpretation of absolute SC volume in MS. Despite all these challenges, it is possible to identify SC lesions and reliably measure SC volume, but there is no "gold standard" (standardized) software for SC volume measurement and no agreement on the SC level (segments) that is most suitable for SC volume loss measurement.
During 2016 we have developed an in-house semiautomatic pipeline for measurement of cervical spinal cord volume that is a part of Scanview program. The segmentation is performed on T2-weighted images. In the first step, a marker is manually placed in a center of an intervertebral disc C3-4 (sagittal plane). Subsequently a cord straightening (manual rotation of the cord to achieve a perpendicular orientation of spinal cord to dorsal part of C3 vertebral body), that enable to reduce partial volume due to the cord orientation. After this centering and straightening,transformation matrix is saved and all subsequent steps are fully automatized. These steps include: 1. Sub-pixel division, 2. Reversing the contrast of T2-weighted images and smoothing by applying a set of median, Gaussian and edge-enhancing filters and 4. Cubic spline interpolation to find a curve that represents a border of a spinal cord with highest probability. Finally, a sum of mean areas of 21 1-mm slices is calculated (1 center slice fixed at center of a intervertebral disc C3-4 and 2 x 10 slices in cranial and caudal direction. Using this new software we have assessed 1,036 MS patients during 2016 and 2017. The intra- and inter-rater variability of SC volume assessment was done by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a two-way mixed absolute agreement and single-measures design. The analysis confirmed very good consistency (> 98%) of the method. The preliminary results showed a significant correlation between spinal cord volume and different clinical phenotypes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Prospective, longitudinal, monocentric, interventional study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MRI and Neuropsychologic testing | Experimental | Other: Magnetic resonance imaging102 healthy controls will be examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain, spinal and thoracic cord at month 0, 12, 24 and 36. 102 healthy controls will be examined by neuropsychological and walking testing designed for patients with multiple sclerosis at month 0, 12, 24 and 36. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Each participant must provide informed consent in accordance with local regulations
- Age 18-60 years.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Not able to undergo MRI examination
- Not able to be examined 4 times, i.e. M 0, 12, 24, 36 during the next 3 years
- Pregnancy at the time of enrollment into the study
- Other disease or medical condition that can influence the volume of brain or spinal cord
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetic resonance imagingAt month 0, 12, 24 and 36 participants will be examined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain, cervical and part of thoracic spine. | Other | MRI and Neuropsychologic testing |
Primary outcome
Measure Spinal Cord Volume Change at 12 months during 3 years follow-up in Healthy Controls
Time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, 36 months
Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging from each visit
Measure Spinal Cord Atrophy Change at 12 months during 3 years follow-up in Healthy Controls
Time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, 36 months
Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging from each visit
2 secondary outcomes
Measure Whole Brain Volume and Atrophy at 12 months during 3 years follow-up in Healthy Controls
Time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, 36 months
Measure Regional Brain Volumes and Atrophies at 12 months during 3 years follow-up in Healthy Controls
Time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, 36 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35561554Vaneckova M, Piredda GF, Andelova M, Krasensky J, Uher T, Srpova B, Havrdova EK, Vodehnalova K, Horakova D, Hilbert T, Marechal B, Fartaria MJ, Ravano V, Kober T. Periventricular gradient of T1 tissue alterations in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin. 2022;34:103009. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103009. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cognitive Change
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Minocycline In Neurocognitive Outcomes - Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease, Cognitive Impairment
Recruiting
Modulating Neurocognitive Processes of Learning to Trust and Distrust in Aging
Aging, Cognitive Change
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Digitally-enhanced, Decentralized, Multi-omics Observational Cohort
Presymptomatic Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Active, not recruiting
Improving Cognitive Function Through High-intensity Interval Training in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy
Breast Cancer, Chemotherapy Effect
RecruitingObservational study
Cognitive Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gynecologic Cancers
Ovarian Cancer, Cognitive Change
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dana Horakova, MD, PhD principal investigator
Dpt of Neurology, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Magnetic resonance imaging in people with Cognitive Change and Atrophy Brain, run by Dana Horakova at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Measure Spinal Cord Volume Change at 12 months during 3 years follow-up in Healthy Controls (time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, 36 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03706118, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.