AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainNCT03756519

The Effect of Exercise on Recent Onset Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department

A study testing Exercise, Advice to stay active and engaged in usual activities. and Advice on use of ice or heat in people with Low Back Pain, run by Queen's University at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading contributor to years lived with disability and an important contributor to healthcare costs and time off work. Exercise is effective for chronic low back pain, but there is a lack of evidence to inform whether exercise in the emergency department is effective for people with acute… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
Exercise, Advice to stay active and engaged in usual activities. and Advice on use of ice or heat
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
69 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 May 2018to 30 Nov 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English speaking
  • Adults (18-65 years)
  • Recent onset low back pain (<1 week)

Who cannot join

  • Subacute/chronic LBP (> 1week)
  • Previous episode of low back pain in past 3 months
  • fracture
  • previous back surgery
  • urinary retention
  • saddle anaesthesia
  • bilateral or multilevel neurological impairment
  • traumatic mechanism of injury (fall >3m or 3 steps, MVC >100km/h).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Kingston Health Sciences Center - Kingston General Hospital and Hotel Dieu Hospital Sites

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Determining the Effects of Adding Exercise to Usual Care for Recent Onset Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading contributor to years lived with disability and an important contributor to healthcare costs and time off work. Exercise is effective for chronic low back pain, but there is a lack of evidence to inform whether exercise in the emergency department is effective for people with acute low back pain. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the effectiveness of a brief exercise intervention provided in the emergency department for people with recent onset low back pain. People with acute low back pain (<1 week) will be randomly assigned to either usual care or to usual care plus a brief exercise intervention delivered by trained physiotherapy students. The study will evaluate the impact of the added exercises on self-reported disability (primary outcome), pain intensity, global rating of change, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. In addition, we will pilot data collection related to return to work, healthcare utilization, and cost effectiveness outcomes to determine the feasibility of conducting a future trial with additional patient participants required to evaluate these outcomes. Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, 48-72 hours, 1-week, 1-month, and 3-months from their initial emergency department visit. The results of this study have the potential to inform emergency department management of acute low back pain.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading contributor to years lived with disability and an important contributor to healthcare costs and time off work. Exercise is effective for chronic low back pain, but there is a lack of evidence to inform whether exercise in the emergency department is effective for people with acute (<1 week) low back pain.

The objectives of this randomized controlled trial are:

  1. To determine the effectiveness of an exercise intervention delivered in the ED in comparison to usual ED care on pain, function, global rating of change, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects in adults with recent onset LBP (< 1 week).
  2. To determine the feasibility of a future RCT to evaluate the effects of the ED exercise intervention on return to work outcomes, health care utilization, and cost-effectiveness in comparison to usual care.

The investigators hypothesize that an exercise intervention in the ED will improve pain, function, global rating of change, and patient satisfaction in comparison to usual ED care with no difference in adverse effects.

Design: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel arms (exercise and usual care).

Blinding: The patient will be partially blinded by our not providing full details on the two exercise approaches being studied. The health care providers delivering the interventions will not be blinded due to the nature of the intervention. However, research assistants administering the outcome measures will be blinded. The outcomes assessed are objective measures assessed using an online survey tool that will be free of assessor bias.

Randomization and allocation concealment: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to exercise or usual care groups by an independent statistician using a computerized random number generator. The random allocation will be placed in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes. The envelopes will be opened by the RA after completion of baseline assessment.

Patient enrollment: Consecutive patients with acute LBP who are seeking urgent care at Kingston General Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and Hotel Dieu Hospital Urgent Care Clinic (UCC) will be invited to participate over a 4-month period May 1 through August 31, 2018). ED based research staff will screen patients for willingness to be invited to participate when they arrive at the ED. These staff will then invite participation once the physician assessment is complete and eligibility criteria are reviewed.

Inclusion criteria: English speaking adults (18-65 years) with recent onset LBP (<1 week).

Exclusion criteria: people with subacute/chronic LBP, previous episode of back pain in the past 3 months, fracture, previous back surgery, red flags (e.g. urinary retention, bilateral or multilevel neurological impairment), traumatic mechanism of injury (fall >3m or 3 steps, MVC >100km/h).

Assessment and outcome measures: All measures will be collected using Qualtrics, a secure online database, at baseline, 48-72 hours, 1-week, 1-month, and 3-months.

Baseline factors used to describe the population: age, gender, duration of back pain (hours), whether there have been previous episodes of back pain, whether or not the participant has pain in other areas of the body, medications, comorbidities, work status prior to onset of back pain, and current work status.

Objective #1: Individual health outcomes will be collected using validated tools described under the outcomes assessed.

Objective #2: This study design will not have adequate power or long-term follow-ups required to adequately evaluate return to work, healthcare use, and cost-effectiveness. The investigators plan to pilot the use of these outcomes to determine the feasibility of conducting a future trial to evaluate these outcomes.

Analysis: For objective #1, Repeated-measure linear mixed models will be used to assess the effect of treatment (exercise versus usual care) on our primary (disability) and secondary (pain, global rating of change, patient satisfaction, adverse effects) outcomes at all time-points (48-72 hours, 1-week, 1- and 3-months). A difference of 2 on the NPRS36 and 3 points on the RMDQ37 will be considered clinically meaningful. For objective #2, all feasibility outcomes will be reported descriptively and analyzed qualitatively as recommended by methods and reporting guidelines for pilot and feasibility studies.

Sample size: The investigators searched one year of ED and UCC records to identify LBP patients eligible for this study. 2000 patients/year attended for back pain with > 500 during our four-month recruitment period. Of these, a chart review suggests 43% of these met our eligibility criteria. Based on past trials in these settings, we expect at least 50% will consent resulting in a sample size of 107+. This will achieve over 90% power to detect a minimally important difference of 3 points on the RMQ, using a two-sided α=0.05 and assuming a standard deviation of 6.2 points and accounting for a 10% loss to follow-up. This will also provide an adequate sample to assess the secondary feasibility objectives.

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
Exercise, Advice to stay active and engaged in usual activities., Advice on use of ice or heat, Advise regarding use of medications
Keywords
acute, exercise, emergency department
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain, Motor Activity, Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ExerciseBehavioural

    A standardized exercise program tailored to the individual based on their directional preferences and current functional abilities.

  • Advice to stay active and engaged in usual activities.Behavioural

    Participants will be advised that staying physically active and continuing to participate in usual activities improves recovery. This verbal advice will be reinforced with a written handout.

  • Advice on use of ice or heatBehavioural

    Participants will be advised on the appropriate use of ice or heat to manage pain. This verbal advice will be reinforced with a written handout.

  • Advise regarding use of medicationsOther

    Participants will receive education regarding the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) for pain relief, if needed and if the patient is appropriate for NSAIDs. Information regarding specific recommended doses, potential benefit and risk will be discussed.

Study groups in NCT03756519
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExerciseExperimentalParticipants in the exercise intervention arm will receive the usual care protocol plus a standardized, evidence informed exercise intervention provided by trained physiotherapy students. The exercise intervention will begin with a brief assessment to rule out contraindications to exercise and to identify any directional preferences (e.g. pain with lumbar flexion and relief with extension). The PT will then be taught four standardized exercises: the pelvic tilt exercise, a rotational exercise, a tailored graded walking program taking into account the current abilities of the patient, and an exercise based on the directional preference of the individual. These will be re-enforced with a handout including the rationale, instructions and dosage recommendations for the exercises.
Receives: Behavioral: Exercise; Behavioral: Advice to stay active and engaged in usual activities.; Behavioral: Advice on use of ice or heat; Other: Advise regarding use of medications
Usual careActive comparatorOur usual care protocol was developed based on 30 responses to an 18 item survey of Queen's Department of Emergency Medicine physicians. Three themes emerged as interventions most commonly used. Each of these strategies has evidence for small, but positive treatment effects and low risk of harms: 1) advice to stay active and engaged in usual activities, 2) use of ice or heat to manage pain, and 3) recommendation for analgesia using NSAIDs if needed and appropriate.
Receives: Behavioral: Advice to stay active and engaged in usual activities.; Behavioral: Advice on use of ice or heat; Other: Advise regarding use of medications

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Self-reported disability

    Roland Morris Questionnaire (0-24, higher represents greater disability)

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3-months with repeated measures at baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months and a primary comparison at 1-week

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Pain Intensity currently

    Numeric pain rating scale (0-10, higher represents greater pain intensity)

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3-months with repeated measures at baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months and a primary comparison at 1-week

  2. Pain intensity on average over past 24-hours

    Numeric pain rating scale (0-10, higher represents greater pain intensity)

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3-months with repeated measures at baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months and a primary comparison at 1-week

  3. Pain intensity at its worst over the past 24-hours

    Numeric pain rating scale (0-10, higher represents greater pain intensity)

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3-months with repeated measures at baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months and a primary comparison at 1-week

  4. Pain intensity at its least over the past 24-hours

    Numeric pain rating scale (0-10, higher represents greater pain intensity)

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3-months with repeated measures at baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months and a primary comparison at 1-week

  5. Global rating of change

    Perceived change in function (-5 to +5, higher represents greater improvement in function)

    Measured: 1-week, 1-month, 3-months with a primary comparison at 1-week

  6. Patient satisfaction

    Satisfaction with healthcare received (-5 to +5, higher represents greater satisfaction with care)

    Measured: 1-week, 1-month, 3-months with a primary comparison at 1-week

  7. Adverse effects

    Self-reported adverse effects of treatment

    Measured: 1-week, 1-month, 3-months with a primary comparison at 1-week

  8. Treatment fidelity

    A fidelity checklist performed by the physiotherapy students carrying out the intervention will be included as a process outcome.

    Measured: At initial visit

  9. Recruitment rate (to determine feasibility for future trial on healthcare utilization, cost-effectiveness and return to work)

    Rate of recruitment (number of participants/week over recruitment period)

    Measured: Recruitment rate over 4 month period

  10. Retention rate (to determine feasibility for future trial)

    Rate of assessment completion

    Measured: Baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months with a primary time-point of 3-month follow-up

  11. Work status - working or not working (piloted to determine the feasibility of conducting a future trial evaluating return to work outcomes)

    Work status (working/not working)

    Measured: Baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months with a primary time-point of 1-week

  12. Work status - full or part time (piloted to determine the feasibility of conducting a future trial evaluating return to work outcomes)

    Work status (full/part-time)

    Measured: Baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months with a primary time-point of 1-week

  13. Work status - full or modified duties/hours(piloted to determine the feasibility of conducting a future trial evaluating return to work outcomes)

    Work status - full/modified duties or hours

    Measured: Baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months with a primary time-point of 1-week

  14. Work status - hours worked (piloted to determine the feasibility of conducting a future trial evaluating return to work outcomes)

    Number of hours worked in past seven days.

    Measured: Baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months with a primary time-point of 1-week

  15. Healthcare utilization (piloted to determine the feasibility of conducting a future trial evaluating healthcare utilization)

    Self-report questoinnaire asking patient to report primary care visits, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, surgeries, consultations with other health care providers (e.g. physiotherapists, chiropractors, physician specialists, diagnostic imaging (e.g. x-ray, CT scan, MRI), and medication

    Measured: 1-week, 1-month, 3-months with a primary time-point of 3-months

  16. Costs (piloted to determine the feasibility of conducting a cost-effectiveness analysis in a future trial)

    Includes all healthcare costs as well as societal costs using a human capital approach

    Measured: All costs incurred between baseline and 3-month follow-up will be calculated

  17. Quality of life (piloted to determine feasibility of performing cost-effectiveness analysis in a future trial)

    EuroQOL 5D-5L (0-100 with greater score indicating greater quality of life)

    Measured: Change from baseline to 3-months with repeated measures at baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months and a primary time-point of 3-months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2018
  2. Study start1 May 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The patient will be partially blinded by our not providing full details on the two interventions being studied. Participants will be instructed that, "Participants in this study will be randomized (chosen as by a coin flip) to receive one of two different types of advice and instruction on maintaining mobility and performing exercise."
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
69 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03756519
Sponsor's protocol ID
REH-715-18
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
19 Apr 2018
Last updated
25 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exercise, Advice to stay active and engaged in usual activities. and Advice on use of ice or heat in people with Low Back Pain, run by Queen's University at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Self-reported disability (time frame: Change from baseline to 3-months with repeated measures at baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-months and a primary comparison at 1-week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in