LeadershipPLPLNCT03783767
Peer Leadership for Physical Literacy
A study testing Leadership Intervention in people with Leadership and Physical Activity, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of the proposed research is to develop, implement, and test the efficacy of a theory-driven evidence-based peer leadership program for elementary school students (Grade 6/7; age 11/12 years) in relation to (a) their own leadership skills and their leadership self-efficacy (i.e., confidence to lead), as… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 14 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Leadership, Physical Activity
- What is being tested?
- Leadership Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 359 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 7 Jan 2019to 24 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 14 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Participants must be teachers (Grade 6/7) and students (Grade 3,4, 6 or 7) in elementary schools in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia.
- Students must have a basic working knowledge of English.
Who cannot join
- There are no exclusion criteria that would exclude anyone who otherwise meets the inclusion criteria specified above
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Psychology of Exercise, Health, and Physical Activity Laboratory
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z1
About this study
Official title: Peer Leadership for Physical Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Elementary School Students
The purpose of the proposed research is to develop, implement, and test the efficacy of a theory-driven evidence-based peer leadership program for elementary school students (Grade 6/7; age 11/12 years) in relation to (a) their own leadership skills and their leadership self-efficacy (i.e., confidence to lead), as well as (b) the physical literacy of younger (Grade 3/4; age 8/9) students with whom they are partnered.
- Conditions
- Leadership, Physical Activity
- Being tested
- Leadership Intervention
- Keywords
- school, intervention, physical literacy, peer mentor, leadership, motor skills, physical activity
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Leadership InterventionBehavioural
Grade 6/7 teachers will take part in a workshop on developing transformational leadership among their Grade 6/7 students, and provide teachers with a 4-week training program. Teachers will implement a 4-week leadership development component to their Grade 6/7 students. Grade 6/7 students will then deliver a 10-week peer-led FMS program to Grade 3/4 students. The Grade 6/7 peer leaders will lead 2 x 30 min sessions per week during physical education classes, recess, or lunch times. In weeks two and three, peer leaders will be observed by members of the research team and provided with feedback using a structured checklist regarding their delivery in the session. Mid-way through the 10-week program teachers will deliver a booster leadership training component to the Grade 6/7 peer-leaders.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Leadership Intervention Group | Experimental | Teachers in the intervention group will receive a half day workshop from a member of the research team. These teachers will then provide a four week training program to Grade 6/7 students, who will then deliver a 10-week fundamental movement skill (FMS) training program to Grade 3/4 students. Receives: Behavioral: Leadership Intervention |
| Waitlist Control | No intervention | This group of students and teachers will act as a waitlist control group. Therefore, during the same time that the other group is receiving the intervention, this group will proceed with their normal practices. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Teacher's rating of their student's transformational leadership using the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire
Transformational leadership by Grade 6/7 peer leaders will be assessed by teachers using an adaption version of the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire (Beauchamp et al., 2010). This abbreviated measures has been used in our previous studies which demonstrated sound reliability (cronbach alpha > 0.89).
Measured: Change from Baseline Transformational Leadership at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Self-Rated Leadership Self-Efficacy using a ten-item questionnaire
Leadership Self-Efficacy by Grade 6/7 peer leaders will be assessed using a ten-item leadership self-efficacy measure using Bandura's (2006) recommended procedures for assessing self-efficacy.
Measured: Change from Baseline Leadership Self-Efficacy at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Grade 3/4 student self reported intrinsic motivation using the Intrinsic motivation measure by Sebire and colleagues (2013)
Intrinsic motivation among Grade 3/4 students will be assessed using the Intrinsic Motivation measure developed by Sebire and colleagues (2013) for specific use with young children in school physical education settings. This measure displays sound reliability (cronbach alpha = 0.77), as well as factorial validity.
Measured: Change from Baseline Intrinsic Motivation at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Grade 3/4 self-reported Perceived Competence using the Perceived Competence measure developed by Sebire and colleagues (2013)
Grade 3/4 Perceived Competence will be measured by a questionnaire developed by Sebire and colleagues (2013) for specific use in school physical education settings with young children. This measure has been shown to display sound reliability (cronbach alpha = 0.72).
Measured: Change from Baseline Intrinsic Motivation at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Physical Self Description Questionnaire (Marsh et al., 2010) will assess Grade 3/4 self-reported self-concept
The Physical Self Description Questionnaire is a self-report measure for Grade 3/4 students that has sound reliability and factorial validity.
Measured: Change from Baseline Self-Concept at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Fundamental Movement Skills Competence assessed via the Test of Gross Motor Development (3rd edition) and product scores (throw/kick speed, successful number of catches)
The kick, throw and a combination throwing/catching test will be performed. Skills will be videoed so that raters can assess the process of each movement and score according to predefined criteria of the Test of Gross Motor Development 3rd edition (Ulrich and Webster, 2017). Our assessment will also enable us to assess maximal kicking and throwing speed. The combination throwing/catching test will be performed for two trials of 30 seconds each, with scores assigned based on the number of successful catches each participant completes.
Measured: Change from Baseline Fundamental Movement Skills at 6 months (Post Intervention)
School Day Physical Activity will be assessed in Grade 3/4 students using hip worn GT3X+ accelerometers
A subsample of Grade 3/4 students will be randomly selected to wear an accelerometer for one school week (5 days) during the school day only.
Measured: Change from Baseline School Day Physical Activity at 6 Months (Post Intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2018
- Study start7 Jan 2019
- Primary completion24 Jan 2020
- Study completion24 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeadershipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 359 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, University of Victoria, Newcastle University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mark Beauchamp, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Mark R Beauchamp, PhD, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03783767
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H18-00141
- Acronym
- PLPL
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Nathan N, Sutherland R, Beauchamp MR, Cohen K, Hulteen RM, Babic M, Wolfenden L, Lubans DR. Feasibility and efficacy of the Great Leaders Active StudentS (GLASS) program on children's physical activity and object control skill competency: A non-randomised trial. J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Dec;20(12):1081-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
PubMed 28487140Beauchamp MR, Barling J, Li Z, Morton KL, Keith SE, Zumbo BD. Development and psychometric properties of the transformational teaching questionnaire. J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(8):1123-34. doi: 10.1177/1359105310364175. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
PubMed 20522503Sebire SJ, Jago R, Fox KR, Edwards MJ, Thompson JL. Testing a self-determination theory model of children's physical activity motivation: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Sep 26;10:111. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-111.
PubMed 24067078Marsh HW, Martin AJ, Jackson S. Introducing a short version of the physical self description questionnaire: new strategies, short-form evaluative criteria, and applications of factor analyses. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010 Aug;32(4):438-82. doi: 10.1123/jsep.32.4.438.
PubMed 20733208Hulteen RM, Lubans DR, Rhodes RE, Faulkner G, Liu Y, Naylor PJ, Nathan N, Waldhauser KJ, Wierts CM, Beauchamp MR. Evaluation of the peer leadership for physical literacy intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0280261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280261. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 36795739
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Peer Leadership for Physical Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Elementary School Students
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03783767
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PLPL / H18-00141
- Conditions
- Leadership, Physical Activity
- Keywords
- school, intervention, physical literacy, peer mentor, leadership, motor skills, physical activity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 359 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, University of Victoria, Newcastle University
- Study start
- 7 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the proposed research is to develop, implement, and test the efficacy of a theory-driven evidence-based peer leadership program for elementary school students (Grade 6/7; age 11/12 years) in relation to (a) their own leadership skills and their leadership self-efficacy (i.e., confidence to lead), as well as (b) the physical literacy of younger (Grade 3/4; age 8/9) students with whom they are partnered.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Leadership Intervention Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Leadership InterventionTeachers in the intervention group will receive a half day workshop from a member of the research team. These teachers will then provide a four week training program to Grade 6/7 students, who will then deliver a 10-week fundamental movement skill (FMS) training program to Grade 3/4 students. |
| Waitlist Control | No intervention | –This group of students and teachers will act as a waitlist control group. Therefore, during the same time that the other group is receiving the intervention, this group will proceed with their normal practices. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participants must be teachers (Grade 6/7) and students (Grade 3,4, 6 or 7) in elementary schools in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia.
- Students must have a basic working knowledge of English.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- There are no exclusion criteria that would exclude anyone who otherwise meets the inclusion criteria specified above
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Leadership InterventionGrade 6/7 teachers will take part in a workshop on developing transformational leadership among their Grade 6/7 students, and provide teachers with a 4-week training program. Teachers will implement a 4-week leadership development component to their Grade 6/7 students. Grade 6/7 students will then deliver a 10-week peer-led FMS program to Grade 3/4 students. The Grade 6/7 peer leaders will lead 2 x 30 min sessions per week during physical education classes, recess, or lunch times. In weeks two and three, peer leaders will be observed by members of the research team and provided with feedback using a structured checklist regarding their delivery in the session. Mid-way through the 10-week program teachers will deliver a booster leadership training component to the Grade 6/7 peer-leaders. | Behavioural | Leadership Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Teacher's rating of their student's transformational leadership using the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire
Time frame: Change from Baseline Transformational Leadership at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Transformational leadership by Grade 6/7 peer leaders will be assessed by teachers using an adaption version of the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire (Beauchamp et al., 2010). This abbreviated measures has been used in our previous studies which demonstrated sound reliability (cronbach alpha > 0.89).
6 secondary outcomes
Self-Rated Leadership Self-Efficacy using a ten-item questionnaire
Time frame: Change from Baseline Leadership Self-Efficacy at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Grade 3/4 student self reported intrinsic motivation using the Intrinsic motivation measure by Sebire and colleagues (2013)
Time frame: Change from Baseline Intrinsic Motivation at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Grade 3/4 self-reported Perceived Competence using the Perceived Competence measure developed by Sebire and colleagues (2013)
Time frame: Change from Baseline Intrinsic Motivation at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Physical Self Description Questionnaire (Marsh et al., 2010) will assess Grade 3/4 self-reported self-concept
Time frame: Change from Baseline Self-Concept at 6 months (Post Intervention)
Fundamental Movement Skills Competence assessed via the Test of Gross Motor Development (3rd edition) and product scores (throw/kick speed, successful number of catches)
Time frame: Change from Baseline Fundamental Movement Skills at 6 months (Post Intervention)
School Day Physical Activity will be assessed in Grade 3/4 students using hip worn GT3X+ accelerometers
Time frame: Change from Baseline School Day Physical Activity at 6 Months (Post Intervention)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28487140Nathan N, Sutherland R, Beauchamp MR, Cohen K, Hulteen RM, Babic M, Wolfenden L, Lubans DR. Feasibility and efficacy of the Great Leaders Active StudentS (GLASS) program on children's physical activity and object control skill competency: A non-randomised trial. J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Dec;20(12):1081-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
- Background: PubMed 20522503Beauchamp MR, Barling J, Li Z, Morton KL, Keith SE, Zumbo BD. Development and psychometric properties of the transformational teaching questionnaire. J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(8):1123-34. doi: 10.1177/1359105310364175. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
- Background: PubMed 24067078Sebire SJ, Jago R, Fox KR, Edwards MJ, Thompson JL. Testing a self-determination theory model of children's physical activity motivation: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Sep 26;10:111. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-111.
- Background: PubMed 20733208Marsh HW, Martin AJ, Jackson S. Introducing a short version of the physical self description questionnaire: new strategies, short-form evaluative criteria, and applications of factor analyses. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010 Aug;32(4):438-82. doi: 10.1123/jsep.32.4.438.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36795739Hulteen RM, Lubans DR, Rhodes RE, Faulkner G, Liu Y, Naylor PJ, Nathan N, Waldhauser KJ, Wierts CM, Beauchamp MR. Evaluation of the peer leadership for physical literacy intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0280261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280261. eCollection 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Leadership
Active, not recruiting
Strategic Thinking and Shaping the Future Training for Midwives' Self-Leadership and Self-Compassion
Self-Leadership, Self-Compassion
Recruiting
Coaching and Leadership in Autism Support Settings
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation and Clinical Impact of GLIM Criteria in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Active, not recruiting
Leadership ThriveCircles
Burnout, Professional Fulfillment
Not yet recruiting
The Efficacy of the iWork.COMP Among Health Care Professionals
Toxic Leadership Styles
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark R Beauchamp, PhD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Leadership Intervention in people with Leadership and Physical Activity, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Teacher's rating of their student's transformational leadership using the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire (time frame: Change from Baseline Transformational Leadership at 6 months (Post Intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03783767, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2022.