Prenatal DisorderPEGASUS-2NCT03831256
PErsonalized Genomics for Prenatal Abnormalities Screening USing Maternal Blood
A study testing Traditional integrated prenatal screening, Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in people with Prenatal Disorder and Aneuploidy, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 6 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
This project aims to provide high- quality evidence to inform decisions by health care organisations about using first-tier non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) to replace traditional screening tests for trisomy 21, and potentially to screen for other fetal chromosome anomalies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Prenatal Disorder, Aneuploidy
- What is being tested?
- Traditional integrated prenatal screening, Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7,849 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 13 Jan 2020to 30 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant women 19 years or older wanting prenatal screening
- 10-13+6 wks determined by dating ultrasound or last menstrual period.
- Not intending to pursue self pay NIPT
Who cannot join
- Known fetal anomaly at the time of recruitment
- Multiple gestation
- Known twin demise
- Planned CVS or amnio for known genetic condition.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
Canada6 sites
Kelowna Regional Fertility Center
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 1P2
CHU Ste-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5
Prince Rupert Regional Hospital
Prince Rupert, British Columbia, V8J 2A6
CHU de Québec - Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, G1L3L5
CIUSSS Côte-Nord
Sept-Îles, Quebec, G4R 0N9
Children's & Women's Health Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1
About this study
Official title: PErsonalized Genomics for Prenatal Abnormalities Screening USing Maternal Blood : Towards First Tier Screening and Beyond
This project aims to provide high- quality evidence to inform decisions by health care organisations about using first-tier non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) to replace traditional screening tests for trisomy 21, and potentially to screen for other fetal chromosome anomalies. We will compare the current screening approach of second-tier NIPS with the use of first-tier NIPS in a large cohort of pregnant women.
Read the detailed description
There is some data on the performance of NIPS as a first tier screening test but our systematic review has shown that no trial comparing the effectiveness (utility) of 2nd-tier NIPS with that of first-tier NIPS has been published . Further it is important for health care decision makers to have evidence produced in Canada since the geographical context of healthcare can affect uptake as well as patient decision and thus their healthcare trajectories. There is a need for a trial that is between an explanatory trial and a pragmatic trial to provide the types of answer that we aim to document in the present state of knowledge on NIPS-based screening strategies in Canada. Our Objective is to perform a pan-Canadian large-scale comparative utility (clinical outcomes) study of first-tier NIPS (expanded or not) as compared to the new standard of care (NIPS as a 2nd tier test performed much later during pregnancy and only in high risk pregnancies).
- Conditions
- Prenatal Disorder, Aneuploidy
- Being tested
- Traditional integrated prenatal screening, Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy
- Keywords
- Real life comparative effectiveness, Non-invasive prenatal screening, Fetal aneuploidy, Randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Aneuploidy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Traditional integrated prenatal screeningDiagnostic test
Also called IPS
biochemical prenatal screening with or without nuchal translucency by US
Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS)Diagnostic test
Also called second tier non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)
genomics based NIPS after a positive traditional prenatal screen
First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS)Diagnostic test
Also called first tier NIPT, Universal NIPS, Universal NIPT
genomics based NIPS at first trimester
Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidyDiagnostic test
amniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling (CVS)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of care (2nd tier NIPS) | Active comparator | For the standard-of-care arm (2nd tier NIPS) women will undergo Traditional integrated prenatal screening i.e. traditional biochemical (+/- NT) and those with a positive screen for T21 or T18 will be offered Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) (for T21, T18, T13) or Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Ultrasound examination in first and second trimester will be done based on clinical care practice ordered by health care provider. Pregnant women with a positive NIPS test will be offered Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy (fetal chromosome analysis). Receives: Diagnostic Test: Traditional integrated prenatal screening; Diagnostic Test: Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS); Diagnostic Test: Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy |
| First-tier NIPS | Experimental | For the intervention arm (1st tier NIPS) women will receive First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) i.e. provide a blood sample between 10-13+5 weeks gestation with NIPS results within 7 - 10 days of sample collection. Ultrasound examination in first and second trimester will be done based on clinical care practice ordered by health care provider. In case of a failed NIPS test (expected to be between 2% and 4% of samples), a new blood sample will be drawn for NIPS retest as well as for a traditional SIPS(serum integrated prenatal screening) or QUAD(quadruple marker prenatal screening) screen (depending on gestational age). Pregnant women with a positive NIPS test will be offered Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy (fetal chromosome analysis). Receives: Diagnostic Test: First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS); Diagnostic Test: Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gestational age at diagnosis
gestational age at final result in the sub-set of participants that have received a positive NIPS result and that have been offered diagnostic testing
Measured: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
Secondary outcomes (9)
Gestational age at negative screening result
gestational age at final result in the sub-set of participants that have received a negative screening result
Measured: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
Gestational age at positive screening result
gestational age at final result in the sub-set of participants that have received a positive screening result
Measured: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
proportion of women with no results
proportion of women with no NIPS result at first and second attempt
Measured: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
numbers of days for women with false positive result of screen to wait for result of definite test
Difference between gestational age (in days) at first positive prenatal screening result and final negative screening result
Measured: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
Change in PROMIS-29 Score
The PROMIS-29 assesses seven health domains: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. Each of the seven domains has four questions which are scored on a five-point Likert scale. The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method available at the Assessment Center website (http://assessmentcenter.net). A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores mean more of the specific scale's construct, which may indicate a desirable or an undesirable outcome. The assessment will be done at recruitment (10-13 weeks of gestation) and at week 16 and week 22 of gestation.
Measured: At weeks of gestation 10-13, week 16 and week 22
Change in PROMIS Emotional Distress - Anxiety - Short Form 8a Score
The PROMIS-Anxiety short form assesses anxiety with 8 questions. The form includes 8 items and uses a scale of 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Almost never, 3= Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Almost always). The raw score is the sum of the points for each response. A higher than average raw score indicates higher than average anxiety. A higher score represents higher levels of anxiety. The assessment will be done at recruitment (10-13 weeks of gestation) and at week 16 and week 22 of gestation.
Measured: At weeks of gestation 10-13, 16 and 22
Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM) - Score
A 17-questions validated PREM questionnaire on pregnancy experience that measures three dimensions - type of prenatal care received and test results (seven questions), pregnancy visits (four questions (scales 1-5) and prenatal screening experience (six questions).
A profile score by looking at frequencies of responses for each item will be used.
Measured: At 22 weeks of gestation
gestational age at termination of pregnancy
Gestational age at termination of pregnancy for participants having volountary termination
Measured: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
percentage of women undergoing invasive diagnostic testing
see outcome title
Measured: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2019
- Study start13 Jan 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023
- Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prenatal DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Open-label prospective comparative-effectiveness (utility) randomised trial between first-tier NIPS and the standard of care (2nd-tier NIPS).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 7,849 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genome Quebec, Genome British Columbia, Genome Alberta, Ontario Research Fund, Laval University, St. Justine's Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, McGill University, University of British Columbia, University of Alberta, Genome Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, François Rousseau, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Investigators
- Sylvie Langlois, MD FRCPC, Principal investigator, University of British ColumbiaFrancois Rousseau, MD MSc FRCPC, Principal investigator, CHU de Québec - Université Laval
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03831256
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SIRUL 118984
- Acronym
- PEGASUS-2
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Badeau M, Lindsay C, Blais J, Nshimyumukiza L, Takwoingi Y, Langlois S, Legare F, Giguere Y, Turgeon AF, Witteman W, Rousseau F. Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 10;11(11):CD011767. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011767.pub2.
PubMed 29125628Dubeau A, El Balqui M, Talbot D, Rousseau F, Langlois S, Chen W, Audibert F, Bujold E, Forest JC, Dofara SG, Legare F. Validation of PREM-PS, a patient-reported experience instrument, in a randomized controlled trial of pregnant women undergoing prenatal screening. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2026 Mar 7;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41687-026-01020-5.
PubMed 41793622
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PErsonalized Genomics for Prenatal Abnormalities Screening USing Maternal Blood : Towards First Tier Screening and Beyond
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03831256
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PEGASUS-2 / SIRUL 118984
- Conditions
- Prenatal Disorder, Aneuploidy
- Keywords
- Real life comparative effectiveness, Non-invasive prenatal screening, Fetal aneuploidy, Randomized controlled trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 7,849 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite LavalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genome Quebec, Genome British Columbia, Genome Alberta, Ontario Research Fund, Laval University, St. Justine's Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, McGill University, University of British Columbia, University of Alberta, Genome Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- 13 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project aims to provide high- quality evidence to inform decisions by health care organisations about using first-tier non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) to replace traditional screening tests for trisomy 21, and potentially to screen for other fetal chromosome anomalies. We will compare the current screening approach of second-tier NIPS with the use of first-tier NIPS in a large cohort of pregnant women.
Detailed description
There is some data on the performance of NIPS as a first tier screening test but our systematic review has shown that no trial comparing the effectiveness (utility) of 2nd-tier NIPS with that of first-tier NIPS has been published . Further it is important for health care decision makers to have evidence produced in Canada since the geographical context of healthcare can affect uptake as well as patient decision and thus their healthcare trajectories. There is a need for a trial that is between an explanatory trial and a pragmatic trial to provide the types of answer that we aim to document in the present state of knowledge on NIPS-based screening strategies in Canada. Our Objective is to perform a pan-Canadian large-scale comparative utility (clinical outcomes) study of first-tier NIPS (expanded or not) as compared to the new standard of care (NIPS as a 2nd tier test performed much later during pregnancy and only in high risk pregnancies).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Open-label prospective comparative-effectiveness (utility) randomised trial between first-tier NIPS and the standard of care (2nd-tier NIPS).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of care (2nd tier NIPS) | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Traditional integrated prenatal screening, Diagnostic Test: Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), Diagnostic Test: Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidyFor the standard-of-care arm (2nd tier NIPS) women will undergo Traditional integrated prenatal screening i.e. traditional biochemical (+/- NT) and those with a positive screen for T21 or T18 will be offered Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) (for T21, T18, T13) or Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Ultrasound examination in first and second trimester will be done based on clinical care practice ordered by health care provider. Pregnant women with a positive NIPS test will be offered Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy (fetal chromosome analysis). |
| First-tier NIPS | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), Diagnostic Test: Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidyFor the intervention arm (1st tier NIPS) women will receive First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) i.e. provide a blood sample between 10-13+5 weeks gestation with NIPS results within 7 - 10 days of sample collection. Ultrasound examination in first and second trimester will be done based on clinical care practice ordered by health care provider. In case of a failed NIPS test (expected to be between 2% and 4% of samples), a new blood sample will be drawn for NIPS retest as well as for a traditional SIPS(serum integrated prenatal screening) or QUAD(quadruple marker prenatal screening) screen (depending on gestational age). Pregnant women with a positive NIPS test will be offered Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy (fetal chromosome analysis). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnant women 19 years or older wanting prenatal screening
- 10-13+6 wks determined by dating ultrasound or last menstrual period.
- Not intending to pursue self pay NIPT
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Known fetal anomaly at the time of recruitment
- Multiple gestation
- Known twin demise
- Planned CVS or amnio for known genetic condition.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional integrated prenatal screeningAlso: IPSbiochemical prenatal screening with or without nuchal translucency by US | Diagnostic test | Standard of care (2nd tier NIPS) |
| Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS)Also: second tier non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)genomics based NIPS after a positive traditional prenatal screen | Diagnostic test | Standard of care (2nd tier NIPS) |
| First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS)Also: first tier NIPT, Universal NIPS, Universal NIPTgenomics based NIPS at first trimester | Diagnostic test | First-tier NIPS |
| Invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidyamniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling (CVS) | Diagnostic test | First-tier NIPS, Standard of care (2nd tier NIPS) |
Primary outcome
Gestational age at diagnosis
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
gestational age at final result in the sub-set of participants that have received a positive NIPS result and that have been offered diagnostic testing
9 secondary outcomes
Gestational age at negative screening result
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
Gestational age at positive screening result
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
proportion of women with no results
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
numbers of days for women with false positive result of screen to wait for result of definite test
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
Change in PROMIS-29 Score
Time frame: At weeks of gestation 10-13, week 16 and week 22
Change in PROMIS Emotional Distress - Anxiety - Short Form 8a Score
Time frame: At weeks of gestation 10-13, 16 and 22
Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM) - Score
Time frame: At 22 weeks of gestation
gestational age at termination of pregnancy
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
percentage of women undergoing invasive diagnostic testing
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2025.
- Background: PubMed 29125628Badeau M, Lindsay C, Blais J, Nshimyumukiza L, Takwoingi Y, Langlois S, Legare F, Giguere Y, Turgeon AF, Witteman W, Rousseau F. Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 10;11(11):CD011767. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011767.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41793622Dubeau A, El Balqui M, Talbot D, Rousseau F, Langlois S, Chen W, Audibert F, Bujold E, Forest JC, Dofara SG, Legare F. Validation of PREM-PS, a patient-reported experience instrument, in a randomized controlled trial of pregnant women undergoing prenatal screening. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2026 Mar 7;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41687-026-01020-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prenatal Disorder
Recruiting
Sustained Cord Circulation at Emergency Cesarean Section
Asphyxia Neonatorum, Fetal Hypoxia
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study to Assess Maternal, Fetal and Infant Outcomes Following Exposure to Rimegepant
Migraine
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Craniofacial Anomalies and Developmental Growth Variants
Prognathism, Retrognathism
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
Selective Antibiotics When Symptoms Develop Versus Universal Antibiotics for Preterm Neonates
Sepsis, PROM, Preterm (Pregnancy)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sylvie Langlois, MD FRCPC principal investigator
University of British Columbia
Francois Rousseau, MD MSc FRCPC principal investigator
CHU de Québec - Université Laval
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Traditional integrated prenatal screening, Second-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and First-tier Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in people with Prenatal Disorder and Aneuploidy, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 6 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gestational age at diagnosis (time frame: Up to 24 weeks of gestational age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03831256, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2025.