Acute Decompensated Heart FailureEDEMANCT03863626
Exploring Diuretics Effective Management in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure, EDEMA Trial
A study testing Frusemide IV shots and Frusemide IV infusion in people with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Diuretics Resistance, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
1. Evaluate efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of IV Frusemide compared to IV shots in acute decompensated heart failure ADHF 2. Evaluate superiority of time-adjusted metolazone to morning frusemide IV shots compared to irrespective administration (at random times) to overcome diuretic resistance Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Decompensated Heart Failure, Diuretics Resistance
- What is being tested?
- Frusemide IV shots and Frusemide IV infusion
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 31 Mar 2019to Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age more than 18 years.
- Chronic heart failure prior diagnosis, based on signs and or symptoms of heart failure, presenting with acute decompensation as judged by the physician to require hospitalization for IV diuretics
Who cannot join
- Refusal to participate in the study.
- Allergy to IV frusemide.
- Severe renal impairment defined as eGFR<30ml/m.
- Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability judged by the treating physician to be unsuitable to participate.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals
Cairo
Salma Sallam
About this study
- Evaluate efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of IV Frusemide compared to IV shots in acute decompensated heart failure ADHF
- Evaluate superiority of time-adjusted metolazone to morning frusemide IV shots compared to irrespective administration (at random times) to overcome diuretic resistance
Read the detailed description
After admission for acute decompensated heart failure and ensuring eligibility to participate in the study, accepting patients will be randomized by a pre-prepared tables into 2 equal groups (A = shots, B = infusion): - Patients randomized to the Frusemide IV shots arm (group A) will be started on 80 mg frusemide daily (or at the least equal to their prior oral dose if was on >80 mg oral frusemide or equivalent doses of other loop diuretics). Dose will be allowed to be modified by judging the urine output in every 3 hours.
Patients randomized to continuous IV infusion arm (group B) will receive 84 mg Frusemide daily (40 mg bolus followed by 2 mg/ hour starting infusion rate). An extra bolus and/or modification of the infusion rate will be allowed after judging the urine output in 3 hours. The same regimen would be continued for at least 72 hours, or more than 72 hours if needed till switching to oral diuretics.
In patients who develop diuretic resistance defined as failure to achieve therapeutically desired urine output despite maximal doses of loop diuretics will be managed by adding thiazide type diuretic "Metolazone" to the regimen to achieve sequential nephron blockade. Metolazone (2.5 - 10 mg /day) addition will be allowed in both arms when deemed indicated, however, in the IV shots arm, there will be further 1:1 randomization for either giving metolazone timed 60 minutes before the morning IV frusemide shot (group A.T) or metolazone at random time irrespective of the frusemide dose timing (group A.R).
Variables that will be assessed in the patients to evaluate the prespecified end-points are:-
- Urine output in L/day as absolute volume and indexed volume to body weight.
- Weight loss in Kg as absolute number and in percentage of initial body weight.
- Diuretic efficiency defined as amount of urine output per 40mg frusemide.
- Impact on hemodynamics assessed by change in mean arterial pressure, inducing hypotension (systolic below 80 mmHg or requiring denovo vasopressors), or new clinical signs of hypoperfusion.
- Cumulative dose of IV frusemide per 72 hours.
- Improvement of NYHA class as judged by the treating physician.
- Number of days to introduction/restoring dose of betablockade therapy.
- Number of days to switch to oral diuretics as judged by the treating physician.
- Duration of ICU stay and of hospital stay.
- Change in serum creatinine (either rising or falling) in absolute value and percentage from baseline creatinine, as well as in eGFR equated by Cockcroft-Gold equation.
- Occurrence of worsening renal function (WRF) as defined by rise of serum creatinine by ≥ 0.3 mg/dl.
- Occurrence of 50% and or 100% rise in serum creatinine or indication to renal replacement therapy.
- Change in serum potassium as absolute value from baseline or below target range (between 4.0 - 5.0 mEq/dl). Serum potassium level will be routinely checked twice daily in the first 72 hours then once daily or every 48 hours as seen necessary.
- Inducing denovo hypomagnesemia (below 1.8mg/dl) or hyponatremia (below 135 mEq/dl)
- Rehospitalization within 30 days for new heart failure decompensation, and hospitalization for any cause.
VI. Study outcomes
- Primary outcome
- Time (in hours) to improvement of NYHA class when frusemide is given as shots compared to infusion.
- Urine output (in ml/kg/h) per 40 mg of frusemide given as shots vs continuous infusion.
- Secondary outcome(s)
- Assessment of additive benefit of addition of metolazone to frusemide in ADHF.
- Evaluating superiority of timely adjusted metolazone compared to given at random in overcoming resistance to IV frusemide (IV shots arm).
- Being tested
- Frusemide IV shots, Frusemide IV infusion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Frusemide IV shotsOther
giving frusemide by IV shots
And if developed diuretic resistance (diminishing diuretic effect despite incremental dose of IV loop diuretic), adjuvant oral Metolazone will be given for sequential nephron blockade comparing its administration timed 60 minutes prior to the morning Frusemide shot versus given after. (This will be in a second level of randomization)
Frusemide IV infusionOther
giving frusemide by continuous IV infusion
And if developed diuretic resistance (diminishing diuretic effect despite incremental dose of IV loop diuretic), adjuvant oral Metolazone will be given for sequential nephron blockade
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Frusemide IV shots = group A | Active comparator | Frusemide as IV shots Receives: Other: Frusemide IV shots |
| Frusemide IV infusion = group B | Active comparator | Frusemide as continuous IV infusion Receives: Other: Frusemide IV infusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to improvement of NYHA class
Time (in hours) to improvement of NYHA class
Measured: within 5 days
Diuretic efficiency
Urine output (in ml/kg/h) per 40 mg of frusemide given as shots vs continuous infusion.
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
effectiveness of sequential nephron block
Assessing improvement of diuresis by adding of metolazone to frusemide in ADHF.patients who had developed diuretic resistance.
Measured: within 5 days of adding metolazone
Evaluating superiority of timely adjusted metolazone compared to given at random in overcoming resistance to IV frusemide (only in IV shots arm)
Evaluating superiority of timely adjusted metolazone given 60 minutes prior to IV frusemide compared to when given at random in overcoming diuretic resistance (only in IV shots arm)
Measured: within 5 days of adding metolazone
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2019
- Study start31 Mar 2019
- Primary completionDec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Decompensated Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- randomized controlled trial 2 equal groups for IV shots and continuous infusion of frusemide in cases of diuretic resistance, metolazone will be added for sequential blockade in the IV shots arm qualifying diuretic resistance, there will be second levle of randomization into time adjusted versus random time metolazone administration
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kasr El Aini Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmad Samir, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Ahmed Shehata, MD, Study chair, Cairo UniversityMagdy Abdelhamid, MD, Study director, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03863626
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- N-166-2018
- Acronym
- EDEMA
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Damman K, Testani JM. The kidney in heart failure: an update. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jun 14;36(23):1437-44. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv010. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
PubMed 25838436
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exploring Diuretics Effective Management in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure, EDEMA Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03863626
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EDEMA / N-166-2018
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kasr El Aini Hospital
- Study start
- 31 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- Evaluate efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of IV Frusemide compared to IV shots in acute decompensated heart failure ADHF
- Evaluate superiority of time-adjusted metolazone to morning frusemide IV shots compared to irrespective administration (at random times) to overcome diuretic resistance
Detailed description
After admission for acute decompensated heart failure and ensuring eligibility to participate in the study, accepting patients will be randomized by a pre-prepared tables into 2 equal groups (A = shots, B = infusion): - Patients randomized to the Frusemide IV shots arm (group A) will be started on 80 mg frusemide daily (or at the least equal to their prior oral dose if was on >80 mg oral frusemide or equivalent doses of other loop diuretics). Dose will be allowed to be modified by judging the urine output in every 3 hours.
Patients randomized to continuous IV infusion arm (group B) will receive 84 mg Frusemide daily (40 mg bolus followed by 2 mg/ hour starting infusion rate). An extra bolus and/or modification of the infusion rate will be allowed after judging the urine output in 3 hours. The same regimen would be continued for at least 72 hours, or more than 72 hours if needed till switching to oral diuretics.
In patients who develop diuretic resistance defined as failure to achieve therapeutically desired urine output despite maximal doses of loop diuretics will be managed by adding thiazide type diuretic "Metolazone" to the regimen to achieve sequential nephron blockade. Metolazone (2.5 - 10 mg /day) addition will be allowed in both arms when deemed indicated, however, in the IV shots arm, there will be further 1:1 randomization for either giving metolazone timed 60 minutes before the morning IV frusemide shot (group A.T) or metolazone at random time irrespective of the frusemide dose timing (group A.R).
Variables that will be assessed in the patients to evaluate the prespecified end-points are:-
- Urine output in L/day as absolute volume and indexed volume to body weight.
- Weight loss in Kg as absolute number and in percentage of initial body weight.
- Diuretic efficiency defined as amount of urine output per 40mg frusemide.
- Impact on hemodynamics assessed by change in mean arterial pressure, inducing hypotension (systolic below 80 mmHg or requiring denovo vasopressors), or new clinical signs of hypoperfusion.
- Cumulative dose of IV frusemide per 72 hours.
- Improvement of NYHA class as judged by the treating physician.
- Number of days to introduction/restoring dose of betablockade therapy.
- Number of days to switch to oral diuretics as judged by the treating physician.
- Duration of ICU stay and of hospital stay.
- Change in serum creatinine (either rising or falling) in absolute value and percentage from baseline creatinine, as well as in eGFR equated by Cockcroft-Gold equation.
- Occurrence of worsening renal function (WRF) as defined by rise of serum creatinine by ≥ 0.3 mg/dl.
- Occurrence of 50% and or 100% rise in serum creatinine or indication to renal replacement therapy.
- Change in serum potassium as absolute value from baseline or below target range (between 4.0 - 5.0 mEq/dl). Serum potassium level will be routinely checked twice daily in the first 72 hours then once daily or every 48 hours as seen necessary.
- Inducing denovo hypomagnesemia (below 1.8mg/dl) or hyponatremia (below 135 mEq/dl)
- Rehospitalization within 30 days for new heart failure decompensation, and hospitalization for any cause.
VI. Study outcomes
- Primary outcome
- Time (in hours) to improvement of NYHA class when frusemide is given as shots compared to infusion.
- Urine output (in ml/kg/h) per 40 mg of frusemide given as shots vs continuous infusion.
- Secondary outcome(s)
- Assessment of additive benefit of addition of metolazone to frusemide in ADHF.
- Evaluating superiority of timely adjusted metolazone compared to given at random in overcoming resistance to IV frusemide (IV shots arm).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- randomized controlled trial 2 equal groups for IV shots and continuous infusion of frusemide in cases of diuretic resistance, metolazone will be added for sequential blockade in the IV shots arm qualifying diuretic resistance, there will be second levle of randomization into time adjusted versus random time metolazone administration
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Frusemide IV shots = group A | Active comparator | Other: Frusemide IV shotsFrusemide as IV shots |
| Frusemide IV infusion = group B | Active comparator | Other: Frusemide IV infusionFrusemide as continuous IV infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age more than 18 years.
- Chronic heart failure prior diagnosis, based on signs and or symptoms of heart failure, presenting with acute decompensation as judged by the physician to require hospitalization for IV diuretics
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Refusal to participate in the study.
- Allergy to IV frusemide.
- Severe renal impairment defined as eGFR<30ml/m.
- Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability judged by the treating physician to be unsuitable to participate.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Frusemide IV shotsgiving frusemide by IV shots And if developed diuretic resistance (diminishing diuretic effect despite incremental dose of IV loop diuretic), adjuvant oral Metolazone will be given for sequential nephron blockade comparing its administration timed 60 minutes prior to the morning Frusemide shot versus given after. (This will be in a second level of randomization) | Other | Frusemide IV shots = group A |
| Frusemide IV infusiongiving frusemide by continuous IV infusion And if developed diuretic resistance (diminishing diuretic effect despite incremental dose of IV loop diuretic), adjuvant oral Metolazone will be given for sequential nephron blockade | Other | Frusemide IV infusion = group B |
Primary outcome
Time to improvement of NYHA class
Time frame: within 5 days
Time (in hours) to improvement of NYHA class
Diuretic efficiency
Time frame: 24 hours
Urine output (in ml/kg/h) per 40 mg of frusemide given as shots vs continuous infusion.
2 secondary outcomes
effectiveness of sequential nephron block
Time frame: within 5 days of adding metolazone
Evaluating superiority of timely adjusted metolazone compared to given at random in overcoming resistance to IV frusemide (only in IV shots arm)
Time frame: within 5 days of adding metolazone
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2021.
- Background: PubMed 25838436Damman K, Testani JM. The kidney in heart failure: an update. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jun 14;36(23):1437-44. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv010. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
- Hoorn EJ, Ellison DH. Diuretic Resistance. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(1):136-142. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.08.027Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Recruiting
Low Level Tragus Stimulation in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Recruiting
Fluid Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Subjects Treated With Reprieve System (FASTR-II) (IDE-G210258)
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Evaluation of NIRSense Tissue Oximetry Sensor Monitoring to Early Detect Cardiogenic Shock
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of FlowMod System While Intermittently Partially Occluding Vena Cava Blood Flow in Subjects With ADHF
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)
Recruiting
A Study Of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ahmed Shehata, MD study chair
Cairo University
Magdy Abdelhamid, MD study director
Cairo University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Frusemide IV shots and Frusemide IV infusion in people with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Diuretics Resistance, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ahmad Samir, MD (00201002647275, ahmad.samir@kasralainy.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to improvement of NYHA class (time frame: within 5 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03863626, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.