AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Decompensated Heart FailureEDEMANCT03863626

Exploring Diuretics Effective Management in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure, EDEMA Trial

A study testing Frusemide IV shots and Frusemide IV infusion in people with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Diuretics Resistance, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

1. Evaluate efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of IV Frusemide compared to IV shots in acute decompensated heart failure ADHF 2. Evaluate superiority of time-adjusted metolazone to morning frusemide IV shots compared to irrespective administration (at random times) to overcome diuretic resistance Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Frusemide IV shots and Frusemide IV infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
31 Mar 2019to Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age more than 18 years.
  • Chronic heart failure prior diagnosis, based on signs and or symptoms of heart failure, presenting with acute decompensation as judged by the physician to require hospitalization for IV diuretics

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to participate in the study.
  • Allergy to IV frusemide.
  • Severe renal impairment defined as eGFR<30ml/m.
  • Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability judged by the treating physician to be unsuitable to participate.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals

    Cairo

    Salma Sallam

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

  1. Evaluate efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of IV Frusemide compared to IV shots in acute decompensated heart failure ADHF
  2. Evaluate superiority of time-adjusted metolazone to morning frusemide IV shots compared to irrespective administration (at random times) to overcome diuretic resistance
Read the detailed description

After admission for acute decompensated heart failure and ensuring eligibility to participate in the study, accepting patients will be randomized by a pre-prepared tables into 2 equal groups (A = shots, B = infusion): - Patients randomized to the Frusemide IV shots arm (group A) will be started on 80 mg frusemide daily (or at the least equal to their prior oral dose if was on >80 mg oral frusemide or equivalent doses of other loop diuretics). Dose will be allowed to be modified by judging the urine output in every 3 hours.

Patients randomized to continuous IV infusion arm (group B) will receive 84 mg Frusemide daily (40 mg bolus followed by 2 mg/ hour starting infusion rate). An extra bolus and/or modification of the infusion rate will be allowed after judging the urine output in 3 hours. The same regimen would be continued for at least 72 hours, or more than 72 hours if needed till switching to oral diuretics.

In patients who develop diuretic resistance defined as failure to achieve therapeutically desired urine output despite maximal doses of loop diuretics will be managed by adding thiazide type diuretic "Metolazone" to the regimen to achieve sequential nephron blockade. Metolazone (2.5 - 10 mg /day) addition will be allowed in both arms when deemed indicated, however, in the IV shots arm, there will be further 1:1 randomization for either giving metolazone timed 60 minutes before the morning IV frusemide shot (group A.T) or metolazone at random time irrespective of the frusemide dose timing (group A.R).

Variables that will be assessed in the patients to evaluate the prespecified end-points are:-

  • Urine output in L/day as absolute volume and indexed volume to body weight.
  • Weight loss in Kg as absolute number and in percentage of initial body weight.
  • Diuretic efficiency defined as amount of urine output per 40mg frusemide.
  • Impact on hemodynamics assessed by change in mean arterial pressure, inducing hypotension (systolic below 80 mmHg or requiring denovo vasopressors), or new clinical signs of hypoperfusion.
  • Cumulative dose of IV frusemide per 72 hours.
  • Improvement of NYHA class as judged by the treating physician.
  • Number of days to introduction/restoring dose of betablockade therapy.
  • Number of days to switch to oral diuretics as judged by the treating physician.
  • Duration of ICU stay and of hospital stay.
  • Change in serum creatinine (either rising or falling) in absolute value and percentage from baseline creatinine, as well as in eGFR equated by Cockcroft-Gold equation.
  • Occurrence of worsening renal function (WRF) as defined by rise of serum creatinine by ≥ 0.3 mg/dl.
  • Occurrence of 50% and or 100% rise in serum creatinine or indication to renal replacement therapy.
  • Change in serum potassium as absolute value from baseline or below target range (between 4.0 - 5.0 mEq/dl). Serum potassium level will be routinely checked twice daily in the first 72 hours then once daily or every 48 hours as seen necessary.
  • Inducing denovo hypomagnesemia (below 1.8mg/dl) or hyponatremia (below 135 mEq/dl)
  • Rehospitalization within 30 days for new heart failure decompensation, and hospitalization for any cause.

VI. Study outcomes

  1. Primary outcome
  • Time (in hours) to improvement of NYHA class when frusemide is given as shots compared to infusion.
  • Urine output (in ml/kg/h) per 40 mg of frusemide given as shots vs continuous infusion.
  1. Secondary outcome(s)
  • Assessment of additive benefit of addition of metolazone to frusemide in ADHF.
  • Evaluating superiority of timely adjusted metolazone compared to given at random in overcoming resistance to IV frusemide (IV shots arm).
Being tested
Frusemide IV shots, Frusemide IV infusion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Frusemide IV shotsOther

    giving frusemide by IV shots

    And if developed diuretic resistance (diminishing diuretic effect despite incremental dose of IV loop diuretic), adjuvant oral Metolazone will be given for sequential nephron blockade comparing its administration timed 60 minutes prior to the morning Frusemide shot versus given after. (This will be in a second level of randomization)

  • Frusemide IV infusionOther

    giving frusemide by continuous IV infusion

    And if developed diuretic resistance (diminishing diuretic effect despite incremental dose of IV loop diuretic), adjuvant oral Metolazone will be given for sequential nephron blockade

Study groups in NCT03863626
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Frusemide IV shots = group AActive comparatorFrusemide as IV shots
Receives: Other: Frusemide IV shots
Frusemide IV infusion = group BActive comparatorFrusemide as continuous IV infusion
Receives: Other: Frusemide IV infusion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to improvement of NYHA class

    Time (in hours) to improvement of NYHA class

    Measured: within 5 days

  2. Diuretic efficiency

    Urine output (in ml/kg/h) per 40 mg of frusemide given as shots vs continuous infusion.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. effectiveness of sequential nephron block

    Assessing improvement of diuresis by adding of metolazone to frusemide in ADHF.patients who had developed diuretic resistance.

    Measured: within 5 days of adding metolazone

  2. Evaluating superiority of timely adjusted metolazone compared to given at random in overcoming resistance to IV frusemide (only in IV shots arm)

    Evaluating superiority of timely adjusted metolazone given 60 minutes prior to IV frusemide compared to when given at random in overcoming diuretic resistance (only in IV shots arm)

    Measured: within 5 days of adding metolazone

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2019
  2. Study start31 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completionDec 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
randomized controlled trial 2 equal groups for IV shots and continuous infusion of frusemide in cases of diuretic resistance, metolazone will be added for sequential blockade in the IV shots arm qualifying diuretic resistance, there will be second levle of randomization into time adjusted versus random time metolazone administration
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
400 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03863626
Sponsor's protocol ID
N-166-2018
Acronym
EDEMA
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
23 Feb 2019
Last updated
27 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Damman K, Testani JM. The kidney in heart failure: an update. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jun 14;36(23):1437-44. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv010. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

    PubMed 25838436

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Frusemide IV shots and Frusemide IV infusion in people with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Diuretics Resistance, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ahmad Samir, MD (00201002647275, ahmad.samir@kasralainy.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to improvement of NYHA class (time frame: within 5 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03863626, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in