Acquired Brain InjuryMAPLESNCT03874650
MAPLES Pilot Study for Low Mood in ABI
A study testing Activity Planning Group, Activity Engagement Group and Waitlist Group in people with Acquired Brain Injury and Depression, run by University of Cambridge at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Low mood and depression are common following acquired brain injury (ABI). There is a lack evidence on effective treatments in ABI. Behavioural Activation (BA) is a potentially valuable option. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acquired Brain Injury, Depression
- What is being tested?
- Activity Planning Group, Activity Engagement Group and Waitlist Group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 20 May 2019to 27 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have a diagnosis of an acquired brain injury (e.g., traumatic brain injury, stroke)
- Speak and comprehend English
- Are a minimum of 3 months post-acquired brain injury
- Are identified as having low mood. Low mood will be identified by either:
- A score of at least 7 on the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, indicating clinically significant levels of depression, or
- Clinicians have identified that a client has low mood (i.e., through their own administration of the HADS within the past 3 months, through clinical interview determining that the client has low mood or would benefit emotionally from increased activity level)
Who cannot join
- Are incapable of attending to and/or understanding the intervention materials (i.e., severe cognitive disability)
- Have a diagnosis of dementia or other neurodegenerative disorder
- Unstable psychotropic medication (i.e., have recently started/recently changed medications)
- Are actively suicidal (i.e., have attempted suicide in the past 3 months, currently self-harm, and/or have a concrete plan to attempt suicide in the future, as identified by recurring clinician)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Cambridgeshire Community Services
Cambridge, Cambs, CB4 1PX
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
About this study
Official title: Mood, Activity Participation, and Leisure Engagement Satisfaction (MAPLES): A Pilot Feasibility Study for Low Mood in Acquired Brain Injury
Low mood and depression are common following acquired brain injury (ABI). There is a lack evidence on effective treatments in ABI. Behavioural Activation (BA) is a potentially valuable option. People with low mood can have problems imagining, planning and engaging in positive activities, or avoid activities due to fear of negative consequences. This can reduce positive reinforcement, further lowering mood. BA aims to reverse this cycle by encouraging individuals to engage in enjoyable activities. Despite its simplicity, it has been as effective as "talking therapies" and mood medication in non-ABI populations. Its simplicity may be particularly helpful in ABI where cognitive problems can form additional barriers to activity engagement.
This study will examine two ways to increase activity levels and improve mood. The first (Activity Engagement Group) is a social group run once a week for 8 weeks in which ABI participants will be encouraged to engage in games, crafts and discussion. The aim is that members gain direct positive reinforcement and may challenge fears such that activity levels could be maintained and mood enhanced after the group ends.
Read more
The second approach (Activity Planning Group), again an 8-week group, is to help participants identify, plan and schedule positive activities. The group will include discussion on identifying and overcoming problems in planning activities. Again, the hope is that training skills in planning and scheduling will generalise beyond the group.
The primary purpose is to examine the practicality, feasibility, and acceptability of the two approaches in ABI. A secondary purpose is to evaluate whether either group leads to improvements in activity levels and mood compared to a waitlist group. Individuals will be randomised to the Activity Engagement, Activity Planning Group or the 8-week Waitlist group. All will complete measures of activity levels and mood. At the end of the groups, these measures will be repeated. Waitlist participants will then be re-randomised to either the Activity Engagement Group or the Activity Planning Group.
Recruitment rates, drop out rates, and exit interviews will be used to assess feasibility and how meaningful or valuable participants found the groups. Comparison of measures will provide some indication of whether the groups are associated with improvements compared to those waitlisted. To establish whether any benefits last, all participants will repeat the measures 1 month after the groups end.
- Conditions
- Acquired Brain Injury, Depression
- Being tested
- Activity Planning Group, Activity Engagement Group, Waitlist Group
- Keywords
- acquired brain injury, traumatic brain injury, depression, rehabilitation, executive function
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Depression, Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Activity Planning GroupBehavioural
Participants in this group will receive 8 1-hour sessions of Behavioural Activation combined with select Goal Management Training strategies over the course of 8 weeks.
Activity Engagement GroupBehavioural
Participants in this group will attend 8 1-hour sessions of various social activities such as board games and puzzles.
Waitlist GroupBehavioural
Participants in this group will continue on their care as usual before being re-randomised into either the Activity Planning Group or Activity Engagement Group after 8 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Activity Planning Group | Experimental | Those in the Activity Planning group receive training and practice in identifying realistic and safe activities in everyday life that may be enjoyable or rewarding to complete. They gain practice in scheduling activities and identifying and overcoming barriers to completion, such as memory problems, avoidance, sticking to habitual patterns and physical and transport issues.
The intervention will consist of weekly 1 hour group sessions over 8 weeks, as below:
Introduction to Group Therapy Identifying Enjoyable Activities The Automatic Pilot and Planning Pleasurable Activities Goal Review and Balancing Enjoyable and Routine Activities Identifying Solutions to Goal Attainment Increasing Mastery and Managing Fatigue Active Approaches to Engagement Relapse Prevention Receives: Behavioral: Activity Planning Group |
| Activity Engagement Group | Experimental | Individuals randomised to this arm will meet weekly for 8 weeks for 1 hour and engage in various potentially rewarding and meaningful social activities such as board games, crafting, and puzzles. Participants in this group will not receive specific training on activity scheduling or overcoming barriers to activity participation. Rather the aim is that participants gain experience of positive reinforcement from the activities and that this explicitly or implicitly challenges potentially negative predictions about such situations and encourages generalised increases in positive activity beyond the group setting. The group will cover activities such as board games, t-shirt making, puzzles, painting, "pub quizzes", figurine painting, origami/paper-craft, and clay sculptures. Receives: Behavioral: Activity Engagement Group |
| Waitlist Group | Placebo comparator | In consenting to the study, individuals understand that access to groups cannot always be immediate. In the design we take advantage of this by completing the outcome measures before and after an 8-week period in participants randomized to this condition. We do not ask participants in any condition to discontinue any clinical services that they currently receive, hence the waitlist forms a treatment as usual control arm against which to judge and effects of the two groups. At the end of the waitlist the participants will be invited to take part in the Activity Planning or Activity Engagement Group depending upon their initial randomisation.. Receives: Behavioral: Waitlist Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Behavioural Activation for Depression Scale (BADS; Kanter et al., 2007)
This measure assesses changes in activity level related to depression. It consists of four subscales, Activation (engaging in meaningful activities) and Avoidance/Rumination (avoiding meaningful activities), Work/School impairment, and Social Impairment. To score the BADS, items from all scales other than the Activation scale are reverse-coded and then all items are summed. To score the subscales, no items are reverse-coded. For the total scale, higher scores represent increased activation, while for the Social Impairment subscale, higher scores represent increased social impairment. The minimum possible score on the BADS is 0, while the maximum possible is 150.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (14)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)
This measure assesses levels of depression (subscale 1) and anxiety (subscale 2) in clinical settings. Each subscale is scored independently. On each subscale, each item is summed with no reverse-coded items. Greater scores on either subscale represent greater depression or anxiety. The minimum possible score on each subscale is 0, while the maximum possible score on each subscale is 21. Higher scores indicate greater depression and anxiety.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Behavioural Inhibition/Behavioural Activation Scales (BIS/BAS; Carver & White 1994)
This measures assesses individual disposition toward avoiding and engaging in activities. The BIS/BAS has three behavioural activation (BA) subscales, and only one subscale assesses behavioural inhibition (BI). The BA subscales are Drive, Fun Seeking, and Reward Responsiveness. All items except for two are reverse coded. Four items are filler questions and are not used for the subscale scores. Once the appropriate questions are reverse coded, each subscale is summed to get the respective subscale scores. The minimum score on BA Drive is 4, maximum 16. Higher scores indicate greater drive to engage. The minimum score on the BA Fun Seeking subscale is 4, maximum 16. Higher scores indicate greater fun seeking. The minimum score on the BA Reward Responsiveness subscale is 5, maximum 20. Higher scores indicate greater reward responsiveness.The minimum score on the BI subscale is 7, maximum 28. Greater scores indicate greater behavioural inhibition.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-Short Form (IUS-SF; Carleton, Norton, & Asmundson)
This measure assesses the degree to which an individual is bothered by uncertainty. The IUS-SF has two subscales, Prospective Anxiety (concerns about the future), and Inhibitory (concerns prevent one from doing things). The items on the subscale are summed. No items are reverse-coded. A total score can be produced from combining two subscales. The minimum score on the Prospective Anxiety subscale is 5, maximum 25. Greater scores indicate greater prospective anxiety. The minimum score on the Inhibitory Anxiety subscale is 7, maximum 35. Greater scores indicate greater inhibitory anxiety.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R, Weiss, 2007)
This measure assesses acute and routine life stress. The IES-R has three subscales, Avoidance (not thinking of stressful events), Intrusion (whether memories of stressful events occur) and Hyperarousal (The degree to which stressful events cause somatic symptoms). No items are reverse-coded. Although each subscale can produce a score, typically the total score is summed to determine the level of impact a stressful event has had on an individual. The items on the subscale are summed, ranging from 0 to 88. Scores 24 or higher indicate cause for clinical concern, 33 represents a probably diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder, and 37 is high enough to suppress immune function (i.e., severe clinical concern).
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Motivation Questionnaire-Self (BMQ-S)
This measure assesses difficulties with overall motivation after brain injury. The scale has no subscales, and has 15 reverse-scored items. Once the appropriate questions are reverse scored, all items are summed to generate a total score. The minimum possible score is 34, maximum 136. Greater scores indicate greater difficulties with motivation.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Modified Outcome Measure - Participation Objective, Participation Subjective (MOM-POPS, Brown et al., 2004)
This is a modified measure of desired and actual participation in home and community activities. The scale contains 3 items, asking participants to rate their involvement in, frequency of, and importance of household, occupational, and social activities. Participants are then asked to check off which activities they have engaged in the past week, such as cleaning the house, made social arrangements, attended religious services, etc. Each item is scored individually, hence there is no score total. The first 3 items represent desired participation in daily activities, and the final item represents actual participation.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Sense of Control Scale (SCS; Lachman & Weaver, 1998a, 1998b)
This measure assesses perceived ability to exert control over one's life. It consists of two subscales, Perceived Constraints (i.e., whether there are barriers to control) and Perceived Mastery (one's subjective belief about their competency in one's life). All items on the perceived constraints scale are reverse coded. Each subscale is summed and interpreted independently. The minimum possible score on the Perceived Constraints scale is 8, maximum 56. Greater scores indicate more constraints.The minimum possible score on the Perceived Mastery subscale is 4, maximum 28. Greater scores indicate greater mastery.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Motivation for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Questionnaire (MOT-Q; Chervinsky et al., 1998)
This scale assesses level of motivation toward rehabilitation-related activities in traumatic brain injury. It consists of 4 subscales, Lack of Denial (good insight), Interest in Rehabilitation, Lack of Anger, and Reliance on Professional Help. The MOT-Q uses a 5-point Likert scale from -2 to +2. The scale contains 19 reverse coded items. Each subscale is totaled separately, and can be added together to produce a total score. Higher scores indicate greater motivation for rehabilitation. Total scores can range from -62 to +62. The Lack of Denial subscale ranges from -16 to +16, with higher scores indicating better insight. The Interest in Rehabilitation subscale ranges from -14 to +14, with greater scores indicating greater interest. The Lack of Anger scubscale ranges from -20 to +20, with higher scores indicating lower anger. The Reliance on Professional Help subscale ranges from -12 to +12, with higher scores indicating greater reliance.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000)
This scale assesses participant expectations of treatment outcome and perceived credibility of treatment. It consists of 6 items. The first 4 items reflect what one think about the intervention, and the last 2 items evaluate how one feels about the intervention. This measure has two factors, Credibility and Expectancy. The Credibility subscale ranges from 3 to 27. Two items on the Expectancy subscale are perecentage based (0 to 100%) and the third item is Likert based from 1 to 9. Typically, items are evaluated individually rather than produce a scale total
Measured: Baseline only
Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS; Snaith et al., 1995)
This scale assesses level of ability to experience pleasure in day-to-day activities. It consists on 14 items, with 7 items reverse coded. Greater scores indicate greater ability to experience pleasure in daily activities. Once the appropriate items are reverse-coded, all items are summed. The minimum possible score is 14, maximum 56.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS; Krupp et al., 1989)
This scale assess overall levels of fatigues in patient populations within the past week. It consists of 7 Likert-rated items and one visual analogue scale for participants to rate overall fatigue. Greater scores indicate higher levels of fatigue. The minimum possible score is 7, maximum 49.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006)
This scale measures symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder such as excessive worry and irritability, over the past two weeks. It consists of 8 items, with greater scores indicating greater anxiety. The minimum possible score is 0, and the highest possible score is 24.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Kroenke et al., 2001)
This scale measures symptoms of depression such as poor appetite or difficulties concentrating, over the past two weeks. It consists of 8 items, with greater scores indicating greater anxiety. The minimum possible score is 0, and the highest possible score is 24.
Measured: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Verbal and Spatial Reasoning Test (VESPAR; Langdon & Warrington, 1995)
This neuropsychological assessment measures fluid intelligence in neurological patients. It consists of 3 verbal and 3 spatial reasoning tasks, designed to calculate an individual's IQ.
Measured: Baseline only
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2019
- Study start20 May 2019
- Primary completion27 Apr 2021
- Study completion27 Apr 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acquired Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cambridge
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tom Manly, University of Cambridge
- Investigators
- Tom Manly, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Cambridge
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03874650
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2026112018
- Acronym
- MAPLES
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 4 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Only anonymised participant data from the study will be made accessible to other researchers upon publication of the study results. All data from all measures, including the questionnaires and qualitative interviews, will be made available once the study is completed. As we intend to publish the study as an open access article, all anonymised data will be available potentially indefinitely.
Publications
Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):459-81. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200411000-00004.
PubMed 15602309Carleton RN, Norton MA, Asmundson GJ. Fearing the unknown: a short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 May 2.
PubMed 16647833Carver CS, White TL. Behavioural inhibition, behavioural activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, 67, 319-333, 1994.
Cattelani R, Zettin M, Zoccolotti P. Rehabilitation treatments for adults with behavioral and psychosocial disorders following acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010 Mar;20(1):52-85. doi: 10.1007/s11065-009-9125-y. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
PubMed 20143264Dimidjian S, Hollon SD, Dobson KS, Schmaling KB, Kohlenberg RJ, Addis ME, Gallop R, McGlinchey JB, Markley DK, Gollan JK, Atkins DC, Dunner DL, Jacobson NS. Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Aug;74(4):658-70. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.658.
PubMed 16881773Fazel S, Wolf A, Pillas D, Lichtenstein P, Langstrom N. Suicide, fatal injuries, and other causes of premature mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: a 41-year Swedish population study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;71(3):326-33. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3935.
PubMed 24430827Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341-53.
PubMed 18162698Jorge RE, Robinson RG, Moser D, Tateno A, Crespo-Facorro B, Arndt S. Major depression following traumatic brain injury. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;61(1):42-50. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.1.42.
PubMed 14706943Kanter JW, Manos RC, Bowe WM, Baruch DE, Busch AM, Rusch LC. What is behavioral activation? A review of the empirical literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):608-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.001.
PubMed 20677369Raes F, Hoes D, Van Gucht D, Kanter JW, Hermans D. The Dutch version of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS): psychometric properties and factor structure. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;41(3):246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
PubMed 20167307Lachman ME, Weaver SL. Sociodemographic variations in the sense of control by domain: findings from the MacArthur studies of midlife. Psychol Aging. 1998 Dec;13(4):553-62. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.4.553.
PubMed 9883456Lachman ME, Weaver SL. The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Mar;74(3):763-73. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.763.
PubMed 9523418Levine B, Robertson IH, Clare L, Carter G, Hong J, Wilson BA, Duncan J, Stuss DT. Rehabilitation of executive functioning: an experimental-clinical validation of goal management training. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000 Mar;6(3):299-312. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700633052.
PubMed 10824502Levine B, Schweizer TA, O'Connor C, Turner G, Gillingham S, Stuss DT, Manly T, Robertson IH. Rehabilitation of executive functioning in patients with frontal lobe brain damage with goal management training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Feb 17;5:9. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00009. eCollection 2011.
PubMed 21369362Mazzucchelli T, Kane R, Rees CS. Behavioural activation treatments for depression in adults: A meta-analysis and review. Clin Psychol-Sci Pr 16(4): 383-411, 2009.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mood, Activity Participation, and Leisure Engagement Satisfaction (MAPLES): A Pilot Feasibility Study for Low Mood in Acquired Brain Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03874650
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAPLES / 2026112018
- Conditions
- Acquired Brain Injury, Depression
- Keywords
- acquired brain injury, traumatic brain injury, depression, rehabilitation, executive function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CambridgeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Apr 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Low mood and depression are common following acquired brain injury (ABI). There is a lack evidence on effective treatments in ABI. Behavioural Activation (BA) is a potentially valuable option. People with low mood can have problems imagining, planning and engaging in positive activities, or avoid activities due to fear of negative consequences. This can reduce positive reinforcement, further lowering mood. BA aims to reverse this cycle by encouraging individuals to engage in enjoyable activities. Despite its simplicity, it has been as effective as "talking therapies" and mood medication in non-ABI populations. Its simplicity may be particularly helpful in ABI where cognitive problems can form additional barriers to activity engagement.
This study will examine two ways to increase activity levels and improve mood. The first (Activity Engagement Group) is a social group run once a week for 8 weeks in which ABI participants will be encouraged to engage in games, crafts and discussion. The aim is that members gain direct positive reinforcement and may challenge fears such that activity levels could be maintained and mood enhanced after the group ends.
The second approach (Activity Planning Group), again an 8-week group, is to help participants identify, plan and schedule positive activities. The group will include discussion on identifying and overcoming problems in planning activities. Again, the hope is that training skills in planning and scheduling will generalise beyond the group.
The primary purpose is to examine the practicality, feasibility, and acceptability of the two approaches in ABI. A secondary purpose is to evaluate whether either group leads to improvements in activity levels and mood compared to a waitlist group. Individuals will be randomised to the Activity Engagement, Activity Planning Group or the 8-week Waitlist group. All will complete measures of activity levels and mood. At the end of the groups, these measures will be repeated. Waitlist participants will then be re-randomised to either the Activity Engagement Group or the Activity Planning Group.
Recruitment rates, drop out rates, and exit interviews will be used to assess feasibility and how meaningful or valuable participants found the groups. Comparison of measures will provide some indication of whether the groups are associated with improvements compared to those waitlisted. To establish whether any benefits last, all participants will repeat the measures 1 month after the groups end.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Activity Planning Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Activity Planning GroupThose in the Activity Planning group receive training and practice in identifying realistic and safe activities in everyday life that may be enjoyable or rewarding to complete. They gain practice in scheduling activities and identifying and overcoming barriers to completion, such as memory problems, avoidance, sticking to habitual patterns and physical and transport issues. The intervention will consist of weekly 1 hour group sessions over 8 weeks, as below: Introduction to Group Therapy Identifying Enjoyable Activities The Automatic Pilot and Planning Pleasurable Activities Goal Review and Balancing Enjoyable and Routine Activities Identifying Solutions to Goal Attainment Increasing Mastery and Managing Fatigue Active Approaches to Engagement Relapse Prevention |
| Activity Engagement Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Activity Engagement GroupIndividuals randomised to this arm will meet weekly for 8 weeks for 1 hour and engage in various potentially rewarding and meaningful social activities such as board games, crafting, and puzzles. Participants in this group will not receive specific training on activity scheduling or overcoming barriers to activity participation. Rather the aim is that participants gain experience of positive reinforcement from the activities and that this explicitly or implicitly challenges potentially negative predictions about such situations and encourages generalised increases in positive activity beyond the group setting. The group will cover activities such as board games, t-shirt making, puzzles, painting, "pub quizzes", figurine painting, origami/paper-craft, and clay sculptures. |
| Waitlist Group | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Waitlist GroupIn consenting to the study, individuals understand that access to groups cannot always be immediate. In the design we take advantage of this by completing the outcome measures before and after an 8-week period in participants randomized to this condition. We do not ask participants in any condition to discontinue any clinical services that they currently receive, hence the waitlist forms a treatment as usual control arm against which to judge and effects of the two groups. At the end of the waitlist the participants will be invited to take part in the Activity Planning or Activity Engagement Group depending upon their initial randomisation.. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Have a diagnosis of an acquired brain injury (e.g., traumatic brain injury, stroke)
- Speak and comprehend English
- Are a minimum of 3 months post-acquired brain injury
- Are identified as having low mood. Low mood will be identified by either:
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Are incapable of attending to and/or understanding the intervention materials (i.e., severe cognitive disability)
- Have a diagnosis of dementia or other neurodegenerative disorder
- Unstable psychotropic medication (i.e., have recently started/recently changed medications)
- Are actively suicidal (i.e., have attempted suicide in the past 3 months, currently self-harm, and/or have a concrete plan to attempt suicide in the future, as identified by recurring clinician)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Activity Planning GroupParticipants in this group will receive 8 1-hour sessions of Behavioural Activation combined with select Goal Management Training strategies over the course of 8 weeks. | Behavioural | Activity Planning Group |
| Activity Engagement GroupParticipants in this group will attend 8 1-hour sessions of various social activities such as board games and puzzles. | Behavioural | Activity Engagement Group |
| Waitlist GroupParticipants in this group will continue on their care as usual before being re-randomised into either the Activity Planning Group or Activity Engagement Group after 8 weeks. | Behavioural | Waitlist Group |
Primary outcome
Behavioural Activation for Depression Scale (BADS; Kanter et al., 2007)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
This measure assesses changes in activity level related to depression. It consists of four subscales, Activation (engaging in meaningful activities) and Avoidance/Rumination (avoiding meaningful activities), Work/School impairment, and Social Impairment. To score the BADS, items from all scales other than the Activation scale are reverse-coded and then all items are summed. To score the subscales, no items are reverse-coded. For the total scale, higher scores represent increased activation, while for the Social Impairment subscale, higher scores represent increased social impairment. The minimum possible score on the BADS is 0, while the maximum possible is 150.
14 secondary outcomes
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Behavioural Inhibition/Behavioural Activation Scales (BIS/BAS; Carver & White 1994)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-Short Form (IUS-SF; Carleton, Norton, & Asmundson)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R, Weiss, 2007)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Motivation Questionnaire-Self (BMQ-S)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Modified Outcome Measure - Participation Objective, Participation Subjective (MOM-POPS, Brown et al., 2004)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Sense of Control Scale (SCS; Lachman & Weaver, 1998a, 1998b)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Motivation for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Questionnaire (MOT-Q; Chervinsky et al., 1998)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000)
Time frame: Baseline only
Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS; Snaith et al., 1995)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS; Krupp et al., 1989)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Kroenke et al., 2001)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Verbal and Spatial Reasoning Test (VESPAR; Langdon & Warrington, 1995)
Time frame: Baseline only
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2021.
- Background: PubMed 15602309Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):459-81. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200411000-00004.
- Background: PubMed 16647833Carleton RN, Norton MA, Asmundson GJ. Fearing the unknown: a short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 May 2.
- BackgroundCarver CS, White TL. Behavioural inhibition, behavioural activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, 67, 319-333, 1994.
- Background: PubMed 20143264Cattelani R, Zettin M, Zoccolotti P. Rehabilitation treatments for adults with behavioral and psychosocial disorders following acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010 Mar;20(1):52-85. doi: 10.1007/s11065-009-9125-y. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
- Background: PubMed 16881773Dimidjian S, Hollon SD, Dobson KS, Schmaling KB, Kohlenberg RJ, Addis ME, Gallop R, McGlinchey JB, Markley DK, Gollan JK, Atkins DC, Dunner DL, Jacobson NS. Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Aug;74(4):658-70. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.658.
- Background: PubMed 24430827Fazel S, Wolf A, Pillas D, Lichtenstein P, Langstrom N. Suicide, fatal injuries, and other causes of premature mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: a 41-year Swedish population study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;71(3):326-33. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3935.
- Background: PubMed 18162698Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341-53.
- Background: PubMed 14706943Jorge RE, Robinson RG, Moser D, Tateno A, Crespo-Facorro B, Arndt S. Major depression following traumatic brain injury. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;61(1):42-50. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.1.42.
- Background: PubMed 20677369Kanter JW, Manos RC, Bowe WM, Baruch DE, Busch AM, Rusch LC. What is behavioral activation? A review of the empirical literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):608-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.001.
- Background: PubMed 20167307Raes F, Hoes D, Van Gucht D, Kanter JW, Hermans D. The Dutch version of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS): psychometric properties and factor structure. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;41(3):246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
- Background: PubMed 9883456Lachman ME, Weaver SL. Sociodemographic variations in the sense of control by domain: findings from the MacArthur studies of midlife. Psychol Aging. 1998 Dec;13(4):553-62. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.4.553.
- Background: PubMed 9523418Lachman ME, Weaver SL. The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Mar;74(3):763-73. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.763.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Only anonymised participant data from the study will be made accessible to other researchers upon publication of the study results. All data from all measures, including the questionnaires and qualitative interviews, will be made available once the study is completed. As we intend to publish the study as an open access article, all anonymised data will be available potentially indefinitely.
Related trials for Acquired Brain Injury
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Physical Activity in Adults With Acquired Brain Injury
Acquired Brain Injury
Recruiting
Exercise and Physical Activity in Children With Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury
Acquired Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adverse Events During Physical Therapy in Neurocritical ICU Patients
Critical Illness, Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Blood NfL and Functional Outcomes After Moderate-to-Severe TBI
Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tom Manly, PhD principal investigator
University of Cambridge
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Activity Planning Group, Activity Engagement Group and Waitlist Group in people with Acquired Brain Injury and Depression, run by University of Cambridge at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Behavioural Activation for Depression Scale (BADS; Kanter et al., 2007) (time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 1 month post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03874650, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2021.