AzTrials
AzTrials

Medication Therapy ManagementBIMEDOCNCT03909035

A Collaborative Approach to Medication Reviews for Older Patients With Polypharmacy

A study testing Medication therapy management in people with Medication Therapy Management, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In patients aged 65 years and older, polypathology is frequent and often associated with polypharmacy. This polypharmacy may be a source of iatrogeny due to pharmacokinetic interactions, enhanced sensitivity of older people to medication, or failure to adhere to the therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Medication Therapy Management
What is being tested?
Medication therapy management
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
697 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
3 Jun 2019to 25 Oct 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient aged 65 or older suffering from long-term illness
  • Patient aged 75 or older
  • Living at home
  • Having 5 medications or more per day for more than 6 months
  • Being a regular patient of the community pharmacy involved in the study
  • General practitioner of the patient agrees to participate to the study
  • Patient being mentally and physically able to decide on his own to participate in the study
  • Patient available by phone throughout the study

Who cannot join

  • Patient refuses to participate
  • Patient without a family doctor
  • Patient whose family doctor refuses to participate in the study
  • Patient who does not understand French, or dependant on someone else to manage his medication
  • Resident of a nursing home
  • Patient placed under guardianship
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Uncertainty of the pharmacist about patient reliability
  • Patient having benefited from a medication review in the previous 12 months
  • Patient already included in another study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Toulouse University Hospital

    Toulouse, Occitanie, 31059

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Medication Reviews Performed for Elderly Patients: a Collaborative Approach Between Community Pharmacists, Patients and General Practitioners to the Optimizations of Prescriptions

In patients aged 65 years and older, polypathology is frequent and often associated with polypharmacy. This polypharmacy may be a source of iatrogeny due to pharmacokinetic interactions, enhanced sensitivity of older people to medication, or failure to adhere to the therapy. Since January 2018, French community pharmacists have been allowed by the Health ministry to perform medication reviews for people aged 65 years and over, who are being treated with more than 5 medications a day. the present hypothesis is that medication therapy management performed in collaboration with patients, general practitioners, and community pharmacists will lead to a reduction in medical events and inappropriate prescriptions.

Read the detailed description

This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in 9 regions of France. Each region represents one cluster with 7 community pharmacies located around the University Hospital associated with that cluster. In total, 63 community pharmacies will be enrolled, with each pharmacy including 20 patients over a 10 month-period. Over the life-time of the project, a total of 1260 patients will benefit from either the intervention or from a controlled pharmaceutical care according to the period of time they will be enrolled.

Being tested
Medication therapy management
Keywords
Medication review polypharmacy, clinical pharmacy, older people, inappropriate prescribing, collaboration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Medication therapy managementOther

    The intervention is in the form of a pharmacist-led medication review aimed at detecting potentially inappropriate prescribing. It includes:

    • A patient-pharmacist interview to collect comorbidities, medication, laboratory results, self-medication, adherence, medication patient's knowledge.
    • A pharmacist's evaluation of the prescriptions based on the patient's conditions and on the current recommendations for clinical practice.
    • Detailed feedback to the general practitioner.
    • An appointment with the patient to explain the modifications made by the general practitioner (GP)
Study groups in NCT03909035
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Medication therapy managementExperimentalMedication therapy management by the community pharmacist in collaboration with the General Practitioners to the Optimizations of Prescriptions
Receives: Other: Medication therapy management
Usual pharmaceutical careNo interventionUsual pharmaceutical care provided by the community pharmacist (first level pharmaceutical analysis of the prescriptions)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of patients hospitalised

    Number of patients hospitalised for more or less than 24 hours, including emergency department transfers during a 12 month-period follow-up.

    Measured: Month 12

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Number of patients hospitalised (only non-scheduled hospitalisations)

    Number of non-scheduled hospitalisations (including emergency department transfers)

    Measured: Month 12

  2. Existence of at least one potentially inappropriate drug per patient

    Evolution of potentially inappropriate prescribing

    Measured: Month 0

  3. Existence of at least one potentially inappropriate drug per patient

    Evolution of potentially inappropriate prescribing

    Measured: Month 2

  4. Existence of at least one potentially inappropriate drug per patient

    Evolution of potentially inappropriate prescribing

    Measured: Month 12

  5. Mean number of medications per patient

    Mean number of medications per patient

    Measured: Month 0

  6. Mean number of medications per patient

    Mean number of medications per patient

    Measured: Month 12

  7. Medication regimen complexity index

    Medication regimen complexity index

    Measured: Month 0

  8. Medication regimen complexity index

    Medication regimen complexity index

    Measured: Month 12

  9. Girerd compliance test score

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on Medication adherence. From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value.

    Measured: Month 0

  10. Girerd compliance test score

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on Medication adherence.From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value.

    From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value.

    Measured: Month 4

  11. Girerd compliance test score

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on Medication adherence. From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value.

    Measured: Month 8

  12. Girerd compliance test score

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on Medication adherence. From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value.

    Measured: Month 12

  13. Quality of life measured with the EuroQol Group 5-level EQ-5D version

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The patients' quality of life: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).

    The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Measured: Month 0

  14. Quality of life measured with the EuroQol Group 5-level EQ-5D version

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The patients' quality of life: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).

    The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Measured: Month 4

  15. Quality of life measured with the EuroQol Group 5-level EQ-5D version

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The patients' quality of life: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).

    The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Measured: Month 8

  16. Quality of life measured with the EuroQol Group 5-level EQ-5D version

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The patients' quality of life: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).

    The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Measured: Month 12

  17. Differential cost ratio

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The cost-utility and cost-efficacy ratios

    Measured: Month 4

  18. Differential cost ratio

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The cost-utility and cost-efficacy ratios

    Measured: Month 8

  19. Differential cost ratio

    To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The cost-utility and cost-efficacy ratios

    Measured: Month 12

  20. Mean number of modifications made by the General Practitioner per patient, following the pharmacist's intervention

    To evaluate the modifications made by the general practitioner due to the pharmacists' interventions

    Measured: Month 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2019
  2. Study start3 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion25 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion25 Oct 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
697 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03909035
Sponsor's protocol ID
RC31/17/0454
Other IDs
17-0277, 2018/A00213/52
Acronym
BIMEDOC
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
19 Mar 2019
Last updated
14 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Medication therapy management in people with Medication Therapy Management, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of patients hospitalised (time frame: Month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in