Nutritional DisorderPhase 3EFFORTcomboNCT04012333
The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
A Phase 3 study testing OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E in people with Nutritional Disorder and Critical Illness, run by RWTH Aachen University at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The primary research question: In critically ill patients with nutrition 'risk factors', what is the effect of providing combined EN/PN to the group prescribed a higher dose (≥2.2 grams/kg/day) of protein/amino acid administration compared to a low group prescribed ≤1.2 gram/kg/day (EN only) on patient's functional… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nutritional Disorder, Critical Illness, Malnutrition
- What is being tested?
- OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Jun 2020to Mar 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥18 years old;
- Expected to remain mechanically ventilated for an additional 48 hours from screening;
- And have one or more of the following risk factors that make them at high nutritional risk:
- Low (≤25) or High BMI (≥35)
- Moderate to severe malnutrition (as defined by local assessments). We will document the means by which sites are making this determination and capture the elements of the assessment (history of weight loss, history of reduced oral intake, etc.).
- Frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale 5 or more from proxy)
- Sarcopenia (SARC-F score of 4 or more from proxy)
- From point of screening, projected duration of mechanical ventilation >4 days
Who cannot join
- >96 continuous hours of mechanical ventilation before enrollment
- Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 7 days from screening
- Pregnancy
- The responsible clinician feels that the patient either needs low or high protein
- Absolute contraindication to EN
- Severe metabolic disorders including electrolyte disorders, uncontrolled hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypophosphatemia.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Severe chronic liver disease (MELD-score >20) or acute fulminant hepatitis.
- Metabolic disorders involving impaired nitrogen utilization
- Not ambulating independently prior to illness that lead to ICU admission (use of gait aid permitted)
- Lower extremity injury or impairments that prevents them walking prior to hospital discharge (e.g. amputation, knee/hip injury)
- Pre-existing cognitive impairment or language barrier that prohibits outcomes assessment
- Pre-existing primary severe systemic neuromuscular disease resulting in severe weakness pre-ICU (e.g., Guillain Barre)
- Intracranial or spinal process affecting motor function
- Patients in hospital >5 days prior to ICU admission
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
University Hospital RWTH Aachen
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074
About this study
The primary research question: In critically ill patients with nutrition 'risk factors', what is the effect of providing combined EN/PN to the group prescribed a higher dose (≥2.2 grams/kg/day) of protein/amino acid administration compared to a low group prescribed ≤1.2 gram/kg/day (EN only) on patient's functional recovery as measured by 6-minute walk distance just prior to hospital discharge? The hypothesis: Compared to a control group reflective of usual care prescribing practices and an EN only approach, the administration of a higher dose protein/amino acids using EN and PN to nutritionally high-risk critically ill patients will be associated with improved functional outcome.
Read the detailed description
Positive, neutral, or negative, the results of the EFFORTcombo study will inform the clinical practice in ICU settings around the world. If positive, because of the pragmatic, multicentre nature of this trial, results will be broadly applicable to all critically ill patients worldwide. If the results are negative, it will be ensured that patients no longer receive high-dose protein/amino acid admixtures or possibly, combined EN/PN.
As it relates to critical care nutrition practice in general, there is a long history of practice-changing initiatives. A process of synthesizing (in the form of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines) and disseminating best practice ideas (in the form of web-based repository of tools and information [see www.criticalcarenutrition.com]) was established.
Over the past several years, this program of research with leaders of the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) and this specific protocol at the annual Clinical Nutrition Week with society leaders, researchers, and the clinical nutrition community at large has been discussed. Partnership with ASPEN will further facilitate both, recruitment initiatives and, importantly, the knowledge translation initiatives. These efforts will increase the likelihood of the uptake of EFFORT results across the world.
This study has both the potential to answer a high-priority clinical question and also transform the new approach in clinical nutrition research. It further represents a unique collaboration between ASPEN, its global partners, and the Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, a methodological support center based in Kingston, Ontario, Canada and managed by Dr. Daren Heyland. If successful, this type of collaboration sets an important precedent for how this community may approach additional research questions related to clinical nutrition. Nested within this larger volunteer-driven registry trial, the aim is to complete a significant sub-study that will establish the role of combined EN/PN in these nutritionally high-risk patients. This protocol pertains to the specifics of this sub-study of combined EN/PN. At the end of the trial, the data from this sub-study will be merged into the results of the overall parent EFFORT Trial (where data points are similar).
- Conditions
- Nutritional Disorder, Critical Illness, Malnutrition, Frailty, Sarcopenia
- Being tested
- OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E
- Medical subject headings
- Nutrition Disorders, Critical Illness, Malnutrition, Frailty, Sarcopenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%EDrug
OLIMEL 7,6%E will be administered via a central access whereas PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E will be administered peripherally.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Patients will receive standard care plus OLIMEL 7,6%E or if no central venous access available PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E to reach protein targets: >2.2g/kg/day Receives: Drug: OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E |
| Standard Care | No intervention | Patients will receive standard care (enteral nutrition only) to stay below the protein level: <1.2g/kg/day |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
6-minute walking distance
measured by performing a 6-minute walking test
Measured: at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (13)
Overall strength-upper and lower extremity
MRC sum-score
Measured: at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Quadriceps force-lower extremity strength
Hand held dynamometry
Measured: ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Distal strength-hand grip strength
Hand grip dynamometry
Measured: ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Overall Physical Functional status
Walking Impairment Questionnaire
Measured: Baseline (questionnaire only) and SPPB & FSS- ICU at ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Overall Physical Functional status
FSS-ICU
Measured: Baseline (questionnaire only) and SPPB & FSS- ICU at ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Overall Physical Functional status
SPPB
Measured: Baseline (questionnaire only) and SPPB & FSS- ICU at ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Discharge location
Discharge location
Measured: at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Body composition
Ultrasound of quadriceps
Measured: Enrollment, ICU day 10 and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Body composition (when clinically available)
Abdominal CT scan at 3rd lumbar vertebra
Measured: Only when clinically available, from 2 weeks before enrolment until 2 weeks after enrolment
Health-related quality of life
SF-36
Measured: (Telephone) survey at baseline and 6 months
Physical functioning
Katz ADL
Measured: (Telephone) survey at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks and 6 months
Health-related quality of life
EQ-5D-5L
Measured: (Telephone) survey at 6 months
Physical functioning
Lawton IADL
Measured: (Telephone) survey at 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2019
- Study startJun 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2022 (estimated)
Why it stopped: PI left site
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nutritional DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Intervention: enteral and parenteral nutrition to reach protein target of 2.2g/kg/day Control: only enteral nutrition to stay below protein target of 1.2g/kg/day
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- RWTH Aachen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinical Evaluation Research Unit at Kingston General Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christian Stoppe, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Aachen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04012333
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18-108
- Acronym
- EFFORTcombo
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 3 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hill A, Heyland DK, Elke G, Schaller SJ, Stocker R, Haberthur C, von Loeffelholz C, Suchner U, Puthucheary ZA, Bear DE, Ney J, Clasen KC, Meybohm P, Lindau S, Laurentius T, Stoppe C. Meeting nutritional targets of critically ill patients by combined enteral and parenteral nutrition: review and rationale for the EFFORTcombo trial. Nutr Res Rev. 2020 Dec;33(2):312-320. doi: 10.1017/S0954422420000165. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
PubMed 32669140
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04012333
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EFFORTcombo / 18-108
- Conditions
- Nutritional Disorder, Critical Illness, Malnutrition, Frailty, Sarcopenia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: PI left site
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- RWTH Aachen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinical Evaluation Research Unit at Kingston General Hospital
- Study start
- Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary research question: In critically ill patients with nutrition 'risk factors', what is the effect of providing combined EN/PN to the group prescribed a higher dose (≥2.2 grams/kg/day) of protein/amino acid administration compared to a low group prescribed ≤1.2 gram/kg/day (EN only) on patient's functional recovery as measured by 6-minute walk distance just prior to hospital discharge? The hypothesis: Compared to a control group reflective of usual care prescribing practices and an EN only approach, the administration of a higher dose protein/amino acids using EN and PN to nutritionally high-risk critically ill patients will be associated with improved functional outcome.
Detailed description
Positive, neutral, or negative, the results of the EFFORTcombo study will inform the clinical practice in ICU settings around the world. If positive, because of the pragmatic, multicentre nature of this trial, results will be broadly applicable to all critically ill patients worldwide. If the results are negative, it will be ensured that patients no longer receive high-dose protein/amino acid admixtures or possibly, combined EN/PN.
As it relates to critical care nutrition practice in general, there is a long history of practice-changing initiatives. A process of synthesizing (in the form of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines) and disseminating best practice ideas (in the form of web-based repository of tools and information [see www.criticalcarenutrition.com]) was established.
Over the past several years, this program of research with leaders of the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) and this specific protocol at the annual Clinical Nutrition Week with society leaders, researchers, and the clinical nutrition community at large has been discussed. Partnership with ASPEN will further facilitate both, recruitment initiatives and, importantly, the knowledge translation initiatives. These efforts will increase the likelihood of the uptake of EFFORT results across the world.
This study has both the potential to answer a high-priority clinical question and also transform the new approach in clinical nutrition research. It further represents a unique collaboration between ASPEN, its global partners, and the Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, a methodological support center based in Kingston, Ontario, Canada and managed by Dr. Daren Heyland. If successful, this type of collaboration sets an important precedent for how this community may approach additional research questions related to clinical nutrition. Nested within this larger volunteer-driven registry trial, the aim is to complete a significant sub-study that will establish the role of combined EN/PN in these nutritionally high-risk patients. This protocol pertains to the specifics of this sub-study of combined EN/PN. At the end of the trial, the data from this sub-study will be merged into the results of the overall parent EFFORT Trial (where data points are similar).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Intervention: enteral and parenteral nutrition to reach protein target of 2.2g/kg/day Control: only enteral nutrition to stay below protein target of 1.2g/kg/day
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Drug: OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%EPatients will receive standard care plus OLIMEL 7,6%E or if no central venous access available PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E to reach protein targets: >2.2g/kg/day |
| Standard Care | No intervention | –Patients will receive standard care (enteral nutrition only) to stay below the protein level: <1.2g/kg/day |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- ≥18 years old;
- Expected to remain mechanically ventilated for an additional 48 hours from screening;
- And have one or more of the following risk factors that make them at high nutritional risk:
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- >96 continuous hours of mechanical ventilation before enrollment
- Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 7 days from screening
- Pregnancy
- The responsible clinician feels that the patient either needs low or high protein
- Absolute contraindication to EN
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%EOLIMEL 7,6%E will be administered via a central access whereas PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E will be administered peripherally. | Drug | Intervention |
Primary outcome
6-minute walking distance
Time frame: at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
measured by performing a 6-minute walking test
13 secondary outcomes
Overall strength-upper and lower extremity
Time frame: at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Quadriceps force-lower extremity strength
Time frame: ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Distal strength-hand grip strength
Time frame: ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Overall Physical Functional status
Time frame: Baseline (questionnaire only) and SPPB & FSS- ICU at ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Overall Physical Functional status
Time frame: Baseline (questionnaire only) and SPPB & FSS- ICU at ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Overall Physical Functional status
Time frame: Baseline (questionnaire only) and SPPB & FSS- ICU at ICU and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Discharge location
Time frame: at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Body composition
Time frame: Enrollment, ICU day 10 and at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks
Body composition (when clinically available)
Time frame: Only when clinically available, from 2 weeks before enrolment until 2 weeks after enrolment
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: (Telephone) survey at baseline and 6 months
Physical functioning
Time frame: (Telephone) survey at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks and 6 months
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: (Telephone) survey at 6 months
Physical functioning
Time frame: (Telephone) survey at 6 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32669140Hill A, Heyland DK, Elke G, Schaller SJ, Stocker R, Haberthur C, von Loeffelholz C, Suchner U, Puthucheary ZA, Bear DE, Ney J, Clasen KC, Meybohm P, Lindau S, Laurentius T, Stoppe C. Meeting nutritional targets of critically ill patients by combined enteral and parenteral nutrition: review and rationale for the EFFORTcombo trial. Nutr Res Rev. 2020 Dec;33(2):312-320. doi: 10.1017/S0954422420000165. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nutritional Disorder
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Stoppe, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Aachen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E in people with Nutritional Disorder and Critical Illness, run by RWTH Aachen University at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
6-minute walking distance (time frame: at hospital discharge, up to 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04012333, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2022.