Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNCT04043780

Clinical Validation of a Decompression Prototype Splint for Patients With Carpal Tunel Syndrome

A study testing Decompression prototype splint for carpal tunnel syndrome and Standard splint for carpal tunnel syndrome in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Universidad de Zaragoza at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

A multicentric randomized controlled trial has been designed to study the effects of a decompression prototype splint on symptoms, functional capacity and nerve conduction studies in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?: Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
What is being tested?: Decompression prototype splint for carpal tunnel syndrome and Standard splint for carpal tunnel syndrome
Type of treatment: Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?: No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people: 60 participants
Where: 1 siteSpain
Study dates: 24 Sep 2019to 1 Sep 2020
Phase: Interventional
Are there results?: None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

Ages 18 years and older
All sexes
No healthy volunteers
Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

Be medically diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome after electrophysiological tests and present mild to moderate involvement. This test is performed according to the standards established by the "American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation"
Ability to understand and communicate their symptoms and to complete the questionnaires.

Who cannot join

Previous surgery in the carpal tunnel in the same limb Other pathologies that may be associated with carpal tunnel syndrome: traumas, pathologies or disorders of the upper limb or cervical spine (cervical radiculopathy, cervical sprain, etc.) or prior cervical surgery
Concurrent comorbidities that may be the cause and interfere with the treatment of the carpal tunnel syndrome: diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, reflex sympathetic dysfunction, obesity, renal disease, alcoholism, significant vitamin deficiency and associated viral or bacterial processes
Pregnancy
Oral drugs, physiotherapy treatment , treatment with splints or infiltrations for carpal tunnel syndrome prior or during the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site

Elena Estébanez de Miguel
Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Clinical Validation of a Decompression Prototype Splint for Patients With Carpal Tunel Syndrome: a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial

Read the detailed description

A decompression prototype splint was designed to simulate an manual mobilization that is able to increase the CSA of the carpal tunnel and the median nerve in cadavers. These changes are important because they may relate to the decrease in CTS symptoms.

Patients with mild or moderate carpal tunnel syndrome will be selected for the trial. They will be randomized in 2 groups. One group will wear an standard splint for carpal tunnel syndrome and the other the decompression prototype splint.

Conditions: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Being tested: Decompression prototype splint for carpal tunnel syndrome, Standard splint for carpal tunnel syndrome
Medical subject headings: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Decompression prototype splint for carpal tunnel syndromeDevice
This group will wear during 6 weeks a decompression prototype splint. They we be informed to wear it as long as possible during the 6 weeks.
Standard splint for carpal tunnel syndromeDevice
This group will wear during 6 weeks a standard splint. They we be informed to wear it as long as possible during the 6 weeks.

Study groups in NCT04043780
Study group	Role	What they receive
Decompression prototype splint	Experimental	The patients of this group will wear the decompression prototype splint. Receives: Device: Decompression prototype splint for carpal tunnel syndrome
standard splint	Active comparator	The patients of this group will wear a standard splint. Receives: Device: Standard splint for carpal tunnel syndrome

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

Intensity of symptoms at baseline
Intensity of the symptoms (pain, paraesthesia...) will be assess with a visual analogic scale (VAS). A VAS is usually a 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors (word anchors) at each end to express the extremes of the feeling. Patients mark the point on the line that best corresponds to their symptom severity . When reading the VAS, the position of the respondent's cross is generally assigned a score between 0 and 100. The scores can then be simply transferred to a 100-value scale using a millimeter tape measure.
Measured: Baseline
Intensity of the symptoms at 6 weeks
Intensity of the symptoms (pain, paraesthesia...) will be assess with a visual analogic scale (VAS). A VAS is usually a 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors (word anchors) at each end to express the extremes of the feeling. Patients mark the point on the line that best corresponds to their symptom severity . When reading the VAS, the position of the respondent's cross is generally assigned a score between 0 and 100. The scores can then be simply transferred to a 100-value scale using a millimeter tape measure.
Measured: 6 weeks
Intensity of the symptoms at 4 months
Intensity of the symptoms (pain, paraesthesia...) will be assess with a visual analogic scale (VAS). A VAS is usually a 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors (word anchors) at each end to express the extremes of the feeling. Patients mark the point on the line that best corresponds to their symptom severity . When reading the VAS, the position of the respondent's cross is generally assigned a score between 0 and 100. The scores can then be simply transferred to a 100-value scale using a millimeter tape measure.
Measured: 4 months
Nerve conduction studies at baseline
The nerve conduction will be assess with electroneurogram.
Measured: Baseline
Nerve conduction studies at 6 weeks
The nerve conduction will be assess with electroneurogram.
Measured: 6 weeks
Self-reported symptom severity and functional status at baseline
This outcome will be assess with The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), that is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), is a patient-based outcome measure that has been developed specifically for patients with CTS. It has two distinct scales, the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) which has 11 questions and uses a five-point rating scale and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) containing 8 items which have to be rated for degree of difficulty on a five-point scale. Each scale generates a final score (sum of individual scores divided by number of items) which ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Measured: Baseline
Self-reported symptom severity and functional status at 6 weeks
This outcome will be assess with The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), that is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), is a patient-based outcome measure that has been developed specifically for patients with CTS. It has two distinct scales, the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) which has 11 questions and uses a five-point rating scale and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) containing 8 items which have to be rated for degree of difficulty on a five-point scale. Each scale generates a final score (sum of individual scores divided by number of items) which ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Measured: 6 weeks
Self-reported symptom severity and functional status at 4 months
This outcome will be assess with The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), that is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), is a patient-based outcome measure that has been developed specifically for patients with CTS. It has two distinct scales, the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) which has 11 questions and uses a five-point rating scale and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) containing 8 items which have to be rated for degree of difficulty on a five-point scale. Each scale generates a final score (sum of individual scores divided by number of items) which ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Measured: 4 months
Global Perceived Effect at 6 weeks
Global perceived effect will be assess with the Global Perceived Effect scale. The global perceived effect scale (GPES) is a commonly used method for measuring patients' assessment of their condition. One of the underlying assumptions of the GPE is that it measures a global assessment of change in the patient's chief complaint. Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) consists of a scale of five points that varies from less than five points (much worse), zero (no change) and five points (completely recovered). The participants are asked in the following way for all the measures of the overall effect perceived: "Compared with the beginning of the episode, how do you describe your wrist/hand today?". Positive scores represent better recovery and negative scores indicate a worsening of symptoms.
Measured: 6 weeks
Global Perceived Effect at 4 months
Global perceived effect will be assess with the Global Perceived Effect scale. The global perceived effect scale (GPES) is a commonly used method for measuring patients' assessment of their condition. One of the underlying assumptions of the GPES is that it measures a global assessment of change in the patient's chief complaint. Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) consists of a scale of five points that varies from less than five points (much worse), zero (no change) and five points (completely recovered). The participants are asked in the following way for all the measures of the overall effect perceived: "Compared with the beginning of the episode, how do you describe your wrist/hand today?". Positive scores represent better recovery and negative scores indicate a worsening of symptoms.
Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (1)

Adherence to the treatment
The participants will fill in a calendar indicating the hours of use
Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

24 Sep 20191 Sep 2020

First posted2 Aug 2019
Study start24 Sep 2019
Primary completion1 Mar 2020
Study completion1 Sep 2020

Resources

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
Publications (31)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
Other trials for Carpal Tunnel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design

Study type: Interventional
Phase: Phase N/A
Primary purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomised
Intervention model: Parallel groups
Masking: Triple blind
Who is masked: Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment: 60 participants (actual)

IDs, dates and publications

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04043780
Sponsor's protocol ID: PI19/334
Status last verified: Nov 2020
First submitted: 30 Jul 2019
Last updated: 4 Nov 2020
Results posted: No
Data monitoring committee: Yes
FDA-regulated drug: No
FDA-regulated device: No
Individual data sharing: No

Publications

Keith MW, Masear V, Chung KC, Maupin K, Andary M, Amadio PC, Watters WC 3rd, Goldberg MJ, Haralson RH 3rd, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, McGowan R. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline on diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2478-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00643. No abstract available.
PubMed 19797585
Werner RA, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;113(9):1373-81. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00169-4.
PubMed 12169318
Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999 Jul 14;282(2):153-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.2.153.
PubMed 10411196
Buckle PW, Devereux JJ. The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergon. 2002 May;33(3):207-17. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(02)00014-5.
PubMed 12164505
Foley M, Silverstein B, Polissar N. The economic burden of carpal tunnel syndrome: long-term earnings of CTS claimants in Washington State. Am J Ind Med. 2007 Mar;50(3):155-72. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20430.
PubMed 17216630
Foley M, Silverstein B. The long-term burden of work-related carpal tunnel syndrome relative to upper-extremity fractures and dermatitis in Washington State. Am J Ind Med. 2015 Dec;58(12):1255-69. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22540. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
PubMed 26523842
Stapleton MJ. Occupation and carpal tunnel syndrome. ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jun;76(6):494-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03770.x.
PubMed 16768777
Roel-Valdes J, Arizo-Luque V, Ronda-Perez E. [Epidemiology of occupationally-caused carpal tunnel syndrome in the province of Alicante, Spain 1996-2004]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2006 Jul-Aug;80(4):395-409. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272006000400009. Spanish.
PubMed 16913614
Akalin E, El O, Peker O, Senocak O, Tamci S, Gulbahar S, Cakmur R, Oncel S. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with nerve and tendon gliding exercises. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Feb;81(2):108-13. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200202000-00006.
PubMed 11807347
Ballestero-Perez R, Plaza-Manzano G, Urraca-Gesto A, Romo-Romo F, Atin-Arratibel MLA, Pecos-Martin D, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Romero-Franco N. Effectiveness of Nerve Gliding Exercises on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Jan;40(1):50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
PubMed 27842937
Baker NA, Moehling KK, Rubinstein EN, Wollstein R, Gustafson NP, Baratz M. The comparative effectiveness of combined lumbrical muscle splints and stretches on symptoms and function in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.013.
PubMed 22200381
Page MJ, Massy-Westropp N, O'Connor D, Pitt V. Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD010003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010003.
PubMed 22786532
Brininger TL, Rogers JC, Holm MB, Baker NA, Li ZM, Goitz RJ. Efficacy of a fabricated customized splint and tendon and nerve gliding exercises for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov;88(11):1429-35. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.019.
PubMed 17964883
Wang JC, Liao KK, Lin KP, Chou CL, Yang TF, Huang YF, Wang KA, Chiu JW. Efficacy of Combined Ultrasound-Guided Steroid Injection and Splinting in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):947-956. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PubMed 28209506
Manente G, Torrieri F, Di Blasio F, Staniscia T, Romano F, Uncini A. An innovative hand brace for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Muscle Nerve. 2001 Aug;24(8):1020-5. doi: 10.1002/mus.1105.
PubMed 11439376

Want to know more?

The sponsor has not listed a contact. The official record may have more details.

Talk to your doctor first and take this page with you. Only the study team can confirm whether you can join.

Questions to ask the study team

What is the study trying to find out?
What would I need to do, and how often would I visit?
Could I receive a placebo instead of the treatment?
What are the possible risks and benefits for me?
Will it cost me anything? Are travel or time paid for?
Can I keep seeing my own doctor during the study?
What happens when the study ends?

See locations

Recruiting
Hand Function Outcome After the Application of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive on Post-burn Patients Presented With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Post-burn
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Progressive Gamified Motor Rehabilitation After Carpal Tunnel Release
Carpal Tunnel Surgery
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Symptom Recovery Time After the Phalen Test in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Sensorimotor Proprioceptive Stimulation Combined With Conventional Physical Therapy on Symptoms, Sensory Function, Proprioception, and Hand Function in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpel Tunnel Syndrome
Recruiting
Effect of Night-time and Full-time Splinting for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

All Carpal Tunnel Syndrome trials

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title: Clinical Validation of a Decompression Prototype Splint for Patients With Carpal Tunel Syndrome: a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04043780
Acronym / sponsor ID: PI19/334
Conditions: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Study type: Interventional
Recruitment status: Completed
Enrolment: 60 participants (actual)
Lead sponsor: Universidad de ZaragozaUniversity, hospital or other
Collaborators: Salud Aragon, Universitat de Catalunya, Institut Català de la Salut
Study start: 24 Sep 2019 (actual)
Primary completion: 1 Mar 2020 (actual)
Study completion: 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
First posted: 2 Aug 2019 (actual)
Results: Not posted in the source record

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

Detailed description

Study design

Primary purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomised
Intervention model: Parallel groups
Masking: Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
Number of arms: 2

Arm	Type	Receives
Decompression prototype splint	Experimental	Device: Decompression prototype splint for carpal tunnel syndromeThe patients of this group will wear the decompression prototype splint.
standard splint	Active comparator	Device: Standard splint for carpal tunnel syndromeThe patients of this group will wear a standard splint.

Who may qualify

Ages: 18 years and older
Sex: All
Healthy volunteers: Not accepted
Age groups: Adult, Older adult

Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)

Be medically diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome after electrophysiological tests and present mild to moderate involvement. This test is performed according to the standards established by the "American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation"
Ability to understand and communicate their symptoms and to complete the questionnaires.

Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)

Previous surgery in the carpal tunnel in the same limb Other pathologies that may be associated with carpal tunnel syndrome: traumas, pathologies or disorders of the upper limb or cervical spine (cervical radiculopathy, cervical sprain, etc.) or prior cervical surgery
Concurrent comorbidities that may be the cause and interfere with the treatment of the carpal tunnel syndrome: diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, reflex sympathetic dysfunction, obesity, renal disease, alcoholism, significant vitamin deficiency and associated viral or bacterial processes
Pregnancy
Oral drugs, physiotherapy treatment , treatment with splints or infiltrations for carpal tunnel syndrome prior or during the study.

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Interventions

Intervention	Type	Arms
Decompression prototype splint for carpal tunnel syndromeThis group will wear during 6 weeks a decompression prototype splint. They we be informed to wear it as long as possible during the 6 weeks.	Device	Decompression prototype splint
Standard splint for carpal tunnel syndromeThis group will wear during 6 weeks a standard splint. They we be informed to wear it as long as possible during the 6 weeks.	Device	standard splint

Primary outcome

Intensity of symptoms at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Intensity of the symptoms (pain, paraesthesia...) will be assess with a visual analogic scale (VAS). A VAS is usually a 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors (word anchors) at each end to express the extremes of the feeling. Patients mark the point on the line that best corresponds to their symptom severity . When reading the VAS, the position of the respondent's cross is generally assigned a score between 0 and 100. The scores can then be simply transferred to a 100-value scale using a millimeter tape measure.
Intensity of the symptoms at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
Intensity of the symptoms (pain, paraesthesia...) will be assess with a visual analogic scale (VAS). A VAS is usually a 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors (word anchors) at each end to express the extremes of the feeling. Patients mark the point on the line that best corresponds to their symptom severity . When reading the VAS, the position of the respondent's cross is generally assigned a score between 0 and 100. The scores can then be simply transferred to a 100-value scale using a millimeter tape measure.
Intensity of the symptoms at 4 months
Time frame: 4 months
Intensity of the symptoms (pain, paraesthesia...) will be assess with a visual analogic scale (VAS). A VAS is usually a 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors (word anchors) at each end to express the extremes of the feeling. Patients mark the point on the line that best corresponds to their symptom severity . When reading the VAS, the position of the respondent's cross is generally assigned a score between 0 and 100. The scores can then be simply transferred to a 100-value scale using a millimeter tape measure.
Nerve conduction studies at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
The nerve conduction will be assess with electroneurogram.
Nerve conduction studies at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
The nerve conduction will be assess with electroneurogram.
Self-reported symptom severity and functional status at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome will be assess with The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), that is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), is a patient-based outcome measure that has been developed specifically for patients with CTS. It has two distinct scales, the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) which has 11 questions and uses a five-point rating scale and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) containing 8 items which have to be rated for degree of difficulty on a five-point scale. Each scale generates a final score (sum of individual scores divided by number of items) which ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Self-reported symptom severity and functional status at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
This outcome will be assess with The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), that is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), is a patient-based outcome measure that has been developed specifically for patients with CTS. It has two distinct scales, the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) which has 11 questions and uses a five-point rating scale and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) containing 8 items which have to be rated for degree of difficulty on a five-point scale. Each scale generates a final score (sum of individual scores divided by number of items) which ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Self-reported symptom severity and functional status at 4 months
Time frame: 4 months
This outcome will be assess with The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), that is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), is a patient-based outcome measure that has been developed specifically for patients with CTS. It has two distinct scales, the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) which has 11 questions and uses a five-point rating scale and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) containing 8 items which have to be rated for degree of difficulty on a five-point scale. Each scale generates a final score (sum of individual scores divided by number of items) which ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Global Perceived Effect at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks
Global perceived effect will be assess with the Global Perceived Effect scale. The global perceived effect scale (GPES) is a commonly used method for measuring patients' assessment of their condition. One of the underlying assumptions of the GPE is that it measures a global assessment of change in the patient's chief complaint. Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) consists of a scale of five points that varies from less than five points (much worse), zero (no change) and five points (completely recovered). The participants are asked in the following way for all the measures of the overall effect perceived: "Compared with the beginning of the episode, how do you describe your wrist/hand today?". Positive scores represent better recovery and negative scores indicate a worsening of symptoms.
Global Perceived Effect at 4 months
Time frame: 4 months
Global perceived effect will be assess with the Global Perceived Effect scale. The global perceived effect scale (GPES) is a commonly used method for measuring patients' assessment of their condition. One of the underlying assumptions of the GPES is that it measures a global assessment of change in the patient's chief complaint. Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) consists of a scale of five points that varies from less than five points (much worse), zero (no change) and five points (completely recovered). The participants are asked in the following way for all the measures of the overall effect perceived: "Compared with the beginning of the episode, how do you describe your wrist/hand today?". Positive scores represent better recovery and negative scores indicate a worsening of symptoms.

1 secondary outcome

Adherence to the treatment
Time frame: 6 weeks

Results and safety

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

Research links

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2020.
Background: PubMed 19797585Keith MW, Masear V, Chung KC, Maupin K, Andary M, Amadio PC, Watters WC 3rd, Goldberg MJ, Haralson RH 3rd, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, McGowan R. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline on diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2478-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00643. No abstract available.
Background: PubMed 12169318Werner RA, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;113(9):1373-81. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00169-4.
Background: PubMed 10411196Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999 Jul 14;282(2):153-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.2.153.
Background: PubMed 12164505Buckle PW, Devereux JJ. The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergon. 2002 May;33(3):207-17. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(02)00014-5.
Background: PubMed 17216630Foley M, Silverstein B, Polissar N. The economic burden of carpal tunnel syndrome: long-term earnings of CTS claimants in Washington State. Am J Ind Med. 2007 Mar;50(3):155-72. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20430.
Background: PubMed 26523842Foley M, Silverstein B. The long-term burden of work-related carpal tunnel syndrome relative to upper-extremity fractures and dermatitis in Washington State. Am J Ind Med. 2015 Dec;58(12):1255-69. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22540. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
Background: PubMed 16768777Stapleton MJ. Occupation and carpal tunnel syndrome. ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jun;76(6):494-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03770.x.
Background: PubMed 16913614Roel-Valdes J, Arizo-Luque V, Ronda-Perez E. [Epidemiology of occupationally-caused carpal tunnel syndrome in the province of Alicante, Spain 1996-2004]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2006 Jul-Aug;80(4):395-409. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272006000400009. Spanish.
Background: PubMed 11807347Akalin E, El O, Peker O, Senocak O, Tamci S, Gulbahar S, Cakmur R, Oncel S. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with nerve and tendon gliding exercises. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Feb;81(2):108-13. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200202000-00006.
Background: PubMed 27842937Ballestero-Perez R, Plaza-Manzano G, Urraca-Gesto A, Romo-Romo F, Atin-Arratibel MLA, Pecos-Martin D, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Romero-Franco N. Effectiveness of Nerve Gliding Exercises on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Jan;40(1):50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Background: PubMed 22200381Baker NA, Moehling KK, Rubinstein EN, Wollstein R, Gustafson NP, Baratz M. The comparative effectiveness of combined lumbrical muscle splints and stretches on symptoms and function in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.013.
Background: PubMed 22786532Page MJ, Massy-Westropp N, O'Connor D, Pitt V. Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD010003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010003.
Individual participant dataSharing planned: No

Related trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Recruiting
Hand Function Outcome After the Application of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive on Post-burn Patients Presented With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Post-burn
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Progressive Gamified Motor Rehabilitation After Carpal Tunnel Release
Carpal Tunnel Surgery
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Symptom Recovery Time After the Phalen Test in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Sensorimotor Proprioceptive Stimulation Combined With Conventional Physical Therapy on Symptoms, Sensory Function, Proprioception, and Hand Function in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpel Tunnel Syndrome
Recruiting
Effect of Night-time and Full-time Splinting for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.

Elena Estébanez-de-Miguel, PhD principal investigator

Universidad de Zaragoza

1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intensity of symptoms at baseline (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04043780, which also lists 31 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2020.