Neck PainNCT04081896
Evaluation of the Effects of a Rehabilitation Program in Individuals with Spine Pain
An observational study of Neck Pain and Low Back Pain, run by SpineZone Medical Fitness, Inc at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
SpineZone is an innovative physical therapy program with its focus on treatment of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar conditions through the use of a multi-disciplinary, technology enabled platform. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 89 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain, Low Back Pain, Scoliosis
- What is being tested?
- Exercise
- How many people
- 5,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2019to 15 Apr 2029
- How long will I take part?
- 2 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 89 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: - Individuals between the ages of 18-89 who are seeking, or have been prescribed physical rehabilitation as a conservative management strategy for a complaint of spine pain (including, but not limited to neck pain, low back pain, thoracic spine pain, or scoliosis).
Who may be able to join
- over 18 years of age
- under 89 years of age
- Patients who have been prescribed physical rehabilitation for management of spine pain
Who cannot join
- under 18 years of age
- over 89 years of age
- Patients who are unable or medically unsafe to participate in physical rehabilitation for management of spine pain as determined by the prescribing physician
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
SpineZone
San Diego, California, 92108
Kamshad Raiszadeh, M.D, 8583376909, kam@spinezone.com
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Effects of Exercise-based Rehabilitation in Individuals with Spine Pain
SpineZone is an innovative physical therapy program with its focus on treatment of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar conditions through the use of a multi-disciplinary, technology enabled platform. Standard physical therapy modalities including psychologically informed physical therapy are employed in addition to online coaching with a fundamental tenant of core strengthening. Treatments are tracked and modified in a multi-disciplinary format taking all radiographic studies into direct consideration. The goal of this study is to utilize a registry of participants undergoing either in-clinic or online rehabilitation treatment for spine pain at the SpineZone clinical in order to understand the clinical outcomes and costs of different rehabilitation modalities in this patient population.
Read the detailed description
The key objectives for this registry are to 1) identify magnitudes of clinical improvements with this specific specialized rehabilitation program in its various formats (in-clinic vs online), in individuals with or without spine pain for comparison to literature-based standard of care values for other conservative care protocols, 2) to identify average value of this treatment approach based on cost assessment, 3) to identify which patients (based on patient-specific predictors) are most likely to succeed with this specialized program and 4) to identify targets for improvement and optimization of patient care any necessary modifications to the industry's standard for care protocol. The goal of this project is to assess the impact of a standardized program based on core strengthening using technologic monitoring in a multidisciplinary format.
This registry of data will not contain individual identifiers.
The study population is comprised of skeletally mature patients, both male and female, from a wide variety of ethnicities representative of the typical population presenting with spinal conditions, pain, or seeking prevention of future injury. There are no child participants, as they are not candidates for the type of programs under investigation.
All data relating to the patient's physical therapy, diagnosis, co-morbidies, medical history, medications etc., will be used for analysis.
STUDY METHODS:
- Describe how the data will be identified: Approved SpineZone staff will extract relevant outcomes data from the Electronic Medical Records system housed on a secure server. Identifiers will be stripped from the data, and claims will be indexed using Coding processes. Investigators will not have access to the pre-coded identifiers. Age, but not date of birth will be used, but no patients over the age of 89 will be included, thus it will not be an identifier. All systems used to store and view the data will be secure, with password protections and login access required. Once initial data extraction and de-identification is complete, the de-identified data will be stored on secure servers in a HIPAA compliant environment, and only transferred for biostatistics analytics through encrypted and password protected email to approved individuals (i.e. research biostatisticians) following a data use agreement.
- Data that will be used:
Outcome variables: Validated questionnaire-based outcomes including but not limited to: VAS (visual analogue scale), ODI (oswestry disability index) for Low Back Pain, NDI (neck disability index) for neck pain, PSFS (patient specific functional scale), SBST (STarT Back Screening Tool), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), medication usage (type, frequency), number of visits, progression to surgery (yes, no), dropout rates and reasons, Online compliance matrix(including access to educational material, log in rates, and self-reporting of compliance with workout regimen); physical examination measurements: strength and ROM measurements, and cost (based on procedural codes).
Predictor variables: Demographic, medical history, and treatment-specific variables including but not limited to: age, gender, ethnicity, diagnosis code (ICD-9/10), SpineZone rehabilitation diagnosis, treatment type, treatment history, radiologic diagnosis, duration of symptoms, postural factors, questionnaire-based pre-treatment disability, psychosocial status, prior treatments, concurrent treatments (e.g., nutrition, mindfulness), and pain scores.
- Who will identify data to be reviewed:
SpineZone clinical staff and Principal Investigator
CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA:
Data that is identified by the primary investigator for review will be additionally checked for any identifiers and stripped prior to analysis by biostatisticians. This data will be stored in two places. Initially, the de-identified data will be stored in the biostatistician's system for analysis. Once initial analysis is complete, the data will be loaded into a secure server with physical 24-hour security preventing unauthorized access to the hardware, with access to data only allowed through HTTPS login or through a direct and secure tunnel. Only investigators will have access to the login information.
Within two months of completion of the study, biostatisticians copy of the data will be destroyed. The data will be maintained in the secure hosted environment indefinitely.
Data will be transmitted with either password protection or PGP encryption on biostatistician computers. These computers and associated hardware are maintained in a secured facility with no public access. Computers are password protected and after 30 minutes of inactivity require the user to login again. Data and programs are backed up on a daily basis during the active phase of any project. Internet access is firewall protected. Anti-virus software is maintained (McAfee) with all incoming and outgoing documents scanned for viruses. Additionally, a scan of all files is performed daily.
Data storage will be on secure servers at a 24-hour guard facility, on windows server systems with updated enterprise virus protection software from Symantec. The database will only be accessible through an HTTPS log-in, with user-based access levels that ensure only personnel authorized by the principal investigator can gain access to the system. Any access will be tracked through a log of historical events that will track what user viewed or manipulated what data at any time.
Systems, security policies, and access logs will all be available for audit and review by the Principal Investigator at any time.
CONSENT:
Consent will be obtained in clinic, or through a form on an online portal for patients participating in the online treatment arm.
RISKS AND BENEFITS:
Risks: A confidentiality breach is a risk associated with data review research, however every measure will be instituted to ensure that patient information is kept confidential. Data analysis worksheets will be kept separate from EMR records. No subject PHI will be collected or shared.
Benefits: The participants are not likely to receive any benefit from the proposed research; however, society and investigators will benefit from the knowledge gained.
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
As this is intended to be a data registry, no current statistical analyses are being proposed. Independent sub-studies utilizing data from this registry will be required to provide power analyses and proposed sample sizes necessary to carry out the objectives of the individual research question.
Data will be analyzed for individual sub-studies by biostatisticians located at the University of California, San Diego. All individuals participating in data analysis will be trained in research compliance, ethics, and will follow regulations according to the approved data use agreements in place.
- Conditions
- Neck Pain, Low Back Pain, Scoliosis, Thoracic Injuries
- Being tested
- Exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain, Low Back Pain, Scoliosis, Thoracic Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExerciseOther
Exercise prescribed to participants includes spine-specific strengthening exercises targeting core musculature (i.e. Multifidus, Erector Spinae, Transversus Abdominus, Obliques, and Rectus Abdominus). The in-clinic exercise program recommends a minimum of 20 visits at 2 visits/week, with a goal of 24 total visits over a 12-week period. Exercise is progressed by 5-10% of their exercise load once they are able to do >20 repetitions. If they are able to reach >10 but <20 repetitions, exercise load remains the same. If they are unable to reach 10 repetitions, exercise load is decreased 5-10% at their next visit.
The online exercise program includes non-machine based home exercises targeting the same muscles of interest, and are personalized to each participant based on their home resources and comfort level.
Concurrent interventions may or may not include nutrition education, mindfulness, cognitive behavioral therapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| In Clinic Rehabilitation | Participants who are undergoing supervised exercise based rehabilitation in the SpineZone clinic Receives: Other: Exercise | |
| Online Rehabilitation | Participants who will be undergoing online-based coaching and exercise as prescribed via telephone, online chat, or web-based interactions with SpineZone rehabilitation staff (physical therapists and physicians) Receives: Other: Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in pain: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 0-100mm
difference in VAS (in mm) between initial evaluation and endpoint
Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Change in disability (%)
difference in Neck Disability Index (for neck pain participants) or Oswestry Disability Index (for Low Back Pain participants), or Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes questionnaire-22 (for Scoliosis participants) between initial evaluation and endpoint
Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Change in quality of life
difference in EQ5-D (points) score between initial evaluation and endpoint
Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Change in strength (lbs*deg)
difference in spine extension torque as measured by isokinetic dynamometer between initial evaluation and endpoint
Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Change in Range of Motion (deg)
difference in total spine flexion and extension (in degrees) between initial evaluation and endpoint
Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in spine extensor muscle cross sectional area (cm2)
Difference in cross sectional area of the multifidus and erector spinae muscles as measured via MRI between initial evaluation and endpoint
Measured: 3 months
change in spine extensor muscle fatty infiltration (%)
difference in percentage of fat within the multifidus and erector spinae muscles as measured by T1-weighted MRI between initial evaluation and endpoint
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2019
- Study start15 Apr 2019
- Primary completion15 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Apr 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 2 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SpineZone Medical Fitness, Inc
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Diego
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kamshad Raiszadeh, MD, SpineZone Medical Fitness, Inc
- Investigators
- Bahar Shahidi, P.T., Ph.D., Study director, University of California, San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04081896
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Spine Exercise
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Patient data will only be accessible to SpineZone and collaborating research partners (UCSD)
Publications
Raiszadeh K, Tapicer J, Taitano L, Wu J, Shahidi B. In-Clinic Versus Web-Based Multidisciplinary Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Treatment of Low Back Pain: Prospective Clinical Trial in an Integrated Practice Unit Model. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 18;23(3):e22548. doi: 10.2196/22548.
PubMed 33734088
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Effects of Exercise-based Rehabilitation in Individuals with Spine Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04081896
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Spine Exercise
- Conditions
- Neck Pain, Low Back Pain, Scoliosis, Thoracic Injuries
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- SpineZone Medical Fitness, IncUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Diego
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Apr 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
SpineZone is an innovative physical therapy program with its focus on treatment of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar conditions through the use of a multi-disciplinary, technology enabled platform. Standard physical therapy modalities including psychologically informed physical therapy are employed in addition to online coaching with a fundamental tenant of core strengthening. Treatments are tracked and modified in a multi-disciplinary format taking all radiographic studies into direct consideration. The goal of this study is to utilize a registry of participants undergoing either in-clinic or online rehabilitation treatment for spine pain at the SpineZone clinical in order to understand the clinical outcomes and costs of different rehabilitation modalities in this patient population.
Detailed description
The key objectives for this registry are to 1) identify magnitudes of clinical improvements with this specific specialized rehabilitation program in its various formats (in-clinic vs online), in individuals with or without spine pain for comparison to literature-based standard of care values for other conservative care protocols, 2) to identify average value of this treatment approach based on cost assessment, 3) to identify which patients (based on patient-specific predictors) are most likely to succeed with this specialized program and 4) to identify targets for improvement and optimization of patient care any necessary modifications to the industry's standard for care protocol. The goal of this project is to assess the impact of a standardized program based on core strengthening using technologic monitoring in a multidisciplinary format.
This registry of data will not contain individual identifiers.
The study population is comprised of skeletally mature patients, both male and female, from a wide variety of ethnicities representative of the typical population presenting with spinal conditions, pain, or seeking prevention of future injury. There are no child participants, as they are not candidates for the type of programs under investigation.
All data relating to the patient's physical therapy, diagnosis, co-morbidies, medical history, medications etc., will be used for analysis.
STUDY METHODS:
- Describe how the data will be identified: Approved SpineZone staff will extract relevant outcomes data from the Electronic Medical Records system housed on a secure server. Identifiers will be stripped from the data, and claims will be indexed using Coding processes. Investigators will not have access to the pre-coded identifiers. Age, but not date of birth will be used, but no patients over the age of 89 will be included, thus it will not be an identifier. All systems used to store and view the data will be secure, with password protections and login access required. Once initial data extraction and de-identification is complete, the de-identified data will be stored on secure servers in a HIPAA compliant environment, and only transferred for biostatistics analytics through encrypted and password protected email to approved individuals (i.e. research biostatisticians) following a data use agreement.
- Data that will be used:
Outcome variables: Validated questionnaire-based outcomes including but not limited to: VAS (visual analogue scale), ODI (oswestry disability index) for Low Back Pain, NDI (neck disability index) for neck pain, PSFS (patient specific functional scale), SBST (STarT Back Screening Tool), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), medication usage (type, frequency), number of visits, progression to surgery (yes, no), dropout rates and reasons, Online compliance matrix(including access to educational material, log in rates, and self-reporting of compliance with workout regimen); physical examination measurements: strength and ROM measurements, and cost (based on procedural codes).
Predictor variables: Demographic, medical history, and treatment-specific variables including but not limited to: age, gender, ethnicity, diagnosis code (ICD-9/10), SpineZone rehabilitation diagnosis, treatment type, treatment history, radiologic diagnosis, duration of symptoms, postural factors, questionnaire-based pre-treatment disability, psychosocial status, prior treatments, concurrent treatments (e.g., nutrition, mindfulness), and pain scores.
- Who will identify data to be reviewed:
SpineZone clinical staff and Principal Investigator
CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA:
Data that is identified by the primary investigator for review will be additionally checked for any identifiers and stripped prior to analysis by biostatisticians. This data will be stored in two places. Initially, the de-identified data will be stored in the biostatistician's system for analysis. Once initial analysis is complete, the data will be loaded into a secure server with physical 24-hour security preventing unauthorized access to the hardware, with access to data only allowed through HTTPS login or through a direct and secure tunnel. Only investigators will have access to the login information.
Within two months of completion of the study, biostatisticians copy of the data will be destroyed. The data will be maintained in the secure hosted environment indefinitely.
Data will be transmitted with either password protection or PGP encryption on biostatistician computers. These computers and associated hardware are maintained in a secured facility with no public access. Computers are password protected and after 30 minutes of inactivity require the user to login again. Data and programs are backed up on a daily basis during the active phase of any project. Internet access is firewall protected. Anti-virus software is maintained (McAfee) with all incoming and outgoing documents scanned for viruses. Additionally, a scan of all files is performed daily.
Data storage will be on secure servers at a 24-hour guard facility, on windows server systems with updated enterprise virus protection software from Symantec. The database will only be accessible through an HTTPS log-in, with user-based access levels that ensure only personnel authorized by the principal investigator can gain access to the system. Any access will be tracked through a log of historical events that will track what user viewed or manipulated what data at any time.
Systems, security policies, and access logs will all be available for audit and review by the Principal Investigator at any time.
CONSENT:
Consent will be obtained in clinic, or through a form on an online portal for patients participating in the online treatment arm.
RISKS AND BENEFITS:
Risks: A confidentiality breach is a risk associated with data review research, however every measure will be instituted to ensure that patient information is kept confidential. Data analysis worksheets will be kept separate from EMR records. No subject PHI will be collected or shared.
Benefits: The participants are not likely to receive any benefit from the proposed research; however, society and investigators will benefit from the knowledge gained.
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
As this is intended to be a data registry, no current statistical analyses are being proposed. Independent sub-studies utilizing data from this registry will be required to provide power analyses and proposed sample sizes necessary to carry out the objectives of the individual research question.
Data will be analyzed for individual sub-studies by biostatisticians located at the University of California, San Diego. All individuals participating in data analysis will be trained in research compliance, ethics, and will follow regulations according to the approved data use agreements in place.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 2 Years
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| In Clinic Rehabilitation | – | Other: ExerciseParticipants who are undergoing supervised exercise based rehabilitation in the SpineZone clinic |
| Online Rehabilitation | – | Other: ExerciseParticipants who will be undergoing online-based coaching and exercise as prescribed via telephone, online chat, or web-based interactions with SpineZone rehabilitation staff (physical therapists and physicians) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 89 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- - Individuals between the ages of 18-89 who are seeking, or have been prescribed physical rehabilitation as a conservative management strategy for a complaint of spine pain (including, but not limited to neck pain, low back pain, thoracic spine pain, or scoliosis).
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- over 18 years of age
- under 89 years of age
- Patients who have been prescribed physical rehabilitation for management of spine pain
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- under 18 years of age
- over 89 years of age
- Patients who are unable or medically unsafe to participate in physical rehabilitation for management of spine pain as determined by the prescribing physician
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExerciseExercise prescribed to participants includes spine-specific strengthening exercises targeting core musculature (i.e. Multifidus, Erector Spinae, Transversus Abdominus, Obliques, and Rectus Abdominus). The in-clinic exercise program recommends a minimum of 20 visits at 2 visits/week, with a goal of 24 total visits over a 12-week period. Exercise is progressed by 5-10% of their exercise load once they are able to do >20 repetitions. If they are able to reach >10 but <20 repetitions, exercise load remains the same. If they are unable to reach 10 repetitions, exercise load is decreased 5-10% at their next visit. The online exercise program includes non-machine based home exercises targeting the same muscles of interest, and are personalized to each participant based on their home resources and comfort level. Concurrent interventions may or may not include nutrition education, mindfulness, cognitive behavioral therapy. | Other | In Clinic Rehabilitation, Online Rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Change in pain: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 0-100mm
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
difference in VAS (in mm) between initial evaluation and endpoint
Change in disability (%)
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
difference in Neck Disability Index (for neck pain participants) or Oswestry Disability Index (for Low Back Pain participants), or Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes questionnaire-22 (for Scoliosis participants) between initial evaluation and endpoint
Change in quality of life
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
difference in EQ5-D (points) score between initial evaluation and endpoint
Change in strength (lbs*deg)
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
difference in spine extension torque as measured by isokinetic dynamometer between initial evaluation and endpoint
Change in Range of Motion (deg)
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
difference in total spine flexion and extension (in degrees) between initial evaluation and endpoint
2 secondary outcomes
Change in spine extensor muscle cross sectional area (cm2)
Time frame: 3 months
change in spine extensor muscle fatty infiltration (%)
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33734088Raiszadeh K, Tapicer J, Taitano L, Wu J, Shahidi B. In-Clinic Versus Web-Based Multidisciplinary Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Treatment of Low Back Pain: Prospective Clinical Trial in an Integrated Practice Unit Model. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 18;23(3):e22548. doi: 10.2196/22548.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Patient data will only be accessible to SpineZone and collaborating research partners (UCSD)
Related trials for Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Strain Counter Strain and Conventional Stretching in School-aged Children With Mechanical Neck Pain Due to Prolong Screen Use
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Recruiting
Longitudinal Stripping Massage vs. Percussion Device for Neck Pain: Ultrasound Study.
Chronic Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Bahar Shahidi, P.T., Ph.D. study director
University of California, San Diego
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Neck Pain and Low Back Pain, run by SpineZone Medical Fitness, Inc at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kamshad Raiszadeh, M.D. (858-337-6909, kam@spinezone.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in pain: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 0-100mm (time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04081896, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2024.