AzTrials
AzTrials

Quality of Health CareNCT04107233

Using Electronic Medical Record Data to Improve HIV Primary Care

A study testing Audit and Feedback in people with Quality of Health Care and HIV/AIDS, run by Unity Health Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cluster randomized control trial examines whether an audit and feedback study improves care of patients living with HIV/AIDS in a family health team setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Audit and Feedback
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
3 Apr 2017to 19 Jul 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Family physicians at the St. Michael's Hospital Academic Family Health Team who have at least 20 PLHA.

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • St. Michael's Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5B1W8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Using Electronic Medical Record Data to Improve HIV Primary Care: an Audit and Feedback Study

This cluster randomized control trial examines whether an audit and feedback study improves care of patients living with HIV/AIDS in a family health team setting.

Read the detailed description

This cluster randomized control trial will use electronic medical record (EMR) data from the St. Michael's Hospital Academic Family Health Team to examine whether the quality of HIV care provided to patients can be improved through an audit and feedback (A\&F) intervention. Our objective is to examine whether A\&F targeting family physicians caring for people living with HIV/AIDS (PHLA) using EMR data can improve laboratory monitoring, engagement in primary care and the uptake of preventive interventions.

Being tested
Audit and Feedback
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Audit and FeedbackBehavioural

    Charts for enrolled physicians will be audited and they will receive feedback, consisting of tailored reports and one-on-one meeting with colleague to review at baseline, 3 months and 6 months

Study groups in NCT04107233
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalAudit and feedback directed at family physicians, including reports a one-on-one meeting.
Receives: Behavioral: Audit and Feedback
ControlNo interventionUsual care; may receive the intervention at the end of the study if successful

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Up to date viral load

    Percentage of HIV infected patients who have an up to date HIV viral load

    Measured: Within six months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Clinic visit

    To assess engagement in care (number of patients who went to see a physician)

    Measured: Within the last 6 months

  2. Up-to-date cancer screenings

    Presence of cancer monitoring for colorectal, breast and cervical cancers

    Measured: 1-3 years

  3. Vaccinations

    Up-to-date for both pneumococcal vaccines and seasonal influenza vaccine (number of patients who received a specific vaccination)

    Measured: Since 2013

  4. Screening for diabetes

    For those 40 or older, the presence of either a fasting blood glucose or HbA1c in the chart

    Measured: Within 1 year

  5. Screening for hypercholesterolemia

    For those 40 or older. the presence of an LDL or non-HDL in the chart

    Measured: Within 1 year

  6. Screening for osteoporosis

    For patients 50 years and older, the presence of a bone mineral density report

    Measured: Within 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2019
  2. Study start3 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion19 Jul 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04107233
Sponsor's protocol ID
SMH-16-381
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
31 May 2019
Last updated
6 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Audit and Feedback in people with Quality of Health Care and HIV/AIDS, run by Unity Health Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Up to date viral load (time frame: Within six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in