Patient Ventilator InteractionsENTROPY-ICUNCT04128124
Entropy Analysis and Complex Patient-ventilator Interactions During Mechanical Ventilation
An observational study of Patient Ventilator Interactions and Spontaneous Breathing Trial, run by Corporacion Parc Tauli at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Complex patterns of patient-ventilator interactions could be miscalculated by visual observation of mechanical ventilator screens or current algorithms based on physiologic waveforms to detect patient-ventilator asynchronies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Patient Ventilator Interactions, Spontaneous Breathing Trial
- What is being tested?
- processing signals of airway pressure and airway flow to calculate entropy
- How many people
- 107 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2019to 1 Dec 2019
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Week
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit without exclusion criteria and who develop a self-extuation episode or a spontaneous breathing trial will be recruited.
Who may be able to join
- Admission to a ICU bed equipped with BetterCare software and intubated fo mechanical ventilation expected to last more than 24hs
- patients who develops a self-extubation episode or a spontaneous breathing trial.
Who cannot join
- <18 years
- <48hs of recorded data
- moribund state
- admission for organ donation
- chest tubes with suspected bronchopleural fistula
- accidental extubation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Entropy Analysis and Complex Patient-ventilator Interactions During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation at Intensive Care Unit Setting
Complex patterns of patient-ventilator interactions could be miscalculated by visual observation of mechanical ventilator screens or current algorithms based on physiologic waveforms to detect patient-ventilator asynchronies. Therefore, we aim to characterize, validate and study the clinical distribution and implications of an automated and personalized non-invasive tool based on Entropy to detect Complex Patient-Ventilator Interactions (CP-VI) during mechanical ventilation, defined as breathing pattern change and/or clusters of asynchronies, over the signals of airway pressure (Paw) and airway flow (Flow).
Read the detailed description
Methods
- Defining complex patient ventilator interactions The Investigators defined "Complex Patient-Ventilator Interactions" (CP-VI) as the presence alone or in combination of a change in the respiratory rate of more than 50%, and/or the occurrence of any kind of asynchronies
- Data acquisition and data analysis Paw and Flow signals will continuously recorded throughout patient's stay in the Intensive Care Unit (UCI) using BetterCare® system (Better Care®, Barcelona, Spain). BetterCare uses drivers specifically designed to interact with the output signal of mechanical ventilators and bedside monitors rather than directly with patients. Recorded signals are synchronized and stored for further analysis. MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc., vR2018b, Natick, MA, USA) will be used to perform the signal processing, data analysis and visual assessment.
- Study Population The Investigators will obtain data from an prospectively constructed database from a connectivity platform (Better Care®) to interoperate signals from different ventilators and monitors and subsequently compute algorithms to diagnose patient-ventilator asynchronies (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03451461). All of those patients corresponding to a self-extubation event previously recorded will be recruited for the characterization and validation process, in order to guarantee at patient-ventilator interactions and episodes when they fight the ventilator. Also, patients in whom an spontaneous breathing trial previous to an attempt to librate him/her from the ventilator will be recruited in order to obtain signals of Paw and Flow. Clinical and demographic data will obtained from the medical chart. The institutional review board approved the protocol and waived informed consent because the study was non-interventional, posed no added risk to patients, and did not interfere with usual care.
- Visual validation of CP-VI Three researchers will visually review the Flow and Paw recordings of events. The segments duration will selected based on previous studies where asynchronous clusters are evaluated. The dataset will be previously selected by an expert in mechanical ventilation ensuring balance by ventilation modes (grouped by Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) and Assist-Control Ventilation modes) and equal distribution of CP-VI presence or absence. The controlled modes included volume assist-control ventilation (VACV) and pressure assist-control ventilation (PACV). Flow and Paw tracings will be randomly ordered in MATLAB prior to visual analysis to ensure blinding of the scorers. Scorers will be provided with written description of CP-VI characteristics before visual analysis, as a reference. On base of CP-VI definition previously described, each researcher will score for the presence or absence of CP-VI events, without time limitation. The visual assessment will considered as the gold standard.
- Entropy Entropy is a non-linear measure that allows assessing the randomness of a series of data. Entropy calculation requires three parameters: the embedding dimension, m (a positive integer); the tolerance value or similarity criterion, r (a positive real number); and the total length, N, of the analysed series.
- Automatic CP-VI detection An automated algorithm for CP-VI detection based on Entropy tool will be implemented.
- Statistical analysis Fleiss's kappa coefficient will be used as reliability of agreement among raters for visual assessment. The automated algorithm for CP-VI detection will be applied over the entropy series derived from the same Flow and Paw. The performance of the automated algorithm will be evaluated on base of sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), accuracy (ACC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).
- Selection of m, r and N In entropy studies, an important step is to determine the optimal settings to robust extract the randomness of a series of data. Therefore, an optimization procedure of m, r and N will performed to properly estimate CP-VI.
- Being tested
- processing signals of airway pressure and airway flow to calculate entropy
- Keywords
- asynchronies, mechanical ventilation, irregularity, complexity, breathing pattern, self-extubation, weaning
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
processing signals of airway pressure and airway flow to calculate entropyOther
processing of previously recorded data from a dedicated software of airway pressure and airway flow in order to calculate entropy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| self-extubation | patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who develops an episode of self-removal (voluntary) of the endotracheal tube. Excluding those accidentally removed. Receives: Other: processing signals of airway pressure and airway flow to calculate entropy | |
| spontaneous breathing trial | patients who, according to the attending physician, are clinically ready to initiate and begin a protocolized test (acording to the institutions or unit) to evaluate the readiness to be liberated from mechanical ventilation. Receives: Other: processing signals of airway pressure and airway flow to calculate entropy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
validation of entropy to detect complex patient-ventilator interactions
validation process of a the novel tool of entropy to detect properly complex patient-ventilator interactions compared to a group of experts physicians in mechanical ventilation
Measured: 3 months
successful extubation (remaining free of mechanical ventilation 72 hours after extubation) in those patients with complex patient-ventilator interactions
analizing the clinical course during the first week after extubation obtaining data from the medical chart and quantifier the distribution over time of complex patient-ventilator interactions detected by entropy.
Measured: 6 month
Secondary outcomes (2)
Rate of reintubation
quantifier the distribution over time of complex patient ventilator interactions detected by entropy in those patients who requiere reintubation in both cohorts
Measured: 6 months
Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay
quantifier the distribution over time of complex patient ventilator interactions detected by entropy in all patients included and in both cohorts and study the duration of their hospitalization
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2019
- Study start1 Sep 2019
- Primary completion1 Dec 2019
- Study completion1 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Patient Ventilator InteractionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Week
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Corporacion Parc Tauli
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Candelaria de Haro, Corporacion Parc Tauli
- Investigators
- Lluis Blanch, M.D., Ph.D., Study director, Critical Care Center, Hospital Universitari Parc Tauli. Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04128124
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Tauli entropy-ICU
- Acronym
- ENTROPY-ICU
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The protocol as well as the study outcomes does not stipulate ta IPD should be shared.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Entropy Analysis and Complex Patient-ventilator Interactions During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation at Intensive Care Unit Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04128124
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENTROPY-ICU / Tauli entropy-ICU
- Keywords
- asynchronies, mechanical ventilation, irregularity, complexity, breathing pattern, self-extubation, weaning
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Corporacion Parc TauliUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Complex patterns of patient-ventilator interactions could be miscalculated by visual observation of mechanical ventilator screens or current algorithms based on physiologic waveforms to detect patient-ventilator asynchronies. Therefore, we aim to characterize, validate and study the clinical distribution and implications of an automated and personalized non-invasive tool based on Entropy to detect Complex Patient-Ventilator Interactions (CP-VI) during mechanical ventilation, defined as breathing pattern change and/or clusters of asynchronies, over the signals of airway pressure (Paw) and airway flow (Flow).
Detailed description
Methods
- Defining complex patient ventilator interactions The Investigators defined "Complex Patient-Ventilator Interactions" (CP-VI) as the presence alone or in combination of a change in the respiratory rate of more than 50%, and/or the occurrence of any kind of asynchronies
- Data acquisition and data analysis Paw and Flow signals will continuously recorded throughout patient's stay in the Intensive Care Unit (UCI) using BetterCare® system (Better Care®, Barcelona, Spain). BetterCare uses drivers specifically designed to interact with the output signal of mechanical ventilators and bedside monitors rather than directly with patients. Recorded signals are synchronized and stored for further analysis. MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc., vR2018b, Natick, MA, USA) will be used to perform the signal processing, data analysis and visual assessment.
- Study Population The Investigators will obtain data from an prospectively constructed database from a connectivity platform (Better Care®) to interoperate signals from different ventilators and monitors and subsequently compute algorithms to diagnose patient-ventilator asynchronies (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03451461). All of those patients corresponding to a self-extubation event previously recorded will be recruited for the characterization and validation process, in order to guarantee at patient-ventilator interactions and episodes when they fight the ventilator. Also, patients in whom an spontaneous breathing trial previous to an attempt to librate him/her from the ventilator will be recruited in order to obtain signals of Paw and Flow. Clinical and demographic data will obtained from the medical chart. The institutional review board approved the protocol and waived informed consent because the study was non-interventional, posed no added risk to patients, and did not interfere with usual care.
- Visual validation of CP-VI Three researchers will visually review the Flow and Paw recordings of events. The segments duration will selected based on previous studies where asynchronous clusters are evaluated. The dataset will be previously selected by an expert in mechanical ventilation ensuring balance by ventilation modes (grouped by Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) and Assist-Control Ventilation modes) and equal distribution of CP-VI presence or absence. The controlled modes included volume assist-control ventilation (VACV) and pressure assist-control ventilation (PACV). Flow and Paw tracings will be randomly ordered in MATLAB prior to visual analysis to ensure blinding of the scorers. Scorers will be provided with written description of CP-VI characteristics before visual analysis, as a reference. On base of CP-VI definition previously described, each researcher will score for the presence or absence of CP-VI events, without time limitation. The visual assessment will considered as the gold standard.
- Entropy Entropy is a non-linear measure that allows assessing the randomness of a series of data. Entropy calculation requires three parameters: the embedding dimension, m (a positive integer); the tolerance value or similarity criterion, r (a positive real number); and the total length, N, of the analysed series.
- Automatic CP-VI detection An automated algorithm for CP-VI detection based on Entropy tool will be implemented.
- Statistical analysis Fleiss's kappa coefficient will be used as reliability of agreement among raters for visual assessment. The automated algorithm for CP-VI detection will be applied over the entropy series derived from the same Flow and Paw. The performance of the automated algorithm will be evaluated on base of sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), accuracy (ACC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).
- Selection of m, r and N In entropy studies, an important step is to determine the optimal settings to robust extract the randomness of a series of data. Therefore, an optimization procedure of m, r and N will performed to properly estimate CP-VI.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Week
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| self-extubation | – | Other: processing signals of airway pressure and airway flow to calculate entropypatients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who develops an episode of self-removal (voluntary) of the endotracheal tube. Excluding those accidentally removed. |
| spontaneous breathing trial | – | Other: processing signals of airway pressure and airway flow to calculate entropypatients who, according to the attending physician, are clinically ready to initiate and begin a protocolized test (acording to the institutions or unit) to evaluate the readiness to be liberated from mechanical ventilation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit without exclusion criteria and who develop a self-extuation episode or a spontaneous breathing trial will be recruited.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Admission to a ICU bed equipped with BetterCare software and intubated fo mechanical ventilation expected to last more than 24hs
- patients who develops a self-extubation episode or a spontaneous breathing trial.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- <18 years
- <48hs of recorded data
- moribund state
- admission for organ donation
- chest tubes with suspected bronchopleural fistula
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| processing signals of airway pressure and airway flow to calculate entropyprocessing of previously recorded data from a dedicated software of airway pressure and airway flow in order to calculate entropy | Other | self-extubation, spontaneous breathing trial |
Primary outcome
validation of entropy to detect complex patient-ventilator interactions
Time frame: 3 months
validation process of a the novel tool of entropy to detect properly complex patient-ventilator interactions compared to a group of experts physicians in mechanical ventilation
successful extubation (remaining free of mechanical ventilation 72 hours after extubation) in those patients with complex patient-ventilator interactions
Time frame: 6 month
analizing the clinical course during the first week after extubation obtaining data from the medical chart and quantifier the distribution over time of complex patient-ventilator interactions detected by entropy.
2 secondary outcomes
Rate of reintubation
Time frame: 6 months
Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The protocol as well as the study outcomes does not stipulate ta IPD should be shared.
Related trials for Patient Ventilator Interactions
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Impact of Inspiratory Effort and Patient-Ventilator Interaction During the Transition Phase
Mechanically Ventilated Patients, Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF)
RecruitingObservational study
B Lymphocyte Populations in the Pulmonary Microenvironment of Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation With or Without VAP (Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia)
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
RecruitingObservational study
Analysis and Evaluation of Asynchronies Between NIV Patients and Their Prisma VENT or LUISA Ventilator
Patient Ventilator Interactions
RecruitingObservational study
Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony: Occurence and Clinical Impact in Usual Care
Mechanical Ventilation, Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Standardising Terminology, Classification, Diagnostic Recognition and Reporting of Patient-ventilator Interactions: Protocol for an International Delphi Consensus Study
Patient-Ventilator Interaction, Asynchrony, Patient-Ventilator
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lluis Blanch, M.D., Ph.D. study director
Critical Care Center, Hospital Universitari Parc Tauli. Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Patient Ventilator Interactions and Spontaneous Breathing Trial, run by Corporacion Parc Tauli at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
validation of entropy to detect complex patient-ventilator interactions (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2020.