AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Heart FailurePre-IcarUSNCT04174794

Investigating Reduction of aCute heArt Failure Readmission With Lung UltraSound-preliminary Trial

An observational study of Acute Heart Failure, run by University Hospital, Geneva at 1 site in Switzerland.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In Switzerland 15% of discharged patients are readmitted within 30 days. Acute heart failure is the leading cause of hospital admission and one of the most frequent reasons for re-admission, mainly because of congestion-driven symptoms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Lung ultrasound
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
43 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
8 Oct 2019to 16 Mar 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A convenience sample of 90 patients admitted to from the emergency room to a general internal medicine ward of a tertiary care center with the diagnosis of acute heart failure

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of acute heart failure on admission chart (primary or secondary diagnosis)
  • Admission from the emergency room to a general internal medicine ward
  • Presentation of acute heart failure according to European Society of Cardiology :
  • Presence of ≥1 symptom or sign based on admission chart review and
  • Raised value of N terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (>300 ng/l)

Who cannot join

  • Interstitial lung disease, lung cancer or metastasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary contusion, previous lung surgery
  • Inability or unwillingness to give consent
  • Presence of oligo-anuric end stage renal disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Geneva University Hospitals

    Geneva, 1205

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Investigating Reduction of aCute heArt Failure Readmission With Lung UltraSound-preliminary Trial (Pre-IcarUS)

In Switzerland 15% of discharged patients are readmitted within 30 days. Acute heart failure is the leading cause of hospital admission and one of the most frequent reasons for re-admission, mainly because of congestion-driven symptoms. Residual congestion is noted in 10%-15% of patients at discharge and is associated with an increased risk of re-admission and mortality. Lung ultrasound outperforms both chest X-ray and physical examination in detection of lung congestion. Several semiquantitative scanning protocols exist for quantifying congestion. The aim of this study is to compare for the first time two widely used lung ultrasound protocols, one exhaustive (28-points) and one simplified (8-points), in real-time settings. The focus is placed on reproducibility (expert-beginner interobserver concordance), feasibility (time consumption for images acquisition and interpretation) and performance (detection of B-lines clearing) of both scores. Semi-quantitative method is expected to have better feasibility with similar reproducibility and performance.

Being tested
Lung ultrasound
Keywords
Acute heart failure, Lung ultrasound

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lung ultrasoundDevice

    Also called Philips Sparq® ultrasound system; Philips AG Health Systems

    The two different lung ultrasound protocols are performed initially within 48 hours of internal medicine ward admission by a pair of expert-beginner echographers. In case of admission during non-working days, the first scan can be done within 72 hours from admission. Follow-up scans are repeated 4 to 6 days later or on the day of discharge if it occurs before de fourth day. Experts and beginners execute the lund ultrasound protocols in sequence, reciprocally blinded, without accessing to clinical data files.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Inter-observer disagreement at admission lung ultrasound

    The primary endpoint is the amount of disagreement between beginner and expert echographers at admission lung ultrasound. In order to compare protocols using different grading systems, a common 4-levels interstitial syndrome (IS) severity scale is defined. For the 28-point protocol, rating of total number of B-lines will be classified according to literature in severe (>30), moderate (16-30), mild (6-15) or no signs of IS (≤5 B-lines). For the 8-point protocol, IS is arbitrarily classified as follows: 'severe' (6-8), 'moderate' (4-5), mild (2-3) and 'no signs' (0-1 positive zones).

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Inter-observer disagreement at follow-up lung ultrasound

    The amount of disagreement between beginner and expert echographers is measured at follow-up lung ultrasound. In order to compare protocols using different grading systems, a common 4-levels IS severity scale is defined. For the 28-point protocol, rating of total number of B-lines will be classified according to literature in severe (>30), moderate (16-30), mild (6-15) or no signs of IS (≤5 B-lines). For the 8-point protocol, IS is arbitrarily classified as follows: 'severe' (6-8), 'moderate' (4-5), mild (2-3) and 'no signs' (0-1 positive zones).

    Measured: Day 4 to 6

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Time consumption for images acquisition and interpretation at admission lung ultrasound

    The time spent for images acquisition and interpretation is measured in both 28-point and 8-point protocols.

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Time consumption for images acquisition and interpretation at follow-up lung ultrasound

    The time spent for images acquisition and interpretation is measured in both 28-point and 8-point protocols.

    Measured: Day 4 to 6

  3. Change in interstitial syndrome severity scale and amount of B-lines at follow-up ultrasound from baseline

    The clearing of B-lines following decongestive therapy is analysed and correlated to a clinical congestion score evolution, the loss of weight, N terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide value decline.

    Measured: Day 0, Day 4 to 6

  4. Post-discharge readmission and mortality at 30 days

    The analysis of correlation between admission, follow-up lung ultrasound IS, echographic decongestion (i.e. B-lines clearing) with readmission and mortality at 30 days post-discharge

    Measured: Day 30 post-discharge

  5. Post-discharge readmission and mortality at 60 days

    The analysis of correlation between admission, follow-up lung ultrasound IS, echographic decongestion (i.e. B-lines clearing) with readmission and mortality at 60 days post-discharge

    Measured: Day 60 post-discharge

  6. Post-discharge readmission and mortality at 90 days

    The analysis of correlation between admission, follow-up LUS ISSS, echographic decongestion (i.e. B-lines clearing) with readmission and mortality at 90 days post-discharge

    Measured: Day 90 post-discharge

  7. Post-discharge readmission and mortality at 180 days

    The analysis of correlation between admission, follow-up lung ultrasound IS, echographic decongestion (i.e. B-lines clearing) with readmission and mortality at 180 days post-discharge

    Measured: Day 180 post-discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Nov 2019
  2. Study start8 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion16 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion16 Mar 2020

Why it stopped: COVID-19 Pandemic

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
43 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04174794
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019-01596
Other IDs
2019
Acronym
Pre-IcarUS
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
19 Nov 2019
Last updated
1 Jun 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Heart Failure, run by University Hospital, Geneva at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: COVID-19 Pandemic). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Inter-observer disagreement at admission lung ultrasound (time frame: Day 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in