AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic CancerCOMMUNICARENCT04257955

COMMUNIcation and Patient Engagement at Diagnosis of PAncreatic CAncer

An observational study of Pancreatic Cancer and Interaction, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in many cases is completely unforeseen by the patient, who often faces a disease that is already at an advanced stage, with poor prognosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Cancer, Interaction, Diagnosis
What is being tested?
Interview and evaluation of Engagement
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
15 Sep 2020to 19 Apr 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patient (<18 years old), Italian mother tongue, enrolled during the visit that takes place at the time of the communication of the pancreatic cancer diagnosis

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (≥18 years);
  • Of Italian mother tongue;
  • Have a histologic diagnosis of PDAC obtained during the 4 weeks before the visit
  • The visit is the first visit after completion of diagnostic procedures and is set to communicate the diagnosis and treatment strategies
  • Give full, written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • PDAC recurrence after previous diagnosis and treatment
  • Poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 3

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Gabriele Capurso

    Milan

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: COMMUNI.CARE (COMMUNIcation and Patient Engagement at Diagnosis of PAncreatic CAncer): Study Protocol

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in many cases is completely unforeseen by the patient, who often faces a disease that is already at an advanced stage, with poor prognosis. The clinical visit during which the diagnosis is communicated together with the first information regarding the planned treatments is of paramount importance. It is hypothesized that the clarity of such information is able to influence patients's engagement and thus the compliance.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to collect quantitative data on the level of PDAC patient engagement and the rate of understanding of the information received from the doctor, and investigate the possible association between these two variables and with the patient's level of compliance.

Read more

METHODS: This is a single-center, observational, cross-sectional cohort study focused on patients diagnosed with PDAC, approved by the Ethics Committee of the San Raffaele Hospital. As no preliminary data are available on the association between PDAC patient's understanding rate and their level of engagement and of compliance no power calculation is possible. This is a pilot study, aimed at enrolling at least 45 PDAC patients during a 3 months frame.

CONCLUSION: COMMUNI.CARE will be the first study specifically investigating whether there is a relation between PDAC patients' rate of understanding, their engagement and compliance at time of diagnosis.

Read the detailed description

The diagnosis of PDAC in most cases is completely unforeseen for the patient, who faces with the disease already at an advanced stage and without a progressive approach to it. The clinical interview in which the diagnosis and the first information regarding treatment options and prognosis are communicated assumes a strong relevance, since it is an unexpected diagnosis with a poor prognosis.

Doctor-patient communication is an integral part of the care itself and poses the basis for the construction of the therapeutic alliance, an essential condition for compliance of the patient with reference to the treatments proposed by the physician.

Many recent studies claim that a good level of patient engagement is an essential condition for building a solid therapeutic alliance; in this regard, objective measurement scales of the patient engagement level have been developed, and have been demonstrated to be useful for quantifying the patient's involvement within the care process Among them is the Patient Health Engagement Scale (PHE-S®)-Scale, a recently validated assessment scale of simple and non-invasive use, that requires only the administration of a questionnaire to the previously informed patient who gives his consent.

The hypothesis of this study is that the clarity of the communication between the treating physician and the patient, and the level of understanding by the patient of the information conveyed by the doctor, in particular at the time of diagnosis largely influences the construction of a solid therapeutic alliance between the treating physician and PDAC patients and consequently the patient's engagement and compliance in the care process.

Our hypothesis is that the clarity of the communication between the treating physician and the patient and the degree of comprehension by the patient, especially during the first phases of the cure, are associated with the level of engagement and consequently with the compliance of patients with PDAC.

If the present pilot study will support the initial hypothesis, further action to improve the clarity of the clinical communication will be promoted.

Being tested
Interview and evaluation of Engagement
Keywords
doctor- patient interaction, pancreatic cancer, diagnosis communication
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interview and evaluation of EngagementBehavioural

    (i) the completion of the scheduled outpatients visit (ii) filling of the PHE-Scale® questionnaire by the patient to investigate the level of engagement and (iii) the completion of a semi-structured interview to assess the rate of understanding of the information received from the doctor.

Study groups in NCT04257955
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pancreatic cancerOutpatients seen at the Gastroenterology, Pancreatic Surgery and Oncology Clinics of the Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan (Italy) will be considered includable if: 1. Adult patients (≥18 years); 2. Of Italian mother tongue; 3. Have a histologic diagnosis of PDAC obtained during the 4 weeks before the visit 4. The visit is the first visit after completion of diagnostic procedures and is set to communicate the diagnosis and treatment strategies 5. Give full, written informed consent The following exclusion criteria will be applied: 1. PDAC recurrence after previous diagnosis and treatment 2. poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 3);
Receives: Behavioral: Interview and evaluation of Engagement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Engagement Level

    Patient Health Engagement Scale (PHE-S®)-Scale is a validated quantitative tool to measure engagement.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Patient's Rate of Understanding

    a semi-structured interview of about 30 minutes to ask the patient questions concerning the clarity of the communication he had received from the doctor and the type of language used, to record the rate of understanding of the information will be employed to define whether the language used by the treating physician and its clarity for the patient allowed understanding defined as the rate.

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Patient's Compliance

    Defined as rate of therapies received compared to what was proposed and planned by the treating physicians.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2020
  2. Study start15 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion19 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion19 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04257955
Sponsor's protocol ID
51/INT/2019
Acronym
COMMUNICARE
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
31 Jan 2020
Last updated
31 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pancreatic Cancer and Interaction, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Engagement Level (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in