Femoroacetabular ImpingementNCT04265222
Cam Decompression Utilizing the Stryker Hip-Check Software Platform
A study testing Hipcheck Software and Conventional Fluoroscopy in people with Femoroacetabular Impingement, run by American Hip Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Accurate femoroplasty has been shown to be critical in achieving success following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (Matsuda, Schnieder, and Sehgal 2014; Mansor et al. 2018; Larson et al. 2014). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Femoroacetabular Impingement
- What is being tested?
- Hipcheck Software and Conventional Fluoroscopy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2020to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Candidates for this study must meet ALL of the following criteria:
- Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy; aged 18-50 years old
- Radiographic evidence of a cam lesion as defined by an alpha angle greater than 60 degrees as measured on the Dunn X-ray.
- Failure of non-conservative management
Who cannot join
- Candidates will be excluded from the study if ANY of the following apply:
- Unwilling to participate
- History of prior hip conditions such as slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, idiopathic avascular necrosis, hip joint trauma, and prior hip surgeries
- The presence of a concurrent systemic inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis; psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus
- Marked osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 2 or higher)
- Subject is considered a part of a vulnerable population
- Pregnancy in order to avoid: x-rays and the contraindication of lying supine after 20 weeks secondary to pressure on the abdominal aorta
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Utilizing the Stryker Hip-Check Software Platform
Accurate femoroplasty has been shown to be critical in achieving success following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (Matsuda, Schnieder, and Sehgal 2014; Mansor et al. 2018; Larson et al. 2014). Nearly 75% of cases undergoing revision hip arthroscopy do so due to residual femoroacetabular impingement (Ricciardi et al. 2014). Femoroplasty remains one of the most challenging and time-consuming procedures in hip arthroscopy and methods to improve accuracy and optimize time management are essential. The HipCheck system is a navigational tool based on intraoperative fluoroscopy that aims at improving accuracy and efficiency of femoroplasty.
The objective of this study is to two-fold. (1) To prospectively compare surgical and (2) radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing femoroplasty with guidance of Stryker's HipCheck system to patients undergoing femoroplasty with conventional fluoroscopic methods.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare surgical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing femoroplasty with guidance of Stryker's HipCheck system to patients undergoing femoroplasty with conventional fluoroscopic methods.
Endpoints:
Time from initiation to completion of femoroplasty Accuracy of femoroplasty as determined by: alpha angle on Dunn view and AP view, femoral head offset, and area of over resection and under resection Fluoroscopic exposure (microgray and seconds) Post-operative opioid consumption/medication use
Basic design: Randomized Controlled Study
Participants: 40 patients 20 patients will undergo femoroplasty with the conventional technique 20 patients will undergo femoroplasty with the HipCheck system
Accurate femoroplasty has been shown to be critical in achieving success following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).1-3 Nearly 75% of cases undergoing revision hip arthroscopy do so due to residual FAI. Matsuda et al. coined the term "critical corner" to describe residual impingement not resected during routine anterolateral femoroplasty. These residual cam lesions have been shown to lead to inferior outcomes and are commonly implicated in revision hip arthroscopies. These studies and others contributed to the development of the "spherical femoroplasty" as an attempt to minimize residual cam lesions while simultaneously, avoiding over-resection. Femoroplasty remains one of the most challenging and time-consuming procedures in hip arthroscopy and methods to improve accuracy and optimize time management are essential.
General Schema of Study Design Overview Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo femoroplasty either with a conventional technique or a navigational method involving the HipCheck system. Preoperatively, the patient will undergo a series of standard radiographs to assess the degree of deformity. At this time, ROM will also be assessed. During surgery time required for femoroplasty as well as total fluoroscopic exposure time, as well as total exposure in microgray will be recorded. At 2 weeks postoperatively patient will undergo a series of standard radiographs to assess accuracy of femoroplasty. Narcotic medication use, pain levels and patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) will be assessed at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. A clinical exam will be performed postoperatively at each visit, consisting of hip range of motion (internal/external rotation, flexion, abduction, and adduction) with the patient in the supine position, impingement tests, and gait. Radiographic measurements will be performed using the institutional PACS system as well as ImageJ for surface area calculations. The patients as well as the clinician performing postoperative radiographic calculations will be blinded to method of treatment.
The total duration of the study is 1 year and 6 months:
Legal contract \& IRB review: 8 weeks Patients recruitment/procedure: 8 weeks Follow up period: 1 year Manuscript writing/submission: 8 weeks
Data Sources Research resources: Research data will be collected and recorded by study personnel designated by the Investigator.
Study Procedures
Pre-Operative A series of standard radiographs (Dunn, AP, False profile views) will be taken to understand the severity of the cam-type impingement. A clinical exam including but not limited to the following will be performed: gait (antalgic, Trendelenburg) hip range of motion (internal/external rotation, flexion, abduction, and adduction) with the patient in the supine position; anterior, posterior and lateral impingement tests; painful internal/external snapping test, FABER's test, Modified Resisted Internal rotation test, Ligamentum Teres test.
Pre-operative patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) and Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) will be taken during screening. The PROs include: mHHS, modified Harris Hip Score; NAHS, Nonarthritic Hip Score; iHOT-12, International Hip Outcome Tool; SF-12M, Short Form 12 Mental; SF-12P, Short Form 12-Physical; VR-12M, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental; VR-12P, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Physical; and Patient satisfaction (out of 10).
Intra-Operative During surgery - time required for femoroplasty as well as total fluoroscopic exposure time, as well as total exposure in microgray will be recorded. Procedural start (at initiation of femoroplasty) and finish (at completion of femoroplasty) time will be recorded for comparative analysis of both groups. Fluoroscopic exposure time and total exposure in microgray will be determined based on total number of shots taken and known duration/microgray exposure of each fluoroscopic shot. Fluoroscopic shot duration/Microgray exposure: mean total fluoroscopy time will be limited to 1.10 minutes or less (52 mGy or less per patient), based on recommendations by Budd et al. 2012
Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Image Acquisition Each patient will be placed in a neutral position to allow for the standardization and comparison with the well-centered, preoperative anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs that are typically used for structural analysis and treatment planning.
Once the fluoroscopic image most closely replicates the AP pelvis, the femoral head-neck junction (FHNJ) will be assessed with fluoroscopy, with the leg in 6 different positions and fluoroscopic C-arm in 3 different positions (see table below) that allow for the evaluation of the medial and lateral FHNJ (extension views) and anterior and posterior FHNJ (flexion views). These views will be obtained by rotating the operative distal femur, flexing/extending the operative hip, and/or adducting the operative hip.
For all six positions, the angle of rotation will be verified with a Goniometer (Prestige Medical, Northridge, CA).
Measurements of the alpha angle will be performed by a single reader on each exported fluoroscopic view (corresponding to the six positions) for every control specimen with the use of the HipCheck System. For the control group the surgeon will review the fluoroscopic images prior to the resection procedure, but without making or reviewing any measurements or analysis (The HipCheck analysis platform will have "alpha angle overlay" turned off, to keep measurements from being displayed). For the HipCheck group the surgeon will review the fluoroscopic images including the HipCheck analysis for each view prior to resection.
Hip Arthroscopy (femoroplasty):
Femoroplasty will be performed using a 5.5 mm bur. This will be done in combination with the aid of fluoroscopic visualization and HipCheck technology or isolated fluoroscopic visualization, depending on the patient group assignment.
The HipCheck system will be used intraoperatively to assist with clinical decision making by assessing and providing feedback on alpha angle and confirming complete bony resection and absence of residual deformity for the test group only. To prevent over- or under resection, HipCheck provides a resection line (spline) for the surgeon to visualize and resect the desired amount, with a target alpha angle of 40 degrees.
The control group will not receive intra-operative assistance from the HipCheck software platform. Both arthroscopic and fluoroscopic imaging will be used to identify the cam and aid in resection per the standard hip arthroscopy technique.
"Postoperative" Fluoroscopic Image Acquisition At the conclusion of the hip arthroscopy, postoperative fluoroscopy views will be obtained with the same six leg positions. The angle of rotation will be verified with a Goniometer (Prestige Medical, Northridge, CA). The HipCheck tablet and software may be used to capture and later analyze the alpha angle for each of these leg positions for both the control and test groups.
Post-Operative At 2 weeks postoperatively patients will undergo a series of standard radiographs (Dunn, AP, False profile views) to assess accuracy of femoroplasty. Measurements will be performed using the institutional PACS system as well as ImageJ for surface area calculations. Accuracy of femoroplasty will be determined by: alpha angle on Dunn, AP views and false profile, femoral head offset, and area of over resection and under resection on AP. The patients as well as the clinician performing postoperative radiographic calculations will be blinded to method of treatment. A post-operative PROs and VAS Pain Score will be taken at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-operatively. Medication use will be documented in post-op recovery, at 2 weeks, 3months, and 12 months post-operatively. A clinical exam including range of motion assessment will be performed at 2-week, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits.
Subject Inclusion Criteria
Candidates for this study must meet ALL of the following criteria:
- Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy; aged 18-50 years old.
- Radiographic evidence of a cam lesion as defined by an alpha angle greater than 60 degrees as measured on the Dunn X-ray.
- Failure of non-conservative management
Subject Exclusion Criteria
Candidates will be excluded from the study if ANY of the following apply:
- Unwilling to participate
- History of prior hip conditions such as slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, idiopathic avascular necrosis, hip joint trauma, and prior hip surgeries
- The presence of a concurrent systemic inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis; psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus
- Marked osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 2 or higher)
- Subject is considered a part of a vulnerable population
- Pregnancy in order to avoid: x-rays and the contraindication of lying supine after 20 weeks secondary to pressure on the abdominal aorta
Subject Withdrawal Criteria Subjects may voluntarily withdraw from the study at any time for any reason. The Investigator may elect at any time to withdraw a subject from the study for any reason if such a decision is in the subject's best medical interest. If a patient discontinues the study or is withdrawn by the Investigator prior to surgery, the patient will not be counted as a completed subject and an additional subject may be enrolled to achieve the enrollment goal of 40 completed subjects.
Data Management Use established data registry and collection methodology. All preoperative and demographic data is collected and inputted into registry preoperatively. Intraoperative data and measurements are collected and inputted at time of surgery. Postoperative radiographic measurements to assess alpha angle and combined femoral offset are made within 3 months postoperatively, using a 2nd independent reader to verify inter- and intra-observer reliability.
Intraoperative data and postoperative complications are collected using OBERD system.
Risks Generalized risks to surgical procedures are present, which include but are not limited to bleeding, infection, injury to surrounding structures such as blood vessels, nerves, tendons, and bone. In addition, risks specific to hip arthroscopy include those related to hip traction related issues such as numbness and parasthesias to the perineum or soft tissue compression related complications. Lastly, risk to radiation exposure is present, however, it is limited with the use of HipCheck, as continuous fluoroscopy is not needed.
Benefits Enhanced verification of intraoperative cam resection via minimal fluoroscopic exposure. In addition, increased accuracy of cam resection with the goals of avoiding over or underresection, will thereby potentially improve patient outcomes following hip arthroscopy.
- Conditions
- Femoroacetabular Impingement
- Being tested
- Hipcheck Software, Conventional Fluoroscopy
- Keywords
- Orthopedics, Cam Decompression, Femoroplasty, Femoroacetabular Impingement
- Medical subject headings
- Femoracetabular Impingement
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hipcheck SoftwareDevice
Also called Stryker HipCheck system
Software
Conventional FluoroscopyOther
Conventional Fluoroscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Fluoroscopy | Other | Participants undergoing femoroplasty with conventional treatment Receives: Other: Conventional Fluoroscopy |
| HipCheck | Experimental | Participants undergoing femoroplasty with Stryker HipCheck System Receives: Device: Hipcheck Software |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
modified Harris Hip Score
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
Measured: 1 year
Nonarthritic Hip Score
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
Measured: 1 year
International Hip Outcome Tool-12
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
Measured: 1 year
Short Form 12 Mental
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal mental outcome
Measured: 1 year
Short Form 12 Physical
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
Measured: 1 year
Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal mental outcome
Measured: 1 year
Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Physical
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
Measured: 1 year
Patient satisfaction
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-10, 10 indicating patient is extremely satisfied with surgery and met expectations.
Measured: 1 year
Visual Analog Pain Scale
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-10, with 0 indicated no pain post-surgery.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Age
Demographic information
Measured: before surgery
Body Mass Index, kg/m^2
Demographic information
Measured: before surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2020
- Study start1 Mar 2020
- Primary completionDec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Femoroacetabular ImpingementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- American Hip Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stryker Orthopaedics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ajay C Lall, MD, MS, Principal investigator, American Hip Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04265222
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AHI-002
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Larson CM, Giveans MR, Samuelson KM, Stone RM, Bedi A. Arthroscopic Hip Revision Surgery for Residual Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI): Surgical Outcomes Compared With a Matched Cohort After Primary Arthroscopic FAI Correction. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1785-90. doi: 10.1177/0363546514534181. Epub 2014 May 29.
PubMed 24875469Mansor Y, Perets I, Close MR, Mu BH, Domb BG. In Search of the Spherical Femoroplasty: Cam Overresection Leads to Inferior Functional Scores Before and After Revision Hip Arthroscopic Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2061-2071. doi: 10.1177/0363546518779064. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
PubMed 29924630Matsuda DK, Schnieder CP, Sehgal B. The critical corner of cam femoroacetabular impingement: clinical support of an emerging concept. Arthroscopy. 2014 May;30(5):575-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
PubMed 24630123Ross JR, Larson CM, Adeoye O, Kelly BT, Bedi A. Residual deformity is the most common reason for revision hip arthroscopy: a three-dimensional CT study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1388-95. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4069-9.
PubMed 25475714
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Utilizing the Stryker Hip-Check Software Platform
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04265222
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AHI-002
- Conditions
- Femoroacetabular Impingement
- Keywords
- Orthopedics, Cam Decompression, Femoroplasty, Femoroacetabular Impingement
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- American Hip InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stryker Orthopaedics
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Accurate femoroplasty has been shown to be critical in achieving success following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (Matsuda, Schnieder, and Sehgal 2014; Mansor et al. 2018; Larson et al. 2014). Nearly 75% of cases undergoing revision hip arthroscopy do so due to residual femoroacetabular impingement (Ricciardi et al. 2014). Femoroplasty remains one of the most challenging and time-consuming procedures in hip arthroscopy and methods to improve accuracy and optimize time management are essential. The HipCheck system is a navigational tool based on intraoperative fluoroscopy that aims at improving accuracy and efficiency of femoroplasty.
The objective of this study is to two-fold. (1) To prospectively compare surgical and (2) radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing femoroplasty with guidance of Stryker's HipCheck system to patients undergoing femoroplasty with conventional fluoroscopic methods.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare surgical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing femoroplasty with guidance of Stryker's HipCheck system to patients undergoing femoroplasty with conventional fluoroscopic methods.
Endpoints:
Time from initiation to completion of femoroplasty Accuracy of femoroplasty as determined by: alpha angle on Dunn view and AP view, femoral head offset, and area of over resection and under resection Fluoroscopic exposure (microgray and seconds) Post-operative opioid consumption/medication use
Basic design: Randomized Controlled Study
Participants: 40 patients 20 patients will undergo femoroplasty with the conventional technique 20 patients will undergo femoroplasty with the HipCheck system
Accurate femoroplasty has been shown to be critical in achieving success following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).1-3 Nearly 75% of cases undergoing revision hip arthroscopy do so due to residual FAI. Matsuda et al. coined the term "critical corner" to describe residual impingement not resected during routine anterolateral femoroplasty. These residual cam lesions have been shown to lead to inferior outcomes and are commonly implicated in revision hip arthroscopies. These studies and others contributed to the development of the "spherical femoroplasty" as an attempt to minimize residual cam lesions while simultaneously, avoiding over-resection. Femoroplasty remains one of the most challenging and time-consuming procedures in hip arthroscopy and methods to improve accuracy and optimize time management are essential.
General Schema of Study Design Overview Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo femoroplasty either with a conventional technique or a navigational method involving the HipCheck system. Preoperatively, the patient will undergo a series of standard radiographs to assess the degree of deformity. At this time, ROM will also be assessed. During surgery time required for femoroplasty as well as total fluoroscopic exposure time, as well as total exposure in microgray will be recorded. At 2 weeks postoperatively patient will undergo a series of standard radiographs to assess accuracy of femoroplasty. Narcotic medication use, pain levels and patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) will be assessed at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. A clinical exam will be performed postoperatively at each visit, consisting of hip range of motion (internal/external rotation, flexion, abduction, and adduction) with the patient in the supine position, impingement tests, and gait. Radiographic measurements will be performed using the institutional PACS system as well as ImageJ for surface area calculations. The patients as well as the clinician performing postoperative radiographic calculations will be blinded to method of treatment.
The total duration of the study is 1 year and 6 months:
Legal contract \& IRB review: 8 weeks Patients recruitment/procedure: 8 weeks Follow up period: 1 year Manuscript writing/submission: 8 weeks
Data Sources Research resources: Research data will be collected and recorded by study personnel designated by the Investigator.
Study Procedures
Pre-Operative A series of standard radiographs (Dunn, AP, False profile views) will be taken to understand the severity of the cam-type impingement. A clinical exam including but not limited to the following will be performed: gait (antalgic, Trendelenburg) hip range of motion (internal/external rotation, flexion, abduction, and adduction) with the patient in the supine position; anterior, posterior and lateral impingement tests; painful internal/external snapping test, FABER's test, Modified Resisted Internal rotation test, Ligamentum Teres test.
Pre-operative patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) and Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) will be taken during screening. The PROs include: mHHS, modified Harris Hip Score; NAHS, Nonarthritic Hip Score; iHOT-12, International Hip Outcome Tool; SF-12M, Short Form 12 Mental; SF-12P, Short Form 12-Physical; VR-12M, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental; VR-12P, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Physical; and Patient satisfaction (out of 10).
Intra-Operative During surgery - time required for femoroplasty as well as total fluoroscopic exposure time, as well as total exposure in microgray will be recorded. Procedural start (at initiation of femoroplasty) and finish (at completion of femoroplasty) time will be recorded for comparative analysis of both groups. Fluoroscopic exposure time and total exposure in microgray will be determined based on total number of shots taken and known duration/microgray exposure of each fluoroscopic shot. Fluoroscopic shot duration/Microgray exposure: mean total fluoroscopy time will be limited to 1.10 minutes or less (52 mGy or less per patient), based on recommendations by Budd et al. 2012
Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Image Acquisition Each patient will be placed in a neutral position to allow for the standardization and comparison with the well-centered, preoperative anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs that are typically used for structural analysis and treatment planning.
Once the fluoroscopic image most closely replicates the AP pelvis, the femoral head-neck junction (FHNJ) will be assessed with fluoroscopy, with the leg in 6 different positions and fluoroscopic C-arm in 3 different positions (see table below) that allow for the evaluation of the medial and lateral FHNJ (extension views) and anterior and posterior FHNJ (flexion views). These views will be obtained by rotating the operative distal femur, flexing/extending the operative hip, and/or adducting the operative hip.
For all six positions, the angle of rotation will be verified with a Goniometer (Prestige Medical, Northridge, CA).
Measurements of the alpha angle will be performed by a single reader on each exported fluoroscopic view (corresponding to the six positions) for every control specimen with the use of the HipCheck System. For the control group the surgeon will review the fluoroscopic images prior to the resection procedure, but without making or reviewing any measurements or analysis (The HipCheck analysis platform will have "alpha angle overlay" turned off, to keep measurements from being displayed). For the HipCheck group the surgeon will review the fluoroscopic images including the HipCheck analysis for each view prior to resection.
Hip Arthroscopy (femoroplasty):
Femoroplasty will be performed using a 5.5 mm bur. This will be done in combination with the aid of fluoroscopic visualization and HipCheck technology or isolated fluoroscopic visualization, depending on the patient group assignment.
The HipCheck system will be used intraoperatively to assist with clinical decision making by assessing and providing feedback on alpha angle and confirming complete bony resection and absence of residual deformity for the test group only. To prevent over- or under resection, HipCheck provides a resection line (spline) for the surgeon to visualize and resect the desired amount, with a target alpha angle of 40 degrees.
The control group will not receive intra-operative assistance from the HipCheck software platform. Both arthroscopic and fluoroscopic imaging will be used to identify the cam and aid in resection per the standard hip arthroscopy technique.
"Postoperative" Fluoroscopic Image Acquisition At the conclusion of the hip arthroscopy, postoperative fluoroscopy views will be obtained with the same six leg positions. The angle of rotation will be verified with a Goniometer (Prestige Medical, Northridge, CA). The HipCheck tablet and software may be used to capture and later analyze the alpha angle for each of these leg positions for both the control and test groups.
Post-Operative At 2 weeks postoperatively patients will undergo a series of standard radiographs (Dunn, AP, False profile views) to assess accuracy of femoroplasty. Measurements will be performed using the institutional PACS system as well as ImageJ for surface area calculations. Accuracy of femoroplasty will be determined by: alpha angle on Dunn, AP views and false profile, femoral head offset, and area of over resection and under resection on AP. The patients as well as the clinician performing postoperative radiographic calculations will be blinded to method of treatment. A post-operative PROs and VAS Pain Score will be taken at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-operatively. Medication use will be documented in post-op recovery, at 2 weeks, 3months, and 12 months post-operatively. A clinical exam including range of motion assessment will be performed at 2-week, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits.
Subject Inclusion Criteria
Candidates for this study must meet ALL of the following criteria:
- Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy; aged 18-50 years old.
- Radiographic evidence of a cam lesion as defined by an alpha angle greater than 60 degrees as measured on the Dunn X-ray.
- Failure of non-conservative management
Subject Exclusion Criteria
Candidates will be excluded from the study if ANY of the following apply:
- Unwilling to participate
- History of prior hip conditions such as slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, idiopathic avascular necrosis, hip joint trauma, and prior hip surgeries
- The presence of a concurrent systemic inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis; psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus
- Marked osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 2 or higher)
- Subject is considered a part of a vulnerable population
- Pregnancy in order to avoid: x-rays and the contraindication of lying supine after 20 weeks secondary to pressure on the abdominal aorta
Subject Withdrawal Criteria Subjects may voluntarily withdraw from the study at any time for any reason. The Investigator may elect at any time to withdraw a subject from the study for any reason if such a decision is in the subject's best medical interest. If a patient discontinues the study or is withdrawn by the Investigator prior to surgery, the patient will not be counted as a completed subject and an additional subject may be enrolled to achieve the enrollment goal of 40 completed subjects.
Data Management Use established data registry and collection methodology. All preoperative and demographic data is collected and inputted into registry preoperatively. Intraoperative data and measurements are collected and inputted at time of surgery. Postoperative radiographic measurements to assess alpha angle and combined femoral offset are made within 3 months postoperatively, using a 2nd independent reader to verify inter- and intra-observer reliability.
Intraoperative data and postoperative complications are collected using OBERD system.
Risks Generalized risks to surgical procedures are present, which include but are not limited to bleeding, infection, injury to surrounding structures such as blood vessels, nerves, tendons, and bone. In addition, risks specific to hip arthroscopy include those related to hip traction related issues such as numbness and parasthesias to the perineum or soft tissue compression related complications. Lastly, risk to radiation exposure is present, however, it is limited with the use of HipCheck, as continuous fluoroscopy is not needed.
Benefits Enhanced verification of intraoperative cam resection via minimal fluoroscopic exposure. In addition, increased accuracy of cam resection with the goals of avoiding over or underresection, will thereby potentially improve patient outcomes following hip arthroscopy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Fluoroscopy | Other | Other: Conventional FluoroscopyParticipants undergoing femoroplasty with conventional treatment |
| HipCheck | Experimental | Device: Hipcheck SoftwareParticipants undergoing femoroplasty with Stryker HipCheck System |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy; aged 18-50 years old
- Radiographic evidence of a cam lesion as defined by an alpha angle greater than 60 degrees as measured on the Dunn X-ray.
- Failure of non-conservative management
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Unwilling to participate
- History of prior hip conditions such as slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, idiopathic avascular necrosis, hip joint trauma, and prior hip surgeries
- The presence of a concurrent systemic inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis; psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus
- Marked osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 2 or higher)
- Subject is considered a part of a vulnerable population
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hipcheck SoftwareAlso: Stryker HipCheck systemSoftware | Device | HipCheck |
| Conventional FluoroscopyConventional Fluoroscopy | Other | Conventional Fluoroscopy |
Primary outcome
modified Harris Hip Score
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
Nonarthritic Hip Score
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
International Hip Outcome Tool-12
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
Short Form 12 Mental
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal mental outcome
Short Form 12 Physical
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal mental outcome
Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Physical
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-100, 100 indicating optimal function outcome
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-10, 10 indicating patient is extremely satisfied with surgery and met expectations.
Visual Analog Pain Scale
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measure. Scale 0-10, with 0 indicated no pain post-surgery.
2 secondary outcomes
Age
Time frame: before surgery
Body Mass Index, kg/m^2
Time frame: before surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 24875469Larson CM, Giveans MR, Samuelson KM, Stone RM, Bedi A. Arthroscopic Hip Revision Surgery for Residual Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI): Surgical Outcomes Compared With a Matched Cohort After Primary Arthroscopic FAI Correction. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1785-90. doi: 10.1177/0363546514534181. Epub 2014 May 29.
- Background: PubMed 29924630Mansor Y, Perets I, Close MR, Mu BH, Domb BG. In Search of the Spherical Femoroplasty: Cam Overresection Leads to Inferior Functional Scores Before and After Revision Hip Arthroscopic Surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2061-2071. doi: 10.1177/0363546518779064. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
- Background: PubMed 24630123Matsuda DK, Schnieder CP, Sehgal B. The critical corner of cam femoroacetabular impingement: clinical support of an emerging concept. Arthroscopy. 2014 May;30(5):575-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 25475714Ross JR, Larson CM, Adeoye O, Kelly BT, Bedi A. Residual deformity is the most common reason for revision hip arthroscopy: a three-dimensional CT study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1388-95. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4069-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Femoroacetabular Impingement
Recruiting
Comparison of Surgery With Prehabilitation, Direct Surgery and Rehabilitation for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Mapping Joint Damage Patterns in Femoroacetabular Impingement
Femoro-acetabular Impingement (FAI)
Active, not recruiting
Early Feasibility Study of Cartilage Defect Repair
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Femoroacetabular Impingement
Not yet recruiting
Labral Repair vs Reconstruction
Femoral Acetabular Impingement
Not yet recruiting
3D MRI Assessment of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Patients With ACL Rupture - Exploratory Study
Femoroacetabular Impingement
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ajay C Lall, MD, MS principal investigator
American Hip Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hipcheck Software and Conventional Fluoroscopy in people with Femoroacetabular Impingement, run by American Hip Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
modified Harris Hip Score (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04265222, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2024.