AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac ArrestCAPPINCT04336930

Evaluation of the "Pupillary Pain Index" in Neurological Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest

An observational study of Cardiac Arrest and Post-Anoxic Coma, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Two-thirds of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit after a cardiac arrest die in the context of treatment withdrawal after a multimodal evaluation that determines an unfavorable neurological outcome. This study will evaluate the Pupillary Pain Index (PPI) in the neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Pupillary pain index (PPI)
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Nov 2021to 1 Jul 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients remaining comatose after cardiac arrest

Who may be able to join

  • Admission to the ICU after cardiac arrest
  • Age > 18 years
  • Presenting a Glasgow score of <8 at admission

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Ocular pathology making pupillometry impossible.
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Matthieu KOSZUTSKI, Dr contact

+33383153017

m.koszutski@chru-nancy.fr

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Pupillary Dilatation Reflex With the "Pupillary Pain Index" in Neurological Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest

Two-thirds of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit after a cardiac arrest die in the context of treatment withdrawal after a multimodal evaluation that determines an unfavorable neurological outcome.

This study will evaluate the Pupillary Pain Index (PPI) in the neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest. The PPI is determined by recording of pupillary dilatation with a videopupillometer after a calibrated and incremented nociceptive stimulus on a cutaneous metamere.

Read the detailed description

Cardiorespiratory arrest is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. The direct consequence of a cardio-circulatory arrest is the absence of blood flow allowing oxygenation of the organs and consequently formation of ischemic lesions. Anoxic cerebral lesions are common in the aftermath of a cardiac arrest and often lead to the death of patients when active therapies are stopped after a multimodal prognostication that indicates that a poor outcome is very likely.

It is of paramount importance to optimize the sensitivity of the prognostication strategy in detecting good neurological outcome. A multimodal approach to the prognostic assessment is essential, and must include at least clinical examination, electrophysiology exploration (electroencephalography and/or evoked potentials) and biomarker analysis.

Although the most reliable predictors did not give false positives in most studies, none of them, considered individually, can establish an unfavorable prognosis with an absolute degree of certitude. For these reasons it is interesting to evaluate new prognostication tools.

The videopupillometry allows precise, reproducible and repeated measurement of changes in pupil diameter in response to a painful or a luminous stimulus. Pupillary pain reflex analysis is usually used to assess the degree of analgesia in a non-communicative patient during general anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. The PPI score is determined at the bedside by recording pupillary dilatation after a calibrated and incremented nociceptive stimulus (electrical current between 5 and 60mA) applied to a skin metamere with two electrodes.

Automated pupillometry measurement has been recently developed to help support prognostication, with a quantitative pupillary light reflex measurement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the Pupillary Pain Index in the neurological prognosis after a cardiac arrest by correlating the PPI at 48h from the patient's arrival to the CPC score at 3 months.

Being tested
Pupillary pain index (PPI)
Keywords
Pupillometry, Pupillary Pain Index, Brain ischemia, Heart arrest, Neuroprognostication
Medical subject headings
Heart Arrest, Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain, Brain Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pupillary pain index (PPI)Diagnostic test

    Measurement of PPI with a pupillometer

Study groups in NCT04336930
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cardiac Arrest groupPatients remaining comatose after a cardiac arrest
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Pupillary pain index (PPI)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Score Cerebral Performance Category (CPC)

    Good outcome defined as CPC 1-2, poor outcome defined as CPC 3-5

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Characteristics of electroencephalography pattern

    Classification of Synek, type of pattern (Very malignant, malignant or benign)

    Measured: Day 2, day 3, day 5, day 7

  2. Biomarkers

    Value of seric Neuron Specific Enolase

    Measured: 24 hours, 48 hours

  3. Glasgow motor score

    Motor response component of the Glasgow Coma Scale, ranging from 1 (no response) to 6 (normal response)

    Measured: 24 hours, 48 hours, day 5, day 7

  4. ICU parameters

    Ventilator days, Length of stay

    Measured: Day 14

  5. Evoked Potentials

    Presence or absence of the N20 component of the evoked potentials

    Measured: Day 14

  6. Neurological pupil index

    standardized evaluation of pupil reactivity ranging from 0 (sluggish or abnormal pupils) to 5 (normally reactive pupils)

    Measured: Day 2, day 3

  7. Diameter of the pupil

    In millimeters (pupillometry measure)

    Measured: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours

  8. Percentage of pupil dilatation

    Pupillometry measure

    Measured: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours

  9. Latency of pupil dilatation

    In milliseconds (pupillometry measure)

    Measured: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours

  10. Velocity of pupil dilatation

    In millimeters per second (pupillometry measure)

    Measured: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2020
  2. Study start1 Nov 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04336930
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019PI275
Acronym
CAPPI
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
10 Mar 2020
Last updated
24 May 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiac Arrest and Post-Anoxic Coma, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Matthieu KOSZUTSKI, Dr (+33383153017, m.koszutski@chru-nancy.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Score Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in