Bone LossEarly Phase 1NCT04449211
The Effectiveness in the Treatment of Long Bone Defect Using 3D-printed Implant
A Early Phase 1 study testing Implantation in people with Bone Loss and Defect Limb, run by Cho Ray Hospital at 1 site in Vietnam.
Trial summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of 3D-printed titanium alloy implants in the treatment of long bone defect in adults Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Loss, Defect Limb
- What is being tested?
- Implantation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteVietnam
- Study dates
- 6 Oct 2023to 30 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult participants with health insurance regardless of sex having bone defect greater than 5cm due to trauma or tumour resection agree to participate the research
Who cannot join
- Participants with contraindication to surgery
- Participants do not agree to undergo surgery
- Participants with local infection or soft tissue defect
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Vietnam1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cho Ray hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, 700000
Hung Do Phuoc, MD, PhD, +84903775579, dphungcr@yahoo.com
Phu Nguyen Hoang, MD, MSc, +84938689292, nguyenhoangphu@ump.edu.vn
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness in the Treatment of Long Bone Defect in Adults Using 3D-printed Titanium Alloy Implant
To evaluate the effectiveness of 3D-printed titanium alloy implants in the treatment of long bone defect in adults
Read the detailed description
The participant with long bone defect or bone tumor of the extremity is referred to the Radiology Department to have a full CT-scan of both limbs to facilitate the later reconstruction. With the contralateral limb CT-scan data, the implant is designed with appropriate geometry and structures through online meetings with the scientists of CSIRO, Australia. Through this discussion, the supporting guides for the precise osteotomy will also be designed and would be 3D-printed later by 3 Dimensional Tech Vision Limited Company (Vietnam) with Poly Lactic Acid material. The 3D-printed metal parts will be manufactured using Titanium - 6 Aluminum - 4 Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) material with Electron Beam Melting technology in CSIRO (Australia). Subsequently, the 3D-printed part will undergo mechanical tests using the Instron 5500R system (Australia) to validate its required mechanical properties. If this metal part cannot fulfill the mechanical requirements, the problematic geometry will be revised and re-designed. Another prototype will be 3D-printed with the same protocol and be tested until it qualified for the mechanical requirement. When the 3D-printed model passes the mechanical test, another 3D-printed metal part with a similar design will be manufactured before transferring to 3-Dimensional Tech Vision Limited Company (Vietnam) for post-processing, surface finishing, sterilising, packaging, labeling. Eventually, the implant will be sent to Cho Ray hospital. The amount of intraoperative blood loss and operative time will be recorded.
- Conditions
- Bone Loss, Defect Limb
- Being tested
- Implantation
- Keywords
- bone defect, 3D-printed Titanium alloy implant, Electron Beam Melting, customised implant, patient-specific implant
- Medical subject headings
- Bone Diseases, Metabolic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ImplantationDevice
Also called Bone defect implant
Reconstructing the long bone defect with 3D-printed customised Titanium alloy implant
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participants with massive bone defect | Experimental | Adult participants with health insurance regardless of sex having bone defect greater than 5cm due to trauma or tumour resection agree to participate the research.
The customised 3D-Printed implant is manufactured and undergoes post-processing treatment before being ready for implantation surgery. Receives: Device: Implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional outcome of the upper limb
For the participant with bone defect of the upper limb, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score will be used to evaluate for the limb functional outcome. The scale is ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Measured: 1 to 12 months
Functional outcome of the lower limb
For the participant with bone defect of the lower limb, the Karlstrom \& Olerud score will be used to evaluate for the limb functional outcome. The scale is graded as: bad, fair, good, excellent functional outcome.
Measured: 1 to 12 months
Radiological imaging
the bone healing process is evaluated by the change in dual energy CT-scan result
Measured: Post-operative day 1 to 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Complications
Rate of complications
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2020
- Study start6 Oct 2023
- Primary completion1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (39)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bone LossStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Prospective participants with health insurance admitted to the Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department of Cho Ray hospital who get the diagnosis of bone defect greater than 5cm due to trauma or tumour resection.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cho Ray Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia, 3 Dimensional Tech Vision Limited Company
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hung Do Phuoc, MD, PhD, Cho Ray Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04449211
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ChoRayH
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Limited data are available only to research providing high quality (of sufficient details as to be useful for research purposes) and accessible (able to be acquired and used) data for research. Those data also include the deidentified data such as X-Ray, CT-scan, MRI, etc. and do not include any identified information
Publications
Nauth A, McKee MD, Einhorn TA, Watson JT, Li R, Schemitsch EH. Managing bone defects. J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Aug;25(8):462-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318224caf0.
PubMed 21738065Keating JF, Simpson AH, Robinson CM. The management of fractures with bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Feb;87(2):142-50. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.15874. No abstract available.
PubMed 15736731Kironde E, Sekimpi P, Kajja I, Mubiri P. Prevalence and patterns of traumatic bone loss following open long bone fractures at Mulago Hospital. OTA Int. 2019 Mar 12;2(1):e015. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000015. eCollection 2019 Mar.
PubMed 33937651Le LC, Blum RW. Road traffic injury among young people in Vietnam: evidence from two rounds of national adolescent health surveys, 2004-2009. Glob Health Action. 2013 Jan 17;6:1-9. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.18757.
PubMed 23336620Ivers RQ, Nguyen HT, La QN. Status of road safety and injury burden: Vietnam. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28 Suppl 1:S50-1. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000098. No abstract available.
PubMed 24858002Masquelet AC, Begue T. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Jan;41(1):27-37; table of contents. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.07.011.
PubMed 19931050Iacobellis C, Berizzi A, Aldegheri R. Bone transport using the Ilizarov method: a review of complications in 100 consecutive cases. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2010 Apr;5(1):17-22. doi: 10.1007/s11751-010-0085-9. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
PubMed 20360874Belthur MV, Conway JD, Jindal G, Ranade A, Herzenberg JE. Bone graft harvest using a new intramedullary system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Dec;466(12):2973-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0538-3. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
PubMed 18841433Cricchio G, Lundgren S. Donor site morbidity in two different approaches to anterior iliac crest bone harvesting. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(3):161-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00198.x.
PubMed 14575632Robertson PA, Wray AC. Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery: a prospective analysis of morbidity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 1;26(13):1473-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107010-00018.
PubMed 11458153Campana V, Milano G, Pagano E, Barba M, Cicione C, Salonna G, Lattanzi W, Logroscino G. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014 Oct;25(10):2445-61. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2. Epub 2014 May 28.
PubMed 24865980Roberts TT, Rosenbaum AJ. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis. 2012 Oct-Dec;8(4):114-24. doi: 10.4161/org.23306. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
PubMed 23247591de Alencar PG, Vieira IF. BONE BANKS. Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;45(6):524-8. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30297-4. eCollection 2010 Nov-Dec.
PubMed 27026958Mauffrey C, Barlow BT, Smith W. Management of segmental bone defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Mar;23(3):143-53. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00018.
PubMed 25716002Matsuno H, Yokoyama A, Watari F, Uo M, Kawasaki T. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium. Biomaterials. 2001 Jun;22(11):1253-62. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00275-1.
PubMed 11336297
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness in the Treatment of Long Bone Defect in Adults Using 3D-printed Titanium Alloy Implant
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04449211
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ChoRayH
- Conditions
- Bone Loss, Defect Limb
- Keywords
- bone defect, 3D-printed Titanium alloy implant, Electron Beam Melting, customised implant, patient-specific implant
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cho Ray HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia, 3 Dimensional Tech Vision Limited Company
- Study start
- 6 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the effectiveness of 3D-printed titanium alloy implants in the treatment of long bone defect in adults
Detailed description
The participant with long bone defect or bone tumor of the extremity is referred to the Radiology Department to have a full CT-scan of both limbs to facilitate the later reconstruction. With the contralateral limb CT-scan data, the implant is designed with appropriate geometry and structures through online meetings with the scientists of CSIRO, Australia. Through this discussion, the supporting guides for the precise osteotomy will also be designed and would be 3D-printed later by 3 Dimensional Tech Vision Limited Company (Vietnam) with Poly Lactic Acid material. The 3D-printed metal parts will be manufactured using Titanium - 6 Aluminum - 4 Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) material with Electron Beam Melting technology in CSIRO (Australia). Subsequently, the 3D-printed part will undergo mechanical tests using the Instron 5500R system (Australia) to validate its required mechanical properties. If this metal part cannot fulfill the mechanical requirements, the problematic geometry will be revised and re-designed. Another prototype will be 3D-printed with the same protocol and be tested until it qualified for the mechanical requirement. When the 3D-printed model passes the mechanical test, another 3D-printed metal part with a similar design will be manufactured before transferring to 3-Dimensional Tech Vision Limited Company (Vietnam) for post-processing, surface finishing, sterilising, packaging, labeling. Eventually, the implant will be sent to Cho Ray hospital. The amount of intraoperative blood loss and operative time will be recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Prospective participants with health insurance admitted to the Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department of Cho Ray hospital who get the diagnosis of bone defect greater than 5cm due to trauma or tumour resection.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participants with massive bone defect | Experimental | Device: ImplantationAdult participants with health insurance regardless of sex having bone defect greater than 5cm due to trauma or tumour resection agree to participate the research. The customised 3D-Printed implant is manufactured and undergoes post-processing treatment before being ready for implantation surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult participants with health insurance regardless of sex having bone defect greater than 5cm due to trauma or tumour resection agree to participate the research
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participants with contraindication to surgery
- Participants do not agree to undergo surgery
- Participants with local infection or soft tissue defect
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ImplantationAlso: Bone defect implantReconstructing the long bone defect with 3D-printed customised Titanium alloy implant | Device | Participants with massive bone defect |
Primary outcome
Functional outcome of the upper limb
Time frame: 1 to 12 months
For the participant with bone defect of the upper limb, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score will be used to evaluate for the limb functional outcome. The scale is ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Functional outcome of the lower limb
Time frame: 1 to 12 months
For the participant with bone defect of the lower limb, the Karlstrom \& Olerud score will be used to evaluate for the limb functional outcome. The scale is graded as: bad, fair, good, excellent functional outcome.
Radiological imaging
Time frame: Post-operative day 1 to 12 months
the bone healing process is evaluated by the change in dual energy CT-scan result
1 secondary outcome
Complications
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Sep 2024.
- Background: PubMed 21738065Nauth A, McKee MD, Einhorn TA, Watson JT, Li R, Schemitsch EH. Managing bone defects. J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Aug;25(8):462-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318224caf0.
- Background: PubMed 15736731Keating JF, Simpson AH, Robinson CM. The management of fractures with bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Feb;87(2):142-50. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.15874. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33937651Kironde E, Sekimpi P, Kajja I, Mubiri P. Prevalence and patterns of traumatic bone loss following open long bone fractures at Mulago Hospital. OTA Int. 2019 Mar 12;2(1):e015. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000015. eCollection 2019 Mar.
- Background: PubMed 23336620Le LC, Blum RW. Road traffic injury among young people in Vietnam: evidence from two rounds of national adolescent health surveys, 2004-2009. Glob Health Action. 2013 Jan 17;6:1-9. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.18757.
- Background: PubMed 24858002Ivers RQ, Nguyen HT, La QN. Status of road safety and injury burden: Vietnam. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28 Suppl 1:S50-1. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000098. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19931050Masquelet AC, Begue T. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Jan;41(1):27-37; table of contents. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.07.011.
- Background: PubMed 20360874Iacobellis C, Berizzi A, Aldegheri R. Bone transport using the Ilizarov method: a review of complications in 100 consecutive cases. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2010 Apr;5(1):17-22. doi: 10.1007/s11751-010-0085-9. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
- Background: PubMed 18841433Belthur MV, Conway JD, Jindal G, Ranade A, Herzenberg JE. Bone graft harvest using a new intramedullary system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Dec;466(12):2973-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0538-3. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
- Background: PubMed 14575632Cricchio G, Lundgren S. Donor site morbidity in two different approaches to anterior iliac crest bone harvesting. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(3):161-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00198.x.
- Background: PubMed 11458153Robertson PA, Wray AC. Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery: a prospective analysis of morbidity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 1;26(13):1473-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107010-00018.
- Background: PubMed 24865980Campana V, Milano G, Pagano E, Barba M, Cicione C, Salonna G, Lattanzi W, Logroscino G. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014 Oct;25(10):2445-61. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2. Epub 2014 May 28.
- Background: PubMed 23247591Roberts TT, Rosenbaum AJ. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis. 2012 Oct-Dec;8(4):114-24. doi: 10.4161/org.23306. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Limited data are available only to research providing high quality (of sufficient details as to be useful for research purposes) and accessible (able to be acquired and used) data for research. Those data also include the deidentified data such as X-Ray, CT-scan, MRI, etc. and do not include any identified information
Related trials for Bone Loss
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diagnostic Accuracy of Large Language Models for Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss on Panoramic Radiographs
Peri-implantitis, Alveolar Bone Loss
Not yet recruitingObservational study
3D-Printed Pelvic Models for Planning Complex Total Hip Arthroplasty
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, Acetabular Bone Loss
Recruiting
Two Bovine Xenografts in Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation With or Without Bone Marrow Blood
Alveolar Bone Loss, Sinus Floor Augmentation
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Fall Prevention for Fracture Reduction
Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Implantation in people with Bone Loss and Defect Limb, run by Cho Ray Hospital at 1 site in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hung Do Phuoc, MD, PhD (+84903775579, dphungcr@ump.edu.vn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional outcome of the upper limb (time frame: 1 to 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04449211, which also lists 39 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2024.