Functional AbilityNCT04490070
Caregiver Training: Evidence of Its Effectiveness for Cognitive and Functional Improvement in Older Adults
A study testing Cognitive Stimulation in people with Functional Ability and Cognitive Decline, run by Universidad de Granada at 10 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Due to demographic changes that have resulted in an aging population, the role of caregiver of an older adult has become very important in recent years. While numerous programs have been designed to lighten the caregiver's physical and emotional burden, fewer programs train caregivers to improve skills and level of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Functional Ability, Cognitive Decline, Older Adults
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive Stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 10 Dec 2015to 10 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Older adults: age 65 or older, receiving care, no diagnosis of dementia, and their informed consent.
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
Spain10 sites
Centro Residencial de Mayores "Entreálamos"
Atarfe, Granada, 18230
Unidad de Estancia Diurna de Atarfe
Atarfe, Granada, 18230
Residencia de mayores María Zayas
Belicena, Granada, 18101
Centro Residencial Regina Mundi
Churriana de la Vega, Granada, 18194
Centro Residencial Geriatric XXI
Cúllar-Vega, Granada, 18195
Centro Cívico Zaidín del Ayuntamiento de Granada
Granada, 18007
Centro Cívico Genil del Ayuntamiento de Granada
Granada, 18008
University of Granada
Granada, 18011
Unidad de Estancia Diurna Ogíjares
Ogíjares, Granada, 18151
Unidad de Estancia Diurna Dr. Alejandro Otero
Pulianas, Granada, 18197
About this study
Due to demographic changes that have resulted in an aging population, the role of caregiver of an older adult has become very important in recent years. While numerous programs have been designed to lighten the caregiver's physical and emotional burden, fewer programs train caregivers to improve skills and level of independence in the person they care for. The objectives of this research study were to assess the benefits of a caregiver training program on the cognitive and functional status of older adults, as well as to compare the effects of this program according to type of caregiver (professional caregiver vs. family caregiver). Methods: The sample was composed of 160 older adults: a) 100 received care from caregivers who had taken the training program (treatment group), of which 60 were professional caregivers and 40 were family caregivers; and b) 60 received care from caregivers who had not taken the program (control group). In order to evaluate program effects on cognitive and functional status, we used both direct measures (MMSE, CAPE and EuroQol) and caregiver reports (Barthel and RMPBC).
- Conditions
- Functional Ability, Cognitive Decline, Older Adults, Healthy Aging
- Being tested
- Cognitive Stimulation
- Keywords
- Older adults, Caregiver training program, Cognitive stimulation, Professional caregivers, Family caregivers
- Medical subject headings
- Cognitive Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive StimulationBehavioural
The caregiver training program consisted of applying the cognitive stimulation model of the CUIDA-2 program. This application included theoretical training made up of three modules: 1) person-centered care, 2) communication strategies, and 3) mediated cognitive stimulation strategies. The training was given in two group sessions of two hours each, plus 50 hours of individual practice, either on the job (in the case of professional caregivers) or in the home (in the case of family caregivers), in both cases supervised by psychologists who were experts in the program. In these individual practice hours, the caregivers were required to keep a weekly log. Here they had to plan in advance the activities that they were going to carry out with the older adult, and once they had taken place, they had to record how they were done and how the older adult had responded.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mini-Examen-Cognoscitivo (MEC), Spanish adaptation of the Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE).
This screening instrument is widely used for detecting cognitive impairment. The final score ranges from 0 to 35 points and is often used as a global index and method for monitoring the evolution of cognitive functions in cognitive impairment and dementia. It has high internal consistency (α = 0.88), good test-retest reliability (0.64-1.00; p < 0.01) and good interjudge reliability (0.69-1.00; p < 0.01).
Measured: 9 months
The Procedimiento de Evaluación Clifton para Ancianos - Cognitive Scale, a Spanish adaptation of the Clifton Assessment Procedure for the Elderly (CAPE).
In the present study, we used the cognitive assessment scale only, which includes one part on information and orientation and another part on mental ability. The final score ranges from 0 to 23 points and higher scores mean a better outcome. Its test-retest reliability falls between 0.79 and 0.90, and between 0.61 and 0.69, for the information and orientation scale and for the mental ability scale, respectively.
Measured: 9 months
EuroQol
Generic measure of health-related quality of life. The individual rates his or her own state of health, first rating levels of severity by dimensions, and afterward a more general assessment using a 20-centimeter visual analog scale (VAS) that goes from 0 to 100. Scores range from 0 to 2 on each of the test scales, and higher scores mean a worse result.
Measured: 9 months
Barthel Index
Evaluates the person's functional ability based on 10 items answered by the caregiver. Scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 being completely dependent and 100 completely independent. Its internal consistency presents an alpha coefficient between 0.86 and 0.92 and interjudge reliability between 0.84 and 0.97.
Measured: 9 months
Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC), in its Spanish version.
Evaluates problems in memory, behavior, and anxiety and depression. The caregiver indicates how often the person under her care has manifest each of the problems described during the past week (frequency scale) and the degree that this bothers or worries her (reaction scale). An alpha coefficient of 0.84 was found for the frequency scale, and 0.90 for the reaction scale.
Measured: 9 months
Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PAC).
This 9-item instrument measures caregivers' satisfaction with providing care to the older adults. It consists of a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree). Scores range from 9 to 45; higher scores indicate a more positive perception and gains from the caregiver experience. It presents good general reliability (Cronbach α = .89) and convergent validity (Cronbach α = .72).
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jul 2020
- Study start10 Dec 2015
- Primary completion10 Mar 2020
- Study completion10 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Functional AbilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de Granada
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Miriam Sanjuan, Universidad de Granada
- Investigators
- Elena Navarro, Study director, Universidad de GranadaDolores Calero, Study chair, Universidad de GranadaMiriam Sanjuán, Principal investigator, Universidad de Granada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04490070
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 545/CEIH/2018
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Caregiver Training: Evidence of Its Effectiveness for Cognitive and Functional Improvement in Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04490070
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 545/CEIH/2018
- Conditions
- Functional Ability, Cognitive Decline, Older Adults, Healthy Aging
- Keywords
- Older adults, Caregiver training program, Cognitive stimulation, Professional caregivers, Family caregivers
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de GranadaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Due to demographic changes that have resulted in an aging population, the role of caregiver of an older adult has become very important in recent years. While numerous programs have been designed to lighten the caregiver's physical and emotional burden, fewer programs train caregivers to improve skills and level of independence in the person they care for. The objectives of this research study were to assess the benefits of a caregiver training program on the cognitive and functional status of older adults, as well as to compare the effects of this program according to type of caregiver (professional caregiver vs. family caregiver). Methods: The sample was composed of 160 older adults: a) 100 received care from caregivers who had taken the training program (treatment group), of which 60 were professional caregivers and 40 were family caregivers; and b) 60 received care from caregivers who had not taken the program (control group). In order to evaluate program effects on cognitive and functional status, we used both direct measures (MMSE, CAPE and EuroQol) and caregiver reports (Barthel and RMPBC).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Older adults: age 65 or older, receiving care, no diagnosis of dementia, and their informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive StimulationThe caregiver training program consisted of applying the cognitive stimulation model of the CUIDA-2 program. This application included theoretical training made up of three modules: 1) person-centered care, 2) communication strategies, and 3) mediated cognitive stimulation strategies. The training was given in two group sessions of two hours each, plus 50 hours of individual practice, either on the job (in the case of professional caregivers) or in the home (in the case of family caregivers), in both cases supervised by psychologists who were experts in the program. In these individual practice hours, the caregivers were required to keep a weekly log. Here they had to plan in advance the activities that they were going to carry out with the older adult, and once they had taken place, they had to record how they were done and how the older adult had responded. | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Mini-Examen-Cognoscitivo (MEC), Spanish adaptation of the Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE).
Time frame: 9 months
This screening instrument is widely used for detecting cognitive impairment. The final score ranges from 0 to 35 points and is often used as a global index and method for monitoring the evolution of cognitive functions in cognitive impairment and dementia. It has high internal consistency (α = 0.88), good test-retest reliability (0.64-1.00; p < 0.01) and good interjudge reliability (0.69-1.00; p < 0.01).
The Procedimiento de Evaluación Clifton para Ancianos - Cognitive Scale, a Spanish adaptation of the Clifton Assessment Procedure for the Elderly (CAPE).
Time frame: 9 months
In the present study, we used the cognitive assessment scale only, which includes one part on information and orientation and another part on mental ability. The final score ranges from 0 to 23 points and higher scores mean a better outcome. Its test-retest reliability falls between 0.79 and 0.90, and between 0.61 and 0.69, for the information and orientation scale and for the mental ability scale, respectively.
EuroQol
Time frame: 9 months
Generic measure of health-related quality of life. The individual rates his or her own state of health, first rating levels of severity by dimensions, and afterward a more general assessment using a 20-centimeter visual analog scale (VAS) that goes from 0 to 100. Scores range from 0 to 2 on each of the test scales, and higher scores mean a worse result.
Barthel Index
Time frame: 9 months
Evaluates the person's functional ability based on 10 items answered by the caregiver. Scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 being completely dependent and 100 completely independent. Its internal consistency presents an alpha coefficient between 0.86 and 0.92 and interjudge reliability between 0.84 and 0.97.
Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC), in its Spanish version.
Time frame: 9 months
Evaluates problems in memory, behavior, and anxiety and depression. The caregiver indicates how often the person under her care has manifest each of the problems described during the past week (frequency scale) and the degree that this bothers or worries her (reaction scale). An alpha coefficient of 0.84 was found for the frequency scale, and 0.90 for the reaction scale.
Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PAC).
Time frame: 9 months
This 9-item instrument measures caregivers' satisfaction with providing care to the older adults. It consists of a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree). Scores range from 9 to 45; higher scores indicate a more positive perception and gains from the caregiver experience. It presents good general reliability (Cronbach α = .89) and convergent validity (Cronbach α = .72).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Functional Ability
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Vestibular Function on Deaf Infants' Activities of Daily Living
Vestibular Dysfunction, Hearing Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Effects of Obesity on Physical Abilities and Daily Living Activities in Elderly Adults
Obesity, Sarcopenic Obesity
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Evaluation of the PPAL
Age Problems
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Robotic Gloves Training on Upper Limb Coordination, Selective Motor Control and Activities of Daily Living in Children With Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy
Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elena Navarro study director
Universidad de Granada
Dolores Calero study chair
Universidad de Granada
Miriam Sanjuán principal investigator
Universidad de Granada
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive Stimulation in people with Functional Ability and Cognitive Decline, run by Universidad de Granada at 10 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mini-Examen-Cognoscitivo (MEC), Spanish adaptation of the Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE). (time frame: 9 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2020.