Patient SafetyNCT04576299
Health Care Workers' Perception of Patient Safety During COVID-19 Pandemic
An observational study of Patient Safety, run by Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche at 4 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
Objective: Analyze health care workers' perception of patient safety during the COVID 19 pandemic. Methodology: Analytical cross-sectional observational study, with a quantitative focus on healthcare workers who are working on-site during the pandemic in the services of healthcare institutions that agree to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Patient Safety
- What is being tested?
- Group 1
- How many people
- 260 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 15 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Healthcare workers and patient safety coordinators from the participant countries (Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador).
Who may be able to join
- Healthcare professionals from all disciplines
- Technicians from all disciplines (health related)
- Working in a face-to-face manner during the pandemic in the services of health institutions
- Professional or technical personnel in charge of the quality and patient safety processes in the institutions.
Who cannot join
- Professional or technical staff from the administrative areas
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 4 countries.
4 sites in 4 countries
About this study
Official title: Health Care Workers' Perception of Patient Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities and Challenges
Objective: Analyze health care workers' perception of patient safety during the COVID 19 pandemic.
Methodology: Analytical cross-sectional observational study, with a quantitative focus on healthcare workers who are working on-site during the pandemic in the services of healthcare institutions that agree to participate in the countries where the study will be conducted, by applying a survey of patient safety perceptions in healthcare workers in times of pandemic. Analysis of the data will employ descriptive and inferential statistical techniques to meet the objectives of the study using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 25.0 software.
Expected results: The study seeks to generate evidence for the perception of patient safety in times of pandemic, for which it will generate the submission of an article with the results obtained to an indexed journal and presentation at a scientific event.
Read the detailed description
Introduction
Patient safety culture The concept of patient safety culture has become one of the strategies in health care institutions that seeks to intervene on adverse events, understood as: the set of characteristics, skills and attitudes, perceptions, abilities, competencies, among others, that are developed within the institutions and their members, which establish the commitment and capabilities to maintain and manage safety in health care in all processes that are developed within the organization. The issue of safety culture is part of the DNA of each organization, involving their operational processes and the perspective of how they manage them, with a view to becoming "highly reliable organizations", being institutions that despite working in very high risk situations, the presence of adverse events, accidents or complications is very low.
Therefore, it is important to understand the patient's perception of safety that allows the evaluation of dimensions such as: commitment of the directives, processes of institutional continuous improvement, systems of notification of events and incidents, communication and climate of confidence, fundamental dimensions at the moment of measuring the culture. However, it is also important to assess how these dimensions have been impacted at times of a pandemic such as the current COVID19 , where around 29,000,000 positive cases and 1 million deaths are reported worldwide, a situation for which institutions and countries were not prepared and which may impact on patient safety processes, mediated by high levels of stress and anxiety in the health team work overload due to increased care and disability leave of workers who have acquired the virus.
Therefore, this study seeks to examine health care workers' perceptions of patient safety during the COVID 19 pandemic.
Rationale
Given the environmental, social and economic impacts that the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is having on all population dynamics, it is important to highlight the effects it is having on the health sector, since it is there that it is directly involved in the access, treatment, control and resolution of patients with this pathology. Precisely its human capital, where health professionals are located, is the most representative and numerous population in the various processes and actions carried out within it. The positive or negative results related to the management of SARS-CoV-2 in users depend on this personnel.
From the aspects highlighted by the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization, given the situation of direct exposure to the virus through contact with health teams and its high increase in infections and deaths of health personnel, agree to promote protection strategies such as establishing standard procedures for prevention and control of infections, increase in the number of personal protective equipment (PPE), expansion in the processes of retraining, flexible workloads and increased staff.
Although there are various initiatives and interventions by health institutions and national governments in response to this situation of security for health personnel, concern is further increased by the increase in the number of Covid - 19 infections, by August 2020 in the epidemiological alert of the Americas for this situation in health personnel, the panorama is as follows. The most affected countries are Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Colombia.
On the Brazilian side, with a total of 268,954 confirmed cases in their health team, the nursing auxiliaries and nurses are the most impacted with 34% and 14% of these cases respectively. On the other hand, in Mexico the confirmed cases in the health personnel ascends to 97,632 people, the professional nursing is the most impacted work with 42% of the total of the professionals.
In third place in Latin American, Argentina has reported a total of 16,194 cases among young people between the ages of 29 and 39. In the case of Colombia, there are currently 7,692 cases, with a greater proportion of nurses and doctors.
According to the above, this research seeks to analyze the perception of patient safety of health workers in Latin American countries during the COVID 19 pandemic. Due to the deficit of knowledge and the situation related to the impacts on health professionals, in the same way few initiatives deepen the generation of knowledge about this problem at the local level, this work is convenient to consolidate more effective actions in view of the increase of cases of health personnel.
On the other hand, the research contributes to expand the linkage of patient safety in health organizations, the work of the professional and the improvement of processes according to the realities that are presented in each of the services, units, institutions that are adapting to the changing situations and variables of the pandemic.
The work has a methodological utility since future research could be carried out related to the subject of hospitals or health institutions at different levels of care, the permanent training of human capital and the improvement of processes according to the adaptations in the management of the care units.
Problem Statement
The culture of patient safety has become the main strategy to mitigate and manage the presentation of adverse events related to health care. Faced with this phenomenon, studies have been carried out related to the validation of instruments that allow measuring the perception of workers and members of the health teams of the institutions of each of the dimensions of the organizational culture associated with safety, which they measure from the commitment of senior management, as communication strategies of the adverse event, job satisfaction, rewards and recognition, teamwork, working conditions, individual factors, attitudes and practices, continuous improvement process, among others, that have used construction validations, internal consistency and viability presenting very good results. Among these reported instruments are: safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ), Veteran Affairs Palo Alto/Stanford Patient Safety Center for Inquiry PSCI =Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organizations PSCHO, AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, Safety Climate Survey, modified ORMAQ and Safety Climate Scale, among others.
To this extent, research has shown the following to be fundamental factors in the patient safety culture: the participation of management and process leaders as indispensable elements for the promotion and prioritization of patient safety issues, and where studies report low commitment and interest at this level, the use of anonymous event reporting systems and with the use of information and communication technologies, as well as low coordination and teamwork among units and members of the same team that is also perceived as leadership failures.
Therefore, it is clear that there are great advances in measuring the culture of safety in health institutions, but this measurement has not been carried out in situations where health systems worldwide are collapsed and have great difficulties in responding to a pandemic, as is currently the case with COVID 19, where intensive care and emergency services have reached occupations of over 90%, which implies a greater work overload, and can interfere negatively with the safe attention to users, also given by high levels of stress and anxiety in the health team that has been shown to be related to aspects to be improved around this problem in previous studies, and which make the presentation of errors and incidents in health care more likely. Thus, this study seeks to analyze the perception of patient safety in the members of the health team during this pandemic, allowing the generation of evidence that will enable health systems and institutions to take action on the findings of the study and to strengthen, if necessary, those dimensions with negative perceptions that will allow a better response to this situation.
Research question:
What is the patient safety perception of health workers during the COVID 19 pandemic in 2020?
- Conditions
- Patient Safety
- Being tested
- Group 1
- Keywords
- Patient Safety, Healthcare Personnel, Hospital Management
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group 1Other
Also called COVID-PS HW
Survey about social networks, notification of adverse events, multidisciplinary teams, the doctor-patient relationship, the role of the ethics and patient safety committees, protocol compliance and suspension of outpatient procedures
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare workers. | Survey developed specifically for the objective of this study: Healthcare worker perception of patient safety in times of pandemic.
The application will be done through a digital questionnaire in the surveymonkey platform (Link of the instrument: https://es.surveymonkey.com/r/COVIDSP) Receives: Other: Group 1 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Safety perception.
Differences of patient safety perceptions among the participants from different countries.
An ad-hoc survey questionnaire (not validated) has been developed by researchers using prior tools and personal experience by means of virtual conference consensus. The survey includes 32 questions about social networks, notification of adverse events, multidisciplinary teams, the doctor-patient relationship, the role of the ethics and patient safety committees, protocol compliance and suspension of outpatient procedures using a likert scale of 5 possible answers (totally disagree - totally agree).
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Oct 2020
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion30 Dec 2021
- Study completion15 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Patient SafetyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad de Santander, Universidad Antonio Nariño, University of Sao Paulo, Universidad Catolica Santiago de Guayaquil, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, José Joaquín Mira, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche
- Investigators
- Jose J Mira, PhD, Principal investigator, Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04576299
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-09
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Antino, M., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., & Ortega, A. (2020). The hospital survey on patient safety culture in Mexican hospitals: Assessment of psychometric properties. Safety Science, 128(May 2017), 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104706
Arias-Botero, J. H., & Gómez-Arias, R. D. (2017). La cultura de la seguridad del paciente: enfoques y metodologías para su medición. Ces Medicina, 31(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesmedicina.31.2.7
Camargo Tobias, G., Queiroz Bezerra, A. L., & Silvestre Branquinho, N. C. (2014). Cultura de la seguridad del paciente en la atención sanitaria: Un estudio bibliométrico. Enfermeria Global, 13(1), 336-361. https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.13.1.159931
Huang L, Lei W, Xu F, Liu H, Yu L. Emotional responses and coping strategies in nurses and nursing students during Covid-19 outbreak: A comparative study. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0237303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237303. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32764825Pinheiro da Penha, M., Junior da Silva, O., da Penha Pinheiro, M., & da Silva Júnior, O. (2017). Evaluación de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en una organización hospitalaria de un hospital universitario. Enfermería Global: Revista Electrónica Semestral de Enfermería, 16(1), 309-352.
Ramos, F., Coca, S. M., & Abeldaño, R. A. (2017). Percepción de la cultura de seguridad de pacientes en profesionales de una institución argentina. Enfermería Universitaria, 14(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reu.2016.12.004
Singer S, Meterko M, Baker L, Gaba D, Falwell A, Rosen A. Workforce perceptions of hospital safety culture: development and validation of the patient safety climate in healthcare organizations survey. Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1999-2021. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00706.x.
PubMed 17850530University Johns Hopkins. (2020). COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
Zhu Z, Xu S, Wang H, Liu Z, Wu J, Li G, Miao J, Zhang C, Yang Y, Sun W, Zhu S, Fan Y, Chen Y, Hu J, Liu J, Wang W. COVID-19 in Wuhan: Sociodemographic characteristics and hospital support measures associated with the immediate psychological impact on healthcare workers. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 24;24:100443. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100443. eCollection 2020 Jul.
PubMed 32766545
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Health Care Workers' Perception of Patient Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities and Challenges
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04576299
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020-09
- Conditions
- Patient Safety
- Keywords
- Patient Safety, Healthcare Personnel, Hospital Management
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad de Santander, Universidad Antonio Nariño, University of Sao Paulo, Universidad Catolica Santiago de Guayaquil, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective: Analyze health care workers' perception of patient safety during the COVID 19 pandemic.
Methodology: Analytical cross-sectional observational study, with a quantitative focus on healthcare workers who are working on-site during the pandemic in the services of healthcare institutions that agree to participate in the countries where the study will be conducted, by applying a survey of patient safety perceptions in healthcare workers in times of pandemic. Analysis of the data will employ descriptive and inferential statistical techniques to meet the objectives of the study using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 25.0 software.
Expected results: The study seeks to generate evidence for the perception of patient safety in times of pandemic, for which it will generate the submission of an article with the results obtained to an indexed journal and presentation at a scientific event.
Detailed description
Introduction
Patient safety culture The concept of patient safety culture has become one of the strategies in health care institutions that seeks to intervene on adverse events, understood as: the set of characteristics, skills and attitudes, perceptions, abilities, competencies, among others, that are developed within the institutions and their members, which establish the commitment and capabilities to maintain and manage safety in health care in all processes that are developed within the organization. The issue of safety culture is part of the DNA of each organization, involving their operational processes and the perspective of how they manage them, with a view to becoming "highly reliable organizations", being institutions that despite working in very high risk situations, the presence of adverse events, accidents or complications is very low.
Therefore, it is important to understand the patient's perception of safety that allows the evaluation of dimensions such as: commitment of the directives, processes of institutional continuous improvement, systems of notification of events and incidents, communication and climate of confidence, fundamental dimensions at the moment of measuring the culture. However, it is also important to assess how these dimensions have been impacted at times of a pandemic such as the current COVID19 , where around 29,000,000 positive cases and 1 million deaths are reported worldwide, a situation for which institutions and countries were not prepared and which may impact on patient safety processes, mediated by high levels of stress and anxiety in the health team work overload due to increased care and disability leave of workers who have acquired the virus.
Therefore, this study seeks to examine health care workers' perceptions of patient safety during the COVID 19 pandemic.
Rationale
Given the environmental, social and economic impacts that the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is having on all population dynamics, it is important to highlight the effects it is having on the health sector, since it is there that it is directly involved in the access, treatment, control and resolution of patients with this pathology. Precisely its human capital, where health professionals are located, is the most representative and numerous population in the various processes and actions carried out within it. The positive or negative results related to the management of SARS-CoV-2 in users depend on this personnel.
From the aspects highlighted by the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization, given the situation of direct exposure to the virus through contact with health teams and its high increase in infections and deaths of health personnel, agree to promote protection strategies such as establishing standard procedures for prevention and control of infections, increase in the number of personal protective equipment (PPE), expansion in the processes of retraining, flexible workloads and increased staff.
Although there are various initiatives and interventions by health institutions and national governments in response to this situation of security for health personnel, concern is further increased by the increase in the number of Covid - 19 infections, by August 2020 in the epidemiological alert of the Americas for this situation in health personnel, the panorama is as follows. The most affected countries are Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Colombia.
On the Brazilian side, with a total of 268,954 confirmed cases in their health team, the nursing auxiliaries and nurses are the most impacted with 34% and 14% of these cases respectively. On the other hand, in Mexico the confirmed cases in the health personnel ascends to 97,632 people, the professional nursing is the most impacted work with 42% of the total of the professionals.
In third place in Latin American, Argentina has reported a total of 16,194 cases among young people between the ages of 29 and 39. In the case of Colombia, there are currently 7,692 cases, with a greater proportion of nurses and doctors.
According to the above, this research seeks to analyze the perception of patient safety of health workers in Latin American countries during the COVID 19 pandemic. Due to the deficit of knowledge and the situation related to the impacts on health professionals, in the same way few initiatives deepen the generation of knowledge about this problem at the local level, this work is convenient to consolidate more effective actions in view of the increase of cases of health personnel.
On the other hand, the research contributes to expand the linkage of patient safety in health organizations, the work of the professional and the improvement of processes according to the realities that are presented in each of the services, units, institutions that are adapting to the changing situations and variables of the pandemic.
The work has a methodological utility since future research could be carried out related to the subject of hospitals or health institutions at different levels of care, the permanent training of human capital and the improvement of processes according to the adaptations in the management of the care units.
Problem Statement
The culture of patient safety has become the main strategy to mitigate and manage the presentation of adverse events related to health care. Faced with this phenomenon, studies have been carried out related to the validation of instruments that allow measuring the perception of workers and members of the health teams of the institutions of each of the dimensions of the organizational culture associated with safety, which they measure from the commitment of senior management, as communication strategies of the adverse event, job satisfaction, rewards and recognition, teamwork, working conditions, individual factors, attitudes and practices, continuous improvement process, among others, that have used construction validations, internal consistency and viability presenting very good results. Among these reported instruments are: safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ), Veteran Affairs Palo Alto/Stanford Patient Safety Center for Inquiry PSCI =Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organizations PSCHO, AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, Safety Climate Survey, modified ORMAQ and Safety Climate Scale, among others.
To this extent, research has shown the following to be fundamental factors in the patient safety culture: the participation of management and process leaders as indispensable elements for the promotion and prioritization of patient safety issues, and where studies report low commitment and interest at this level, the use of anonymous event reporting systems and with the use of information and communication technologies, as well as low coordination and teamwork among units and members of the same team that is also perceived as leadership failures.
Therefore, it is clear that there are great advances in measuring the culture of safety in health institutions, but this measurement has not been carried out in situations where health systems worldwide are collapsed and have great difficulties in responding to a pandemic, as is currently the case with COVID 19, where intensive care and emergency services have reached occupations of over 90%, which implies a greater work overload, and can interfere negatively with the safe attention to users, also given by high levels of stress and anxiety in the health team that has been shown to be related to aspects to be improved around this problem in previous studies, and which make the presentation of errors and incidents in health care more likely. Thus, this study seeks to analyze the perception of patient safety in the members of the health team during this pandemic, allowing the generation of evidence that will enable health systems and institutions to take action on the findings of the study and to strengthen, if necessary, those dimensions with negative perceptions that will allow a better response to this situation.
Research question:
What is the patient safety perception of health workers during the COVID 19 pandemic in 2020?
Study design
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare workers. | – | Other: Group 1Survey developed specifically for the objective of this study: Healthcare worker perception of patient safety in times of pandemic. The application will be done through a digital questionnaire in the surveymonkey platform (Link of the instrument: https://es.surveymonkey.com/r/COVIDSP) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Healthcare workers and patient safety coordinators from the participant countries (Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador).
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Healthcare professionals from all disciplines
- Technicians from all disciplines (health related)
- Working in a face-to-face manner during the pandemic in the services of health institutions
- Professional or technical personnel in charge of the quality and patient safety processes in the institutions.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Professional or technical staff from the administrative areas
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1Also: COVID-PS HWSurvey about social networks, notification of adverse events, multidisciplinary teams, the doctor-patient relationship, the role of the ethics and patient safety committees, protocol compliance and suspension of outpatient procedures | Other | Healthcare workers. |
Primary outcome
Patient Safety perception.
Time frame: 30 days
Differences of patient safety perceptions among the participants from different countries. An ad-hoc survey questionnaire (not validated) has been developed by researchers using prior tools and personal experience by means of virtual conference consensus. The survey includes 32 questions about social networks, notification of adverse events, multidisciplinary teams, the doctor-patient relationship, the role of the ethics and patient safety committees, protocol compliance and suspension of outpatient procedures using a likert scale of 5 possible answers (totally disagree - totally agree).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2022.
- BackgroundAntino, M., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., & Ortega, A. (2020). The hospital survey on patient safety culture in Mexican hospitals: Assessment of psychometric properties. Safety Science, 128(May 2017), 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104706
- BackgroundArias-Botero, J. H., & Gómez-Arias, R. D. (2017). La cultura de la seguridad del paciente: enfoques y metodologías para su medición. Ces Medicina, 31(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesmedicina.31.2.7
- BackgroundCamargo Tobias, G., Queiroz Bezerra, A. L., & Silvestre Branquinho, N. C. (2014). Cultura de la seguridad del paciente en la atención sanitaria: Un estudio bibliométrico. Enfermeria Global, 13(1), 336-361. https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.13.1.159931
- Background: PubMed 32764825Huang L, Lei W, Xu F, Liu H, Yu L. Emotional responses and coping strategies in nurses and nursing students during Covid-19 outbreak: A comparative study. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0237303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237303. eCollection 2020.
- BackgroundPinheiro da Penha, M., Junior da Silva, O., da Penha Pinheiro, M., & da Silva Júnior, O. (2017). Evaluación de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en una organización hospitalaria de un hospital universitario. Enfermería Global: Revista Electrónica Semestral de Enfermería, 16(1), 309-352.
- BackgroundRamos, F., Coca, S. M., & Abeldaño, R. A. (2017). Percepción de la cultura de seguridad de pacientes en profesionales de una institución argentina. Enfermería Universitaria, 14(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reu.2016.12.004
- Background: PubMed 17850530Singer S, Meterko M, Baker L, Gaba D, Falwell A, Rosen A. Workforce perceptions of hospital safety culture: development and validation of the patient safety climate in healthcare organizations survey. Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1999-2021. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00706.x.
- BackgroundUniversity Johns Hopkins. (2020). COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
- Background: PubMed 32766545Zhu Z, Xu S, Wang H, Liu Z, Wu J, Li G, Miao J, Zhang C, Yang Y, Sun W, Zhu S, Fan Y, Chen Y, Hu J, Liu J, Wang W. COVID-19 in Wuhan: Sociodemographic characteristics and hospital support measures associated with the immediate psychological impact on healthcare workers. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 24;24:100443. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100443. eCollection 2020 Jul.
- Be+ Against COVID Second Victims working group websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Patient Safety
RecruitingObservational study
A Study in Children and, Adults With Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (cTTP) Treated With Adzynma
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Atrasentan in Pediatric Patients With Primary IgAN
Berger Disease, Bergers Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Risdiplam Administered as an Early Intervention in Pediatric Participants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy After Gene Therapy
Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jose J Mira, PhD principal investigator
Professor
4 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Patient Safety, run by Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche at 4 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Safety perception. (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04576299, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2022.