Social IsolationVGVNCT04593433
A 3-month Cycle of Virtual Guided Tours to Promote Health in Older Community Members in a Context of COVID-19 Induced Social Isolation: a Pilot Study
A study testing Museum virtual guided tours in people with Social Isolation and Quality of Life, run by Jewish General Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Social isolation is defined as the objective and/or subjective reduction of number and quality of interpersonal contacts leading to a loss of an individual's social role and stigmatization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Social Isolation, Quality of Life, Well Aging
- What is being tested?
- Museum virtual guided tours
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 4 Mar 2021to 4 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being 65 years and over
- Having an Internet access and an electronic device (smartphone and/or tablet) at the participant's place of living as the repetitive assessments for this study will be performed on the web platform of the Centre of Excellence on Longevity of McGill University, and the guided tours will be virtual.
- Understanding and writing the language of the recruitment centre (i.e., French or English)
Who cannot join
- a concomitant participation to an experimental study,
- planning to have a journey over one week during the cycle of visits,
- having participated to a participatory art-based activity of the MMFA during the 6 month-period before the recruitment,
- not speaking the language of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A 3-month Cycle of Virtual Weekly Montreal Museum of Fine Arts Tours to Promote Social Inclusion, Well-being, Quality of Life and Health in Older Community Members : a Pilot Study
Social isolation is defined as the objective and/or subjective reduction of number and quality of interpersonal contacts leading to a loss of an individual's social role and stigmatization. It is a major problem in Canadian society with a high prevalence in the older population (30% in individuals aged 65 and over, representing 1.5 million individuals). Social isolation is associated with a wide range of mental and physical health problems that leads to an increase in the use of health and social services. This issue increased with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic which attacking your society at its core. Social distancing and in particular home confinement exacerbated social isolation of frailer groups like the elderly people.
In 2016, the International Federation on Ageing reported that "the main new problem facing seniors in Canada is maintaining their social contacts and activities". This highlights the need for efficient and effective interventions to improve the social inclusion of older adults experiencing social isolation.
Read more
Research suggests that art-based activities carried out at museums have significant benefits for older adults experiencing social isolation, and may foster social inclusion, well-being, quality of life and mitigate frailty. Yet few studies have examined empirically the effects of museum art-based activities in older adults experiencing social isolation. In 2019, the principal investigator of this research conducted an experimental pilot study based on a pre-post intervention (i.e., 3-month cycle of weekly guided tours carried out at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts (MMFA)), single arm, prospective and longitudinal follow-up named "Effects of Montreal Museum of Fine Arts visits and older community dwellers with a precarious state: An experimental study", which indicated the potential of museum tours to improve social inclusion, well-being, the quality of life and frailty in older community members experiencing social isolation.
However, these studies were performed before the COVID-19 crisis and were in-site activities. The principal investigator hypothesizes that a 3-month cycle of virtual weekly MMFA tours may induce changes in well-being, quality of life and health condition in older community dwellers participating like the 'Beautiful Thursday' cycle, and that this activity can prevent the worsening of vulnerability and social isolation due to social distancing.
- Conditions
- Social Isolation, Quality of Life, Well Aging, Frailty
- Being tested
- Museum virtual guided tours
- Medical subject headings
- Social Isolation, Frailty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Museum virtual guided toursOther
The intervention is a participatory art-based activity which consists in MMFA virtual guided tours. Each virtual guided tour is performed with a group of 5 participants. They meet online one time per week for a 20 to 25 min of a visit tour during a 3-month period. Each tour is different and supervised by a MMFA trained guide.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Group with the virtual museum guided tours Receives: Other: Museum virtual guided tours |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Well-being
using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) self-validated questionnaire composed by 14 positively worded item scale with five response categories. It covers most aspects of positive mental health (positive thoughts and feelings). Scores can range from a minimum of 14 to a maximum of 70 points. Higher scores are associated with higher levels of mental well-being
Measured: 3 months
Quality of life
using EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), a standardized measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. It is composed of two parts: a questionnaire of five questions with score per question ranged from 1 (i.e., no issue) to 5 (i.e., worse issue), each question ranged from 0 (i.e., no issue) to 25 (i.e., worse issue), and a visual analogic scale of how good or bad participant health was. This scale is numbered from 0 (i.e., worse health participant can imagine) to 100 (i.e., best health participant can imagine).
Measured: 3 months
frailty
using CESAM questionnaire, composed of 20 items providing two complementary information: 1) A global score of frailty ranged from 0 (i.e., best health and functional condition) to 18 (i.e., worse health and functional condition) and 2) Categorized health condition in four levels (vigorous with a score between 0 and 3, mild frailty with a score between 4 and 7, moderate frailty with a score between 8 and 12, and important frailty with a score above 12).
Measured: 3 months
social isolation
using the digital form of the 11-item Dike Social Support Index (DSSI). The index is composed of two subscales: social interaction (i.e., frequency of interactions) and subjective support (i.e., satisfaction with emotional support provided). DSSI score ranges from 11 to 33, increased score indicating higher levels of social insertion. The scores of the 11 items are combined and categorized as low-fair (score ≤26), high (score 27-29) and very high (score 30-33). We will use the mean score of 11-item DSSI and its distribution in three categories.
Measured: 3 months
socio-geriatric vulnerability
using ESOGER questionnaire, composed of 17 items exploring the COVID risk, the COVID past history, the social isolation risk due to COVID (access to food, home support and healthcare, contact with external persons, anxiety). Items correspond to a question in closed-ended format (i.e., yes or no, or calling for a specific answer). The ESOGER categorizes state of vulnerability in three levels (Low, Moderate and High vulnerability).
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Incident planned and unplanned visits to physicians, Emergency Department (ED) and hospitalization
recorded at the end of the cycle by asking directly to the participants
Measured: 3 months
compliance
determined by the total number of guided tours performed, on a maximum of 12.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2020
- Study start4 Mar 2021
- Primary completion4 Jul 2021
- Study completion4 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Social IsolationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jewish General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Olivier Beauchet, Jewish General Hospital
- Investigators
- Olivier Beauchet, MD, Principal investigator, Jewish General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04593433
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021-2604
- Acronym
- VGV
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 27 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 3-month Cycle of Virtual Weekly Montreal Museum of Fine Arts Tours to Promote Social Inclusion, Well-being, Quality of Life and Health in Older Community Members : a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04593433
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VGV / 2021-2604
- Conditions
- Social Isolation, Quality of Life, Well Aging, Frailty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jewish General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Social isolation is defined as the objective and/or subjective reduction of number and quality of interpersonal contacts leading to a loss of an individual's social role and stigmatization. It is a major problem in Canadian society with a high prevalence in the older population (30% in individuals aged 65 and over, representing 1.5 million individuals). Social isolation is associated with a wide range of mental and physical health problems that leads to an increase in the use of health and social services. This issue increased with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic which attacking your society at its core. Social distancing and in particular home confinement exacerbated social isolation of frailer groups like the elderly people.
In 2016, the International Federation on Ageing reported that "the main new problem facing seniors in Canada is maintaining their social contacts and activities". This highlights the need for efficient and effective interventions to improve the social inclusion of older adults experiencing social isolation.
Research suggests that art-based activities carried out at museums have significant benefits for older adults experiencing social isolation, and may foster social inclusion, well-being, quality of life and mitigate frailty. Yet few studies have examined empirically the effects of museum art-based activities in older adults experiencing social isolation. In 2019, the principal investigator of this research conducted an experimental pilot study based on a pre-post intervention (i.e., 3-month cycle of weekly guided tours carried out at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts (MMFA)), single arm, prospective and longitudinal follow-up named "Effects of Montreal Museum of Fine Arts visits and older community dwellers with a precarious state: An experimental study", which indicated the potential of museum tours to improve social inclusion, well-being, the quality of life and frailty in older community members experiencing social isolation.
However, these studies were performed before the COVID-19 crisis and were in-site activities. The principal investigator hypothesizes that a 3-month cycle of virtual weekly MMFA tours may induce changes in well-being, quality of life and health condition in older community dwellers participating like the 'Beautiful Thursday' cycle, and that this activity can prevent the worsening of vulnerability and social isolation due to social distancing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Museum virtual guided toursGroup with the virtual museum guided tours |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Being 65 years and over
- Having an Internet access and an electronic device (smartphone and/or tablet) at the participant's place of living as the repetitive assessments for this study will be performed on the web platform of the Centre of Excellence on Longevity of McGill University, and the guided tours will be virtual.
- Understanding and writing the language of the recruitment centre (i.e., French or English)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- a concomitant participation to an experimental study,
- planning to have a journey over one week during the cycle of visits,
- having participated to a participatory art-based activity of the MMFA during the 6 month-period before the recruitment,
- not speaking the language of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Museum virtual guided toursThe intervention is a participatory art-based activity which consists in MMFA virtual guided tours. Each virtual guided tour is performed with a group of 5 participants. They meet online one time per week for a 20 to 25 min of a visit tour during a 3-month period. Each tour is different and supervised by a MMFA trained guide. | Other | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Well-being
Time frame: 3 months
using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) self-validated questionnaire composed by 14 positively worded item scale with five response categories. It covers most aspects of positive mental health (positive thoughts and feelings). Scores can range from a minimum of 14 to a maximum of 70 points. Higher scores are associated with higher levels of mental well-being
Quality of life
Time frame: 3 months
using EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), a standardized measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. It is composed of two parts: a questionnaire of five questions with score per question ranged from 1 (i.e., no issue) to 5 (i.e., worse issue), each question ranged from 0 (i.e., no issue) to 25 (i.e., worse issue), and a visual analogic scale of how good or bad participant health was. This scale is numbered from 0 (i.e., worse health participant can imagine) to 100 (i.e., best health participant can imagine).
frailty
Time frame: 3 months
using CESAM questionnaire, composed of 20 items providing two complementary information: 1) A global score of frailty ranged from 0 (i.e., best health and functional condition) to 18 (i.e., worse health and functional condition) and 2) Categorized health condition in four levels (vigorous with a score between 0 and 3, mild frailty with a score between 4 and 7, moderate frailty with a score between 8 and 12, and important frailty with a score above 12).
social isolation
Time frame: 3 months
using the digital form of the 11-item Dike Social Support Index (DSSI). The index is composed of two subscales: social interaction (i.e., frequency of interactions) and subjective support (i.e., satisfaction with emotional support provided). DSSI score ranges from 11 to 33, increased score indicating higher levels of social insertion. The scores of the 11 items are combined and categorized as low-fair (score ≤26), high (score 27-29) and very high (score 30-33). We will use the mean score of 11-item DSSI and its distribution in three categories.
socio-geriatric vulnerability
Time frame: 3 months
using ESOGER questionnaire, composed of 17 items exploring the COVID risk, the COVID past history, the social isolation risk due to COVID (access to food, home support and healthcare, contact with external persons, anxiety). Items correspond to a question in closed-ended format (i.e., yes or no, or calling for a specific answer). The ESOGER categorizes state of vulnerability in three levels (Low, Moderate and High vulnerability).
2 secondary outcomes
Incident planned and unplanned visits to physicians, Emergency Department (ED) and hospitalization
Time frame: 3 months
compliance
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Aug 2021.
Related trials for Social Isolation
Not yet recruiting
A Mobile Informatics Solution to Assist Caregivers in Care Coordination and Monitoring Social Engagement
Memory Disorders, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Recruiting
Does Attachment Anxiety Moderate the Influence of Social Rejection on Alcohol Use Among Young Adults?
Social Rejection, Attachement Style
Active, not recruiting
Multimodal Training With Immersive Virtual Reality to Improve the Cognitive Health and Emotional Well-being of Older Women Living Alone
Social Isolation in Older Adults, Poverty
Recruiting
Social Connection Collective for Older Adults in Subsidized Housing
Social Isolation in Older Adults, Social Isolation or Loneliness
Not yet recruiting
Improving Diet Quality of Community-Dwelling Seniors Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach
Diet Quality, Social Isolation in Older Adults
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olivier Beauchet, MD principal investigator
Jewish General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Museum virtual guided tours in people with Social Isolation and Quality of Life, run by Jewish General Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Well-being (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2021.