PainNCT04611451
Effect of Whole Body Vibration Exercises for Patients wıth Chronic Nonspeific Low Back Pain
A study testing classic lumbar home exercise, Whole body vibration and Whole body vibration exercise in people with Pain and Labor Pain, run by Yerkoy State Hospital.
Trial summary
Whole body vibration (WBV), which is a new treatment method and applied through the device, is defined as mechanical repetitive motion or oscillatory motion occurring around a balance point (5). Chronic nonspecific low back pain is still a serious clinical, social and economic health problem. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Labor Pain, Quality of Life
- What is being tested?
- classic lumbar home exercise, Whole body vibration and Whole body vibration exercise
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2017to 1 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion criterias are non-specific LBP (LBP other than those excluded, see exclusion criteria below) of a more than 3 months in patients aged 20 to 50 years, with average pain intensity evaluated Visaual Analog Scale (VAS) (1-10) that is higher than 5
Who cannot join
- Exclusion criterias are participants with likely specific causes of LBP This includes exclusion of history of malignancy, history of recent spinal surgery, dislocation, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis and history of weakness of lower extremity or loss of sensation in lower extremity. Additionally, current pregnancy, , lactation, uncontrolled hypertension and history of diagnosed mental health conditions that would limit adherence to the trial procedures will be excluded
About this study
Official title: Effect of Whole Body Vibration Exercises for Patients wıth Chronic Nonspeific Low Back Pain on Labor and Quality of Life: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Whole body vibration (WBV), which is a new treatment method and applied through the device, is defined as mechanical repetitive motion or oscillatory motion occurring around a balance point (5). Chronic nonspecific low back pain is still a serious clinical, social and economic health problem. There are few studies and limited evidence evaluating the effectiveness of WBV exercises in chronic nonspecific low back pain. Different protocols are used for wbv exercise in studies (6). Our aim is to compare the effects of whole body vibration exercise modality on pain, functional recovery, laboor impact, quality of life with control group in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
Read the detailed description
Low back pain is a prevalent problem all over the World. low back pain prevalence is 84% by lifetime Chronic low back pain prevalence is 23%. Low back pain causing disability prevalence is also11% (1). Increasing sedentary lifestyle and obesity, aging of the population and inappropriate ergonomic work activities and working environment in the working society contribute to this increase (2).
Chronic low back pain is an important cause of labor losses and also it is the most common functional insufficiency under 45 years of age (3). Treatment approaches such as exercise and education in which the patient is actively involved in the treatment are recommended for the treatment of non-specific acute, subacute and especially chronic low back pain (4).
Whole body vibration (WBV), which is a new treatment method and applied through the device, is defined as mechanical repetitive motion or oscillatory motion occurring around a balance point (5). Chronic nonspecific low back pain is still a serious clinical, social and economic health problem. There are few studies and limited evidence evaluating the effectiveness of WBV exercises in chronic nonspecific low back pain. Different protocols are used for wbv exercise in studies (6). Our aim is to compare the effects of whole body vibration exercise modality on pain, functional recovery, laboor impact, quality of life with control group in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
MATERYAL METHOD
This prospective, randomized and controlled study include 70 patients who were diagnosed chronic nonspecific low back pain. Patients were randomized into two groups using the 1:1 method. The first group was the treatment group in which applied the whole body vibration exercise and classical lumbar home exercise program. The second group (control) only received classical lumbar home exercise program.
Inclusion criterias are non-specific LBP (LBP other than those excluded, see exclusion criteria below) of a more than 3 months in patients aged 20 to 50 years, with average pain intensity evaluated Visaual Analog Scale (VAS) (1-10) that is higher than 5 Exclusion criterias are participants with likely specific causes of LBP This includes exclusion of history of malignancy, history of recent spinal surgery, dislocation, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis and history of weakness of lower extremity or loss of sensation in lower extremity. Additionally, current pregnancy, , lactation, uncontrolled hypertension and history of diagnosed mental health conditions that would limit adherence to the trial procedures will be excluded.
Patients in the TVT exercise group; 24 sessions of TVT exercise 3 days a week (with at least 1 day of rest between each session) was performed under the supervision of a physician for a total of 8 weeks. . The vibration was given by the Power Plate® (pro5TM; Power Plate North America, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA) device where a three-plan oscillation took place (most vertical, Z-axis).The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index is a self-reported measure of functional disability . The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index has reliability and validit(7). Quality of life was assessed using Short form-36 (SF-36). SF-36 is a widely used and validated scale in assessing quality of life. It is not specific to any disease group. Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ) was used in our study to evaluate job performance. HLQ is designed to collect quantitative data on the treatment of disease and its relationship to work performance. Intercultural adaptation was made to Turkish. HLQ data allow to estimate the production losses (costs) of paid and unpaid labor (8).
- Conditions
- Pain, Labor Pain, Quality of Life, Disability Physical
- Being tested
- classic lumbar home exercise, Whole body vibration, Whole body vibration exercise
- Keywords
- low back pain, whole body vibration, labor
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Labor Pain, Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
classic lumbar home exerciseOther
classic lumbar home exercise
Whole body vibrationDevice
Whole body vibration (WBV), which is a new treatment method and applied through the device, is defined as mechanical repetitive motion or oscillatory motion occurring around a balance point
Whole body vibration exerciseOther
Whole body vibration exercise
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| whole body vibration group | Experimental | Patients in the WBV exercise group; 24 sessions of TVT exercise 3 days a week (with at least 1 day of rest between each session) was performed under the supervision of a physician for a total of 8 weeks. Patients in the WBV exercise group were also shown a classic lumbar home exercise program and they were asked to apply for 8 weeks Receives: Other: classic lumbar home exercise; Device: Whole body vibration; Other: Whole body vibration exercise |
| exercise | Active comparator | The second group (control) only received classical lumbar home exercise program. Receives: Other: classic lumbar home exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ)
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ) was used in our study to evaluate job performance. HLQ is designed to collect quantitative data on the treatment of disease and its relationship to work performance. Intercultural adaptation was made to Turkish. HLQ data allow to estimate the production losses (costs) of paid and unpaid labor
Measured: baseline (0 day)
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ)
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ) was used in our study to evaluate job performance. HLQ is designed to collect quantitative data on the treatment of disease and its relationship to work performance. Intercultural adaptation was made to Turkish. HLQ data allow to estimate the production losses (costs) of paid and unpaid labor
Measured: 8 week
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ)
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ) was used in our study to evaluate job performance. HLQ is designed to collect quantitative data on the treatment of disease and its relationship to work performance. Intercultural adaptation was made to Turkish. HLQ data allow to estimate the production losses (costs) of paid and unpaid labor
Measured: 20 week
Quality of life Short form-36 (SF-36)
Quality of life was assessed using Short form-36 (SF-36). SF-36 is a widely used and validated scale in assessing quality of life. It is not specific to any disease group. This scale consisting of 36 questions; It has 8 subgroups as general health, physical function, physical role difficulty, pain, energy, social function, emotional role difficulty, mental health.
Measured: baseline (0 day)
Quality of life Short form-36 (SF-36)
Quality of life was assessed using Short form-36 (SF-36). SF-36 is a widely used and validated scale in assessing quality of life. It is not specific to any disease group. This scale consisting of 36 questions; It has 8 subgroups as general health, physical function, physical role difficulty, pain, energy, social function, emotional role difficulty, mental health.
Measured: 8 week
Quality of life Short form-36 (SF-36)
Quality of life was assessed using Short form-36 (SF-36). SF-36 is a widely used and validated scale in assessing quality of life. It is not specific to any disease group. This scale consisting of 36 questions; It has 8 subgroups as general health, physical function, physical role difficulty, pain, energy, social function, emotional role difficulty, mental health.
Measured: 20 week
Visual Analog Scale
Visual Analog Scale was used for pain
Measured: baseline (0 day)
Visual Analog Scale
Visual Analog Scale was used for pain
Measured: 8 week
Visual Analog Scale
Visual Analog Scale was used for pain
Measured: 20 week
Secondary outcomes (3)
disability
The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index is a self-reported measure of functional disability consisting of 18 questions about various activities related to back pain. Each question has 6 possible responses ranging from 0 to 5, with a total possible maximum score of 50. The total Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index score is with higher percentages indicating greater levels of self-reported disability. The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index has reliability and validit(7).
Measured: baseline (0 day)
disability
The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index is a self-reported measure of functional disability consisting of 18 questions about various activities related to back pain. Each question has 6 possible responses ranging from 0 to 5, with a total possible maximum score of 50. The total Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index score is with higher percentages indicating greater levels of self-reported disability. The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index has reliability and validit(7).
Measured: 8 week
disability
The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index is a self-reported measure of functional disability consisting of 18 questions about various activities related to back pain. Each question has 6 possible responses ranging from 0 to 5, with a total possible maximum score of 50. The total Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index score is with higher percentages indicating greater levels of self-reported disability. The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index has reliability and validit(7).
Measured: 20 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2017
- Primary completion15 Oct 2020
- Study completion1 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yerkoy State Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Başak Çiğdem Karaçay, Yerkoy State Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04611451
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016/70
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):482-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60610-7. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
PubMed 21982256Weiner SS, Nordin M. Prevention and management of chronic back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;24(2):267-79. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.12.001.
PubMed 20227647Ladeira CE. Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 May-Jun;15(3):190-9. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011000300004.
PubMed 21829982Sitja Rabert M, Rigau Comas D, Fort Vanmeerhaeghe A, Santoyo Medina C, Roque i Figuls M, Romero-Rodriguez D, Bonfill Cosp X. Whole-body vibration training for patients with neurodegenerative disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD009097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009097.pub2.
PubMed 22336858Perraton L, Machotka Z, Kumar S. Whole-body vibration to treat low back pain: fact or fad? Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):88-93. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009.44. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
PubMed 22210985Duruoz MT, Ozcan E, Ketenci A, Karan A. Development and validation of a functional disability index for chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(1):45-54. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00349.
PubMed 23411648McGorry RW, Webster BS, Snook SH, Hsiang SM. The relation between pain intensity, disability, and the episodic nature of chronic and recurrent low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 1;25(7):834-41. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200004010-00012.
PubMed 10751295cakar E, Özcan E, Özgörgü E, Durmuş O, Karan A, Kıralp MZ. Health and labour questionnaire: Turkish adaptation for ankylosing spondylitis. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg. 2012;58(3):205-12.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Whole Body Vibration Exercises for Patients wıth Chronic Nonspeific Low Back Pain on Labor and Quality of Life: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04611451
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016/70
- Conditions
- Pain, Labor Pain, Quality of Life, Disability Physical
- Keywords
- low back pain, whole body vibration, labor
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yerkoy State HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Whole body vibration (WBV), which is a new treatment method and applied through the device, is defined as mechanical repetitive motion or oscillatory motion occurring around a balance point (5). Chronic nonspecific low back pain is still a serious clinical, social and economic health problem. There are few studies and limited evidence evaluating the effectiveness of WBV exercises in chronic nonspecific low back pain. Different protocols are used for wbv exercise in studies (6). Our aim is to compare the effects of whole body vibration exercise modality on pain, functional recovery, laboor impact, quality of life with control group in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
Detailed description
Low back pain is a prevalent problem all over the World. low back pain prevalence is 84% by lifetime Chronic low back pain prevalence is 23%. Low back pain causing disability prevalence is also11% (1). Increasing sedentary lifestyle and obesity, aging of the population and inappropriate ergonomic work activities and working environment in the working society contribute to this increase (2).
Chronic low back pain is an important cause of labor losses and also it is the most common functional insufficiency under 45 years of age (3). Treatment approaches such as exercise and education in which the patient is actively involved in the treatment are recommended for the treatment of non-specific acute, subacute and especially chronic low back pain (4).
Whole body vibration (WBV), which is a new treatment method and applied through the device, is defined as mechanical repetitive motion or oscillatory motion occurring around a balance point (5). Chronic nonspecific low back pain is still a serious clinical, social and economic health problem. There are few studies and limited evidence evaluating the effectiveness of WBV exercises in chronic nonspecific low back pain. Different protocols are used for wbv exercise in studies (6). Our aim is to compare the effects of whole body vibration exercise modality on pain, functional recovery, laboor impact, quality of life with control group in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
MATERYAL METHOD
This prospective, randomized and controlled study include 70 patients who were diagnosed chronic nonspecific low back pain. Patients were randomized into two groups using the 1:1 method. The first group was the treatment group in which applied the whole body vibration exercise and classical lumbar home exercise program. The second group (control) only received classical lumbar home exercise program.
Inclusion criterias are non-specific LBP (LBP other than those excluded, see exclusion criteria below) of a more than 3 months in patients aged 20 to 50 years, with average pain intensity evaluated Visaual Analog Scale (VAS) (1-10) that is higher than 5 Exclusion criterias are participants with likely specific causes of LBP This includes exclusion of history of malignancy, history of recent spinal surgery, dislocation, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis and history of weakness of lower extremity or loss of sensation in lower extremity. Additionally, current pregnancy, , lactation, uncontrolled hypertension and history of diagnosed mental health conditions that would limit adherence to the trial procedures will be excluded.
Patients in the TVT exercise group; 24 sessions of TVT exercise 3 days a week (with at least 1 day of rest between each session) was performed under the supervision of a physician for a total of 8 weeks. . The vibration was given by the Power Plate® (pro5TM; Power Plate North America, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA) device where a three-plan oscillation took place (most vertical, Z-axis).The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index is a self-reported measure of functional disability . The Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability index has reliability and validit(7). Quality of life was assessed using Short form-36 (SF-36). SF-36 is a widely used and validated scale in assessing quality of life. It is not specific to any disease group. Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ) was used in our study to evaluate job performance. HLQ is designed to collect quantitative data on the treatment of disease and its relationship to work performance. Intercultural adaptation was made to Turkish. HLQ data allow to estimate the production losses (costs) of paid and unpaid labor (8).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| whole body vibration group | Experimental | Other: classic lumbar home exercise, Device: Whole body vibration, Other: Whole body vibration exercisePatients in the WBV exercise group; 24 sessions of TVT exercise 3 days a week (with at least 1 day of rest between each session) was performed under the supervision of a physician for a total of 8 weeks. Patients in the WBV exercise group were also shown a classic lumbar home exercise program and they were asked to apply for 8 weeks |
| exercise | Active comparator | Other: classic lumbar home exerciseThe second group (control) only received classical lumbar home exercise program. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inclusion criterias are non-specific LBP (LBP other than those excluded, see exclusion criteria below) of a more than 3 months in patients aged 20 to 50 years, with average pain intensity evaluated Visaual Analog Scale (VAS) (1-10) that is higher than 5
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Exclusion criterias are participants with likely specific causes of LBP This includes exclusion of history of malignancy, history of recent spinal surgery, dislocation, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis and history of weakness of lower extremity or loss of sensation in lower extremity. Additionally, current pregnancy, , lactation, uncontrolled hypertension and history of diagnosed mental health conditions that would limit adherence to the trial procedures will be excluded
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| classic lumbar home exerciseclassic lumbar home exercise | Other | exercise, whole body vibration group |
| Whole body vibrationWhole body vibration (WBV), which is a new treatment method and applied through the device, is defined as mechanical repetitive motion or oscillatory motion occurring around a balance point | Device | whole body vibration group |
| Whole body vibration exerciseWhole body vibration exercise | Other | whole body vibration group |
Primary outcome
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ)
Time frame: baseline (0 day)
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ) was used in our study to evaluate job performance. HLQ is designed to collect quantitative data on the treatment of disease and its relationship to work performance. Intercultural adaptation was made to Turkish. HLQ data allow to estimate the production losses (costs) of paid and unpaid labor
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ)
Time frame: 8 week
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ) was used in our study to evaluate job performance. HLQ is designed to collect quantitative data on the treatment of disease and its relationship to work performance. Intercultural adaptation was made to Turkish. HLQ data allow to estimate the production losses (costs) of paid and unpaid labor
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ)
Time frame: 20 week
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ) was used in our study to evaluate job performance. HLQ is designed to collect quantitative data on the treatment of disease and its relationship to work performance. Intercultural adaptation was made to Turkish. HLQ data allow to estimate the production losses (costs) of paid and unpaid labor
Quality of life Short form-36 (SF-36)
Time frame: baseline (0 day)
Quality of life was assessed using Short form-36 (SF-36). SF-36 is a widely used and validated scale in assessing quality of life. It is not specific to any disease group. This scale consisting of 36 questions; It has 8 subgroups as general health, physical function, physical role difficulty, pain, energy, social function, emotional role difficulty, mental health.
Quality of life Short form-36 (SF-36)
Time frame: 8 week
Quality of life was assessed using Short form-36 (SF-36). SF-36 is a widely used and validated scale in assessing quality of life. It is not specific to any disease group. This scale consisting of 36 questions; It has 8 subgroups as general health, physical function, physical role difficulty, pain, energy, social function, emotional role difficulty, mental health.
Quality of life Short form-36 (SF-36)
Time frame: 20 week
Quality of life was assessed using Short form-36 (SF-36). SF-36 is a widely used and validated scale in assessing quality of life. It is not specific to any disease group. This scale consisting of 36 questions; It has 8 subgroups as general health, physical function, physical role difficulty, pain, energy, social function, emotional role difficulty, mental health.
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: baseline (0 day)
Visual Analog Scale was used for pain
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: 8 week
Visual Analog Scale was used for pain
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: 20 week
Visual Analog Scale was used for pain
3 secondary outcomes
disability
Time frame: baseline (0 day)
disability
Time frame: 8 week
disability
Time frame: 20 week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2022.
- Background: PubMed 21982256Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):482-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60610-7. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
- Background: PubMed 20227647Weiner SS, Nordin M. Prevention and management of chronic back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;24(2):267-79. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.12.001.
- Background: PubMed 21829982Ladeira CE. Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 May-Jun;15(3):190-9. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011000300004.
- Background: PubMed 22336858Sitja Rabert M, Rigau Comas D, Fort Vanmeerhaeghe A, Santoyo Medina C, Roque i Figuls M, Romero-Rodriguez D, Bonfill Cosp X. Whole-body vibration training for patients with neurodegenerative disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD009097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009097.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 22210985Perraton L, Machotka Z, Kumar S. Whole-body vibration to treat low back pain: fact or fad? Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):88-93. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009.44. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
- Background: PubMed 23411648Duruoz MT, Ozcan E, Ketenci A, Karan A. Development and validation of a functional disability index for chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(1):45-54. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00349.
- Background: PubMed 10751295McGorry RW, Webster BS, Snook SH, Hsiang SM. The relation between pain intensity, disability, and the episodic nature of chronic and recurrent low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 1;25(7):834-41. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200004010-00012.
- Backgroundcakar E, Özcan E, Özgörgü E, Durmuş O, Karan A, Kıralp MZ. Health and labour questionnaire: Turkish adaptation for ankylosing spondylitis. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg. 2012;58(3):205-12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing classic lumbar home exercise, Whole body vibration and Whole body vibration exercise in people with Pain and Labor Pain, run by Yerkoy State Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ) (time frame: baseline (0 day)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04611451, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2022.