Lung Transplant RejectionNCT04792294
Multicenter Analysis of Efficacy and Outcomes of Extracorporeal Photopheresis as Treatment of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction
An observational study of Lung Transplant Rejection, run by Medical University of Vienna.
Trial summary
Lung transplantation is an established therapy for end-stage lung disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. However, Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Transplant Rejection
- What is being tested?
- Extracorporeal photopheresis
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 800 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2005to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction who received extracorporeal photopheresis as treatment
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of CLAD Adult transplant recipients (>18 years)
Who cannot join
- ECP for other diagnosis Recipients of multi-organ transplantation Recipients of single lung transplantation
About this study
Lung transplantation is an established therapy for end-stage lung disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. However, Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors. The 5-year survival rate is reported to be 50%, which is considerably inferior compared to other solid organ transplantation. In addition, the financial burden of CLAD (around 80.000 euro/year for a patient with CLAD) is considerable. No curative therapy is available yet. To date, the two most effective treatment are azithromycin and extracorporeal photopheresis. Azithromycin is used as first-line treatment and it is effective in stopping FEV1 decline, however its effects are only limited to a set of patients. ECP can be used as second-line treatment in patients unresponsive to azithromycin. ECP has been firstly developed for treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphomas and later used in a variety of other indications including solid organ transplantation. The process starts with leukapheresis, followed by incubation of the isolated cells with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and subsequent activation of 8-MOP with ultraviolet A radiation. At the end, the cells are reinfused into the patient. 8-MOP is a biologically inert substance, but in the presence of UVA light it cross-links DNA by forming covalent bonds with pyrimidine bases and causes apoptosis. ECP is effective in the palliative treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma but its effectiveness was also shown in several other T-cell-mediated diseases, particularly in the treatment and prevention of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. In depth knowledge on the mechanisms whereby ECP manipulates the immune system are still unclear. Most of the experimental studies have been performed in murine models of GvHD. Apoptotic cells isolated during ECP treatment have the potential to induce IL-10 secretion, reduce dendritic cells activation and increase percentage of Tregs. In addition, ECP reduces the production of IL-6 and TNF-α and increases TGF-β production. In lung transplantation, ECP treatment is used as second-line treatment of CLAD and it has the potential to stabilize lung function decline and to improve long-term graft. According to the published literature, however, approximately 30 to 40% of treated recipients did not profit from ECP. Greer and colleagues found that RAS patients as well as rapid lung function decliners showed lower rate of response and worse long-term outcomes. On the contrary in a more recent analysis only BOS diagnosis was associated with better outcomes. A single prospective interventional study was published by our group and it confirmed results from other previous retrospective analysis. Up to now, no clear predictors for response have been identified yet.
- Conditions
- Lung Transplant Rejection
- Being tested
- Extracorporeal photopheresis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Extracorporeal photopheresisDevice
ECP can be used as second-line treatment in patients unresponsive to azithromycin. ECP has been firstly developed for treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphomas and later used in a variety of other indications including solid organ transplantation. The process starts with leukapheresis, followed by incubation of the isolated cells with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and subsequent activation of 8-MOP with ultraviolet A radiation. At the end, the cells are reinfused into the patient. 8-MOP is a biologically inert substance, but in the presence of UVA light it cross-links DNA by forming covalent bonds with pyrimidine bases and causes apoptosis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction | Lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction, who underwent extracorporeal photopheresis Receives: Device: Extracorporeal photopheresis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in forced expiratory value in 1 second at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Percentage change in FEV1 within 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
change in maximal expiratory flow (50%) at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Percentage change in MEF50 within 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Measured: 3 months
Change in forced expiratory value in 1 second/dorced vital capacity ratio at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Percentage change in FEV1/FVC within 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Measured: 3 months
Change in total lung capacity at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Percentage change in TLC within 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Measured: 3 months
Patients' survival
Patients' survival
Measured: Within 5 years from start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Graft survival
Graft survival
Measured: Within 5 years from start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Adverse events on extracorporeal photopheresis
Adverse events on extracorporeal photopheresis
Measured: Within 5 years from start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2021
- Study start1 Jan 2005
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung Transplant RejectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of ViennaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alberto Benazzo, Medical University of Vienna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04792294
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1541/2020
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter Analysis of Efficacy and Outcomes of Extracorporeal Photopheresis as Treatment of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04792294
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1541/2020
- Conditions
- Lung Transplant Rejection
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of ViennaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2005 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lung transplantation is an established therapy for end-stage lung disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. However, Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors. The 5-year survival rate is reported to be 50%, which is considerably inferior compared to other solid organ transplantation. In addition, the financial burden of CLAD (around 80.000 euro/year for a patient with CLAD) is considerable. No curative therapy is available yet. To date, the two most effective treatment are azithromycin and extracorporeal photopheresis. Azithromycin is used as first-line treatment and it is effective in stopping FEV1 decline, however its effects are only limited to a set of patients. ECP can be used as second-line treatment in patients unresponsive to azithromycin. ECP has been firstly developed for treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphomas and later used in a variety of other indications including solid organ transplantation. The process starts with leukapheresis, followed by incubation of the isolated cells with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and subsequent activation of 8-MOP with ultraviolet A radiation. At the end, the cells are reinfused into the patient. 8-MOP is a biologically inert substance, but in the presence of UVA light it cross-links DNA by forming covalent bonds with pyrimidine bases and causes apoptosis. ECP is effective in the palliative treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma but its effectiveness was also shown in several other T-cell-mediated diseases, particularly in the treatment and prevention of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. In depth knowledge on the mechanisms whereby ECP manipulates the immune system are still unclear. Most of the experimental studies have been performed in murine models of GvHD. Apoptotic cells isolated during ECP treatment have the potential to induce IL-10 secretion, reduce dendritic cells activation and increase percentage of Tregs. In addition, ECP reduces the production of IL-6 and TNF-α and increases TGF-β production. In lung transplantation, ECP treatment is used as second-line treatment of CLAD and it has the potential to stabilize lung function decline and to improve long-term graft. According to the published literature, however, approximately 30 to 40% of treated recipients did not profit from ECP. Greer and colleagues found that RAS patients as well as rapid lung function decliners showed lower rate of response and worse long-term outcomes. On the contrary in a more recent analysis only BOS diagnosis was associated with better outcomes. A single prospective interventional study was published by our group and it confirmed results from other previous retrospective analysis. Up to now, no clear predictors for response have been identified yet.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction | – | Device: Extracorporeal photopheresisLung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction, who underwent extracorporeal photopheresis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction who received extracorporeal photopheresis as treatment
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Diagnosis of CLAD Adult transplant recipients (>18 years)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- ECP for other diagnosis Recipients of multi-organ transplantation Recipients of single lung transplantation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Extracorporeal photopheresisECP can be used as second-line treatment in patients unresponsive to azithromycin. ECP has been firstly developed for treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphomas and later used in a variety of other indications including solid organ transplantation. The process starts with leukapheresis, followed by incubation of the isolated cells with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and subsequent activation of 8-MOP with ultraviolet A radiation. At the end, the cells are reinfused into the patient. 8-MOP is a biologically inert substance, but in the presence of UVA light it cross-links DNA by forming covalent bonds with pyrimidine bases and causes apoptosis. | Device | Lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction |
Primary outcome
Change in forced expiratory value in 1 second at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage change in FEV1 within 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
6 secondary outcomes
change in maximal expiratory flow (50%) at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Time frame: 3 months
Change in forced expiratory value in 1 second/dorced vital capacity ratio at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Time frame: 3 months
Change in total lung capacity at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Time frame: 3 months
Patients' survival
Time frame: Within 5 years from start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Graft survival
Time frame: Within 5 years from start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Adverse events on extracorporeal photopheresis
Time frame: Within 5 years from start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2021.
Related trials for Lung Transplant Rejection
RecruitingPhase 1
Syk Inhibition in MItigating Lung Allograft Rejection (SIMILAR): A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Fostamatinib in Lung Transplant Patients With Donor-Specific Antibodies
Lung Transplantation
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Test How Effective Belumosudil Tablets Are for Treating Adult Participants With Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction
Lung Transplant Rejection
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Siltuximab for the Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Lung Transplantation
Antibody Mediated Rejection of Lung Transplant
RecruitingPhase 2
Belumosudil to Block Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) in High Risk Lung Transplant Recipients
Lung Transplant
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Multicenter Research on Donor and Recipient Management Strategies to Improve Lung Transplant Outcomes
Lung Transplant; Complications, Lung Transplant; Infection or Inflammation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Transplant Rejection, run by Medical University of Vienna.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in forced expiratory value in 1 second at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2021.