AzTrials
AzTrials

Adherence, PatientNCT04887779

Pathologist Lung Transplant Study

A study testing Pathologist intervention in people with Adherence, Patient and Psychological, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Using a prospective qualitative approach, explore whether pathologist intervention is feasible as part of multimodal multidisciplinary care model for transplant patients in effecting psychological dimensions such as experience, satisfaction, or patient's understanding of their disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Adherence, Patient, Psychological, Coping Skills
What is being tested?
Pathologist intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2021to 1 Aug 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Lung transplant patient, transplanted after IRB approval of study -Transplanted primarily for COPD
  • English speaking
  • within three months of initial transplant (prior to initial discharge)
  • > 18 years old

Who cannot join

  • Transplant indication other than COPD
  • <18 year old
  • Non English speaking

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UPMC Presbyterian Hospital

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pathologist Led Intervention To Improve Psychological Outcomes and Adherence in Lung Transplant Patients

Using a prospective qualitative approach, explore whether pathologist intervention is feasible as part of multimodal multidisciplinary care model for transplant patients in effecting psychological dimensions such as experience, satisfaction, or patient's understanding of their disease. Additionally, to examine if this intervention improves medication adherence.

Read the detailed description

Specific Aims 1. Create post-transplant pathologist-led intervention Objective 1a: Recruit 10 patients who have undergone lung transplantation primarily for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Use pathologist to show gross/microscopic explanted organs.

Specific Aim 2. Assess the efficacy of intervention pilot Objective 2a: Immediate (within 1 day after pathologist intervention) phone interview to access patient's reaction, feelings, and experience with intervention and understanding of disease.

Objective 2b: 1 month later, phone interview asking questions related to medication adherence, patient experience with intervention and lung transplant overall, and patient understanding of disease. Results will be compared to first interview.

Objective 2c: Analyze Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) for quality of life, Basel assessment of adherence to immunosuppressive medications scale (BAASIS) as a self report adherence measure, and conduct a mixed methods/grounded theory analysis of qualitative data (patient experience, disease understanding). This analysis will systematically identify themes, and assign these descriptive words.

Specific Aim 3: Finalize intervention protocol based on pilot testing. Objective 3a. Adjust and refine the content and process of intervention protocol based on findings of pilot study Objective 3b. Final changes will assure readiness for large scale study.

Being tested
Pathologist intervention
Medical subject headings
Patient Compliance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pathologist interventionBehavioural

    viewing explanted organ and microscopy

Study groups in NCT04887779
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalPatient viewing ex-planted organ and microscopy with pathologist
Receives: Behavioral: Pathologist intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS©)

    The Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS©) was developed to assess adherence to immunosuppressive drugs in adult and adolescent transplant recipients. Initiation starts when a patient takes his/her first dose of medication. This is a binary event (yes/no). Implementation of the dosing regimen refers to "the extent to which a patient's actual dosing corresponds to the prescribed dosing regimen, from initiation until the last dose is taken" and implies a dosing history.

    Discontinuation refers to "the moment that the patient discontinues his/her medication regimen" and is assessed as a time to event. Persistence is thus the duration between time of initiation and the moment the last dose is taken. Any yes response demonstrates issues with medication adherence.

    Measured: one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later

  2. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)

    The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire is an 8 item measure of client satisfaction. An "overall score" is calculated by summing the respondent's rating (item rating) score for each scale item. Scores therefore range from 8 to 32, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction. with services with both a parent intervention versus averages of lung transplant patients.

    Measured: one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Patient understanding

    Assess if patient has gained more understanding of their condition. No specific scale used, assessed by interview.

    Measured: one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later

  2. Patient experience

    Discussing patient's overall experience. No specific scale used, assessed by interview.

    Measured: one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2021
  2. Study startDec 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2022 (estimated)

Why it stopped: personale shortage

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Prospective, no blinding or randomization
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04887779
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY19060024
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
11 May 2021
Last updated
21 Feb 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pathologist intervention in people with Adherence, Patient and Psychological, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS©) (time frame: one day after intervention and assessment for change one month later). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in