AzTrials
AzTrials

Critically IllNCT04896515

INTENT-Muscle (A Sub-study of INTENT)

An observational study of Critically Ill, run by Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre at 6 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The currently recruiting randomised controlled trial "Intensive Nutrition Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Critically Ill Adults" (INTENT, NCT03292237) is the first multi-centre trial to compare an intensive, individualised nutrition intervention to standard care for the duration of hospital admission in critically… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Critically Ill
What is being tested?
Supplemental parenteral nutrition
How many people
21 participants
Where
6 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
21 Jun 2021to 27 Feb 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Sixty to eighty critically ill patients from up to 6 participating INTENT sites in Australia and New Zealand will be recruited to INTENT-Muscle

Who may be able to join

  • Randomised to the INTENT trial at a participating sub-study site

Who cannot join

  • Patients will be excluded from the sub-study if they have any of the following:
  • A pacemaker or electronic implantable device
  • Missing limb(s)
  • Unable to get adequate separation in the limbs (e.g. severe obesity)
  • Inaccessible site(s) for electrode placement (e.g. major burns, trauma)
  • Broken skin at the site(s) of electrode placement
  • The treating clinician does not believe the study to be in the best interest of the patient
  • Person responsible/Medical treatment decision maker is of non-English speaking background (therefore cannot provide informed consent) Note Before: If the Person responsible/medical treatment decision maker is of English speaking background but the patient is not (and the Person responsible/Medical treatment decision maker speaks the same language as the patient) you may continue assessing the patient for eligibility to INTENT-Muscle as the Person Responsible/Medical treatment decision maker can translate the Patient Information and Consent Form (PICF) and consent discussion with the patient in order to obtain continuing consent)

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 2 countries.

6 sites in 2 countries

Australia5 sites
  • Ballarat Base Hospital

    Ballarat, Victoria, 3353

  • Blacktown Hospital

    Blacktown, New South Wales, 2148

  • Frankston Hospital

    Frankston, Victoria, 3199

  • Nepean Hospital

    Kingswood, New South Wales, 2747

  • The Alfred Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3004

Other trials in Australia

New Zealand1 site
  • Auckland Hospital (CVICU)

    Auckland, 1023

Other trials in New Zealand

About this study

Official title: Intensive Nutrition Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomised Pilot Trial - Muscle (a Sub-study of INTENT)

The currently recruiting randomised controlled trial "Intensive Nutrition Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Critically Ill Adults" (INTENT, NCT03292237) is the first multi-centre trial to compare an intensive, individualised nutrition intervention to standard care for the duration of hospital admission in critically ill patients. INTENT-Muscle, is an observational longitudinal study nested within INTENT. The aim of INTENT-Muscle is to compare longitudinal changes in muscle health (assessed by bioimpedance and muscle ultrasound) in critically ill patients randomised to each arm of INTENT.

Read the detailed description

Background: Critically ill patients may experience debilitating loss of muscle mass and strength, leading to substantial functional impairments both during and long after hospitalisation. Little is known about what therapies may attenuate deterioration of muscle health (muscle mass and muscle quality) in this setting but nutrition is thought to be important, based on the physiological response to critical illness.

The currently recruiting randomised controlled trial (RCT) "Intensive Nutrition Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Critically Ill Adults" (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03292237) is the first multi-centre trial to provide an individualised nutrition intervention for the duration of hospital admission in critically ill patients. Combining the most promising and novel bedside techniques for objectively measuring muscle health (bioimpedance technology and ultrasound) with a whole hospital nutrition intervention has never been done before, and will provide crucial data to understand the relationship between nutrition delivery and changes in muscularity from ICU admission to hospital discharge.

Aim: To explore changes in muscle health in response to an individualised nutrition intervention and in association with clinical and functional outcomes, using clinically applicable bedside techniques.

Secondary aims:

In both arms of INTENT to:

  1. Compare longitudinal changes in bioimpedance variables (fat-free mass, normally hydrated lean tissue, extracellular/intracellular ratio, and variables from Cole modelling) to hospital discharge (or day 28)
  2. Compare longitudinal changes in ultrasound variables (mid-upper arm and quadriceps muscle thickness, rectus femoris cross-sectional area, and rectus femoris echogenicity) to hospital discharge (or day 28)
  3. Compare clinical and functional outcomes in patients identified as having low muscularity (assessed by ultrasound) at ICU admission
  4. Investigate the relationship between bioimpedance and ultrasound variables with clinical and functional outcomes at baseline and over the hospital admission (collected as part of INTENT)

Hypothesis: In critically ill patients receiving individualised nutrition care for the duration of hospital admission (censored at study day 28), declines in phase angle and muscle health will be attenuated compared to patients receiving standard nutritional care.

Conditions
Critically Ill
Being tested
Supplemental parenteral nutrition
Keywords
Critically ill, Critical illness, Muscle, Nutrition, Intensive care unit, Ward, Ultrasound, Adult
Medical subject headings
Critical Illness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Supplemental parenteral nutritionDietary supplement

    Supplemental parenteral nutrition OLIMEL N12E (Baxter Healthcare Corporation)

Study groups in NCT04896515
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard Nutrition ArmIn INTENT (the parent study) participants will be randomised to the i) Standard Nutrition or ii) Intensive Nutrition arm. A brief description of each is below. In ICU: 1. After enrolment, patients allocated to the standard nutrition therapy (control) group will commence or continue nutrition via an enteral tube to a target rate according to unit protocol including the use of promotility agents and the placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes if required. 2. Parenteral Nutrition (PN) will only be used if the above methods have been attempted, or an absolute contraindication to enteral nutrition (EN) develops. After ICU: 1. Nutrition management will be as per usual site management at that hospital.
Intensive Nutrition ArmIn ICU: 1. Supplemental PN will be commenced within 2 hours of randomisation. The starting dose will be determined by the amount of energy received in the 24 hours prior to randomisation 2. The need for the intervention will be based on the adequacy of nutrition provision and assessed daily until ICU discharge 3. If there is an interruption of EN for greater than 2 hours the PN must be run at 20 kcal/kg calculated body weight until EN is recommenced. After the interruption, EN should be recommenced as per local protocol. After ICU: 1. An intensive nutrition intervention will be provided on the ward. The goal of nutrition care across the hospital stay will be to ensure 80-100% of participant's estimated energy requirements are met.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Supplemental parenteral nutrition

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Phase angle

    To compare longitudinal changes in phase angle during hospital admission in patients randomised to both arms of INTENT.

    Measured: Hospital admission (censored at study day 28)

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change in bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) derived phase angle

    Change in BIS-derived phase angle from baseline to hospital discharge and every 7 days between

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  2. Change in BIS-derived impedance ratio

    Change in BIS-derived impedance ratio from baseline to hospital discharge and every 7 days between.

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  3. Change in BIS-derived fat-free mass

    Change in BIS-derived fat-free mass (kg) from baseline to hospital discharge and every 7 days between.

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  4. Change in BIS-derived normally-hydrated lean tissue

    Change in BIS-derived normally-hydrated lean tissue (kg) (generated using the Chamney model) from baseline to hospital discharge and every 7 days between.

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  5. Change in BIS-derived Cole model variable R infinity to R0

    Change in BIS-derived Cole model variable R infinity to R0 from baseline to hospital discharge and every 7 days between.

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  6. Change in BIS-derived characteristic frequency (ωc, a Cole model variable)

    Change in BIS-derived Cole model variable characteristic frequency (ωc) from baseline to hospital discharge and every 7 days between.

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  7. Change in BIS-derived membrane capacitance (a Cole model variable)

    Change in BIS-derived Cole model variable membrane capacitance from baseline to hospital discharge and every 7 days between.

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  8. Change in BIS-derived extra-cellular water

    Change in BIS-derived extracellular water from baseline to hospital discharge and every 7 days between.

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  9. Change in BIS-derived intracellular water

    Change in BIS-derived intracellular water from baseline to hospital discharge and every 7 days between.

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  10. Change in ultrasound-derived Rectus femoris cross-sectional area

    Change in ultrasound-derived Rectus femoris cross-sectional area (cm2) from baseline to hospital discharge and at measurement points (every 7 days during hospital admission).

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  11. Change in ultrasound-derived mid-upper arm muscle thickness

    Change in ultrasound-derived muscle thickness (in centimetres) at the mid-upper arm from baseline to hospital discharge and at measurement points (every 7 days during hospital admission).

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  12. Change in ultrasound-derived bilateral quadriceps muscle thickness

    Change in ultrasound-derived bilateral quadriceps muscle thickness (in centimetres) from baseline to hospital discharge and at measurement points (every 7 days during hospital admission).

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  13. Change in ultrasound-derived Rectus femoris echogenicity

    Change in ultrasound-derived Rectus femoris echogenicity from baseline to hospital discharge and at measurement points (every 7 days during hospital admission).

    Measured: Every 7 days during hospital admission (censored to study day 28)

  14. Muscle mass at ICU admission

    An estimate of whole-body muscularity at ICU admission (enrolment) will be assessed by ultrasound

    Measured: Baseline (Enrolment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2021
  2. Study start21 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion27 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion27 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04896515
Sponsor's protocol ID
ANZIC-RC/ER003
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
15 Apr 2021
Last updated
24 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Critically Ill, run by Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre at 6 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Australia, New Zealand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Phase angle (time frame: Hospital admission (censored at study day 28)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in