AzTrials
AzTrials

GoalsNCT04977206

Engaging Patients in Mutual Goal-Setting in Hospitalized Patients

A study testing Mutual Goal-Setting Education in people with Goals, run by Marquette University at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mutual goal setting and action planning in patients with long-term conditions in outpatient settings is associated with favorable effects on measures of physical health, psychological health, subjective health status, self-management self-efficacy levels, activation levels, and perceived empowerment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Goals
What is being tested?
Mutual Goal-Setting Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 May 2022to 30 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 18 years of age or older
  • Must be alert and oriented to person, place, and time
  • Inpatient on one of two included units

Who cannot join

  • Less than 24 hour length of stay
  • Non English-speaking

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Teresa A Jerofke-Owen, PhD contact

2624423696

teresa.jerofke@marquette.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Froedtert Memorial Hospital

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

    Kristi Opper, MSN, 414-454-7357

    Teresa Jerofke-Owen, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Mutual goal setting and action planning in patients with long-term conditions in outpatient settings is associated with favorable effects on measures of physical health, psychological health, subjective health status, self-management self-efficacy levels, activation levels, and perceived empowerment. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of an educational intervention delivered to the staff nurses of two surgical units on how to engage patients in mutual goal-setting in the acute care setting. Staff nurses from two 32-bed surgical units will be scheduled to attend an hour-long educational intervention. A total of 630 chart audits will be conducted one month prior and one and three months following the intervention per unit, to examine the number of patients with a daily goal recorded in the prior 24 hours and the quality of the recorded goal using the SMART-GEM. The self-efficacy of engaging in mutual goal-setting with patients will be examined by asking nurses to complete the Appraisal Inventory Tool (AIT) prior to and immediately following the intervention. The patient experience of engaging in mutual goal-setting will be examined by having a total of 165 patients complete the Patient Experience of Mutual Goal-Setting Tool (PEMGST) one month prior to the intervention and one and three months following the intervention on each of the two units.

Conditions
Goals
Being tested
Mutual Goal-Setting Education

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mutual Goal-Setting EducationOther

    Nurses will receive both written and verbal instruction on mutual goal-setting with patients using SMART methodology

Study groups in NCT04977206
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No InterventionNo interventionPatients receiving usual care
InterventionExperimentalPatient's receiving care following nurse education on mutual goal-setting
Receives: Other: Mutual Goal-Setting Education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in percentage of charts reviewed with an individualized goal recorded in the electronic health record

    percentage of charts reviewed with individualized goals recorded in their electronic health record

    Measured: Over the course of one month before delivery of education intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in quality of goals as measured by the SMART-GEM.

    Quality of charted individualized goals using talhe SMART-GEM tool. The SMART-GEM (Bowman, Mogensen, Marsland, \& Lannin, 2015) is an objective tool that can be used to score the quality of a SMART goal. The interrater agreement on total scores was very good (ICC=.0895, 95% CI = .743 to .986, p=.001) with excellent internal consistency (alpha = .995).

    Measured: Over the course of one month before delivery of education intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention

  2. Change in patient experience with mutual goal-setting using the Patient Experience of Mutual Goal-Setting Tool.

    Patient experience with mutual goal setting using the Patient Experience of Mutual Goal-Setting Tool, a 5-item survey created by PI to measure the patient experience of mutual goal-setting (involvement, satisfaction, knowledge, feeling heard, achievement of goals). Questions are on a 6-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable experience.

    Measured: Over the course of one month before delivery of educational intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention

  3. Change in nurse self-efficacy participating in mutual goal-setting with patients pre and post-intervention using the Appraisal Inventory Tool.

    Nurse self-efficacy participating in mutual goal-setting with patients. The Appraisal Inventory Tool is a 5-item survey created by PI to measure nurse self-efficacy for mutual goal-setting using Bandura's (2006) guidelines. The items use an 11-point Likert scale, and higher scores indicate a higher self-efficacy score

    Measured: Immediately before starting the educational intervention and immediately following the conclusion of the educational intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2021
  2. Study start19 May 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04977206
Sponsor's protocol ID
HR-3725
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
22 Jun 2021
Last updated
26 May 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Jerofke-Owen TA, Opper K, Beiler J, Singh M. An Educational Intervention on Mutual Goal Setting for Hospital Nurses: A Mixed-Methods Study. West J Nurs Res. 2026 Jan;48(1):4-14. doi: 10.1177/01939459251384711. Epub 2025 Nov 5.

    PubMed 41190497

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mutual Goal-Setting Education in people with Goals, run by Marquette University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Teresa A Jerofke-Owen, PhD (2624423696, teresa.jerofke@marquette.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in percentage of charts reviewed with an individualized goal recorded in the electronic health record (time frame: Over the course of one month before delivery of education intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04977206, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in