Cardiogenic ShockPARANOVANCT04984603
Passive Leg Raising for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in VA-ECMO Assisted Patients
An observational study of Cardiogenic Shock, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA ECMO) is a temporary assistance that provides a mechanical circulatory support in patients victim of cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory cardiac arrest. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiogenic Shock
- What is being tested?
- PLR in patients under VA-ECMO
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2020to 1 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients under invasive mechanical ventilation and VA-ECMO support with indication of vascular expansion
Who may be able to join
- Decision to perform volume expansion made by the attending physician for one of the following reasons:
- Hypotension or attempt to reduce vasopressor dose
- Hypoperfusion (oliguria, skin mottling, hyperlactatemia)
- Suspected Low NCO
Who cannot join
- Age less than 18 years
- Evidence of significant hypovolemia such as kicking drainage cannula
- Active hemorrhage
- Concomitant left ventricle assist device (Impella/ LVAD) or Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)
- Atrial or ventricular communication
- Significant aortic insufficiency
- Unsatisfactory cardiac echogenicity (an inability to correctly align the Doppler beam to generate reliable VTI measurements at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Ability of PAssive Leg RAising Combined to Transthoracic Echography, Pulse Pressure and EtCO2 Monitoring to Predict an Increase of Native Cardiac Output After Fluid Administration in Patients Assisted by VA-ECMO
Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA ECMO) is a temporary assistance that provides a mechanical circulatory support in patients victim of cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory cardiac arrest.
During VA-ECMO support, hypotension may frequently occur due to deteriorated cardiac function, vasoplegia, or hypovolemia. Volume expansion is a common means to correct hypotension and improve systemic perfusion, but inappropriate fluid therapy is associated with adverse outcomes. As other intensive care unit (ICU) patients, VA-ECMO assisted patients have been shown to have higher mortality in case of large early fluid administration. Prediction of fluid responsiveness could achieve a lower fluid balance and improve outcomes of patients treated with VA-ECMO.
Read more
Several dynamic hemodynamic parameters based on cardio-pulmonary interactions (stroke volume, pulse pressure or inferior vena cava variations induced by invasive ventilation cycles) have been described and validated for predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Unfortunately, the VA-ECMO conditions (native cardiac circulation by-pass, low pulsatility, presence of drainage canulation in the inferior vena cava, the use of low tidal volume) make this parameters less reliable.
Simulation of a fluid loading by shifting blood from the lower limbs and splanchnic compartment thanks to a revisable maneuver is another feasible approach to assess fluid responsiveness. Whereas the use of different maneuvers have been validated in the classical ICU population, very few data exist in the ECMO population and their application is questioning because blood transfer may be modified by the preload dependence of the ECMO. Recently, Luo et al showed that the variation of aortic Velocity Time Integral (VTI) measured using echocardiography induced by a Trendelenburg maneuver was predictive of fluid responsiveness during VA-ECMO support. However, their study excluded patients with low cardiac ejection (pulse pressure < 15 mmHg) so that their data may not be extrapolated to the acute phase of heart failure requiring full mechanical support.
Moreover, aortic VTI measurement suffers from low reproducibility in case of low native cardiac output (NCO) and arrythmia; and can be time-consuming. The investigators previously demonstrated in an observational prospective study that End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) and Pulse Pressure (PP) were strongly correlated to NCO during VA-ECMO when NCO < 2l/min.
The investigators aim to study the variations of aortic VTI, EtCO2 and PP induced by Passive Leg Rising (PLR) and their ability to predict fluid responsiveness in patients under VA-ECMO.
Read the detailed description
Settings :
This prospective non interventional study is conducted since february 2020 in the investigators' ICU and has been approved by their hospital's institutional review board. Informed consent is obtained from all patients or their surrogates.
Patients :
All patients who receive VA-ECMO support and mechanical ventilation for refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest of any etiology (acute myocardial infarction, end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy, heart surgery, fulminant myocarditis…) are screened.
Patients conditioning :
Patients are sedated by propofol/dexmedetomidine and sufentanyl and under invasive mechanical ventilation. Continuous blood pressure is monitored via a radial arterial catheter. PP is defined as systolic arterial pressure-diastolic arterial pressure. Central venous catheter is placed at the upper body for central venous oxygen saturation (ScVO2) monitoring. Lung ventilation is managed with low levels of respiratory rate (10-14 breaths/min) and tidal volume (4-6mL/ kg), and with a modest level of positive end- expiratory pressure (8-10 cmH2O) to ensure protective ventilation. EtCO2 is measured noninvasively from exhaled breath on a ventilator circuit and monitored using a ventilator CO2 analyzer (Maquet servo U, Drager Evita Infinity V500).
ECMO circuit settings and patients management under ECMO :
VA-ECMO consist of polyvinyl chloride tubing with a membrane oxygenator (PH.I.S.I.O and EOS; Sorin Group, Clamart, France), a centrifugal pump (Stockert; Sorin Group), and percutaneous or surgically inserted arterial and venous femoral cannulae (Fem-Flex and Fem-Track, Edwards Life- sciences, Guyancourt, France) with or without an additional 7 F cannula inserted distally into the femoral artery to prevent lower limb ischemia. An oxygen-air blender (Sechrist Industries, Anaheim, CA) ventilate the membrane oxygenator.
Unfractionated heparin is administrated to maintain an anti-factor-Xa activity of between 0.2 and 0.3 IU/mL. In the initial phase of the circulatory assistance, VA-ECMO flow is set to provide adequate tissue perfusion (ScVO2 ≥ 65%) and to obtain correction of metabolic acidosis (serum lactate clearance). Thereafter, the VA-ECMO flow is set at the lowest rate necessary to ensure adequate tissue perfusion, while the highest NCO is wanted. Respiratory minute ventilation and ECMO sweep gas flow are adjusted to maintain baseline PaCO2 in a normal range, of around 40 mmHg.
Protocol :
Following data are recorded before inclusion :
- Age, gender, weight.
- VA-ECMO indication and reason to perform vascular expansion
- Vasopressive support : noradrenaline mg/h, dobutamine mg/h; inhaled nitric oxyde.
- Richmond agitation-Sedation scale (RASS) and Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) levels.
- Ventilatory settings : tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure.
Protocol steps :
The protocol include four sequential steps :
- Baseline position: semirecumbent position (45°)
- Supine position with a 0° angulation
- Passive leg raising (after securing of VA ECMO tubing) : using an automatic bed elevation technique, the lower limbs are raised to a 45° angle while the patient's trunk is lowered in supine position
- Return to baseline and realization of a fluid challenge (administration of 500 mL of isotonic saline serum over 15 min).
Data collection :
All following data are recorded after 1 minute of stabilization at step 1, 3 and at the end of step 4 :
- Clinical data : heart rate, systolic, diastolic, mean and pulse arterial pressures, EtCO2.
- Doppler echocardiography (transthoracic or trans-esophageal) data : E and A waves measured with mitral inflow Doppler (ratio E/A), Velocity Time Integral (VTI) at the level of the left ventricular outflow, using the 5-chamber apical view. Three consecutive measurements are recorded to calculate a mean VTI value.
- ECMO data : pump outflow (PO, in mL/min), pump rotation speed (round/min). Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter is measured by echocardiography at step 1 Central venous pressure is measured at step 2 and 3 Tele-expiratory inferior vena cava diameter is measured at step 1 and 3
Statistical analysis :
Categorical variables (expressed as absolute value and percentage) will be compared using the chi-squared test. Continuous variables (expressed as median [25th-75th percentile]) will be compared with Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate according to the normality distribution assessed graphically.
Fluid responsiveness will be defined by a 15% increase of aortic VTI (ΔVTI>15%) between step 1 (half sitting position) and the end of step 4 (after fluid expansion). Linear regression analysis will be used to demonstrate relationships between percent change of VTI (ΔVTI), PP (ΔPP), EtCO2 (ΔEtCO2) induced by PLR maneuver and fluid challenge.
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves will be generated to evaluate percent changes in VTI, PP and EtCO2 induced by the PLR maneuver to predicts fluid responsiveness. The area under ROC curve will be compared using the DeLong test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be calculated based on the cutoff value as determined by the Youden Index (specificity+sensitivity - 1). Statistical significance will be defined as p <0.05.
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Being tested
- PLR in patients under VA-ECMO
- Keywords
- Adults human, Prospective study, Cardiogenic shock, Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Fluid responsiveness, Passive leg raising, Native cardiac output, End-tidal carbon dioxide
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Cardiogenic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PLR in patients under VA-ECMOProcedure or surgery
After securing the VA-ECMO tubing, PLR is realized using an automatic bed elevation technique. The lower limbs are raised to a 45° angle while the patient's trunk is lowered in supine position
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation between VTI changes induced by PLR and VTI changes induced by fluid challenge
VTI variations induced by PLR vs VTI variations induced by fluid challenge
Measured: During VA-ECMO support (<28 days)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Correlation between EtCO2 changes induced by PLR and EtCO2 changes induced by fluid challenge
EtCO2 variations induced by PLR vs EtCO2 variations induced by fluid challenge
Measured: During VA-ECMO support (<28 days)
Correlation between PP changes induced by PLR and PP changes induced by fluid challenge
PP variations induced by PLR vs PP variations induced by fluid challenge
Measured: During VA-ECMO support (<28 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2021
- Study start1 Feb 2020
- Primary completion1 Sep 2021
- Study completion1 Jun 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiogenic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, MontpellierThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MARC MOURAD, MD, Study director, University Hospital, Montpellier
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04984603
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RECHMPL19_0616
- Acronym
- PARANOVA
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: NC
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Ability of PAssive Leg RAising Combined to Transthoracic Echography, Pulse Pressure and EtCO2 Monitoring to Predict an Increase of Native Cardiac Output After Fluid Administration in Patients Assisted by VA-ECMO
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04984603
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PARANOVA / RECHMPL19_0616
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Keywords
- Adults human, Prospective study, Cardiogenic shock, Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Fluid responsiveness, Passive leg raising, Native cardiac output, End-tidal carbon dioxide
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, MontpellierUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA ECMO) is a temporary assistance that provides a mechanical circulatory support in patients victim of cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory cardiac arrest.
During VA-ECMO support, hypotension may frequently occur due to deteriorated cardiac function, vasoplegia, or hypovolemia. Volume expansion is a common means to correct hypotension and improve systemic perfusion, but inappropriate fluid therapy is associated with adverse outcomes. As other intensive care unit (ICU) patients, VA-ECMO assisted patients have been shown to have higher mortality in case of large early fluid administration. Prediction of fluid responsiveness could achieve a lower fluid balance and improve outcomes of patients treated with VA-ECMO.
Several dynamic hemodynamic parameters based on cardio-pulmonary interactions (stroke volume, pulse pressure or inferior vena cava variations induced by invasive ventilation cycles) have been described and validated for predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Unfortunately, the VA-ECMO conditions (native cardiac circulation by-pass, low pulsatility, presence of drainage canulation in the inferior vena cava, the use of low tidal volume) make this parameters less reliable.
Simulation of a fluid loading by shifting blood from the lower limbs and splanchnic compartment thanks to a revisable maneuver is another feasible approach to assess fluid responsiveness. Whereas the use of different maneuvers have been validated in the classical ICU population, very few data exist in the ECMO population and their application is questioning because blood transfer may be modified by the preload dependence of the ECMO. Recently, Luo et al showed that the variation of aortic Velocity Time Integral (VTI) measured using echocardiography induced by a Trendelenburg maneuver was predictive of fluid responsiveness during VA-ECMO support. However, their study excluded patients with low cardiac ejection (pulse pressure < 15 mmHg) so that their data may not be extrapolated to the acute phase of heart failure requiring full mechanical support.
Moreover, aortic VTI measurement suffers from low reproducibility in case of low native cardiac output (NCO) and arrythmia; and can be time-consuming. The investigators previously demonstrated in an observational prospective study that End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) and Pulse Pressure (PP) were strongly correlated to NCO during VA-ECMO when NCO < 2l/min.
The investigators aim to study the variations of aortic VTI, EtCO2 and PP induced by Passive Leg Rising (PLR) and their ability to predict fluid responsiveness in patients under VA-ECMO.
Detailed description
Settings :
This prospective non interventional study is conducted since february 2020 in the investigators' ICU and has been approved by their hospital's institutional review board. Informed consent is obtained from all patients or their surrogates.
Patients :
All patients who receive VA-ECMO support and mechanical ventilation for refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest of any etiology (acute myocardial infarction, end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy, heart surgery, fulminant myocarditis…) are screened.
Patients conditioning :
Patients are sedated by propofol/dexmedetomidine and sufentanyl and under invasive mechanical ventilation. Continuous blood pressure is monitored via a radial arterial catheter. PP is defined as systolic arterial pressure-diastolic arterial pressure. Central venous catheter is placed at the upper body for central venous oxygen saturation (ScVO2) monitoring. Lung ventilation is managed with low levels of respiratory rate (10-14 breaths/min) and tidal volume (4-6mL/ kg), and with a modest level of positive end- expiratory pressure (8-10 cmH2O) to ensure protective ventilation. EtCO2 is measured noninvasively from exhaled breath on a ventilator circuit and monitored using a ventilator CO2 analyzer (Maquet servo U, Drager Evita Infinity V500).
ECMO circuit settings and patients management under ECMO :
VA-ECMO consist of polyvinyl chloride tubing with a membrane oxygenator (PH.I.S.I.O and EOS; Sorin Group, Clamart, France), a centrifugal pump (Stockert; Sorin Group), and percutaneous or surgically inserted arterial and venous femoral cannulae (Fem-Flex and Fem-Track, Edwards Life- sciences, Guyancourt, France) with or without an additional 7 F cannula inserted distally into the femoral artery to prevent lower limb ischemia. An oxygen-air blender (Sechrist Industries, Anaheim, CA) ventilate the membrane oxygenator.
Unfractionated heparin is administrated to maintain an anti-factor-Xa activity of between 0.2 and 0.3 IU/mL. In the initial phase of the circulatory assistance, VA-ECMO flow is set to provide adequate tissue perfusion (ScVO2 ≥ 65%) and to obtain correction of metabolic acidosis (serum lactate clearance). Thereafter, the VA-ECMO flow is set at the lowest rate necessary to ensure adequate tissue perfusion, while the highest NCO is wanted. Respiratory minute ventilation and ECMO sweep gas flow are adjusted to maintain baseline PaCO2 in a normal range, of around 40 mmHg.
Protocol :
Following data are recorded before inclusion :
- Age, gender, weight.
- VA-ECMO indication and reason to perform vascular expansion
- Vasopressive support : noradrenaline mg/h, dobutamine mg/h; inhaled nitric oxyde.
- Richmond agitation-Sedation scale (RASS) and Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) levels.
- Ventilatory settings : tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure.
Protocol steps :
The protocol include four sequential steps :
- Baseline position: semirecumbent position (45°)
- Supine position with a 0° angulation
- Passive leg raising (after securing of VA ECMO tubing) : using an automatic bed elevation technique, the lower limbs are raised to a 45° angle while the patient's trunk is lowered in supine position
- Return to baseline and realization of a fluid challenge (administration of 500 mL of isotonic saline serum over 15 min).
Data collection :
All following data are recorded after 1 minute of stabilization at step 1, 3 and at the end of step 4 :
- Clinical data : heart rate, systolic, diastolic, mean and pulse arterial pressures, EtCO2.
- Doppler echocardiography (transthoracic or trans-esophageal) data : E and A waves measured with mitral inflow Doppler (ratio E/A), Velocity Time Integral (VTI) at the level of the left ventricular outflow, using the 5-chamber apical view. Three consecutive measurements are recorded to calculate a mean VTI value.
- ECMO data : pump outflow (PO, in mL/min), pump rotation speed (round/min). Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter is measured by echocardiography at step 1 Central venous pressure is measured at step 2 and 3 Tele-expiratory inferior vena cava diameter is measured at step 1 and 3
Statistical analysis :
Categorical variables (expressed as absolute value and percentage) will be compared using the chi-squared test. Continuous variables (expressed as median [25th-75th percentile]) will be compared with Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate according to the normality distribution assessed graphically.
Fluid responsiveness will be defined by a 15% increase of aortic VTI (ΔVTI>15%) between step 1 (half sitting position) and the end of step 4 (after fluid expansion). Linear regression analysis will be used to demonstrate relationships between percent change of VTI (ΔVTI), PP (ΔPP), EtCO2 (ΔEtCO2) induced by PLR maneuver and fluid challenge.
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves will be generated to evaluate percent changes in VTI, PP and EtCO2 induced by the PLR maneuver to predicts fluid responsiveness. The area under ROC curve will be compared using the DeLong test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be calculated based on the cutoff value as determined by the Youden Index (specificity+sensitivity - 1). Statistical significance will be defined as p <0.05.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients under invasive mechanical ventilation and VA-ECMO support with indication of vascular expansion
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Decision to perform volume expansion made by the attending physician for one of the following reasons:
- Hypotension or attempt to reduce vasopressor dose
- Hypoperfusion (oliguria, skin mottling, hyperlactatemia)
- Suspected Low NCO
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age less than 18 years
- Evidence of significant hypovolemia such as kicking drainage cannula
- Active hemorrhage
- Concomitant left ventricle assist device (Impella/ LVAD) or Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)
- Atrial or ventricular communication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PLR in patients under VA-ECMOAfter securing the VA-ECMO tubing, PLR is realized using an automatic bed elevation technique. The lower limbs are raised to a 45° angle while the patient's trunk is lowered in supine position | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Correlation between VTI changes induced by PLR and VTI changes induced by fluid challenge
Time frame: During VA-ECMO support (<28 days)
VTI variations induced by PLR vs VTI variations induced by fluid challenge
2 secondary outcomes
Correlation between EtCO2 changes induced by PLR and EtCO2 changes induced by fluid challenge
Time frame: During VA-ECMO support (<28 days)
Correlation between PP changes induced by PLR and PP changes induced by fluid challenge
Time frame: During VA-ECMO support (<28 days)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. NC
Related trials for Cardiogenic Shock
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Capital Offload-Shock
Hypervolemia, Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Support With Impella® Best Practices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
AMI Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
Cardiogenic Shock
Recruiting
CRP Apheresis in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Skeletal Muscle Thickness in Patients With Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Muscle Atrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MARC MOURAD, MD study director
University Hospital, Montpellier
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiogenic Shock, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation between VTI changes induced by PLR and VTI changes induced by fluid challenge (time frame: During VA-ECMO support (<28 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2021.